Survey: Forklift fleet management programs still a work in progress
Our exclusive survey shows that lift truck fleet managers are making a stab at gathering performance data on their vehicles. But they're not always making good use of the info they collect.
James Cooke is a principal analyst with Nucleus Research in Boston, covering supply chain planning software. He was previously the editor of CSCMP?s Supply Chain Quarterly and a staff writer for DC Velocity.
This fall, hardware distributor Emery-Waterhouse plans to abandon paper-record keeping on the forklifts at its Portland, Maine, warehouse in favor of outfitting the trucks with electronic data recorders. The reason? The distributor wants to take a more scientific approach to vehicle replacement in its fleet of 20 or so electric forklifts. "The data recorders will give us statistics on usage and engine performance," says Mark Maloney, Emery-Waterhouse's director of operations. "The software will tell us when the cost per usage is rising and you should replace the truck."
While the benefits of a data-driven approach might seem obvious, it turns out that Emery-Waterhouse is more the exception than the rule when it comes to the way it manages its fleet. A recent DC Velocity reader survey found that only a quarter of the respondents have adopted a formal fleet management program. Formal fleet management programs typically track key data, such as hours of use and repair records, for each vehicle in a fleet. This information allows managers to optimize truck usage and to determine the economic tipping point at which it becomes more cost effective to buy a new truck than repair the old one.
The respondents' go-slow approach runs counter to the advice of lift-truck dealers and independent third parties, both of which advocate the use of fleet management programs. With a formal fleet management program, they contend, users have immediate access to detailed data on all of the vehicles they oversee. Not only can that information help streamline daily operations, they say, but it's also useful for strategic decision-making. For example, data on a vehicle's operating history could prove invaluable to a manager who's trying to determine whether a vehicle has reached the end of its useful life.
All over the map
The spotty use of fleet management programs in North American DCs was just one of the key findings of DC Velocity's lift truck survey, which was conducted earlier this summer. In all, 362 readers representing a broad cross section of industries completed the online questionnaire, which looked at how companies manage the lift trucks in their warehouses and DCs. The largest share of respondents—41 percent—worked in wholesale or industrial distribution, followed by 17 percent from consumer goods manufacturing and 14 percent from the retail sector.
The fleets run by the survey respondents range from the very small—10 or fewer trucks—to the very large (more than 100 vehicles). However, most fell somewhere in between. The majority (57 percent) of the respondents operate fleets with fewer than 25 units, and another 31 percent oversee fleets of between 26 and 100 trucks. Only 12 percent had a fleet of more than 100 trucks.
As for the type of trucks these operations use, electric vehicles topped the list. A full 88 percent of the respondents said their fleet included electric models. Other vehicles mentioned included internal combustion units (used by 26 percent of the respondents) and liquid petroleum-powered vehicles (25 percent). In a sign of the times, 2 percent reported using trucks powered by fuel cells.
Roughly three-fifths of the survey respondents (59 percent) own the trucks they operate, while another 11 percent lease or rent their vehicles. Thirty percent reported using some combination of buying and leasing.
When it comes to maintaining and repairing their trucks, most of the survey respondents have chosen the outsourcing route. Nearly half the respondents (44 percent) have their vehicles serviced by dealers, while 27 percent use third parties. Another 27 percent reported that they used some combination of dealers, in-house operations, and third parties. Only 9 percent—typically those with the largest fleets—said they handled all of their maintenance and repairs in house.
Tracking the trucks
While their approaches to data collection may vary, the majority of respondents do keep some kind of records on the vehicles they use. Eighty-one percent track repair costs for each truck, 80 percent keep tabs on the hours each vehicle is used, and 78 percent maintain logs on the repairs made to each vehicle. In addition, 64 percent keep records on routine maintenance work, like tire and battery replacements. Only 25 percent track equipment utilization by specific drivers. (See Exhibit 1.)
Notably, while four out of five respondents keep some type of records, they don't necessarily pull out these records when they go to make vehicle replacement decisions. Just 59 percent of the survey respondents said that they used the data they collected to determine when to replace a truck.
As for how respondents go about collecting vehicle performance data, methods range from the strictly manual to the highly automated. Predictably, the research found a strong correlation between fleet size and the use of electronic recorders, with the large fleets far more likely to use automated systems than their smaller counterparts (see Exhibit 2). For instance, while two-thirds of operations with 100 or more vehicles had formal fleet management programs in place, only 13 percent of operations with 10 or fewer trucks had adopted such programs.
