Office Depot VP touts potential of off-the-shelf technology for supply chain applications
Brent Beabout of Office Depot has made a career of developing innovative IT solutions for logistics and supply chain problems. And the kinds of technologies he has used might surprise you.
Mitch Mac Donald has more than 30 years of experience in both the newspaper and magazine businesses. He has covered the logistics and supply chain fields since 1988. Twice named one of the Top 10 Business Journalists in the U.S., he has served in a multitude of editorial and publishing roles. The leading force behind the launch of Supply Chain Management Review, he was that brand's founding publisher and editorial director from 1997 to 2000. Additionally, he has served as news editor, chief editor, publisher and editorial director of Logistics Management, as well as publisher of Modern Materials Handling. Mitch is also the president and CEO of Agile Business Media, LLC, the parent company of DC VELOCITY and CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
Q: Could you walk us through your career path to date? A: I guess I've had a pretty unusual career path in comparison with most folks in the supply chain field. I started out as a nuclear submarine officer in the U.S. Navy. I actually did that for quite a long time—13 years' active duty. That was a great background and training, certainly on the technology side, but more important, it taught me a lot about leadership.
After that, I applied for a fellowship at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). It's called the Leaders for Global Operations Program. There were about 45 of us in the fellowship program. We earned dual degrees over two years. In my case, I got my M.B.A. from the Sloan School of Management as well as my master's in civil engineering with a heavy emphasis on network optimization and design.
Q: Two MIT graduate degrees in two years? Not bad. A: Yes. Two degrees, two years. I left there and went to Amazon.com, which had a pretty good gathering of ex-MIT-ers. They recruited some of us out of that program, so I kind of fell into the retail world by accident, if you will. I started in management operations in one of its DCs in Nevada. I then went on to corporate up in Seattle, where I worked my way up to director of operations. I was in charge of DC design and DC optimization.
Q: From there, you went over to the service provider side of logistics at DHL. What did you do there? A: I took a position in south Florida as vice president of engineering for DHL Express. That job was pretty much twofold. Primarily, I worked on improving the pickup and delivery on the "last mile" of the DHL network in the United States. At that time, we were loading and moving just under 20,000 trucks a day. One of the reasons they brought me in, I think, was to grow and improve the industrial engineering group there, which was kind of on the skids. I focused on bringing about Lean concepts and standardization to get their operations up to proper levels. It was about Leaning out the system.
The second part of the job was working with an outside software firm to develop a world-class solution using some proprietary technology to optimize the last mile of the network. The solution we came up with allowed us to re-optimize the route of any driver in real time throughout the delivery day.
We hooked that solution up with an off-the-shelf Garmin receiver you can buy at Best Buy. Basically, we wrote a software program to integrate the Garmin receiver and a GPS receiver in the truck with the dynamic route optimization process. What we ended up with was a system that provides optimized delivery plans for drivers that was so simple to use that even a new driver who didn't know the routes could follow it on the first day. He just followed the voice of the Garmin.
Q: That brings us to your current role at Office Depot. Could you tell us a little bit about your work there? A: Office Depot is about a $12 billion company, as measured by annual sales. We operate approximately 1,150 retail stores in the United States. We have 16 distribution centers in the United States as well as international centers in about 52 other countries, but obviously nothing close to the size of operations in the United States.
We also have a very large direct-customer business. We call it the Business Services Division. That services customers like IBM and those kinds of folks with high purchasing volumes.
We are just now completing a DC consolidation program. We used to have two separate supply chains in the United States—we had a retail distribution network and we had the traditional DCs that fit the direct-customer business. In the last year and a half, we've gone from 33 buildings down to 16. We've put the inventory together, reduced our overhead with leases, and so on.
Q: Have you accomplished what you set out to do? A: Actually, our service right now is probably approaching world-class levels. At this point, every store in the United States is receiving deliveries five days a week. Previously, it was two to three days per week. Obviously, the retail stores like that because they can put their labor on the floor selling as opposed to unloading a lot of pallets. Another nice thing is that we can now optimize our inventory in stores. We're very close to achieving our goal of replenishing, on a daily basis, only what was consumed the day before at that store.
One of the benefits is the very Lean concept of removing waste. Another is that the stores now make better use of labor because workers no longer have to spend time moving a lot of merchandise around in the back room. And obviously, it decreases overall inventory levels, which saves a lot of money for a company of this size.
Q: Turning to another topic, what do you consider to be the most important skill sets for a supply chain professional? A: I think you need a combination of things and not just industry experience any more. As a matter of fact, I think that's a handicap.
I think you have to be a little bit, I will call it bilingual, not in the literal sense, but you have to be able to speak operations and have some operations experience, be that in transportation, the DC, or somewhere else. You need that street credibility to work well with the group that runs the supply chain, to be able to speak their language.
You also have to be able to speak the language of finance because at the end of the day, that's the language of business, right? That's what sells, if you will, at the CFO, CEO level.
You also have to be able to speak technology because technology is probably the key enabler when it comes to getting supply chain performance where it needs to be. So the supply chain executive, I think, now needs to speak all those languages to be competitive.
Q: Let's take a look at the horizon. What's next for the supply chain? A: I do think robotics are going to expand considerably. We talk about them most often for a new-built facility, right? I think they're at the point now where they are flexible enough and cheap enough where you can justify investing in them to run critical parts of your business. They have been in manufacturing for years, but in supply chain, they just haven't been cost effective until now.
Second, I see a lot of potential in some of the technology out there that is not even necessarily supply chain-related—a lot of the things you see at Best Buy or in manufacturing or what have you. I think there is a lot of room for bolting together commercial off-the-shelf software or hardware with some kind of small software app in the middle, a little like we did at DHL—combine a Garmin with a GPS and a software package and together, they add up to more than the sum of the parts, if that makes sense.
Q: Yes, it does. A: On the technology side, I think that's where the early bird gets the worm, so to speak. The people who figure that out—that it could be a whole lot cheaper to bolt together existing applications than to try to develop a proprietary system from scratch—will have the advantage over companies that don't think about that.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."