The leaves are turning, and the kids are back in school. Now's a great time to re-evaluate your performance measurement program. Here's some advice for kicking it up a notch.
It's that time of year again. The leaves are turning, and the kids are back in school. But why should they have all the fun? It only seems fair that logistics professionals should also have the opportunity to brush up their skills or learn new ones.
For example, now's a great time to take another look at your performance measurement program. If your operation is typical, there's a good chance your metrics protocol could use a little tweaking. In most cases, all that's required is a quick review of the four fundamental subjects: math, English, history, and science. What follows is a look at how revisiting each of these areas can help you improve your performance measurement program.
Math
When it comes to math and performance measurement programs, a common mistake is to confuse numbers with metrics. They may look alike, but they're not one and the same. A metric should provide meaningful information that is actionable; it is not just a simple number, like a count of how many packages were sent on a particular day. For the number to be meaningful, you have to place it within a larger context—i.e., by performing some calculations. Do that, and you have a metric.
Let's say you want to find out how well your shipping department is performing. You make some inquiries and learn that DC sent out 100 error-free shipments yesterday. But that tells you absolutely nothing about the quality of your performance. What you really need to know is what percentage of your total shipments were error-free. If it was 100 out of 100 (or 101), you're doing well. But if it was 100 out of 200, you have a serious performance problem. The point is, knowing the total package count for a given day doesn't help you much. But knowing the percentage of error-free shipments on that same day tells you a lot. It's a meaningful metric—one that offers information you can use.
You can use the same approach to zero in on the source of a problem. For instance, if you're trying to determine what's causing your shipping errors, you might decide to calculate the percentage of packages sent with bad labels. Again, that's information you can use. If you find it's 80 percent, you know labeling is something you'll have to address right away. But if it's just 1 or 2 percent, you know you'll have to look elsewhere for the source of the problem.
English
What does English have to do with metrics? A good deal, it turns out. A good metric must be clearly defined, free of ambiguities and leaving no room for interpretation. If a metric doesn't mean exactly the same thing to every party in the supply chain, you're inviting all kinds of miscommunication.
Take "on time shipments," for example. "On time" means many different things to different people. The guy in shipping might interpret it as meaning the shipment left the DC on schedule. The truck driver might see it as delivery on the agreed-upon day. But to the customer, "on time" might mean the shipment was delivered not just on the appointed day but within a 15-minute to 1-hour window of a specific time. Those differences might sound trivial, but they could lead to all kinds of misunderstandings. For example, consider the customer service implications if the supplier thinks it's meeting expectations by delivering the order on the right day, but the customer is counting on having its order arrive between noon and 2 p.m.
It's the same with the "percentage shipped error-free" measure. What exactly does "error-free" mean? What elements of a shipment need to be correct for it to be considered free of errors? There are a lot of elements to consider here: shipping documentation, content, quantity, packaging requirements, labeling requirements, and on-time delivery, to name a few. A well drafted metric should make it clear exactly what's involved and how it should be measured.
History
At first glance, it might seem that history has little to do with metrics programs. But actually there's a connection. After all, even the best metric doesn't mean very much in isolation. To get a full understanding of your performance against a metric, you need a sense of its history to see where it's trending.
For example, say you've just found out your operation's error-free shipment rate yesterday was only 50 percent. While we can agree that this is a clear indicator that something's gone awry, our understanding could be so much richer if we understood its history. Is the 50 percent performance an aberration, something that has only occurred once on one particular day? Or is it a long-term trend? The answer will undoubtedly shape your response.
And if you still need convincing, consider this: If your goal is to improve performance against a specific metric, you'll have no way of knowing whether you're on track to hit that target unless you're monitoring performance over time.
Science
Once you have a clear understanding of how a measure is calculated, what it means, and how your operation has been performing against it over time, what do you do with that information? Like any good scientist, you must test your data and delve more deeply into the findings. For example, if you're trying to reduce shipping errors, you need to determine the source of the problem. Is it documentation, content, quantity, timeliness, labeling, or packaging? A root cause analysis will help you figure out where to focus your attention.
For example, you might find that 50 percent of your problems come from shipping the wrong item, while 30 percent come from shipping the wrong quantity. The remaining 20 percent might be split more or less evenly among the other components, documentation, timeliness, and labeling and packaging. That tells you the underlying problem isn't shipping; it's order fulfillment at the warehouse.
Solve that problem and you eliminate the majority of the shipment errors. It's important to have the curiosity of a scientist and the willingness to test data down to the root cause in order to drive improvement from the metrics.
Now that you've brushed up on the basics of math, English, history, and science, it's time to re-evaluate your metrics program. Chances are, you'll discover one or more opportunities to give your program a quick jolt and reinvigorate the performance of your operation.
The New York-based industrial artificial intelligence (AI) provider Augury has raised $75 million for its process optimization tools for manufacturers, in a deal that values the company at more than $1 billion, the firm said today.
