Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
That may be a reasonable question for trucking executives to ponder as they start 2010. That is,
if they aren't too busy beating each other up over pricing to think through the consequences of
their actions.
As a grinding freight recession ended its third year, the rate environment for truckload and, in
particular, less-than-truckload (LTL) services, continued to weaken. Pricing trends in both
categories deteriorated considerably in the third quarter from the first half of 2009, according
to data culled from company reports and compiled by investment banker JPMorgan Chase. Even
railroad pricing on commodities for which the rails compete with truckload carriers has been
hurt by the weakness in truckload rates, according to the firm. Only ground and express parcel
services showed a sequential pricing improvement through the first three quarters of 2009,
according to the JPMorgan data.
Industry veterans have rarely seen anything like it. Michael Regan, CEO of TranzAct Technologies Inc., an Elmhurst, Ill.-based consultancy that over the years has negotiated and purchased billions of dollars of LTL capacity for shipper clients, says he's seen discounts of as much as 90 percent below retail, or tariff, rates.
The pain is being felt across the carrier spectrum. For example, two of the healthiest LTL
carriers, Old Dominion Freight Line Inc. and Con-way Inc., posted sub-par revenue and net income
results in the third quarter of 2009, with the top executives at both companies attributing their
respective performances to declines in tonnage and aggressive pricing competition.
"Overall, the business environment continues to present formidable challenges, characterized
by weak demand, excess capacity, and pricing pressure. We expect these conditions to persist in
the near term, diminishing the prospects for earnings growth," Con-way President and CEO Douglas
W. Stotlar said in a statement accompanying his company's results.
William D. Zollars, chairman and CEO of YRC Worldwide Inc., the nation's largest LTL carrier,
said he doesn't expect
a meaningful economic or freight rebound during the first half of 2010 and that rate weakness
will likely continue at least through that period. In an interview with TranzAct's Regan, Zollars
said YRC has been disciplined about pricing, noting it increasingly walks away from freight it
deems to be unprofitable.
"We don't want to be acting like our competitors who are 'fire-saleing' things for various
reasons," Zollars said in the interview.
Yet that didn't stop YRC from discounting its rates by as much as one-third through at least
the end of 2009. Jon A. Langenfeld, a transport analyst for Milwaukee-based Robert W. Baird & Co.
who reported the YRC move in a recent research note, said the action represents more "pricing
aggression" that will impede a meaningful recovery in prices and negatively impact LTL
profitability well into 2010.
Self-inflicted wounds
For carriers, the wounds have been largely self-inflicted. Beset by soft freight flows and
persistent overcapacity—the consensus among analysts is that there is 20 percent excess
capacity in the LTL sector—truckers have spent the better part of 2009 slashing rates to
win or keep business.
At the same time, carriers remained loath to remove capacity, keeping the supply-demand scale
firmly tilted in favor of shippers. Satish Jindel, head of SJ Consulting, a Pittsburgh-based
consultancy, says with the exception of YRC, no major LTL carrier took out capacity in more than
single-digit amounts last year. By contrast, YRC removed up to 30 percent of its capacity by
shuttering several regional operations and cutting 190 terminals from its YRC National unit during
the 2009 integration of Yellow Transportation and Roadway Express into the new entity.
Most of the predatory pricing was aimed at
taking share from YRC to drive the financially troubled carrier out of business and eliminate a
large source of supply. However, it appears those plans will have to be put on hold.
A November 2009 agreement under which
YRC's bondholders planned to exchange their debt for 1 billion newly issued equity shares—a
deal that will allow YRC to eliminate nearly $400 million in 2010 interest payments and give it
access to a revolving credit line of more than $100 million—is likely to keep the trucker
afloat at least through the end of 2010. This gives YRC critical breathing space to remain
competitive with a smaller, more efficient network that Zollars said "fits our business volumes
pretty well." At this writing, the swap had yet to be consummated.
Faced with the prospect of a surviving and perhaps recovering YRC, its rivals may take the
pedal off the pricing metal and look for different ways to remain competitive. "We think carriers,
once they realize YRC's financial situation isn't as precarious as it was, may step back and
create some stability in pricing," says Jindel.
That could actually be good news for shippers, who while being the beneficiaries of a
year-long rate gift that kept on giving, understand that in the long run, a carrier's inability
to earn an adequate return may deter it from making the investments needed to deliver a quality
product.
Regan of TranzAct believes shippers have picked most of the low-hanging rate fruit and should
not expect carriers to slash prices much further for fear of failing to cover even their variable
costs. "The bigger shippers have already grabbed the bulk of the savings that are there," he says.
Regan expects LTL rates to remain flat year over year, barring any unexpected developments.
Light at the tunnel's end?
There may be some light at the end of this very dark tunnel. Truckload rates, which normally lead
LTL pricing by many months, appear to have bottomed in late 2009 and are poised for an upward spike. If history is any guide, LTL rates should firm up sometime in 2010.
But these are not ordinary times. Unlike the LTL category, the truckload sector has already seen
a significant reduction in capacity during the recession. LTL overcapacity is likely to remain an
issue even after freight volumes recover.
Another and perhaps more profound trend is a shift in what Jindel called a shipper's "product
characteristics." Tonnage has traditionally been the bread and butter of LTL carriers. Yet the
goods being produced today are lighter and smaller than ever before, leading to painful declines
in tonnage tendered to the carriers.
Jindel says much of this lighter, smaller freight is being increasingly "converted" to
parcel services, a factor that may explain why parcel pricing
held up relatively well through most of 2009. The analyst says the shrinking in cargo size and
weight is a long-term trend, and LTL carriers must reposition their value propositions accordingly
or risk losing more business to parcel companies. "This is a more important long-term issue for LTL
than pricing," he says.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."