Five ways to improve your refurbishment operations
Refurbishing and reselling returned goods can make some serious money for your company—if you can do it quickly and cost effectively. Here are some tips for getting it right.
Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
Decisions, decisions. What should you do with all the returned goods flowing back to your facility through the reverse logistics pipeline? Some companies dismantle them and recycle the parts. Others simply destroy the goods. But there's a third option: repair, refurbish, and resell them.
For some companies, that third route makes an awful lot of sense: If done right, repairs and refurbishment can be a moneymaker instead of a cost center. Trouble is, it's not always easy to do it right. The costs of refurbishment (labor, equipment, transportation, and so forth) tend to add up quickly, making it difficult for companies to recoup their investment. And it can be tough to get products back on the shelves quickly enough to avoid some loss of value.
If you're not sure whether refurbishment is right for your company—or are wondering whether there are ways to make your returns operation faster, more efficient, or more cost effective—the following five tips might point you in the right direction.
1. Make sure your product is a good candidate for refurbishment.
One of the keys to running a fast, cost-effective refurbishment operation is to be smart about which products you refurbish, says Timothy Konrad, vice president of reverse logistics for Genco, a third-party logistics service provider (3PL). He says it's not uncommon for Genco to find a new customer is paying more to refurbish an item than it's likely to recover through the item's resale.
How do you determine whether a particular product is worth refurbishing? It will probably require some number crunching, says Terry Steger, a senior executive in Accenture's Supply Chain Management practice. Basically, what you have to do is calculate what it costs to recover and refurbish a product and compare that with the current resale value of the revamped item, he says.
In the case of consumer electronics and information technology products, Konrad advises his clients to follow a simple rule of thumb: Consider refurbishment only if the product originally sold for more than $125. Konrad notes, however, that there's one exception to his rule. If you have a hot item, like a high-end MP3 player, where there's a demonstrable market for a refurbished version of the product, then by all means go ahead with refurbishment.
For items with a longer shelf life than consumer electronics, different standards apply. Jeffrey Pepperworth, president of 3PL Inmar Reverse Logistics, believes that even relatively low-value products, such as kitchen appliances or sporting equipment, can be worth refurbishing under the right conditions. The key factor is volume, he says. "If the volume is large enough, economies of scale make processing even low-value materials feasible."
Even if you've already done all the cost calculations for your product, it could be time to revisit your decision. "Sometimes, a device or product is so old that, at that point in its lifecycle, it no longer makes economic sense to refurbish it," Steger says. For products with very short shelf lives, such as wireless devices or high-end consumer electronics, the decision may have to be reviewed on a monthly basis.
2. Evaluate whether refurbishment is truly necessary.
Experts agree that only a small percentage of returned products actually require refurbishing. For example, in the consumer electronics arena, 50 to 70 percent of all returns have nothing wrong with them, says Konrad. "Products that have been returned due to buyer's remorse or because the consumer didn't understand how to use the product don't need to go to the refurbishment operation," he points out.
The sooner you can perform "triage"—that is, assess which products can be immediately resold and which actually need to be fixed—the better. By making this determination as early in the process as possible—say, at the retail return center or a regional DC—you eliminate touches, reduce transportation expenses and the potential for damage, and increase cash flow, says Pepperworth. It also allows you to get the product back on the market sooner and may help reduce (or even avoid) the need for markdowns.
3. Monitor your service provider's performance and costs.
Although some companies like to handle refurbishment themselves, many choose to outsource this activity—largely for reasons of cost. For most companies, it's more cost-effective to use a 3PL that has specialized equipment and a specially trained staff in place, says Dale Rogers, professor of supply chain management at the University of Nevada-Reno and author of a textbook on reverse logistics.
But that doesn't mean you should just hand off this task and forget about it. It's important to monitor the process to make sure that your partner is running an efficient, cost-effective operation.
For example, Steger recommends keeping an eye on parts usage. Most third parties charge the contract owner for the parts they use, so it's wise to put a mechanism in place to assure providers aren't replacing parts unnecessarily, he says.
Another way to keep costs from getting out of hand is to establish a "time required to refurbish" threshold, Pepperworth says. "If the product takes longer than X minutes to refurbish, it should move to recycle or scrap disposition," he explains. "If it is within the threshold, a company can refurbish it and increase asset recovery."
4. Choose the right location for your operation.
Where a refurbishment operation is located can have a big impact on the overall cost. While a centralized location provides economies of scale with regard to labor and facility expenses, the savings could be offset by higher transportation costs if the goods have to travel far. By the same token, using regional or local refurbishment centers usually cuts transportation costs but is likely to mean higher facility costs. For this reason, Steger recommends using a local model for heavy or large products that are costly to transport and a more centralized model for lighter products.
These days, some companies are relocating their refurbishment operations to Mexico to take advantage of lower labor costs, Rogers says. But labor costs are only part of the picture, warns Konrad. When considering whether or not to move your operation south of the border, he says, be sure to factor in the additional transportation costs as well as any political and security considerations.
Steger notes that it may be possible to employ a mixed strategy—for example, using a Mexican facility to serve Southern California and the Southwestern states and a U.S.-based facility to handle the rest of the country. That might allow you to take advantage of Mexico's low labor costs without having to bear the costs of shipping from, say, Mexico to New England.
5. Make full use of the available data.
One of the biggest mistakes companies can make when it comes to their refurbishment operations is failing to collect and mine data on returns. "The real value in refurbishment lies in tracking and analyzing data," says Gary Noone, vice president of global aftermarket services for 3PL ModusLink.
It can also make the returns operation itself more efficient, Noone says. For instance, if a company is able to identify the most common causes of failure for a particular item, it could then use the findings to improve the triage operation—say, by having employees at the processing center sort returns by type of failure. Those items could then be shipped together to the refurbishment operation, which improves efficiency downstream.
Perhaps more to the point, however, the company could share its findings on product failures with the original manufacturer's product design or engineering team. That kind of information has the potential to lead to advancements in the product's design, which would ultimately produce the biggest improvement of all: reducing the actual volume of returns.
Container traffic is finally back to typical levels at the port of Montreal, two months after dockworkers returned to work following a strike, port officials said Thursday.
Today that arbitration continues as the two sides work to forge a new contract. And port leaders with the Maritime Employers Association (MEA) are reminding workers represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) that the CIRB decision “rules out any pressure tactics affecting operations until the next collective agreement expires.”
The Port of Montreal alone said it had to manage a backlog of about 13,350 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) on the ground, as well as 28,000 feet of freight cars headed for export.
Port leaders this week said they had now completed that task. “Two months after operations fully resumed at the Port of Montreal, as directed by the Canada Industrial Relations Board, the Montreal Port Authority (MPA) is pleased to announce that all port activities are now completely back to normal. Both the impact of the labour dispute and the subsequent resumption of activities required concerted efforts on the part of all port partners to get things back to normal as quickly as possible, even over the holiday season,” the port said in a release.
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.