Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
The past four years have been a rough ride for U.S. trucking, and the segment known as "dedicated contract carriage" was dinged up like the rest.
The business model, which has been around for decades, is aimed at shippers who want the advantages of a private fleet without the attendant headaches. Under a dedicated service arrangement, a shipper outsources its fleet operations to a third-party specialist that "dedicates" rigs, trailers, and drivers for that customer's sole use. The standard dedicated contract runs three to five years, and usually requires the customer to compensate the provider for an agreed-upon number of miles driven on a round-trip basis. Companies with enough freight to justify round trips—often from DCs to stores and back—may find dedicated a better value proposition than paying for one-way truckload service.
For shippers and their customers, the dedicated model has two-tiered appeal: Not only does it shift a non-core competency to a third party, but it enables users to lock in dependable and consistent truck capacity at predictable rates for a multi-year period.
However, the trucking environment of the past four years has worked against the model's success. Freight demand began declining around 2006 and then plummeted following the financial crisis and broad-based downturn in 2008 and 2009.
Carriers responded by taking capacity out of play as fast as they could. Despite that, space remained so abundant that shippers often found it cheaper to contract for one-way hauls than pay for round-trip service and worry about filling backhaul miles in a weak economy. One trucking executive, John Simone, president and COO of Dallas-based dedicated service provider Greatwide Logistics Services, LLC, describes the past four years as "the longest period of overcapacity I've seen in 28 years in the business."
Annual data on third-party logistics providers (3PLs) from research and consulting firm Armstrong & Associates Inc. give some indication of how hard the segment was hit. In 2009, gross revenues for the nine asset-based dedicated service providers Armstrong tracks declined 16 percent year over year. Net revenues—or revenues after paying for purchased transportation—fell by 15.9 percent in the same period.
The firm expects dedicated gross revenues to grow in 2010 by 6.6 percent over 2009 levels. By contrast, it forecasts 13.4 percent year-on-year gross revenue growth for the 3PL sector as a whole.
Armstrong believes dedicated will continue to lag behind other types of outsourced services when it comes to growth. The dedicated segment is a "mature market" with "very limited" growth potential, says Evan Armstrong, the firm's president. "The large private fleets that were going to be outsourced have already been outsourced," he adds.
Difference of opinion
Those in the trenches take issue with the idea that the dedicated category has little life left. With trucking capacity continuing to shrink, a looming shortage of qualified drivers, and one-way rates on the rise, shippers and their customers will increasingly turn to dedicated carriage to secure predictable service at fixed rates, they say.
Some shippers are already moving in that direction. RockTenn Co., a Norcross, Ga.-based producer of paperboard, containerboard, and corrugated packaging, is looking to expand its use of dedicated from its current 15 percent, according to Josh Webb, the company's supply chain manager. "We are adding dedicated fleets to avoid increasing freight rates and tightening capacity," says Webb. "We feel this is a long-term sustainable transportation solution."
Simone of Greatwide says his largest customers are growing more and more concerned over the outlook for capacity, and are seeking certainty in what is becoming a clouded market. That anxiety has in part fueled a 15 percent year-over-year increase in Greatwide's dedicated revenue, he says. Simone estimates that 80 percent of Greatwide's customer base came from private fleets, while the rest had been relying on irregular route truckload capacity.
Transport logistics giant J.B. Hunt Transport Services Inc. has also seen a pickup in its dedicated business. During the third quarter, revenue and operating income from Hunt's dedicated services rose 18 percent and 17 percent, respectively, from year-earlier levels. (Dedicated accounted for slightly less than one-fourth of Hunt's total revenue in the quarter.)
As Hunt sees it, that's a positive sign not just for the dedicated segment, but for the economy as a whole. "Load volume in our [dedicated services] segment, which we believe is a strong indicator of current customer demand and the general direction of the freight economy, continues to point toward steady business activity," said company CEO Kirk Thompson in a statement announcing Hunt's third-quarter results.
Slicing and dicing
The dedicated model doesn't work for everybody. For one thing, it carries some risk for shippers. In a dedicated arrangement, customers are contractually committed to pay for all their miles—whether they can find the freight to fill them or not. Paying for empty backhauls can be a costly proposition, and in a tough economy, it's a gamble not all companies are willing to take.
