Visibility system does double duty as ISF compliance aid
A decade ago, apparel maker Jones Group installed a visibility system to keep tabs on shipments. No one ever imagined the system would also become its solution to regulatory compliance.
James Cooke is a principal analyst with Nucleus Research in Boston, covering supply chain planning software. He was previously the editor of CSCMP?s Supply Chain Quarterly and a staff writer for DC Velocity.
When The Jones Group (formerly Jones Apparel Group) installed a visibility system a decade ago, it had just one goal in mind—to get a better handle on its sprawling international supply chain. With suppliers scattered across the world, tracking orders and goods in transit had become a task of monumental proportions. "We needed to know the whereabouts of all our shipments," says Jodie Mendoza, the company's senior vice president of corporate logistics, "and trying to keep up with it on a manual basis was just impossible."
What the company could not have foreseen was that the same visibility system would become the linchpin of its regulatory compliance program. Not long after Jones Group started rolling out the system, the nation was rocked by the 9/11 terrorist attacks. That led the U.S. government to step up its cargo screening efforts, with the result that importers today face a host of new data collection requirements. Although it had to make minor adjustments to its operations, Jones Group has found compliance to be a breeze. Its visibility system provides all the data it needs to meet the new requirements and keep its merchandise flowing smoothly through the supply chain.
Coming into the country
Headquartered in Bristol, Pa., The Jones Group is a designer, marketer, and wholesaler of branded clothing, shoes, and accessories for women, men, and children. Its well-known brands include Anne Klein, Jones New York, Nine West, and Easy Spirit. The company reported about $3.3 billion in total revenue for 2009 from sales through specialty retail stores, outlets, and e-commerce sites.
Most of the company's merchandise is made overseas by contract manufacturers in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa (Kenya), and shipped to the United States by ocean. (Although Jones Group does use air freight on occasion, close to 95 percent of its products move via steamship.) While ocean has the advantage over air when it comes to cost, it also has a downside: lengthy and unpredictable transit times. That makes it difficult for importers like Jones Group to keep tabs on merchandise while it's in transit from the factory to North America.
About 10 years ago, those visibility problems came to a head, prompting the apparel company to take the software route. "At that time, we were having so many shipments that could drop in a black hole," says Mendoza. "So it was a top priority for us, because we needed to know when the goods were going to hit [U.S. shores], so we could pull out the correct goods to ship to our stores."
Today, all of the Jones Group divisions as well as their vendors and trading partners are connected to an online pOréal that serves as a repository for both product and shipping information. When an overseas factory is ready to ship merchandise to the United States, it pulls up the purchase order electronically and enters the packing list data into an online database (including such details as the style and color of each item in a carton). The freight forwarder or NVOCC (non-vessel operating common carrier) that picks up the shipment then adds further details, like the name of the ocean carrier, to the database. The process continues all the way down the line.
All of the information provided by Jones Group's supply chain partners—vendors, ocean and air carriers, freight forwarders, NVOCCs, customs brokers, domestic consolidators, and so forth—is held in a common database. Although these partners all have rights to enter data into the system, Jones Group strictly controls who has access to what information. "We share this information with the different partners based on whether they have a need to know," says Mendoza. "For example, the freight forwarders will only see what they need to see."
All told, it took nearly a decade to get all of Jones Group's suppliers up and running on the visibility system. But the company considers it time well spent. Among other benefits, the system gives Jones Group and its partners visibility into the contents of incoming containers, which enables them to decide in advance how they'll route the products once they arrive in North America.
More importantly, the visibility system notifies Jones Group when things aren't going to plan. For example, if a factory runs late with production of an order and misses a scheduled ocean sailing, the system alerts Jones Group to the problem so it can find an alternate way to move the goods. "When things are not in the time frame they should be, we're not out chasing the information. We can concentrate on errors," says Mendoza. "When you're controlling so many partners, this happens."
Meeting the 10+2 challenge
Although it was originally implemented as a shipment tracking tool, the visibility system now plays a central role in Jones Group's regulatory compliance program as well. In January, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) began enforcing its Importer Security Filing (ISF) rule. The ISF rule is intended to help CBP learn more about imports and their origins, intermediate stops, and destinations in order to target high-risk shipments for further inspection; it is more popularly known as "10+2" (a name derived from the number of data elements importers and ocean carriers must provide to CBP).
In order to comply with the ISF rule, importers must submit 10 specific pieces of information to CBP before a container arrives at a U.S. port. The required information includes the names of the supplier, seller, and buyer; the container's stuffing location and country of origin; and the commodity's Harmonized Tariff Schedule number, among other things.
Since Jones Group brings in 18,000 to 20,000 shipments a year, of which 12,000 to 14,000 are ocean containers, this reporting requirement has the potential to be a headache and a half. But with the visibility system in place, filing is a snap, Mendoza says. "Now, because everything is sitting in one database, we have the opportunity to use this information to do all the security filings we need."
Mendoza says the visibility system has become "absolutely critical" to her company's 10+2 compliance efforts. And it's not just because the system allows the company to process huge volumes of information swiftly, she says. It's also because the setup assures data accuracy.
"If you control the base of information, like the purchase order, the style numbers [you eliminate the risk of] misspellings and other inaccuracies in the security filings submitted to Customs," she explains. That helps assure the quick acceptance of a filing, which allows imports to be cleared in a timely fashion, she adds.
Mendoza is as surprised as anyone about the way things have worked out. The company's sole purpose in implementing the visibility system was to keep tabs on shipments, she says. The discovery that the system could also streamline ISF compliance was welcome—though wholly unexpected. "When we did this 10 years ago," she says, "nobody had this in mind."
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.