Office Depot VP touts potential of off-the-shelf technology for supply chain applications
Brent Beabout of Office Depot has made a career of developing innovative IT solutions for logistics and supply chain problems. And the kinds of technologies he has used might surprise you.
Mitch Mac Donald has more than 30 years of experience in both the newspaper and magazine businesses. He has covered the logistics and supply chain fields since 1988. Twice named one of the Top 10 Business Journalists in the U.S., he has served in a multitude of editorial and publishing roles. The leading force behind the launch of Supply Chain Management Review, he was that brand's founding publisher and editorial director from 1997 to 2000. Additionally, he has served as news editor, chief editor, publisher and editorial director of Logistics Management, as well as publisher of Modern Materials Handling. Mitch is also the president and CEO of Agile Business Media, LLC, the parent company of DC VELOCITY and CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
Q: Could you walk us through your career path to date? A: I guess I've had a pretty unusual career path in comparison with most folks in the supply chain field. I started out as a nuclear submarine officer in the U.S. Navy. I actually did that for quite a long time—13 years' active duty. That was a great background and training, certainly on the technology side, but more important, it taught me a lot about leadership.
After that, I applied for a fellowship at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). It's called the Leaders for Global Operations Program. There were about 45 of us in the fellowship program. We earned dual degrees over two years. In my case, I got my M.B.A. from the Sloan School of Management as well as my master's in civil engineering with a heavy emphasis on network optimization and design.
Q: Two MIT graduate degrees in two years? Not bad. A: Yes. Two degrees, two years. I left there and went to Amazon.com, which had a pretty good gathering of ex-MIT-ers. They recruited some of us out of that program, so I kind of fell into the retail world by accident, if you will. I started in management operations in one of its DCs in Nevada. I then went on to corporate up in Seattle, where I worked my way up to director of operations. I was in charge of DC design and DC optimization.
Q: From there, you went over to the service provider side of logistics at DHL. What did you do there? A: I took a position in south Florida as vice president of engineering for DHL Express. That job was pretty much twofold. Primarily, I worked on improving the pickup and delivery on the "last mile" of the DHL network in the United States. At that time, we were loading and moving just under 20,000 trucks a day. One of the reasons they brought me in, I think, was to grow and improve the industrial engineering group there, which was kind of on the skids. I focused on bringing about Lean concepts and standardization to get their operations up to proper levels. It was about Leaning out the system.
The second part of the job was working with an outside software firm to develop a world-class solution using some proprietary technology to optimize the last mile of the network. The solution we came up with allowed us to re-optimize the route of any driver in real time throughout the delivery day.
We hooked that solution up with an off-the-shelf Garmin receiver you can buy at Best Buy. Basically, we wrote a software program to integrate the Garmin receiver and a GPS receiver in the truck with the dynamic route optimization process. What we ended up with was a system that provides optimized delivery plans for drivers that was so simple to use that even a new driver who didn't know the routes could follow it on the first day. He just followed the voice of the Garmin.
Q: That brings us to your current role at Office Depot. Could you tell us a little bit about your work there? A: Office Depot is about a $12 billion company, as measured by annual sales. We operate approximately 1,150 retail stores in the United States. We have 16 distribution centers in the United States as well as international centers in about 52 other countries, but obviously nothing close to the size of operations in the United States.
We also have a very large direct-customer business. We call it the Business Services Division. That services customers like IBM and those kinds of folks with high purchasing volumes.
We are just now completing a DC consolidation program. We used to have two separate supply chains in the United States—we had a retail distribution network and we had the traditional DCs that fit the direct-customer business. In the last year and a half, we've gone from 33 buildings down to 16. We've put the inventory together, reduced our overhead with leases, and so on.
Q: Have you accomplished what you set out to do? A: Actually, our service right now is probably approaching world-class levels. At this point, every store in the United States is receiving deliveries five days a week. Previously, it was two to three days per week. Obviously, the retail stores like that because they can put their labor on the floor selling as opposed to unloading a lot of pallets. Another nice thing is that we can now optimize our inventory in stores. We're very close to achieving our goal of replenishing, on a daily basis, only what was consumed the day before at that store.
One of the benefits is the very Lean concept of removing waste. Another is that the stores now make better use of labor because workers no longer have to spend time moving a lot of merchandise around in the back room. And obviously, it decreases overall inventory levels, which saves a lot of money for a company of this size.
Q: Turning to another topic, what do you consider to be the most important skill sets for a supply chain professional? A: I think you need a combination of things and not just industry experience any more. As a matter of fact, I think that's a handicap.
I think you have to be a little bit, I will call it bilingual, not in the literal sense, but you have to be able to speak operations and have some operations experience, be that in transportation, the DC, or somewhere else. You need that street credibility to work well with the group that runs the supply chain, to be able to speak their language.
You also have to be able to speak the language of finance because at the end of the day, that's the language of business, right? That's what sells, if you will, at the CFO, CEO level.
You also have to be able to speak technology because technology is probably the key enabler when it comes to getting supply chain performance where it needs to be. So the supply chain executive, I think, now needs to speak all those languages to be competitive.
Q: Let's take a look at the horizon. What's next for the supply chain? A: I do think robotics are going to expand considerably. We talk about them most often for a new-built facility, right? I think they're at the point now where they are flexible enough and cheap enough where you can justify investing in them to run critical parts of your business. They have been in manufacturing for years, but in supply chain, they just haven't been cost effective until now.
Second, I see a lot of potential in some of the technology out there that is not even necessarily supply chain-related—a lot of the things you see at Best Buy or in manufacturing or what have you. I think there is a lot of room for bolting together commercial off-the-shelf software or hardware with some kind of small software app in the middle, a little like we did at DHL—combine a Garmin with a GPS and a software package and together, they add up to more than the sum of the parts, if that makes sense.
Q: Yes, it does. A: On the technology side, I think that's where the early bird gets the worm, so to speak. The people who figure that out—that it could be a whole lot cheaper to bolt together existing applications than to try to develop a proprietary system from scratch—will have the advantage over companies that don't think about that.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."