The leaves are turning, and the kids are back in school. Now's a great time to re-evaluate your performance measurement program. Here's some advice for kicking it up a notch.
It's that time of year again. The leaves are turning, and the kids are back in school. But why should they have all the fun? It only seems fair that logistics professionals should also have the opportunity to brush up their skills or learn new ones.
For example, now's a great time to take another look at your performance measurement program. If your operation is typical, there's a good chance your metrics protocol could use a little tweaking. In most cases, all that's required is a quick review of the four fundamental subjects: math, English, history, and science. What follows is a look at how revisiting each of these areas can help you improve your performance measurement program.
Math
When it comes to math and performance measurement programs, a common mistake is to confuse numbers with metrics. They may look alike, but they're not one and the same. A metric should provide meaningful information that is actionable; it is not just a simple number, like a count of how many packages were sent on a particular day. For the number to be meaningful, you have to place it within a larger context—i.e., by performing some calculations. Do that, and you have a metric.
Let's say you want to find out how well your shipping department is performing. You make some inquiries and learn that DC sent out 100 error-free shipments yesterday. But that tells you absolutely nothing about the quality of your performance. What you really need to know is what percentage of your total shipments were error-free. If it was 100 out of 100 (or 101), you're doing well. But if it was 100 out of 200, you have a serious performance problem. The point is, knowing the total package count for a given day doesn't help you much. But knowing the percentage of error-free shipments on that same day tells you a lot. It's a meaningful metric—one that offers information you can use.
You can use the same approach to zero in on the source of a problem. For instance, if you're trying to determine what's causing your shipping errors, you might decide to calculate the percentage of packages sent with bad labels. Again, that's information you can use. If you find it's 80 percent, you know labeling is something you'll have to address right away. But if it's just 1 or 2 percent, you know you'll have to look elsewhere for the source of the problem.
English
What does English have to do with metrics? A good deal, it turns out. A good metric must be clearly defined, free of ambiguities and leaving no room for interpretation. If a metric doesn't mean exactly the same thing to every party in the supply chain, you're inviting all kinds of miscommunication.
Take "on time shipments," for example. "On time" means many different things to different people. The guy in shipping might interpret it as meaning the shipment left the DC on schedule. The truck driver might see it as delivery on the agreed-upon day. But to the customer, "on time" might mean the shipment was delivered not just on the appointed day but within a 15-minute to 1-hour window of a specific time. Those differences might sound trivial, but they could lead to all kinds of misunderstandings. For example, consider the customer service implications if the supplier thinks it's meeting expectations by delivering the order on the right day, but the customer is counting on having its order arrive between noon and 2 p.m.
It's the same with the "percentage shipped error-free" measure. What exactly does "error-free" mean? What elements of a shipment need to be correct for it to be considered free of errors? There are a lot of elements to consider here: shipping documentation, content, quantity, packaging requirements, labeling requirements, and on-time delivery, to name a few. A well drafted metric should make it clear exactly what's involved and how it should be measured.
History
At first glance, it might seem that history has little to do with metrics programs. But actually there's a connection. After all, even the best metric doesn't mean very much in isolation. To get a full understanding of your performance against a metric, you need a sense of its history to see where it's trending.
For example, say you've just found out your operation's error-free shipment rate yesterday was only 50 percent. While we can agree that this is a clear indicator that something's gone awry, our understanding could be so much richer if we understood its history. Is the 50 percent performance an aberration, something that has only occurred once on one particular day? Or is it a long-term trend? The answer will undoubtedly shape your response.
And if you still need convincing, consider this: If your goal is to improve performance against a specific metric, you'll have no way of knowing whether you're on track to hit that target unless you're monitoring performance over time.
Science
Once you have a clear understanding of how a measure is calculated, what it means, and how your operation has been performing against it over time, what do you do with that information? Like any good scientist, you must test your data and delve more deeply into the findings. For example, if you're trying to reduce shipping errors, you need to determine the source of the problem. Is it documentation, content, quantity, timeliness, labeling, or packaging? A root cause analysis will help you figure out where to focus your attention.
For example, you might find that 50 percent of your problems come from shipping the wrong item, while 30 percent come from shipping the wrong quantity. The remaining 20 percent might be split more or less evenly among the other components, documentation, timeliness, and labeling and packaging. That tells you the underlying problem isn't shipping; it's order fulfillment at the warehouse.
Solve that problem and you eliminate the majority of the shipment errors. It's important to have the curiosity of a scientist and the willingness to test data down to the root cause in order to drive improvement from the metrics.
Now that you've brushed up on the basics of math, English, history, and science, it's time to re-evaluate your metrics program. Chances are, you'll discover one or more opportunities to give your program a quick jolt and reinvigorate the performance of your operation.
Container traffic is finally back to typical levels at the port of Montreal, two months after dockworkers returned to work following a strike, port officials said Thursday.
Today that arbitration continues as the two sides work to forge a new contract. And port leaders with the Maritime Employers Association (MEA) are reminding workers represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) that the CIRB decision “rules out any pressure tactics affecting operations until the next collective agreement expires.”
The Port of Montreal alone said it had to manage a backlog of about 13,350 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) on the ground, as well as 28,000 feet of freight cars headed for export.
Port leaders this week said they had now completed that task. “Two months after operations fully resumed at the Port of Montreal, as directed by the Canada Industrial Relations Board, the Montreal Port Authority (MPA) is pleased to announce that all port activities are now completely back to normal. Both the impact of the labour dispute and the subsequent resumption of activities required concerted efforts on the part of all port partners to get things back to normal as quickly as possible, even over the holiday season,” the port said in a release.
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.