According to Augury, its goal is deliver a new generation of AI solutions that provide the accuracy and reliability manufacturers need to make AI a trusted partner in every phase of the manufacturing process.
The “series F” venture capital round was led by Lightrock, with participation from several of Augury’s existing investors; Insight Partners, Eclipse, and Qumra Capital as well as Schneider Electric Ventures and Qualcomm Ventures. In addition to securing the new funding, Augury also said it has added Elan Greenberg as Chief Operating Officer.
“Augury is at the forefront of digitalizing equipment maintenance with AI-driven solutions that enhance cost efficiency, sustainability performance, and energy savings,” Ashish (Ash) Puri, Partner at Lightrock, said in a release. “Their predictive maintenance technology, boasting 99.9% failure detection accuracy and a 5-20x ROI when deployed at scale, significantly reduces downtime and energy consumption for its blue-chip clients globally, offering a compelling value proposition.”
The money supports the firm’s approach of "Hybrid Autonomous Mobile Robotics (Hybrid AMRs)," which integrate the intelligence of "Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs)" with the precision and structure of "Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs)."
According to Anscer, it supports the acceleration to Industry 4.0 by ensuring that its autonomous solutions seamlessly integrate with customers’ existing infrastructures to help transform material handling and warehouse automation.
Leading the new U.S. office will be Mark Messina, who was named this week as Anscer’s Managing Director & CEO, Americas. He has been tasked with leading the firm’s expansion by bringing its automation solutions to industries such as manufacturing, logistics, retail, food & beverage, and third-party logistics (3PL).
Supply chains continue to deal with a growing volume of returns following the holiday peak season, and 2024 was no exception. Recent survey data from product information management technology company Akeneo showed that 65% of shoppers made holiday returns this year, with most reporting that their experience played a large role in their reason for doing so.
The survey—which included information from more than 1,000 U.S. consumers gathered in January—provides insight into the main reasons consumers return products, generational differences in return and online shopping behaviors, and the steadily growing influence that sustainability has on consumers.
Among the results, 62% of consumers said that having more accurate product information upfront would reduce their likelihood of making a return, and 59% said they had made a return specifically because the online product description was misleading or inaccurate.
And when it comes to making those returns, 65% of respondents said they would prefer to return in-store, if possible, followed by 22% who said they prefer to ship products back.
“This indicates that consumers are gravitating toward the most sustainable option by reducing additional shipping,” the survey authors said in a statement announcing the findings, adding that 68% of respondents said they are aware of the environmental impact of returns, and 39% said the environmental impact factors into their decision to make a return or exchange.
The authors also said that investing in the product experience and providing reliable product data can help brands reduce returns, increase loyalty, and provide the best customer experience possible alongside profitability.
When asked what products they return the most, 60% of respondents said clothing items. Sizing issues were the number one reason for those returns (58%) followed by conflicting or lack of customer reviews (35%). In addition, 34% cited misleading product images and 29% pointed to inaccurate product information online as reasons for returning items.
More than 60% of respondents said that having more reliable information would reduce the likelihood of making a return.
“Whether customers are shopping directly from a brand website or on the hundreds of e-commerce marketplaces available today [such as Amazon, Walmart, etc.] the product experience must remain consistent, complete and accurate to instill brand trust and loyalty,” the authors said.
When you get the chance to automate your distribution center, take it.
That's exactly what leaders at interior design house
Thibaut Design did when they relocated operations from two New Jersey distribution centers (DCs) into a single facility in Charlotte, North Carolina, in 2019. Moving to an "empty shell of a building," as Thibaut's Michael Fechter describes it, was the perfect time to switch from a manual picking system to an automated one—in this case, one that would be driven by voice-directed technology.
"We were 100% paper-based picking in New Jersey," Fechter, the company's vice president of distribution and technology, explained in a
case study published by Voxware last year. "We knew there was a need for automation, and when we moved to Charlotte, we wanted to implement that technology."
Fechter cites Voxware's promise of simple and easy integration, configuration, use, and training as some of the key reasons Thibaut's leaders chose the system. Since implementing the voice technology, the company has streamlined its fulfillment process and can onboard and cross-train warehouse employees in a fraction of the time it used to take back in New Jersey.
And the results speak for themselves.
"We've seen incredible gains [from a] productivity standpoint," Fechter reports. "A 50% increase from pre-implementation to today."
THE NEED FOR SPEED
Thibaut was founded in 1886 and is the oldest operating wallpaper company in the United States, according to Fechter. The company works with a global network of designers, shipping samples of wallpaper and fabrics around the world.
For the design house's warehouse associates, picking, packing, and shipping thousands of samples every day was a cumbersome, labor-intensive process—and one that was prone to inaccuracy. With its paper-based picking system, mispicks were common—Fechter cites a 2% to 5% mispick rate—which necessitated stationing an extra associate at each pack station to check that orders were accurate before they left the facility.
