Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
That may be a reasonable question for trucking executives to ponder as they start 2010. That is,
if they aren't too busy beating each other up over pricing to think through the consequences of
their actions.
As a grinding freight recession ended its third year, the rate environment for truckload and, in
particular, less-than-truckload (LTL) services, continued to weaken. Pricing trends in both
categories deteriorated considerably in the third quarter from the first half of 2009, according
to data culled from company reports and compiled by investment banker JPMorgan Chase. Even
railroad pricing on commodities for which the rails compete with truckload carriers has been
hurt by the weakness in truckload rates, according to the firm. Only ground and express parcel
services showed a sequential pricing improvement through the first three quarters of 2009,
according to the JPMorgan data.
Industry veterans have rarely seen anything like it. Michael Regan, CEO of TranzAct Technologies Inc., an Elmhurst, Ill.-based consultancy that over the years has negotiated and purchased billions of dollars of LTL capacity for shipper clients, says he's seen discounts of as much as 90 percent below retail, or tariff, rates.
The pain is being felt across the carrier spectrum. For example, two of the healthiest LTL
carriers, Old Dominion Freight Line Inc. and Con-way Inc., posted sub-par revenue and net income
results in the third quarter of 2009, with the top executives at both companies attributing their
respective performances to declines in tonnage and aggressive pricing competition.
"Overall, the business environment continues to present formidable challenges, characterized
by weak demand, excess capacity, and pricing pressure. We expect these conditions to persist in
the near term, diminishing the prospects for earnings growth," Con-way President and CEO Douglas
W. Stotlar said in a statement accompanying his company's results.
William D. Zollars, chairman and CEO of YRC Worldwide Inc., the nation's largest LTL carrier,
said he doesn't expect
a meaningful economic or freight rebound during the first half of 2010 and that rate weakness
will likely continue at least through that period. In an interview with TranzAct's Regan, Zollars
said YRC has been disciplined about pricing, noting it increasingly walks away from freight it
deems to be unprofitable.
"We don't want to be acting like our competitors who are 'fire-saleing' things for various
reasons," Zollars said in the interview.
Yet that didn't stop YRC from discounting its rates by as much as one-third through at least
the end of 2009. Jon A. Langenfeld, a transport analyst for Milwaukee-based Robert W. Baird & Co.
who reported the YRC move in a recent research note, said the action represents more "pricing
aggression" that will impede a meaningful recovery in prices and negatively impact LTL
profitability well into 2010.
Self-inflicted wounds
For carriers, the wounds have been largely self-inflicted. Beset by soft freight flows and
persistent overcapacity—the consensus among analysts is that there is 20 percent excess
capacity in the LTL sector—truckers have spent the better part of 2009 slashing rates to
win or keep business.
At the same time, carriers remained loath to remove capacity, keeping the supply-demand scale
firmly tilted in favor of shippers. Satish Jindel, head of SJ Consulting, a Pittsburgh-based
consultancy, says with the exception of YRC, no major LTL carrier took out capacity in more than
single-digit amounts last year. By contrast, YRC removed up to 30 percent of its capacity by
shuttering several regional operations and cutting 190 terminals from its YRC National unit during
the 2009 integration of Yellow Transportation and Roadway Express into the new entity.
Most of the predatory pricing was aimed at
taking share from YRC to drive the financially troubled carrier out of business and eliminate a
large source of supply. However, it appears those plans will have to be put on hold.
A November 2009 agreement under which
YRC's bondholders planned to exchange their debt for 1 billion newly issued equity shares—a
deal that will allow YRC to eliminate nearly $400 million in 2010 interest payments and give it
access to a revolving credit line of more than $100 million—is likely to keep the trucker
afloat at least through the end of 2010. This gives YRC critical breathing space to remain
competitive with a smaller, more efficient network that Zollars said "fits our business volumes
pretty well." At this writing, the swap had yet to be consummated.
Faced with the prospect of a surviving and perhaps recovering YRC, its rivals may take the
pedal off the pricing metal and look for different ways to remain competitive. "We think carriers,
once they realize YRC's financial situation isn't as precarious as it was, may step back and
create some stability in pricing," says Jindel.
That could actually be good news for shippers, who while being the beneficiaries of a
year-long rate gift that kept on giving, understand that in the long run, a carrier's inability
to earn an adequate return may deter it from making the investments needed to deliver a quality
product.
Regan of TranzAct believes shippers have picked most of the low-hanging rate fruit and should
not expect carriers to slash prices much further for fear of failing to cover even their variable
costs. "The bigger shippers have already grabbed the bulk of the savings that are there," he says.
Regan expects LTL rates to remain flat year over year, barring any unexpected developments.
Light at the tunnel's end?
There may be some light at the end of this very dark tunnel. Truckload rates, which normally lead
LTL pricing by many months, appear to have bottomed in late 2009 and are poised for an upward spike. If history is any guide, LTL rates should firm up sometime in 2010.
But these are not ordinary times. Unlike the LTL category, the truckload sector has already seen
a significant reduction in capacity during the recession. LTL overcapacity is likely to remain an
issue even after freight volumes recover.
Another and perhaps more profound trend is a shift in what Jindel called a shipper's "product
characteristics." Tonnage has traditionally been the bread and butter of LTL carriers. Yet the
goods being produced today are lighter and smaller than ever before, leading to painful declines
in tonnage tendered to the carriers.
Jindel says much of this lighter, smaller freight is being increasingly "converted" to
parcel services, a factor that may explain why parcel pricing
held up relatively well through most of 2009. The analyst says the shrinking in cargo size and
weight is a long-term trend, and LTL carriers must reposition their value propositions accordingly
or risk losing more business to parcel companies. "This is a more important long-term issue for LTL
than pricing," he says.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."