Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
The economy may be in freefall, but logistics salaries appear to be holding their own …for the most part anyway. About onethird of the 1,148 logistics professionals who responded to our fourth annual salary survey in February said their total annual compensation had stayed the same in the previous 12 months. And more than half (53 percent) said their annual compensation had actually increased—better than you might expect considering the headlines of late.
Not everyone was so fortunate, though. About 14 percent of the respondents said they were making less than they did the previous year. That's a significant jump compared to 2008's survey, when only 3 percent of respondents said their pay had fallen during the past 12 months. This group most likely includes people who are unemployed, have taken a pay cut, or have taken a lowerpaying position after losing their previous job. In fact, no matter how you looked at the data, median and average salaries were down slightly almost across the board.
Hard labor
Their paychecks may be smaller, but readers are working as hard as ever. Only 25 percent of those who took part in the salary survey said they worked 40 hours or less during the average week. Another 68 percent said they typically worked 46 to 60 hours a week (including time spent working outside the office). A harried 7 percent can't seem to tear themselves away, devoting more than 60 hours a week to their jobs. And it doesn't seem to matter much what your title, industry, or location may be—with 87 percent of respondents reporting that their work hours had increased or stayed the same, almost everyone is putting their nose to the grindstone these days.
That's partly because many people in this field have more responsibilities than they did in the past. Sixtysix percent of the survey respondents, in fact, reported that the number of functions they manage has increased over the past three years. Another 29 percent said their responsibilities had stayed the same, and 5 percent reported a decrease. The typical reader, moreover, is no longer responsible for a single function. Plenty of respondents said they carried responsibility for three or more of the six functions mentioned in the survey (see the sidebar). The greater the number of functions you oversee, of course, the more people to manage. No surprise, then, that 61 percent of the survey respondents said they had five or more direct reports.
So what kind of compensation are readers being paid for those long hours and growing lists of responsibilities? As we noted earlier, in many cases, it's less than they made before. The average salary this year was $97,776 (down from $105,834 the previous year), while the median salary was $83,000—some $6,000 less than the median in last year's survey.
That downward slide is due in part to the record number of respondents (14 percent) whose pay declined in the previous 12 months. Yet some respondents appear to be holding steady or even doing a bit better than in the past. Thirty-three percent said their pay had not changed over the previous year, and a fortunate 53 percent brought home more bacon during that same period. The latter reported an average increase of 5.5 percent over the previous year (the median was 3.6 percent). It's important to note that those numbers reflect more than just annual raises. Sixty-one percent of all respondents reported that at least part of their total compensation was based on performance.
Title bout
With respondents reporting a wide range of titles and responsibilities (see the sidebar), it's inevitable that our survey would show a significant range in salaries. For the most part, the latest results are similar to patterns we've been seeing all along. One interesting exception: The biggest paychecks this year did not go to the highest-level executives. The three highest-paid readers all identified themselves as managers; they hailed from the pharmaceutical and health care ($980,000), wholesale/retail ($950,000), and food and grocery ($900,000) industries. The three lowest earners, who came from the wholesale/retail and electronics/electrical equipment and components industries, brought home between $10,000 and $12,000—unusually low numbers that may reflect job losses or part-time work.
It's impossible to know whether that nearly million-dollar differential is an anomaly or signals some new trend. But in most cases, job title is still the biggest factor in determining the size of your paycheck.
Which titles pay the most on average? As was the case last year, vice presidents were at the top of the salary ladder. The median salary for VP-level respondents was $144,000—5 percent higher than the median salary of those next in line, corporate officers. Presidents and directors came next, with median salaries of $120,000 and $104,000, respectively.
From there, it's a big jump down to the lower levels. Managers made $28,000 less than directors, and supervisors earned $19,000 less than managers. Exhibit 1 shows the median salary and average salary for each title (we've used the median numbers, rather than the averages, as the basis for comparison because they are less likely to be skewed by statistical extremes).
Experience and education count
Job title may carry the most weight, but many other factors influence how much an individual logistics or supply chain professional makes. The region where you work, your level of education, and how long you've been in the business will typically play a big role in determining your salary.
Let's start with geographic region. As Exhibit 2 shows, this year, the highest median salary was found in the Western states, where the median pay was $87,500. The Middle Atlantic region paid second best, with a median salary of $85,700. Managers working in the Lower 48 did considerably better than their counterparts in Hawaii, Alaska, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, where the median salary was just $63,000.
Did your parents push you to get an advanced degree so you would make more money? Well, they knew what they were doing. Exhibit 3 illustrates the strong correlation between earnings and education. The median salary for respondents with only a highschool diploma was $67,000. With a median salary of $145,000, those who have earned a doctorate take home more than twice as much.
Experience in the field also influences earnings (see Exhibit 4). The median salary of newcomers to the profession (those with five or fewer years of experience in logistics) was $66,650. Those at the other end of the scale (respondents with more than 25 years' experience) command a hefty premium for their expertise. With a median salary of $100,000, the veterans outearned the newcomers by about 50 percent.
