With a deadline less than three years away, a team of U.S. Army specialists is racing to bring the Iraqi Army up to speed on military logistics. Despite a Humvee-load of challenges, it's on track to meet that goal.
Steve Geary is adjunct faculty at the University of Tennessee's Haaslam College of Business and is a lecturer at The Gordon Institute at Tufts University. He is the President of the Supply Chain Visions family of companies, consultancies that work across the government sector. Steve is a contributing editor at DC Velocity, and editor-at-large for CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
At a U.S. military outpost some 60 miles northwest of Baghdad, the U.S. Army's First Sustainment
Brigade is engaged in a little-publicized but crucially important part of the program to bring U.S.
forces home from Iraq.
The brigade has the job of helping the Iraqi Army develop something it currently lacks—a
logistics capability.
Before they can safely exit, the coalition forces must ensure that they're leaving behind a
self-reliant Iraqi Security Force—one with a solid grasp of military logistics. The First's
mission is to provide support for that effort and an umbrella while the instruction is under way,
and it has less than three years to pull it off. Now that's a training challenge!
The First is located at Camp Taji, a former base for the Republican Guard. It has a complement of
85 soldiers divided into four Logistics Training and Advisory Teams that work with Iraqi units of
some 1,200 men.
The teams partner with Iraq's Taji Location Command and General Transportation Regiment
(GTR), which is at the center of the emerging logistics capability. Since Sept. 1, the GTR has had
the responsibility of distributing all classes of supplies to location commands positioned
throughout Iraq as well as maintenance facilities at Taji and Rustamiyah in eastern Baghdad.
Capt. Audrey Iriberri was one of the soldiers at the heart of the effort. The Manhattan native
and 2005 graduate of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point served as deputy commander of
one of the First Brigade's advisory teams and worked with the command staff of the Iraqi
Army's Taji Location Command before returning home late last year.
Speaking to DC VELOCITY while still deployed in Iraq, Iriberri said that to be successful, the
American advisers have to understand the way the Iraqi Army works. "Iraqi Army logistics is
very centralized on the leaders," she explained. "All of their supply, maintenance, and transportation
orders come from the top, from the Ministry of Defense." She described the Iraqi soldiers
the First mentors as a group with a very diverse mix of experience—ranging from veteran
officers to brand-new privates.
According to Iriberri, providing advice in this context requires flexibility. "It is a little bit
of adopting some of the new techniques that they have seen used in coalition logistics and also
using some of the doctrine that they have established in their old army."
The challenge, she added, is learning the Iraqi approach, accepting it for what it is, and resisting
the impulse "to impose what we believe is right and what works in our army [on the Iraqis]." The
goal, she emphasized, is to "make them stress their own system and find their own solution—an Iraqi solution to an Iraqi problem."
Iriberri was optimistic about the prospects for success. "The Iraqi Army has put its best foot
forward in trying to re-create its logistics system," she said. "[For example,] the Taji third-line
maintenance facility commander has been in the maintenance field his entire career, over 20 years,
and the same with the transportation officers."
Training from the back seat
Capt. Iriberri's task was often a delicate one. She was a junior
captain who dealt with Iraqi colonels and generals, which required more than a little tact and
diplomacy.
Asked about a typical day, Capt. Iriberri said her workday frequently began with a visit to
General Sabah, with an interpreter in tow. "General Sabah would insist on having chai [tea]," she
said. "We would have tea and I would ask, 'When is the GTR arriving on Taji? Is the GTR arriving on
Taji? How many people are coming with them, and how many vehicles are coming with them? Do they have
a place to live? Does that place have beds? Does that place have power? How will they eat?' So a lot
of it was just figuring out life support for the unit."
Her goal, she said, was to find out "to what extent that commander had doctrine already set in
his mind and [come up with] a standard operating procedure for his unit to figure out what kind of
training support we would be required to provide." Using the information she gleaned from her
discussions with the general, Iriberri would determine whether the advisory team needed to provide
technical assistance in establishing procedures from scratch, or if the team needed to learn an Iraqi
system so it could identify areas for support. Training could then be precisely targeted to specific
tasks, such as hand and arm signals for safety or appropriate tie-downs on vehicles to prevent
rollovers.
Often, her role included gaining the confidence of Iraqi officers. "I could tell how a situation
was going to go because every time I was introduced to an Iraqi officer, I extended my hand," she
said. "There were times when they didn't take it, and that is fine. I just knew how it was going to
go. It didn't change how I dealt with them as an American officer, so I would continue with what I
had to say, what my business was, what command I represented, and what kind of support we would be
able to provide. At the end of the conversation, I would always extend my hand again and never in
the time I was there did the conversation end without a handshake."
Putting U.S. mentors out of a job
Each meeting can be seen as a small step toward the larger goal of ensuring that the GTR is prepared
to handle critical army logistics on its own when the U.S. forces inevitably depart.
Capt. Donna Johnson, who has served as the Logistics Training Assessment Team officer in charge
for the GTR, laid out the objectives in a prepared statement released by the Army last fall. "The
purpose of GTR will be to push critical supplies from the ports of embarkation, such
as the seaport, airport, and neighboring countries, to the Taji National Depot on Camp Taji," she
said. "From there, they transport equipment to the 12 location commands all over Iraq, which means
the GTR has a huge role in getting the supplies distributed throughout the Iraqi theater of
operations."
In that same press release, a commander of the GTR, a colonel who goes by the single name
Muhammad, added, "We will transport supplies, vehicle parts from the border of Jordan, Syria, and
Kuwait or any border to the depot here on Taji for distribution to Iraqi Army location
commands. The mission is to improve the movement of supplies, parts, and troops needed to help
sustain the soldiers of the Iraqi Army."
Asked about the progress to date, Iriberri sounded like a proud parent, describing the GTR as
"genuinely self-reliant in executing certain tasks. They receive their missions from the Ministry
of Defense. They go outside the wire with their own convoy security elements. They execute and
return without incident. So, in terms of the missions they have received so far, they are doing well
without coalition support outside the wire.
"So many times you hear that the Iraqi Army is not ready to execute things on its own. But there
is success. The GTR is the first and only unit of its kind—completely Iraqi run. We are not
physically with them when they go outside the wire, but they have so far accomplished all of their
missions. So it is a very good news story."
Reflecting on her time in Iraq, Iriberri said, "I just want to let you know and let
people know that the Iraqi security forces are trying to better themselves and make
it so that the Americans are working themselves out of a job. We would like it
so that we could train the Iraqi Army and make it so that their system works for
them their way. That is it."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."