David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
A few years back, cookware distributor Meyer Corp. found itself facing the classic growth challenge—at least where its distribution operations were concerned. Although it has only been doing business in the United States since the early '80s, the company, a subsidiary of global cookware giant Meyer Manufacturing, has enjoyed tremendous success in that time. Today, it has grown into one of the largest cookware distributors in the country, marketing such well-known brands as Circulon, Anolon, Farberware, KitchenAid, SilverStone, Rachael Ray, and Paula Deen.
That kind of growth is great for the bottom line, but it can create problems elsewhere in the organization. In this case, it was the company's DC in Fairfield, Calif., that was feeling the strain. Growing volume had created serious capacity problems at the 365,000-square-foot facility, forcing the supplier to store product in five nearby off-site facilities. That stopgap measure was creating as many problems as it solved, such as the need for double handling and inventory-tracking complications.
Moving was not an option. The company wanted to remain in its current building, which is located on its main distribution campus in Fairfield. Problem was, there was little room to expand its footprint. Then the company hit upon a solution: If it couldn't expand outward, it would expand upward.
High rise
The distributor's solution was to build a high-bay addition that houses a new, high-capacity automated storage and retrieval system (AS/RS). The 12-aisle high-bay system, which was designed and built by Daifuku, now stores approximately 66,000 pallets of cookware in a footprint of only 165,000 square feet.
"The advantage for us of using a high-bay AS/RS is that it would require 750,000 square feet of traditional space to house what we can put into that 165,000 square feet," says Mark Warcholski, the company's director of warehouse operations.
The AS/RS was built as a rack-supported addition, meaning the roof actually rests on the top of the racking and the shell of the building was erected around the rack structure. The system, which Daifuku customized for its client, features 11 stories of racking reaching a total height of 100 feet. The aisles within the system vary in length, with the longest aisle running 675 feet and the shortest 570 feet. Because the addition had to be constructed to fit the available land, the system's configuration was largely dictated by those space constraints.
Not only is the new addition space efficient, it's also a showpiece of eco-friendly construction. The racking was fabricated from 82 percent recycled steel. Solar panels will soon be mounted on the roof; recycled well water is being used for irrigation around the building; and the parking lot incorporates recycled concrete from a nearby freeway project. Since no humans need to enter the AS/RS area, it can operate with the lights out, which yields substantial savings on energy.
In August, Meyer was able to consolidate the inventory from the five satellite facilities into the AS/RS, and there's still plenty of room to spare. Right now, the company is using only about 55 percent of the system's storage capacity. It hopes to use some of its excess capacity to provide third-party logistics services for other companies.
Picks and pans
Now that the AS/RS is in operation, the receiving, putaway, and retrieval processes unfold in a tightly choreographed sequence. As container-loads of merchandise arrive from overseas, the products are unloaded, labeled, palletized onto plastic pallets, and shrink wrapped for optimal handling by the automated systems. Lift trucks then gather the pallets and take them to drop-off stations in the high-bay area. (Meyer's plans call for replacing the lift trucks with automatic guided vehicles by the middle of next year.)
Before entering the AS/RS, the pallets first go through a load sizing and identification area to ensure they will fit in the racks and are configured properly to avoid jamming the system. Pallets that fail to meet the specifications for size, weight, and so forth are rejected to two work stations or a "jackpot" lane, where workers make needed adjustments.
Once a load passes the sizing area, it moves on to a pickup station, where one of four Sorting Transfer Vehicles (STVs), also supplied by Daifuku, collects the pallet. The STVs, which run on a 500-foot looped rail that passes in front of each of the system's 12 aisles, move the loads to the ends of their assigned aisles. Storage assignments are made by Daifuku's WarehouseRx warehouse control system (WCS). Typically, the system uses a round-robin approach to assigning storage locations, so that product is spread evenly across the aisles.
Twelve storage/retrieval cranes operate within the system, one in each aisle. As the STVs discharge their loads, the cranes gather them up and deposit them in the predetermined locations. Collectively, the cranes, which can move loads of up to 1,200 pounds, handle 60 to 70 pallet loads an hour.
Since the system uses randomly assigned double-deep storage, one SKU may be placed in front of another (the cranes have the capability to shuffle pallets around to gain access to the right pallet). The WCS will also attempt to assign faster-moving SKUs closer to the aisle's input/output station to save time during putaway and retrieval.
When pallets are needed to fill orders or replenish the facility's pick modules, the WCS dispatches several cranes simultaneously to gather pallets from multiple aisles. The cranes deposit the loads at drop-off stations, where the STVs gather them up and ferry them to one of two conveyor outputs. Lift trucks then collect the pallets for transport. Pallets that will ship to customers as full loads are taken directly to the outbound shipping docks, while other loads are taken to the pick modules to be used for replenishment purposes.
Orders for wholesale and retail customers and for consumers who place orders via the company's website, potsandpans.com, are filled in the pick modules, which are set up to support both full-case and split-case picking. The items selected are conveyed to one of two shipping sorters, depending on where in the modules the picks were made. One is a pop-up sorter supplied by Hytrol, while the other is a sliding shoe sorter provided by Automotion. From there, the cartons are sorted to outbound docks.
Putting a lid on it
As for how it's all working out, Warcholski says the Fairfield facility has realized a number of benefits from the AS/RS. For one thing, the new setup has allowed the company to bring everything under one roof, which has greatly simplified the distribution process.
"When you manage multiple facilities, there is a lot of jumping through hoops as you have multiple inventories to manage," says Warcholski. "It is much easier now to manage the flow and our processes."
For another, the new setup has cut down on handling. Because double handling is no longer required, Meyer can get its products to market faster. On top of that, reduced handling has led to a decrease in product damage.
"It's almost a slam dunk," Warcholski says of the project overall. "As a company, we want to be on the cutting edge. This has allowed us to maximize our storage density and has shortened the window of time it takes to execute our orders."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."