All that has changed since implementing Voxware's Voice Management Suite (VMS) at the Charlotte DC. The system automates the workflow and guides associates through the picking process via a headset, using voice commands. The hands-free, eyes-free solution allows workers to focus on locating and selecting the right item, with no paper-based lists to check or written instructions to follow.
Thibaut also uses the tech provider's analytics tool, VoxPilot, to monitor work progress, check orders, and keep track of incoming work—managers can see what orders are open, what's in process, and what's completed for the day, for example. And it uses VoxTempo, the system's natural language voice recognition (NLVR) solution, to streamline training. The intuitive app whittles training time down to minutes and gets associates up and working fast—and Thibaut hitting minimum productivity targets within hours, according to Fechter.
EXPECTED RESULTS REALIZED
Key benefits of the project include a reduction in mispicks—which have dropped to zero—and the elimination of those extra quality-control measures Thibaut needed in the New Jersey DCs.
"We've gotten to the point where we don't even measure mispicks today—because there are none," Fechter said in the case study. "Having an extra person at a pack station to [check] every order before we pack [it]—that's been eliminated. Not only is the pick right the first time, but [the order] also gets packed and shipped faster than ever before."
The system has increased inventory accuracy as well. According to Fechter, it's now "well over 99.9%."
IT projects can be daunting, especially when the project involves upgrading a warehouse management system (WMS) to support an expansive network of warehousing and logistics facilities. Global third-party logistics service provider (3PL) CJ Logistics experienced this first-hand recently, embarking on a WMS selection process that would both upgrade performance and enhance security for its U.S. business network.
The company was operating on three different platforms across more than 35 warehouse facilities and wanted to pare that down to help standardize operations, optimize costs, and make it easier to scale the business, according to CIO Sean Moore.
Moore and his team started the WMS selection process in late 2023, working with supply chain consulting firm Alpine Supply Chain Solutions to identify challenges, needs, and goals, and then to select and implement the new WMS. Roughly a year later, the 3PL was up and running on a system from Körber Supply Chain—and planning for growth.
SECURING A NEW SOLUTION
Leaders from both companies explain that a robust WMS is crucial for a 3PL's success, as it acts as a centralized platform that allows seamless coordination of activities such as inventory management, order fulfillment, and transportation planning. The right solution allows the company to optimize warehouse operations by automating tasks, managing inventory levels, and ensuring efficient space utilization while helping to boost order processing volumes, reduce errors, and cut operational costs.
CJ Logistics had another key criterion: ensuring data security for its wide and varied array of clients, many of whom rely on the 3PL to fill e-commerce orders for consumers. Those clients wanted assurance that consumers' personally identifying information—including names, addresses, and phone numbers—was protected against cybersecurity breeches when flowing through the 3PL's system. For CJ Logistics, that meant finding a WMS provider whose software was certified to the appropriate security standards.
"That's becoming [an assurance] that our customers want to see," Moore explains, adding that many customers wanted to know that CJ Logistics' systems were SOC 2 compliant, meaning they had met a standard developed by the American Institute of CPAs for protecting sensitive customer data from unauthorized access, security incidents, and other vulnerabilities. "Everybody wants that level of security. So you want to make sure the system is secure … and not susceptible to ransomware.
"It was a critical requirement for us."
That security requirement was a key consideration during all phases of the WMS selection process, according to Michael Wohlwend, managing principal at Alpine Supply Chain Solutions.
"It was in the RFP [request for proposal], then in demo, [and] then once we got to the vendor of choice, we had a deep-dive discovery call to understand what [security] they have in place and their plan moving forward," he explains.
Ultimately, CJ Logistics implemented Körber's Warehouse Advantage, a cloud-based system designed for multiclient operations that supports all of the 3PL's needs, including its security requirements.
GOING LIVE
When it came time to implement the software, Moore and his team chose to start with a brand-new cold chain facility that the 3PL was building in Gainesville, Georgia. The 270,000-square-foot facility opened this past November and immediately went live running on the Körber WMS.
Moore and Wohlwend explain that both the nature of the cold chain business and the greenfield construction made the facility the perfect place to launch the new software: CJ Logistics would be adding customers at a staggered rate, expanding its cold storage presence in the Southeast and capitalizing on the location's proximity to major highways and railways. The facility is also adjacent to the future Northeast Georgia Inland Port, which will provide a direct link to the Port of Savannah.
"We signed a 15-year lease for the building," Moore says. "When you sign a long-term lease … you want your future-state software in place. That was one of the key [reasons] we started there.
"Also, this facility was going to bring on one customer after another at a metered rate. So [there was] some risk reduction as well."
Wohlwend adds: "The facility plus risk reduction plus the new business [element]—all made it a good starting point."
The early benefits of the WMS include ease of use and easy onboarding of clients, according to Moore, who says the plan is to convert additional CJ Logistics facilities to the new system in 2025.
"The software is very easy to use … our employees are saying they really like the user interface and that you can find information very easily," Moore says, touting the partnership with Alpine and Körber as key to making the project a success. "We are on deck to add at least four facilities at a minimum [this year]."