Grab bag
A grab bag of other factors can have an influence on salaries. Our survey found that a respondent's age and gender, the size of the company he or she works for, and the length of his or her tenure with the current employer can make a difference.
Take age, for example. It seems logical that median salaries should increase with age; as Exhibit 5 shows, that is true, although the differences start to taper off once respondents reach their mid50s. The median salaries for respondents aged 56 to 60 ($89,000) and for those over 60 were separated by just a few hundred dollars.
For as long as salary surveys have been around, women have lagged behind men in terms of their compensation. As Exhibit 6 shows, the difference in median salaries this year was $20,000, or 31 percent. The persistent gender gap appears to be based to some degree on experience. Sixtyfive percent of the women who responded to this year's survey had 15 years' experience or less, compared to 40 percent of the men.
The size of the company you work for makes a difference in your salary (see Exhibit 7). As you might expect, small businesses—those with fewer than 100 employees—pay the least, a median salary of $75,000. Working for a slightly larger company will get you a slightly larger salary—$2,500 more, to be precise. From there, it's a steady step upward to the large corporations that pay a median salary of $95,000.
When it comes to pay, the length of respondents' tenure with their current employers seems to be less important than you might expect. As Exhibit 8 shows, our survey found only a weak correlation between them. As has been true in past years, salaries do not necessarily increase with the number of years with a particular employer. This year, median salaries for those with 11 to 20 years of service with their current employer dipped below those of more recent arrivals. The most senior people, however, outpaced the rest of their colleagues by several thousand dollars.
Glimmer of hope
As anyone who's ever undergone a salary review well knows, there are countless other variables that might influence a person's salary—job performance, departmental budget, and perks and benefits, to name a few. But generally speaking, the primary factors in determining salary are title, geographic region, education, experience, age, company size, and gender.
What does that mean for those eager to boost their earnings? Well, there's not much you can do about your age or gender. But if you suspect your location or a lack of schooling might be holding you back, you can think about moving to a different part of the country or going back to school. But be realistic: In the current economy, even tactics that were once considered tried and true may not pay off.
It's clear that the salaries reflect what's happening in the economy at large. As orders and shipping volumes decline, companies are discontinuing bonuses and cutting compensation. Don't give up hope, though. More than half of the survey respondents saw their pay increase, albeit by a pretty slim percentage. And when times get tough, smart companies take a fresh look at their operations to find efficiencies and cost savings. Who better to take on that mission and prove their worth than logistics and distribution pros?
who are you?
The results of DC VELOCITY's fourth annual salary survey once again offer a comprehensive portrait of our readers. The study was based on the responses of 1,148 subscribers who completed a 20-question survey in February. The survey respondents came from a broad swath of industries—everything from wholesale/retail (27 percent), third-party logistics services (10 percent), and food and grocery (8 percent) to pharmaceuticals and health care (5 percent), consumer packaged goods (6 percent), and apparel and footwear (4 percent).
All of the respondents classified themselves as having some sort of managerial responsibility. At the higher levels, 3 percent said they were corporate officers (CEOs, COOs, CFOs), another 3 percent identified themselves as presidents, 9 percent were vice presidents, and 20 percent were directors. The largest group, 53 percent, described themselves simply as managers, followed by the 12 percent who said they were supervisors.
Respondents represented companies of all sizes, from the 21 percent who were employed by businesses with fewer than 100 employees, all the way up to the 29 percent who worked for companies with more than 5,000 employees. Thirty-three percent worked for midsized companies that employ anywhere from 100 to 1,000 people, and 17 percent worked for organizations employing 1,001 to 5,000 people. The respondents' companies were located throughout the United States, as well as in Canada and Mexico.
Our survey asked respondents to identify the functions they managed. The overwhelming majority of the survey-takers indicated that they had multiple areas of responsibility. Warehouse and/or distribution center management was the most frequent answer, cited by nearly three-fourths (73 percent) of the respondents. Logistics management (60 percent) was close behind, followed by supply chain management (50 percent), transportation management (52 percent), import/export operations (26 percent), and fleet operations (22 percent).
As for the respondents themselves, the vast majority (88 percent) were male; just 12 percent were female. Some were relative newcomers to the workforce—13 percent were 35 years of age or younger. Others could boast years of experience. The largest group of respondents (68 percent) fell into the 36-to-55 age range. Nineteen percent were over the age of 56 (including the 2 percent who said they were over 65). The majority (69 percent) had gone to college, earning a bachelor's degree or higher. But 31 percent— including a few of the most highly paid respondents—had ended their formal education with a high school diploma.
Most respondents were seasoned professionals. Only 12 percent said they'd been working in logistics for five years or less. Another 17 percent have worked in the field for six to 10 years, 19 percent for 11 to 15 years, 18 percent for 16 to 20 years, 12 percent for 21 to 25 years, and 22 percent for more than 25 years. And they're not the type to bounce around from one job to the next: Two-thirds (67 percent) said they had been working at the same company for six years or more.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."