Commentary: For U.S. Marines, going green can save lives
Researchers at the U.S. Marines' new test lab are looking at ways to conserve water and energy at operating bases in Afghanistan. It's not just a PR initiative; their efforts could save lives.
Steve Geary is adjunct faculty at the University of Tennessee's Haaslam College of Business and is a lecturer at The Gordon Institute at Tufts University. He is the President of the Supply Chain Visions family of companies, consultancies that work across the government sector. Steve is a contributing editor at DC Velocity, and editor-at-large for CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
Not long ago, I received an invitation to tour the Marines' new Experimental Forward Operating Base, a test lab where researchers are investigating ways to conserve energy and other resources at forward operating bases in Afghanistan. The guest list included, among others, the commandant of the Marine Corps, Gen. James T. Conway.
There's a war on, there are Marines in harm's way, and the commandant of the Marine Corps is going to take time out to tour a lab devoted to green initiatives? I reread the press release to make sure I had it right, and sure enough, that's what it said. Now I think sustainability is important, but it just doesn't feel like something that would make it onto the top Marine's to-do list during a war.
But it turns out there's more to the story than first appears. The Marines' push to make operating bases more sustainable isn't some kind of science project or public relations initiative. It's about saving lives.
Rolling supply lines
What the lab is ultimately looking to do is cut down on the Marines' use of supply convoys, which are particularly vulnerable to attack. Right now, the forward operating bases depend heavily on these convoys to supply their basic needs. For instance, it's not unusual for an operating base in Afghanistan to be located in an area with no local source of potable water. In that case, trucks will likely be needed to haul in vast quantities of fresh water on a regular basis—according to the Marine Corps Survival Manual, a single Marine in the field in Afghanistan needs to consume at least 10 liters (2.6 gallons) of water a day to remain healthy.
And it's not just water. It's the same with the fuel needed for the generators that power the bases' 21st century high-tech equipment. In today's conflict zones in Southwest Asia, fuel consumption runs to over 25 gallons a day per troop—fuel that often has to be brought in from a supply depot a full day's drive away. Add the fuel and the water, and that's a lot of liquid moving down the road in the back of a truck—maybe as many as eight trucks going out a couple of times a week, each carrying two Marines with accompanying armed vehicle escorts.
Questions of cost and efficiency aside, running convoys is dangerous business. In 2009, Gen. Conway identified convoy security as one of the most pressing problems related to the risk of casualties. Cutting down on the use of convoys would reduce the Marines' exposure to improvised explosive devices and other threats. "We have to get Marines off the road," says Maj. Patrick Reynolds, who works at the new Experimental Forward Operating Base, which is located in Quantico, Va.
Sustainable solutions
And that's where sustainability comes in. Reducing consumption of fuel and bottled water at the forward operating bases would reduce the need for convoys, which in turn would reduce the risk to Marines on the convoy trucks. Making the bases more self-sufficient would have another benefit as well: It would reduce their exposure to supply line disruptions. Right now, a successful attack on a convoy could cut off the base from its source of supply, and if the situation persisted, even jeopardize its ability to continue its mission.
Researchers at the lab are currently looking at ways to use commercial, off-the-shelf technologies to make the bases' operations more sustainable. They're investigating methods of making shelters more energy efficient, so less fuel will be required to heat or cool them. They're looking at solar and photovoltaic technologies as possible "off the grid" energy-generation solutions that don't require fuel transport. And they're testing micro-purification plants, which could be used at the company level, as a means of allowing Marines to make use of wells, rivers, or canals for drinking water.
And these sustainable solutions will help protect the Marine in harm's way.
For the Marines in Afghanistan today, the logistics tail—all the support that follows troops into combat—is not an afterthought. It's a priority. That's why the Marines are willing to spend dollars (which are in very short supply) to create the Experimental Forward Operating Base.
It isn't a science experiment. It's a very real issue that has very real implications for the troops on the ground in Afghanistan.
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.