Art van Bodegraven was, among other roles, chief design officer for the DES Leadership Academy. He passed away on June 18, 2017. He will be greatly missed.
Last month, we looked at the various types of management consultants operating in the supply chain management arena, from giant international corporations to one-man or one-woman shops. Now, let's examine, albeit briefly, what they can do and how to find one that fits your needs.
Why do businesses need consultants? There are lots of good reasons—a shortage of internal resources, for example, or a lack of specific internal experience. Sometimes it's a desire for a fresh perspective or advice from someone with knowledge of and access to best practices. Many times, businesses find it helpful to bring in consultants who have experience with specific technology solutions (like analytic and decision support tools) or a specific service provider in order to shorten the learning curve and ease the transition.
Within the supply chain management sphere of operations, there are a number of activities in which consultants— real honest-to-goodness management consultants— can add genuine value. These include:
Creating a conceptual overall supply chain design
Designing a physical distribution network
Creating supply chain strategies for service and performance for the overall supply chain or for specific components
Logistics service provider (LSP)/3PL evaluation, selection, contracting, and management
Litigation support, on either a plaintiff or defendant basis
Across-the-board or targeted cost-reduction analysis and implementation
Transportation management analysis and improvement
Facility operations improvement
Facility retrofit and upgrade
Facility location
Software evaluation, selection, and implementation
Training and education in supply chain management concepts and components
Metrics design, implementation, and analysis
Supplier management programs
Process design/re-engineering
Due diligence on other studies (the "insurance policy")
Performance management (productivity) programs.
The list could be longer—much longer—but you get the drift. The trick is to find the right consultant for the right problem. Maybe a consultant can help with that task, too— really, we're serious.
Finding the right consultant
How do you select a consultant? What's important in a consulting relationship? And where do you find one in the first place? We'll struggle to respond to these questions without being too self-serving (we hope).
First, consider what type of consultancy you're looking for. If your organization is culturally welded to a mega-firm approach, it's usually pointless to open the bidding to a lot of sole practitioners. On the other hand, if the organization is confident and secure, the sole practitioner can be marvelously time- and cost-effective. If the problem has some complexity, the small/mid-sized firm, or a team of sole practitioners, can be the right way to go.
As for how to find a consultant, there are many options. One is to use directories. The Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals has one, but it is incomplete.
Another method—actually an excellent way—is to talk with industry peers. Networking in your professional community is also a good way to get the lowdown on consulting professionals.
Yet another option is to go to the Internet, which is currently generating consulting contacts at a level undreamed of just a couple of years ago. Anybody worth anything has a Web site. A cautionary note: Concentrate on Web site content versus gee-whiz site design and graphic effects. Emphasis on the superficial might be more revealing than the firm involved realizes.
But how do you know whether a consultant is any good? Competence can be evaluated from references and from experience. Experience means stuff the actual people on the job have actually done, hands on, not the endless list of organizational qualifications. Cautionary note: IT application experience is not the same as operating experience.
Presuming competency, the final selection will generally come down to cHemiätry, style, and comfort. Typically, you are going to be working with the consultant(s) for some time. Tolerance of a style mismatch wears very thin, very quickly.
There are a few additional points. As you evaluate the possibilities, look for a good listener, one who's more interested in you and your business than in his own credentials.
Take that a step further and try to ferret out whether he or she is comfortable departing from the script when an unexpected comment or subject pops up.
A grim reality
One of the dirty little secrets of the consulting business is turnover, which can only be described as incredible. The average consulting career is shorter than that of an NFL player: less than three years. The mega-firms, particularly, chew 'em up and spit 'em out. It's a tough lifestyle; tough on the individual, tougher on families.
Even the "career" consultants don't tend to stay in one place for long. Most bounce from firm to firm, a few years here and a few years there. Although those who have successful small firms tend to stay in the game longer, very, very few establish long careers at one organization.
So, the odds are good that the consultant you really liked last time is no longer a consultant, and the probability that he or she is still with the same organization is somewhere south of No Chance.
