When they think about relocating offshore operations to Mexico, most companies focus on the supply chain benefits. What they should be looking at are the challenges.
James Cooke is a principal analyst with Nucleus Research in Boston, covering supply chain planning software. He was previously the editor of CSCMP?s Supply Chain Quarterly and a staff writer for DC Velocity.
Not so long ago, Asia was the clear destination of choice for companies looking to set up offshore manufacturing operations. Now that's starting to change. In recent months, a number of U.S.-based companies in the consumer electronics, telecommunications, and pharmaceutical industries have quietly closed up shop overseas and relocated their operations to a country much closer to home: Mexico.
"In the past year to 18 months—partly as a result of the economic crisis—we have seen more companies making the decision to outsource their logistics or manufacturing operations to Mexico," says Larry Malanga, president of the third-party logistics service provider Mexflex Logistics, S.A. de C.V.
Although wages and currency fluctuations play a role, it's clear that the desire to cut freight costs and transit times weighs heavily in these decisions. "From the cost of fuel and resources, you minimize a great deal with being in Mexico," says Larry Monaghan, who's the department head for logistics at LG Electronics, which makes products like cell phones and plasma TVs in Mexico for U.S. consumption.
Mexico may have the edge over Asia when it comes to freight costs and delivery times, but it's not without its logistics challenges. Take infrastructure, for example. "Public roads with a few exceptions are in bad shape," says Rolando García, who works on the strategic planning team for contact center management company Teleperformance in Monterrey, Mexico. Bad roads cause wear and tear on trucks, García says, so anyone planning to operate trucks in Mexico should be prepared to make frequent equipment repairs.
And that's just one example. Companies can expect to encounter a number of other obstacles as they start laying the groundwork for operations in Mexico. That's why Monaghan and the other experts interviewed for this article urge businesses to familiarize themselves with the potential troublespots and think about how they're going to address them beforehand.
Overcoming hurdles
One of the biggest considerations for companies looking to manufacture in Mexico is how they'll transport the Mexico-made goods to U.S. markets. To someone unfamiliar with doing business in Mexico, that might sound like a straightforward decision—either hire a Mexican trucker to deliver the goods in the United States or send a U.S. carrier into Mexico to pick them up. But it's not that simple.
To begin with, using a Mexican trucker to make deliveries in the United States would be illegal. Although it agreed to give Mexican truckers full and free access to U.S. highways as part of the North American Free Trade Agreement (which took effect in 1994), the United States has yet to deliver on that promise. At this writing, Mexican truckers are banned from U.S. highways beyond a 50-mile border zone. That means that once a Mexican trucker hauls a cargo trailer to the border, he has to hand it off to a U.S. carrier.
The second option—hiring a U.S. carrier to pick up goods in Mexico—is perfectly legal, but few companies actually go this route. For one thing, it's difficult to find a trucker that's willing to do so—U.S. carriers have been hesitant to go into Mexico, partly out of safety concerns. García reports that for the past two years, Mexico has been experiencing an unprecedented crime wave. Rather than send trucks into the country, most U.S. carriers choose to interchange cargo at the border with a Mexican counterpart.
That means that along with hiring a U.S. carrier, a company has to find a trustworthy Mexican trucking partner—a process that's complicated by a lack of big-name truckers in that country. Although U.S. carriers have begun buying ownership stakes in some Mexican transport providers, most Mexican truckers are still "mom and pop" operations, Monaghan says. He adds that shippers can learn a lot about the rigor of a potential partner's security practices by asking detailed questions about the trucker's hiring procedures. Quality carriers collect a lot of personal information on drivers and their background, including pictures of the driver and the driver's family, he says.
To further safeguard their shipments, Monaghan advises shippers to put reinforced locks on their trailers. He also suggests monitoring the carrier's travel time to the border. "If it takes too long to reach the destination, you have to wonder if anything was compromised," he says. It's critical for companies to keep tabs on carriers because the importer who's listed as the shipper of record bears the responsibility for any breach.
Where available, trains offer a somewhat safer alternative to trucks, even though the transit times are longer, according to Monaghan. "There are [fewer] security issues with rail because the train is always moving," he explains.
Border lines
Another factor to take into account when planning a move to Mexico is the potential for delays at the border. Due to U.S. concerns over smuggling and illegal immigration, customs clearance can be time-consuming. David Morgan, chief executive officer of D.W. Morgan Co. Inc., reports that it has taken some of its customers 16 to 20 hours to clear customs. "The main bottleneck for Mexico-U.S. shipping is the border," he says.
