Five years ago, a facility with a warehouse management system was considered cutting edge. Today, China's top-tier operations are abloom with mobile computers, RFID systems, and wireless
networking devices.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
China's thirst for knowledge about logistics and supply chain technology is evident from the growing number of trade shows showcasing the latest innovations. In 2009, logisticians in China could choose from nearly a dozen events where they could get "full firsthand experience in the charm of modern logistics," as one exhibition company phrased it.
According to TechnomicAsia, the Shanghai-based consulting unit of Tompkins Associates, adoption
of logistics technology in that country is still in the "embryonic" stage, with only about 5
percent of warehouses reporting that they have sufficient IT systems. Some are taking matters into
their own hands, reports Managing Director Steven Ganster in his blog on the company's Web site.
"Many Chinese companies are writing their own WMS programs that are not built to international
standards," he writes.
Still, proven logistics technologies are making inroads. A look at a directory of logistics and
supply chain service offerings in China reveals such familiar names as RedPrairie, Descartes
Systems, HighJump, IBM, Infor, JDA, Manhattan Associates, and SAP, to name just a few. Developers
of other types of warehouse and DC solutions—bar-code readers, RFID systems, wireless
communications, hand-held computers, and more—also are finding success in China.
Some of China's largest manufacturers and third-party logistics service providers (3PLs) have
purchased logistics technology from U.S. and European vendors. Others have gained access to the
technology they want through partnerships. For example, in 2007, China's largest logistics
services company, Sinotrans, struck a deal with National Retail Systems, a U.S.-based logistics
company with a strong technology focus, to form a joint venture called SinoNRS.
There are many more examples of logistics technology adoption in this rapidly growing market
than we can include here. A brief look at just a few of them will provide an idea of the technical
capabilities that are taking root and beginning to blossom in China.
WMS gain early acceptance
Warehouse management systems (WMS) attracted attention early on, in large part because China's
extraordinary export growth quickly overwhelmed manual warehouses and DCs. One of the earliest
WMS installations was by P.G. Logistics, one of China's first and largest 3PLs. In 2003, the 3PL
implemented a WMS from Infor in a distribution center it managed for Phillips Electronics. P.G.
Logistics has since extended the WMS to several other facilities to serve multinational customers
like Kraft Foods, Procter & Gamble, Samsung Electronics, and Unilever.
Other Chinese 3PLs quickly followed suit, incorporating warehousing software into their own
operations. In 2006, for instance, Fanhang Logistics implemented RedPrairie's WMS solution. The
following year, Hongxun Logistics selected HighJump Software's WMS. Tingtong Logistics is currently
rolling out Manhattan Associates' ILS Integrated Logistics Solutions to 50 sites across China.
Earlier this year, Manhattan was named the top WMS provider in Asia by ARC Advisory Group in its
Warehouse Management Systems Worldwide Outlook market analysis. But Western WMS suppliers
should keep an eye out for potential domestic competition. In 2007, China's CDC Corp., a global
software giant, strengthened its WMS offerings when it bought U.S.-based Catalyst International
and folded it into its CDC Supply Chain division.
Follow that container!
Like logistics software, wireless technology and RFID are hot topics in China nowadays. China has
an active RFID association, and the technology is a frequent subject of conference sessions and
workshops. There is even a trade show devoted to radio-frequency identification: the China
International RFID Technologies and Applications Show in Logistics, Manufacturing, and
Anti-counterfeiting.
Given the vast distances between China's population centers and its fractured inland
transportation system, it's no wonder RFID and other tracking and security technologies are
generating interest. Savi Networks is just one of the developers that have jumped on this
opportunity. In August, Savi announced that Shanghai-based Coscon Logistics would begin real-time,
global positioning system (GPS) tracking of both domestic and international shipments using
Savi's sensors.
Another player in container security in China is Powers International, which offers a
satellite-based system. Late last year, Powers began collaborating with European Datacomm-Asia and
Beijing-based Trade-Route to offer EDC-76, a "smart" container that provides origin-to-destination
location and status information.
Wireless communication is showing up inside China's warehouses and DCs. Beijing-based 3PL
Southwest Logistics has gone into wireless in a big way at its Southwest Logistics Center, a
complex of eight warehouses plus offices and employee dormitories scattered throughout Beijing's
Yushuzhuang district. The complex, which totals some 3 million square feet, provides receiving,
storage, packaging, and domestic shipping and distribution services for more than 200 book
publishers.
Southwest Logistics turned to wireless to solve two problems. First, some of the buildings are
far apart geographically, and all of them are in a congested part of the city, which made it
difficult to share information between the various locations. Second, the 3PL's rapid business
growth had outstripped its manual warehouse operation's ability to keep up with demand. The
company decided it needed a single, robust data network that could connect storehouses, offices,
and residences. Also on its wish list: wireless access for hand-held terminals and security systems.
Finally, it all had to be part of an integrated solution that could provide high-capacity bandwidth
to ensure uninterrupted Internet access for transmission of voice, video, and data—not to mention
extensive Wi-Fi coverage that could be easily expanded to accommodate the company's growth.
The Azalea wireless mesh network connects the Southwest Logistics Center buildings shown here in blue.
That was a lot to ask, but the supplier Southwest Logistics chose, Azalea Networks, had done it
all before: Azalea was the principal provider of equipment for the "Wireless Beijing" project that
established wireless broadband access across a 30-mile swath of the city during the 2008 Olympic
Games.
The solution for the Southwest Logistics Center was "mesh" technology—a combination of
outdoor and indoor wireless routers, with one or two routers per geographic zone to ensure coverage
in all directions. Each router includes multiple radios, which allows different types of traffic to
flow to and from the main network through the same router.
With the secure wireless network in place, Southwest Logistics' staff can access warehouse and
logistics information via hand-held computers from any company location. They can also transmit
data via their wireless terminals to the company's WMS. The wireless system additionally gave
Southwest Logistics more flexibility when it came to locating video surveillance cameras, leading
to better security at the warehouses. Furthermore, because voice and data communications travel
over the same network, employees can make free voice calls anywhere within the company's network,
which has significantly reduced communication costs.
Demand will grow
Some of the installations described here are as good as any you'll find elsewhere in the world. But
if you've done business in China, you know that those examples are not representative of the
average warehouse in that country.
It's likely, though, that software, RFID, wireless, and other logistics technologies will
quickly gain currency in China. For one thing, the domestic third-party logistics industry will
have to adopt the latest applications in order to compete with 3PLs that have brought their own
systems with them from North America, Europe, and elsewhere in Asia. For another, foreign companies
that do business in China expect to get the same kind of supply chain data there that they do in
other markets.
The Chinese consumer will have as much to say about it as anyone. As the country's middle class
grows and its standard of living rises, consumers will demand more consistent, reliable delivery of
their orders—and they won't get it without modern logistics information systems.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."