Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
For the first half of 2010, the transportation industry has been partying like it's well 2005.
As the following examples show, activity has been strong across all modes. Consider:
Maritime. The Baltic Dry Index (BDI), a leading economic indicator that tracks prices charged by dry-bulk ocean carriers to move raw materials, rose in early June to 4,041, its highest level of the year. The index's recent move upward has been due to a surge of iron ore imports to China, experts said. The rise dispelled concerns that arose in April when the closely watched BDI hovered around 3,000, leading some to believe the global recovery had stalled. With ships busy and ports increasingly congested, experts look for the BDI to continue rising in the months ahead.
Air freight. After suffering unprecedented declines from late 2008 to early 2009, airfreight volumes have snapped back in impressive fashion. International air tonnage grew at a 26-percent annualized pace in the first quarter of 2010, despite service disruptions from the Iceland volcanic ash plume, according to data from the International Air Transport Association (IATA). Airfreight exports from the key Hong Kong market set records in April, up 54 percent from April 2009 levels. Cargo yields, or revenue per pound, rose 15 percent in the first quarter, with cargo load factors regaining pre-9/11 levels, IATA said. The outlook for air cargo "looks better than it has for the past two years," said Brian Pearce, IATA's chief economist.
Rail and intermodal. U.S. rail volumes of non-intermodal shipments rose in the first week of June by 27 percent over the same period in 2009. Intermodal traffic soared 33 percent over the same period in 2009 and rose eight percent over June 2008, before the financial crisis hit. Intermodal volumes are growing on the backs of improving imports and tightening truckload capacity, which is forcing shippers onto trains almost by default and is leading to significant intermodal rate increases.
Trucking. Demand for trucking continued to be strong through May, according to a key monthly index published by Cass Information Systems, a leading U.S. freight audit and payment firm. An index of shipments grew by 11.1 percent year-over-year, while a measure of transportation expenditures climbed nearly 25 percent over the same period. Both barometers of trucking activity have been steadily rising throughout 2010.
As shipments and expenditures have risen, so have truck rates. This is especially true for non-contractual rates quoted on the spot market. Truck giant J.B. Hunt Transport Services, for example, said in mid-May that its spot market rates are increasing at a faster pace than in the 2003-2005 period, the last sustained up-cycle for U.S. trucking. While contract rate increases have lagged the spot market, they are expected to accelerate in the second half of the year as shippers accept higher rates in contract renewals.
Noel Perry, a partner in the U.S. consultancy FTR Associates, said the freight recession that has gripped truckers since the end of 2006 is, at least for now, history. "I am not at all worried about the next 12 to 18 months," he said.
In fact, the trucking industry's biggest problem through the end of 2011, says Perry, will be hiring and training enough qualified rig and trailer buyers to meet the increasing demand.
Lastly, an index of domestic rail and truck demand published by investment firm Robert W. Baird & Co. rose 6.2 percent in April compared to the same period in 2009. April's figures represented the strongest year-over-year growth rate for any month over the past 20 years, according to Baird analysts. Growth continues to be supported by "sales activity improvement, lean inventory replenishment, and more normal inventory ordering cycles," the analysts wrote.
So where does transport go from here? Some have predicted that the U.S. economy—and by extension ordering and shipping activity—will slow in the second half of 2010 as previously lean inventory levels reach a more normal level and the U.S. government's stimulus spending begins to wane.
One logistics executive at a leading U.S. technology company (who asked not to be identified) said the current strong shipping data reflect business conditions at the "tail-end" of the supply chain. At the front-end of the supply chain, raw material purchases are currently showing "great softness." As raw material purchases are a better indicator of where the economy is heading, the executive expects the U.S. economy to slow significantly in the second half.
Similarly Dr. Donald Ratajczak, the former head of the economic forecasting unit at Georgia State University and now an independent economist, in January offered a sober outlook for U.S. growth in the second half of the year. At the time, Ratajczak said that the winding down of the government stimulus and inventory replenishment efforts that should begin to affect the economy in June or July.
However, in a June 1 report, Ratajczak said the increase in backlogs in the first quarter will trigger continued gains in production and shipping at least for the next two months.
As a result, Ratajczak said he has raised his projections for business inventories and sales. Because sales forecasts have revised higher than inventories, further production increases are likely needed to bring inventory levels in line with sales, he said.
The economist forecasts a 3.6-percent increase in second-quarter U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP), followed by a two percent GDP gain in the third quarter due to weakness in the U.S. housing market, and a three percent GDP increase in the fourth quarter.
Among transportation providers themselves the outlook for the second half remains mixed. For example, demand for airfreight services is expected to level off as the replenishment cycle runs its course sometime in the year's second half, said Pearce of IATA. Air freight is viewed as an early cycle indicator because it is sensitive to inventory levels and near-term restocking needs. Still, Pearce said shippers remain confident, and the capital investment outlook, especially among air-reliant technology firms, remains "surprisingly strong."
In the maritime sector, Mike Zampa, chief spokesman for shipping giant APL, said shipper demand "remains strong" at mid-year, and APL, along with other steamship lines, is reporting high vessel utilization. "The unknown is whether the economic recovery is sustainable" into the latter half of the year, Zampa said.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."