Public-private partnerships touted as answer to logistics labor woes
Industry is desperate for trained logistics employees. Governments want to create jobs. Colleges want students. When they team up on logistics workforce development, everybody wins.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
At a time when scads of logistics experts are looking for work, you'd think it would be easy to find the right people to fill logistics, distribution, and transportation positions. Yet companies still say they face a serious shortage of logistics talent. What gives?
The problem is not a scarcity of executive MBAs, and it's not about simply filling open slots with warm bodies. It's about the lack of knowledgeable, competent people to work in operations—forklift drivers, warehouse supervisors, import/export managers, and just about any other entry- and mid-level logistics position you can think of. These jobs are now viewed as integral components of a complex supply chain, and most require some understanding of technology. By all accounts, there aren't enough people who can perform those functions as they need to be performed in this era of "the perfect order." In short, the demand for logistics-savvy workers has exceeded the supply.
To address this problem, public-private partnerships focused on logistics workforce development are springing up across the country. Industry, academia, and government are collaborating to meet industry's needs while promoting economic and job growth—a formula they think will be a winner for all sides.
Mutual interests
Logistics industry groups have already tried to address the workforce issue. What's different now is the breadth of participation and the recognition that logistics is a critical player in economic development.
For example, North Carolina's Piedmont Triad Logistics and Distribution Roundtable has four objectives: land-use planning, developing the region as a global logistics hub, promoting logistics as a career path for youth, and expanding logistics education programs. The Columbus (Ohio) Region Logistics Council's objectives include fostering a "logistics-friendly" business environment, improving logistics infrastructure, bringing more logistics technology to regional industry, and developing a highly skilled logistics workforce.
These and other public-private groups typically include employers (such as shippers, carriers, and third-party logistics companies), academic institutions, economic development agencies, and local or state governments. All have a vested interest in a knowledgeable logistics workforce. Employers need skilled workers who understand day-to-day operations. Governments want to create jobs—and logistics is one field where jobs are likely to grow. Economic development agencies want to attract business, and a pool of well-trained workers is a powerful incentive. And academic institutions are looking to expand their offerings and serve more students.
Each of these groups brings something to the table, says John Ness, president of ODW Logistics and co-chair of the Columbus Region Logistics Council. "We have learned a lot from the failure of freight-only or private industry-only initiatives that are out of touch with what government, technology, and academia are doing to advance their individual causes for the region's overall benefit," he says.
Leaders of workforce initiatives stress the importance of harnessing the resources of a chamber of commerce or other economic development agency. "We get access to an engine we wouldn't have on our own: the chamber's established process for driving change and influencing government," says Ness, whose group is supported by the Columbus Chamber of Commerce. Both the Columbus Chamber and the Greensboro, N.C.-based Piedmont Triad Partnership, the business development group spearheading that region's logistics initiative, have hired logistics experts to help turn ideas into economic reality.
Not all such public-private groups are local. The state of Michigan recently launched the Michigan Supply Chain Management Development Commission; commissioners include representatives from industry, government, and academia appointed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm. The commission's goal is to influence state transportation and economic development policies. Its immediate task is to develop a statewide plan for attracting, supporting, marketing, and growing the international trade, supply chain, and logistics sectors. Workforce development will be a key component of that effort. That's a natural focus in a state whose economy depends on manufacturing, says commission member John A. Evans, president of Evans Distribution Systems. "In order to have a good environment to encourage manufacturing development, you need good logistics and supply chain management. In order to have good logistics and supply chain capabilities, you need industry. They rely on each other."
Making progress
A look at a few of the public-private logistics workforce initiatives now under way offers a glimpse of how different constituencies are collaborating:
In North Carolina, the Piedmont Triad Partnership has announced plans to build the Piedmont Triad Center for Global Logistics, which will be housed at a new facility at Guilford Technical Community College in Greensboro. Nearly 20 community colleges and four-year colleges and universities, along with shippers, carriers, and business development organizations, are involved in developing certificate, degree, and continuing education programs.
Workforce Florida Inc., an agency that oversees the state's workforce policies, programs, and services, established the Employ Florida Banner Center for Logistics & Distribution. Three educational institutions that operate the center collaborate with a consortium of five other public and private organizations. The center's advisory council includes operations managers from shippers, carriers, ports, and third-party logistics service providers (3PLs) as well as representatives of economic development agencies and the participating colleges and universities.
A diverse group of government agencies, private businesses, and community colleges in the Dallas-Fort Worth area have joined forces to develop a Certified Logistics Associate and Certified Logistics Technician credentialing program. The certifications, designed for both high school and community college students, are administered by the Manufacturing Skill Standards Council. The national training center for certification program instructors is the Tarrant County College Corporate Training Center located at the Alliance Global Logistics Hub.
The Columbus Region Logistics Council's workforce committee provides a forum for businesses to discuss training and skills requirements and learn about logistics education resources in the area. The group also works with educators to develop relevant curricula and helps employment organizations understand logistics career paths.
The logistics advantage
In all of these programs, industry's input continues to be critical. Shippers, carriers, 3PLs, and other companies know what logistics skills are in short supply now and what their businesses will need in the future.
Academic institutions are listening. Community colleges, with their focus on practical application of knowledge, are playing a leading role in logistics curriculum development. They consult with both line managers and senior executives to ensure their course offerings are relevant. "The pattern starts with industry's needs, and we develop a curriculum around that," explains Columbus State Community College professor Mary Vaughn, co-chair of the Columbus Region Logistics Council's workforce development committee.
Ultimately, public-private logistics workforce initiatives will benefit the economy as a whole, many believe. It's not hard to see why: "We're in a unique economic situation, transforming from manufacturing to services," says Mark Richards, vice president of Associated Warehouses Inc. and a former chairman of the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals. "That doesn't change the need for logistics expertise. Regardless of where a product comes from, as a country, we have to be sure we have the most efficient supply chain to maintain our competitive advantage."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."