When they think about relocating offshore operations to Mexico, most companies focus on the supply chain benefits. What they should be looking at are the challenges.
James Cooke is a principal analyst with Nucleus Research in Boston, covering supply chain planning software. He was previously the editor of CSCMP?s Supply Chain Quarterly and a staff writer for DC Velocity.
Not so long ago, Asia was the clear destination of choice for companies looking to set up offshore manufacturing operations. Now that's starting to change. In recent months, a number of U.S.-based companies in the consumer electronics, telecommunications, and pharmaceutical industries have quietly closed up shop overseas and relocated their operations to a country much closer to home: Mexico.
"In the past year to 18 months—partly as a result of the economic crisis—we have seen more companies making the decision to outsource their logistics or manufacturing operations to Mexico," says Larry Malanga, president of the third-party logistics service provider Mexflex Logistics, S.A. de C.V.
Although wages and currency fluctuations play a role, it's clear that the desire to cut freight costs and transit times weighs heavily in these decisions. "From the cost of fuel and resources, you minimize a great deal with being in Mexico," says Larry Monaghan, who's the department head for logistics at LG Electronics, which makes products like cell phones and plasma TVs in Mexico for U.S. consumption.
Mexico may have the edge over Asia when it comes to freight costs and delivery times, but it's not without its logistics challenges. Take infrastructure, for example. "Public roads with a few exceptions are in bad shape," says Rolando García, who works on the strategic planning team for contact center management company Teleperformance in Monterrey, Mexico. Bad roads cause wear and tear on trucks, García says, so anyone planning to operate trucks in Mexico should be prepared to make frequent equipment repairs.
And that's just one example. Companies can expect to encounter a number of other obstacles as they start laying the groundwork for operations in Mexico. That's why Monaghan and the other experts interviewed for this article urge businesses to familiarize themselves with the potential troublespots and think about how they're going to address them beforehand.
Overcoming hurdles
One of the biggest considerations for companies looking to manufacture in Mexico is how they'll transport the Mexico-made goods to U.S. markets. To someone unfamiliar with doing business in Mexico, that might sound like a straightforward decision—either hire a Mexican trucker to deliver the goods in the United States or send a U.S. carrier into Mexico to pick them up. But it's not that simple.
To begin with, using a Mexican trucker to make deliveries in the United States would be illegal. Although it agreed to give Mexican truckers full and free access to U.S. highways as part of the North American Free Trade Agreement (which took effect in 1994), the United States has yet to deliver on that promise. At this writing, Mexican truckers are banned from U.S. highways beyond a 50-mile border zone. That means that once a Mexican trucker hauls a cargo trailer to the border, he has to hand it off to a U.S. carrier.
The second option—hiring a U.S. carrier to pick up goods in Mexico—is perfectly legal, but few companies actually go this route. For one thing, it's difficult to find a trucker that's willing to do so—U.S. carriers have been hesitant to go into Mexico, partly out of safety concerns. García reports that for the past two years, Mexico has been experiencing an unprecedented crime wave. Rather than send trucks into the country, most U.S. carriers choose to interchange cargo at the border with a Mexican counterpart.
That means that along with hiring a U.S. carrier, a company has to find a trustworthy Mexican trucking partner—a process that's complicated by a lack of big-name truckers in that country. Although U.S. carriers have begun buying ownership stakes in some Mexican transport providers, most Mexican truckers are still "mom and pop" operations, Monaghan says. He adds that shippers can learn a lot about the rigor of a potential partner's security practices by asking detailed questions about the trucker's hiring procedures. Quality carriers collect a lot of personal information on drivers and their background, including pictures of the driver and the driver's family, he says.
To further safeguard their shipments, Monaghan advises shippers to put reinforced locks on their trailers. He also suggests monitoring the carrier's travel time to the border. "If it takes too long to reach the destination, you have to wonder if anything was compromised," he says. It's critical for companies to keep tabs on carriers because the importer who's listed as the shipper of record bears the responsibility for any breach.
Where available, trains offer a somewhat safer alternative to trucks, even though the transit times are longer, according to Monaghan. "There are [fewer] security issues with rail because the train is always moving," he explains.
Border lines
Another factor to take into account when planning a move to Mexico is the potential for delays at the border. Due to U.S. concerns over smuggling and illegal immigration, customs clearance can be time-consuming. David Morgan, chief executive officer of D.W. Morgan Co. Inc., reports that it has taken some of its customers 16 to 20 hours to clear customs. "The main bottleneck for Mexico-U.S. shipping is the border," he says.
To speed up the customs clearance process, Monaghan urges companies manufacturing in Mexico to join the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT), a voluntary supply chain security program run by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). (Essentially, C-TPAT members agree to police their own supply chains in exchange for expedited clearance.) That applies to their transportation partners as well. "Make sure to use carriers that are C-TPAT certified as they can get across the border faster," Monaghan says. He also encourages companies to make use of C-TPAT experts who can put together programs to ensure compliance.
Another way to ease border crossing headaches is to use a qualified freight forwarder, customs broker, or third-party logistics service provider. "There are several cross-border agents that are good at handling the required documentation and customs issues to facilitate the crossing process," says Malanga. He recommends choosing agents that have existing alliances with transportation providers.
Help wanted!
The challenges associated with logistics operations in Mexico aren't limited to the mechanics of moving freight. Another issue is staffing. Many companies have run into difficulty recruiting and hiring qualified people to work in operations south of the border. Although businesses can usually find what they're looking for in major cities like Mexico City, Guadalajara, and Monterrey, that's not the case in smaller cities, García says.
Companies unable to find local expertise may be able to "import" talent. In certain cases, Mexico does allow businesses to bring in foreign workers, Monaghan says. Otherwise, their best bet is to train and develop local talent, he says. Monaghan notes that online training can be a good way to bring supply chain personnel up to speed quickly.
A head start
Given the potential difficulties, the experts interviewed for this article urge companies planning a move to Mexico to begin working out the details well in advance. García of Teleperformance recommends the team approach—establishing a core project team that includes both company executives and local experts to oversee the transition. "In my personal experience, the best practice is to hire the local key players months ahead of the go-live and send them to the home country for training," he says.
Whether a company chooses to form a team or not, the important thing is to set up its own "infrastructure" of transportation and logistics partners as well as qualified local personnel. "It's not like you can find a factory in Mexico and start shipping," says Monaghan. "You need to do your homework. It's not a decision to be made without understanding all that's involved."
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."