As much as we believe in the value and potential efficacy of consultants in helping clients achieve supply chain excellence, it can be overdone. The average company doesn't need consultants to answer every question. And it might not need large numbers of them, if the consultant is inclined to leverage knowledge and experience through the efforts of internal teams.
It's a bit reminiscent of those interesting people on talk radio's "Dr. Laura" show who answer their own questions before the call is over. The solution frequently lies within the company, and it may only take a little probing and direction to get the organization on the right path.
Logistics real estate developer Prologis today named a new chief executive, saying the company’s current president, Dan Letter, will succeed CEO and co-founder Hamid Moghadam when he steps down in about a year.
After retiring on January 1, 2026, Moghadam will continue as San Francisco-based Prologis’ executive chairman, providing strategic guidance. According to the company, Moghadam co-founded Prologis’ predecessor, AMB Property Corporation, in 1983. Under his leadership, the company grew from a startup to a global leader, with a successful IPO in 1997 and its merger with ProLogis in 2011.
Letter has been with Prologis since 2004, and before being president served as global head of capital deployment, where he had responsibility for the company’s Investment Committee, deployment pipeline management, and multi-market portfolio acquisitions and dispositions.
Irving F. “Bud” Lyons, lead independent director for Prologis’ Board of Directors, said: “We are deeply grateful for Hamid’s transformative leadership. Hamid’s 40-plus-year tenure—starting as an entrepreneurial co-founder and evolving into the CEO of a major public company—is a rare achievement in today’s corporate world. We are confident that Dan is the right leader to guide Prologis in its next chapter, and this transition underscores the strength and continuity of our leadership team.”
The New York-based industrial artificial intelligence (AI) provider Augury has raised $75 million for its process optimization tools for manufacturers, in a deal that values the company at more than $1 billion, the firm said today.
According to Augury, its goal is deliver a new generation of AI solutions that provide the accuracy and reliability manufacturers need to make AI a trusted partner in every phase of the manufacturing process.
The “series F” venture capital round was led by Lightrock, with participation from several of Augury’s existing investors; Insight Partners, Eclipse, and Qumra Capital as well as Schneider Electric Ventures and Qualcomm Ventures. In addition to securing the new funding, Augury also said it has added Elan Greenberg as Chief Operating Officer.
“Augury is at the forefront of digitalizing equipment maintenance with AI-driven solutions that enhance cost efficiency, sustainability performance, and energy savings,” Ashish (Ash) Puri, Partner at Lightrock, said in a release. “Their predictive maintenance technology, boasting 99.9% failure detection accuracy and a 5-20x ROI when deployed at scale, significantly reduces downtime and energy consumption for its blue-chip clients globally, offering a compelling value proposition.”
The money supports the firm’s approach of "Hybrid Autonomous Mobile Robotics (Hybrid AMRs)," which integrate the intelligence of "Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs)" with the precision and structure of "Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs)."
According to Anscer, it supports the acceleration to Industry 4.0 by ensuring that its autonomous solutions seamlessly integrate with customers’ existing infrastructures to help transform material handling and warehouse automation.
Leading the new U.S. office will be Mark Messina, who was named this week as Anscer’s Managing Director & CEO, Americas. He has been tasked with leading the firm’s expansion by bringing its automation solutions to industries such as manufacturing, logistics, retail, food & beverage, and third-party logistics (3PL).
Supply chains continue to deal with a growing volume of returns following the holiday peak season, and 2024 was no exception. Recent survey data from product information management technology company Akeneo showed that 65% of shoppers made holiday returns this year, with most reporting that their experience played a large role in their reason for doing so.
The survey—which included information from more than 1,000 U.S. consumers gathered in January—provides insight into the main reasons consumers return products, generational differences in return and online shopping behaviors, and the steadily growing influence that sustainability has on consumers.
Among the results, 62% of consumers said that having more accurate product information upfront would reduce their likelihood of making a return, and 59% said they had made a return specifically because the online product description was misleading or inaccurate.