To speed up the customs clearance process, Monaghan urges companies manufacturing in Mexico to join the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT), a voluntary supply chain security program run by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). (Essentially, C-TPAT members agree to police their own supply chains in exchange for expedited clearance.) That applies to their transportation partners as well. "Make sure to use carriers that are C-TPAT certified as they can get across the border faster," Monaghan says. He also encourages companies to make use of C-TPAT experts who can put together programs to ensure compliance.
Another way to ease border crossing headaches is to use a qualified freight forwarder, customs broker, or third-party logistics service provider. "There are several cross-border agents that are good at handling the required documentation and customs issues to facilitate the crossing process," says Malanga. He recommends choosing agents that have existing alliances with transportation providers.
Help wanted!
The challenges associated with logistics operations in Mexico aren't limited to the mechanics of moving freight. Another issue is staffing. Many companies have run into difficulty recruiting and hiring qualified people to work in operations south of the border. Although businesses can usually find what they're looking for in major cities like Mexico City, Guadalajara, and Monterrey, that's not the case in smaller cities, García says.
Companies unable to find local expertise may be able to "import" talent. In certain cases, Mexico does allow businesses to bring in foreign workers, Monaghan says. Otherwise, their best bet is to train and develop local talent, he says. Monaghan notes that online training can be a good way to bring supply chain personnel up to speed quickly.
A head start
Given the potential difficulties, the experts interviewed for this article urge companies planning a move to Mexico to begin working out the details well in advance. García of Teleperformance recommends the team approach—establishing a core project team that includes both company executives and local experts to oversee the transition. "In my personal experience, the best practice is to hire the local key players months ahead of the go-live and send them to the home country for training," he says.
Whether a company chooses to form a team or not, the important thing is to set up its own "infrastructure" of transportation and logistics partners as well as qualified local personnel. "It's not like you can find a factory in Mexico and start shipping," says Monaghan. "You need to do your homework. It's not a decision to be made without understanding all that's involved."
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
Keith Moore is CEO of AutoScheduler.AI, a warehouse resource planning and optimization platform that integrates with a customer's warehouse management system to orchestrate and optimize all activities at the site. Prior to venturing into the supply chain business, Moore was a director of product management at software startup SparkCognition. He is a graduate of the University of Tennessee, where he earned a Bachelor of Science degree in mechanical engineering.
Q: Autoscheduler provides tools for warehouse orchestration—a term some readers may not be familiar with. Could you explain what warehouse orchestration means?
A: Warehouse orchestration tools are software control layers that synthesize data from existing systems to eliminate costly delays, streamline inefficient workflows, and [prevent the waste of] resources in distribution operations. These platforms empower warehouses to optimize operations, enhance productivity, and improve order accuracy by dynamically prioritizing work continuously to ensure that the operation is always running optimally. This leads to faster trailer turn times, reduced costs, and a network that runs like clockwork, even during fluctuating demands.
Q: How is orchestration different from a typical warehouse management system?
A: A warehouse management system (WMS) focuses on tracking inventory and managing warehouse operations. Warehouse orchestration goes a step further by integrating and optimizing all aspects of warehouse activities in a capacity-constrained way. Orchestration provides a dynamic, real-time layer that coordinates various systems and processes, enabling more agile and responsive operations. It enhances decision-making by considering multiple variables and constraints.
Q: How does warehouse orchestration help facilities make their workers more productive?
A: Two ways to make labor in a warehouse more productive are to work harder and to work smarter. For teams that want to work harder, most companies use a labor management system to track individual performances against an expected standard. Warehouse orchestration technology focuses on the other side of the coin, helping warehouses "work smarter."
Warehouse orchestration technology optimizes labor by providing real-time insights into workload demands and resource availability based on actual fluctuating constraints around the building. It enables dynamic task assignments based on current priorities and worker skills, ensuring that labor is allocated where it's needed most, even accounting for equipment availability, flow constraints, and overall work speed. This approach reduces idle time, balances workloads, and enhances employee productivity.
Q: How can visibility improve operations?
A: Due to the software ecosystem in place today, most distribution operations are highly reactive environments where there is always a "hair on fire" problem that needs to be solved. By leveraging orchestration technologies, this problem is mitigated because you're providing the site with added visibility into the past, present, and future state of the operation. This opens up a vast number of doors for distribution leadership. They go from learning about a problem after it's happened to gaining the ability to inform customers and transportation teams about potential service issues that are 24 hours away.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.