That's not surprising, says Chris Roy, a national accounts manager at Kenco Material Handling Solutions LLC, a Toyota forklift dealer that also offers a fleet management program. Companies that only operate a few forklifts don't see a need for a formal program because they tend to keep track of their equipment themselves, he says.
For operations with hundreds of trucks to track, however, an automated data collection system can take a lot of the pain out of the process. Better yet, these systems contain report-generation and data crunching capabilities that make analysis a breeze, users say. "Our fleet management program keeps all the data in a format that we can manipulate to gather specific data upon request," wrote one respondent, a vice president of distribution for a retail industry company. "It identifies trucks with high repair costs," said another reader, a warehouse manager in the wholesale distribution sector with a fleet of 100-plus units.
Fleet management experts say the survey findings jibe with their experience. "Owners of large fleets are more apt to have a formal data collection process and outsource maintenance to achieve that objective," says Greg Martin, president of Anaheim, Calif.-based Challenger Enterprises, a third-party provider of fleet management services. He adds that large companies use this service to ensure compliance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) rules that require them to maintain a work-order history for each lift truck.
Matt Logan, director of marketing and product management at Crown Equipment, agrees with Martin that businesses with larger fleets are more apt to invest in fleet optimization tools. "To realize a return, you have to be in a position to make an investment," he says, "and we've been in a period when expenditures for new projects have been significantly limited—if not eliminated. When customers have made this investment, they've told us that our system has increased the profitability of their operation and provided a return on investment."
[Exhibit 1] What fleet managers monitor
Metric
% of users
Repair costs for individual trucks
81
Hours of equipment utilization (by individual truck)
80
Equipment repairs for individual trucks
78
Standard maintenance
64
Equipment utilization by driver
25
Fuel or power usage for individual trucks
12
When it comes to the type of records fleet managers keep, repair costs topped the list.
[Exhibit 2] Who's using fleet management programs?
Size of fleet
Has program
Does not have program
One to 10 trucks
13%
13%
11 to 25 trucks
22%
78%
26 to 50 trucks
23%
77%
51 to 100 trucks
46%
54%
More than 100 trucks
67%
33%
Operators of large forklift fleets are more likely to have formal fleet management programs in place than their smaller counterparts.
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
Manufacturing and logistics workers are raising a red flag over workplace quality issues according to industry research released this week.
A comparative study of more than 4,000 workers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia found that manufacturing and logistics workers say they have seen colleagues reduce the quality of their work and not follow processes in the workplace over the past year, with rates exceeding the overall average by 11% and 8%, respectively.
The study—the Resilience Nation report—was commissioned by UK-based regulatory and compliance software company Ideagen, and it polled workers in industries such as energy, aviation, healthcare, and financial services. The results “explore the major threats and macroeconomic factors affecting people today, providing perspectives on resilience across global landscapes,” according to the authors.
According to the study, 41% of manufacturing and logistics workers said they’d witnessed their peers hiding mistakes, and 45% said they’ve observed coworkers cutting corners due to apathy—9% above the average. The results also showed that workers are seeing colleagues take safety risks: More than a third of respondents said they’ve seen people putting themselves in physical danger at work.
The authors said growing pressure inside and outside of the workplace are to blame for the lack of diligence and resiliency on the job. Internally, workers say they are under pressure to deliver more despite reduced capacity. Among the external pressures, respondents cited the rising cost of living as the biggest problem (39%), closely followed by inflation rates, supply chain challenges, and energy prices.
“People are being asked to deliver more at work when their resilience is being challenged by economic and political headwinds,” Ideagen’s CEO Ben Dorks said in a statement announcing the findings. “Ultimately, this is having a determinantal impact on business productivity, workplace health and safety, and the quality of work produced, as well as further reducing the resilience of the nation at large.”
Respondents said they believe technology will eventually alleviate some of the stress occurring in manufacturing and logistics, however.
“People are optimistic that emerging tech and AI will ultimately lighten the load, but they’re not yet feeling the benefits,” Dorks added. “It’s a gap that now, more than ever, business leaders must look to close and support their workforce to ensure their staff remain safe and compliance needs are met across the business.”
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.