In addition, dedicated carriage relies on symmetry—trucks returning to origin—and not every routing is structured in such a fashion.
"The main limiting factor in dedicated is physical connectivity," says Thomas K. Sanderson, president and CEO of Transplace, a Frisco, Texas-based asset-light 3PL whose services include dedicated carriage. Transplace manages inbound flows to DCs for its retail customers and coordinates with a network of truckers—for hire, private, and dedicated—for store deliveries.
Providers have gotten creative in an effort to surmount these obstacles, and are leveraging their entire customer base to execute. For example, Transplace will pair up two different customers operating in the same lane and build a dedicated operation that would not have been possible with the loads from just one customer. Transplace also contracts for 60 trucks with four carriers and guarantees them a certain number of paid weekly miles. It then scans what Sanderson calls its "basket" of freight to find loads that can fill the backhaul and reduce its empty miles.
"If you run enough miles and have fewer empty miles, it's cheaper to operate a dedicated service than it was with one-way freight," Sanderson says. "Shippers get a better price than they would on a one-way move, and the providers like it because their assets are being used."
Cardinal Logistics Management Corp., a Roswell, Ga.-based dedicated service provider, has taken a similar approach to helping clients fill backhaul miles. Jerry Bowman, Cardinal's president and COO, says his company will first look inside the company's customer universe to match empty miles and available loads. Then, if needed, it will go outside its customer base to find freight.
"The advantage of matching lanes with other dedicated customers is that we control the scheduling, we control the drivers, and we control the equipment, so we are able to provide the same service level to both customers as if we were hauling their own product both ways," he says.
Bowman adds that Cardinal focuses exclusively on arranging direct or near-direct backhauls because it's the only way it can deliver quality service while maximizing fleet utilization. "We can't send a unit and a driver on a three- or four-leg move as we don't have excess capacity built into our dedicated operations," he says.
In some cases, shippers themselves get involved in the load matching efforts. RockTenn, which is a Transplace customer, works with the provider to explore what Webb of RockTenn calls "collaborative pop-up fleet opportunities" with other Transplace customers. The strategy, which Webb acknowledges is "non-traditional," allows RockTenn to increase service and capacity as needed to a specific region. Once demand drops off and capacity isn't needed, "the fleet can dissolve," he says.
RockTenn also works with Transplace and other dedicated carriers to fill the empty miles of other dedicated fleets, Webb says. "This provides RockTenn [with] savings over the current baseline and allows carriers and [the] shipper with the dedicated fleet to recover [their] cost."
Greatwide, for its part, has developed two "hybrid" versions of the traditional dedicated model for customers concerned about empty backhauls. In one, a shipper pays for all miles driven, but Greatwide will use its brokerage services to search for other freight—often not the customer's freight—to fill miles that the customer can't. Greatwide and the customer then share the revenue and profit from the traffic.
In the second, Greatwide, rather than the shipper, takes the risk on fulfilling the "empty mile" requirement. The shipper pays a higher rate for the one-way move than it would by using either the traditional model or the first hybrid option; however, it's off the hook for empty miles obligations.
The second option may sound a lot like traditional truckload service, but Greatwide executives point out that with this arrangement, the shipper still enjoys all the advantages of dedicated service. Richard M. Metzler, Greatwide's chief commercial officer, adds that the two hybrid services are best suited to shippers with diverse product lines and who need multiple solutions to give them service flexibility at an affordable cost.
The lure of predictability
For all the providers' bullish talk, no one expects dedicated's growth to return to the heady post-deregulation days of the 1980s when businesses operating private fleets were all too happy to dump their assets, reduce their bloat, and let someone else do the work. Skeptics like consultant Evan Armstrong say that one-way truckload capacity would have to tighten much more than it has for the dedicated model to gain meaningful traction.
Yet those in the dedicated field believe that for the first time in years, the trends are working in their favor.
"I don't know of any other way you can lock in three to five years of predictable costs and higher service levels ... and take the risk out of what your costs will be," says Bowman. "You can't do it in your own private fleet. And you certainly can't do it in the one-way truckload market. It doesn't fit every movement, but for the movements it fits, we still think there's a great market for dedicated."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."