LGVs take big bite out of costs at Del Monte's pet food DC
A year ago, Del Monte Foods had to send out a lift truck and driver whenever it needed something retrieved at its pet food DC. Now, all it takes is a vehicle.
David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
When Del Monte Foods went to build a new pet food DC a few years back, it could have stuck with the tried and true. With a number of distribution centers already operating around the country, the company was an experienced player in the distribution game. Rather than start from scratch, it could have duplicated the processes used in the other facilities at the new site.
But Del Monte chose not to do that. It had begun to suspect there was a better way of doing things—an approach that was more efficient and less costly.
"The thought of building a new site and doing it the traditional way was not very appealing," says Keith Arntson, vice president of DC operations for Del Monte Foods. "We wanted instead to find a way to take the non-value-added costs out of the equation."
Soon after it got operations up and running at the new facility, which opened in 2008, Del Monte turned its attention to ways to eliminate those costs. It quickly zeroed in on the labor-intensive material handling system, which required workers on lift trucks to carry out routine pallet storage and retrieval tasks. It seemed pretty clear to all concerned that the facility would benefit from automating that part of the operation, which would then free up workers for more challenging tasks. The only question was how.
The pick of the litter
While Del Monte Foods is primarily known for its canned fruits and vegetables, it's actually one of the top dogs in the pet food market. Collectively, its pet food and pet snack lines—which include such well-known brands as Kibbles 'n Bits, Meow Mix, Milk-Bone, 9Lives, and Snausages—accounted for 45 percent of the company's sales last year.
Dry pet food and pet snacks are produced at a plant in Topeka, Kan. Up until 2008, the plant shipped all of its finished products off site to warehouses across the country for regional distribution. But that wasn't always an efficient system. For one thing, it meant that orders for customers in the Midwest had to be shipped back to the heartland, which resulted in additional handling and transportation costs.
The opening of the new 420,000-square-foot DC, which is located adjacent to the Topeka plant, changed all that. Now, finished goods can be moved directly to the DC as soon as they roll off the line. From there, products destined for other parts of the country are shipped out to other Del Monte DCs for local distribution. Orders for Midwestern customers, however, are now processed on site, which eliminates the need for double handling.
Del Monte's labor-saving initiatives have gone well beyond simply eliminating double handling. Last October, the company replaced the 20 or so lift trucks it used during the facility's first year of operation with laser-guided vehicles (LGVs) supplied by Elettric 80, an automated equipment specialist based in Viano, Italy. Moving to driverless vehicles would allow Del Monte to reallocate a substantial amount of labor—some 50 lift truck drivers over three shifts—to other parts of the operation.
The LGVs come equipped with a navigation system that emits laser beams as the vehicles move through the facility. Using the signals it receives when the lasers hit reflectors mounted at various spots, the system calculates distances and "steers" the LGVs along a course within extremely precise tolerances. There's no need for wires embedded in the floor, as there would be with wire-guided systems, which means the vehicles can be easily routed anywhere within the building.
The moves are coordinated by Elettric 80's management software working in tandem with Del Monte's EXE (now Infor) warehouse management system (WMS). In addition to dispatching the LGVs, the systems work together to manage inventory. Arntson reports that the software has performed flawlessly in that regard. "Inventory accuracy is ... spot on," he says.
Well trained
Today, 39 LGVs are in use at the Topeka distribution center. Thirty-five of those LGVs are single-position vehicles that carry one pallet at a time. These units resemble large stand-up forklifts, but of course without the operators. The remaining four LGVs are configured as four-pallet-position "barges" that can transport multiple pallet loads.
"They are like a conveyor on wheels," says Arntson.
The barges are used to transport loads from the plant to the distribution center, which are connected by a corridor. Once they arrive at the DC, the barges discharge the pallets onto a staging conveyor.
A single-position LGV with forks is next summoned to pick up the load from the conveyor. If the pallet is needed right away for an order, the LGV takes it directly to a staging area near shipping. Otherwise, it transports the pallet to storage. Pallets are stored either at floor locations, where they're stacked up to four high, or in five- or six-level drive-in racks. In all, the facility boasts 35,000 pallet positions.
In the storage areas, the LGVs rely on reflectors within the racks to guide pallet placement. "They are incredibly precise," notes Arntson. "These LGVs stack at the same point every single time. You can look down the line from the first pallet, and every single pallet in the row is perfectly in line."
When a pallet is needed from storage, the WMS dispatches an LGV to retrieve it. The LGV pulls the pallet from the rack or floor position using its forks and ferries it to staging.
Consistent performers
Although they're designed for round-the-clock operation, the LGVs do require occasional attention. Like conventional lift trucks, they need battery changes every eight to 10 hours. But with LGVs, it's a relatively hassle-free operation. When their power runs low, the LGVs automatically head to a battery station, where their batteries can be changed out in minutes. The vehicles also direct themselves to a technician station whenever they're due for preventive maintenance.
As for how the LGVs are working out to date, the reviews are positive. "These vehicles have been very impressive," says Arntson. "They provide us with huge labor savings, allowing us to operate this facility with half of the labor of a traditional site."
There are other benefits as well. Because of their precision driving and handling, the LGVs have cut product damage to 10 percent of the typical damage rate for an operation using conventional lift trucks. In a food handling operation, that translates to more than just cost savings. A reduction in product damage means a cleaner facility, which in turn leads to better pest control.
The LGV system is also highly scalable. Vehicles can be easily added as volume grows. The vehicles operate the same way, day in and day out, which will make it simple for Del Monte to predict its vehicle needs based on product throughput projections.
"This LGV system adds consistency to our business," says Arntson. "It is easy for us to calculate the capacities we need. It has really streamlined and smoothed the operation."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."