Faced with mounting customer demands for swift order turnaround and perfect accuracy, swimsuit manufacturer A.H. Schreiber took a deep breath and invested in an automated labeling and sortation system.
Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
A.H. Schreiber may not be a household name, but millions of women and girls know its products. The privately held company is one of the nation's largest manufacturers and distributors of women's and girls' swimwear, producing some 14 million swimsuits each year under brand names like Badgley Mischka, Beach Native, Delta Burke, and Longitude.
Schreiber distributes all of its swimwear from a 176,000-square-foot distribution center in Bristol, Tenn., shipping about 900,000 cartons each year to customers throughout the country. "We distribute swimwear to virtually anyone who sells it, from the surfside shop to major department stores," says Sandy Nash, the company's warehouse manager.
For years, the company relied on manual processes to fill all of those orders, literally lining up cartons on the floor and sending workers around to apply shipping labels by hand. But about three years ago, it realized that would no longer be enough to keep up with the demands of one of its largest customers, Target.
Like most retailers, Target expects its suppliers to conform to strict specifications when it comes to labeling and delivering shipments to its 26 DCs, and it requires swift turnaround of even the largest, most complex orders. As Schreiber struggled to comply with all of Target's demands, its overtime costs soared and accuracy began to suffer. It was clear that the company was going to have to make some changes.
Man vs. machine Although the swimwear maker was fully committed to meeting Target's demands, the Schreiber team knew it wouldn't be easy. Schreiber ships a total of eight to 10 trailerloads to Target a week— sending shipments three times a week during peak season and twice weekly the rest of the time. Turnaround times are tight: From the time Target sends the Schreiber corporate office an order, the company has just three days to the ship date. "We receive pick tickets on Monday and ship Wednesday, or we receive pick tickets on Wednesday and ship Friday," Nash says. "We know the destination at that time, but we do not know which DCs' [orders] will be combined together in a load until later in the process."
The tight deadlines put a lot of stress on Schreiber's order fulfillment operation. "Our old method of handling Target orders was to actually pull all the product and line it up on the floor," Nash says. "It took up a tremendous amount of floor space. We would have people taking labels and going skid to skid applying labels to cartons and transferring the cartons to another skid. To accomplish this required a lot of people and a lot of overtime."
The manual system also led to mislabeling, which resulted in chargebacks from the customer. "We had to be faster and more accurate," Nash says.
To address these problems, Schreiber decided to invest in an automated labeling and sortation system to handle the Target orders. Nash is candid about the reasoning. "Any time you use a machine instead of a person, you become more reliable and accurate, and you save on labor," he says.
After reviewing its options, the company decided to go with a compliance labeling and carton sortation system from Cornerstone Automation Systems Inc., or CASI. The system provides automatic shipping labeling, a software interface to Schreiber's software management system, and sortation software plus hardware that includes accumulation conveyor, scanners, a bi-directional heavy-duty case sortation system, and label applicators.
The system was installed about three years ago.
Scan, sort, repeat Today, Target's orders flow smoothly through the facility with minimal human intervention. Orders received from the retailer are released from Schreiber's homegrown enterprise resource planning (ERP) system to the CASI system. The Schreiber system produces a separate pick ticket for each destination DC. Workers scan the cartons as they place them onto an accumulation conveyor, where the cartons are staged in zones ahead of the labeling section. The system spaces the cartons for optimum system speed and squares up the cartons to ensure proper label application.
In-line scanners read the Schreiber bar code and send that information back to the ERP system, which then identifies the product and relays the information to the printer. The printer produces a Uniform Code Council (UCC) 128 compliance bar-code label in the customer's preferred format and applies it according to the customer's requirements. (In Target's case, that means that on cartons less than five inches tall, the label must be applied one inch from the bottom.) Another scanner reads the label to ensure it is legible and in the right location.
The cartons then move to the sorter, where they are diverted onto a gravity conveyor to one of eight outbound lanes.
Each of those lanes is set up for three Target distribution centers.
Going for an A To date, Schreiber has realized multiple benefits from the CASI system. To begin with, accuracy problems are history, says Nash. "Now, the carton is automatically routed to the correct DC, and we have the correct labels with the correct products," he says. "We have seen a reduction in chargebacks. We have also seen a side benefit. When we had hand-applied labels, it took half a day just to print the labels." Installing the machines has shortened and simplified the process, he reports.
Along with boosting accuracy, the new system has enabled Schreiber to reduce both headcount and overtime. The savings in labor and compliance costs from the Target account alone paid for the system in less than two years, according to Nash.
Based on its positive experience with the Target orders, A.H. Schreiber recently expanded the system to include orders from JC Penney, another major customer. Penney, Nash says, is in some ways more demanding than Target. Because of the way the company's transportation management system (TMS) handles routing, Schreiber has about 24 hours to turn around an order.
Adding Penney to the system required some modification. For example, Schreiber had to add another in-line printer that could apply a label to the top of a carton (as opposed to the side) to meet Penney's requirements.
Incorporating Penney's orders into the system also slowed the operation down. The system had initially handled about 20 cartons a minute, or about 1,200 per hour, Nash says. Modifications made to the system to accommodate the Penney orders have cut that to about 800 an hour. Even so, Nash remains pleased with the performance of the CASI system, which now handles about 20 percent of the DC's total output. And he considers the equipment purchased to meet Penney's needs to be money well spent. In fact, Nash is certain that Schreiber got a return on that investment in the current peak shipping season (which runs roughly from the end of November through June).
Beyond the monetary savings, Nash sees one further benefit to using the CASI system that's not easily quantified but may prove to be the most important of all: customer retention. "We have report cards with every customer," he says, referring to the retailers' practice of grading suppliers on compliance. "We want to be an A supplier." Nash explains that in the high-stakes retail business, earning top marks is more than a matter of pride. At a time when some retailers are eliminating their third- and fourth-tier suppliers, good compliance scores can be essential to keeping the business.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."
Businesses are cautiously optimistic as peak holiday shipping season draws near, with many anticipating year-over-year sales increases as they continue to battle challenging supply chain conditions.
That’s according to the DHL 2024 Peak Season Shipping Survey, released today by express shipping service provider DHL Express U.S. The company surveyed small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to gauge their holiday business outlook compared to last year and found that a mix of optimism and “strategic caution” prevail ahead of this year’s peak.
Nearly half (48%) of the SMEs surveyed said they expect higher holiday sales compared to 2023, while 44% said they expect sales to remain on par with last year, and just 8% said they foresee a decline. Respondents said the main challenges to hitting those goals are supply chain problems (35%), inflation and fluctuating consumer demand (34%), staffing (16%), and inventory challenges (14%).
But respondents said they have strategies in place to tackle those issues. Many said they began preparing for holiday season earlier this year—with 45% saying they started planning in Q2 or earlier, up from 39% last year. Other strategies include expanding into international markets (35%) and leveraging holiday discounts (32%).
Sixty percent of respondents said they will prioritize personalized customer service as a way to enhance customer interactions and loyalty this year. Still others said they will invest in enhanced web and mobile experiences (23%) and eco-friendly practices (13%) to draw customers this holiday season.