And when it comes to making those returns, 65% of respondents said they would prefer to return in-store, if possible, followed by 22% who said they prefer to ship products back.
“This indicates that consumers are gravitating toward the most sustainable option by reducing additional shipping,” the survey authors said in a statement announcing the findings, adding that 68% of respondents said they are aware of the environmental impact of returns, and 39% said the environmental impact factors into their decision to make a return or exchange.
The authors also said that investing in the product experience and providing reliable product data can help brands reduce returns, increase loyalty, and provide the best customer experience possible alongside profitability.
When asked what products they return the most, 60% of respondents said clothing items. Sizing issues were the number one reason for those returns (58%) followed by conflicting or lack of customer reviews (35%). In addition, 34% cited misleading product images and 29% pointed to inaccurate product information online as reasons for returning items.
More than 60% of respondents said that having more reliable information would reduce the likelihood of making a return.
“Whether customers are shopping directly from a brand website or on the hundreds of e-commerce marketplaces available today [such as Amazon, Walmart, etc.] the product experience must remain consistent, complete and accurate to instill brand trust and loyalty,” the authors said.
When you get the chance to automate your distribution center, take it.
That's exactly what leaders at interior design house
Thibaut Design did when they relocated operations from two New Jersey distribution centers (DCs) into a single facility in Charlotte, North Carolina, in 2019. Moving to an "empty shell of a building," as Thibaut's Michael Fechter describes it, was the perfect time to switch from a manual picking system to an automated one—in this case, one that would be driven by voice-directed technology.
"We were 100% paper-based picking in New Jersey," Fechter, the company's vice president of distribution and technology, explained in a
case study published by Voxware last year. "We knew there was a need for automation, and when we moved to Charlotte, we wanted to implement that technology."
Fechter cites Voxware's promise of simple and easy integration, configuration, use, and training as some of the key reasons Thibaut's leaders chose the system. Since implementing the voice technology, the company has streamlined its fulfillment process and can onboard and cross-train warehouse employees in a fraction of the time it used to take back in New Jersey.
And the results speak for themselves.
"We've seen incredible gains [from a] productivity standpoint," Fechter reports. "A 50% increase from pre-implementation to today."
THE NEED FOR SPEED
Thibaut was founded in 1886 and is the oldest operating wallpaper company in the United States, according to Fechter. The company works with a global network of designers, shipping samples of wallpaper and fabrics around the world.
For the design house's warehouse associates, picking, packing, and shipping thousands of samples every day was a cumbersome, labor-intensive process—and one that was prone to inaccuracy. With its paper-based picking system, mispicks were common—Fechter cites a 2% to 5% mispick rate—which necessitated stationing an extra associate at each pack station to check that orders were accurate before they left the facility.
All that has changed since implementing Voxware's Voice Management Suite (VMS) at the Charlotte DC. The system automates the workflow and guides associates through the picking process via a headset, using voice commands. The hands-free, eyes-free solution allows workers to focus on locating and selecting the right item, with no paper-based lists to check or written instructions to follow.
Thibaut also uses the tech provider's analytics tool, VoxPilot, to monitor work progress, check orders, and keep track of incoming work—managers can see what orders are open, what's in process, and what's completed for the day, for example. And it uses VoxTempo, the system's natural language voice recognition (NLVR) solution, to streamline training. The intuitive app whittles training time down to minutes and gets associates up and working fast—and Thibaut hitting minimum productivity targets within hours, according to Fechter.
EXPECTED RESULTS REALIZED
Key benefits of the project include a reduction in mispicks—which have dropped to zero—and the elimination of those extra quality-control measures Thibaut needed in the New Jersey DCs.
"We've gotten to the point where we don't even measure mispicks today—because there are none," Fechter said in the case study. "Having an extra person at a pack station to [check] every order before we pack [it]—that's been eliminated. Not only is the pick right the first time, but [the order] also gets packed and shipped faster than ever before."
The system has increased inventory accuracy as well. According to Fechter, it's now "well over 99.9%."