When wholesaler Central Grocers broke ground on a new DC, it opted for a number of environmentally (and economically) attractive options. Among them: hydrogen fuel cellpowered lift trucks.
Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
When Central Grocers and Certified Grocers Midwest merged last year, one of the consequences was the need for a new distribution center to serve the combined networks.
The merged company, a memberowned wholesaler that continues to operate under the Central Grocers name, is now serving more than 400 independently owned grocery stores in Chicagoland and northwest Indiana—a big increase from what Central Grocers had served before. The merger also shifted the geography somewhat, adding to the need to open a new DC.
To serve its expanded customer base, the company opted to build an allnew DC, a 960,000-square-foot facility in Joliet, Ill. That facility opened last month.
Building from scratch gave the company the opportunity to look at the technologies it would employ in the building with fresh eyes. As a result, it made several choices that not only are economically advantageous, but environmentally friendly as well.
Take, for example, the lift trucks the new facility is using.
The Central Grocers DC will be one of the few in the nation whose entire lift truck fleet will operate with hydrogen fuel cells.
Two-stage conversion
The decision to go with fuel cells may seem unusual for a grocery distributor. Grocers, whose margins tend to be razor thin, are noted for the sharp pencils they bring to their purchasing. "The grocery industry runs on pennies," says Kal Anglewicz, president of Yale Equipment & Services, the Rosemont, Ill., dealer that's providing the lift trucks. "They cannot just do a green initiative unless it is cost justified."
But Central Grocers' analysis, along with tough negotiations, led to a deal that will pay off in longterm savings in operating costs, according to John Coari, vice president of operations for Central Grocers. Coari took time to discuss the new facility and the lift truck decision with DC VELOCITY while traveling between facilities in the scramble prior to the new building's opening.
During the analysis of what lift trucks the company would employ in the new facility and how they would be powered, Central Grocers managers looked at several alternative fuel options, Coari said. Eventually, they settled on hydrogen fuel cells and negotiated a deal with Plug Power, a developer of alternative energy products. Plug Power is supplying the facility with 220 of its GenDrive fuel cell units for use in the lift truck fleet.
The GenDrive units make use of compressed hydrogen gas converted from liquid hydrogen. The liquid hydrogen storage system and fueling stations were supplied by Air Products, a company that provides atmospheric and specialty gases to a variety of industries.
The trucks themselves are being converted to hydrogen fuel cells in two stages. The first phase included 140 Yale center-control pallet trucks. Those trucks went into operation with the GenDrive fuel cell units when the new DC opened in April. The fleet also includes 41 reach trucks, 30 standup counterbalanced trucks at the shipping and receiving docks, and five sit-down three-wheel trucks for the freezer and cooler operations. Those are battery-operated trucks that will be converted to fuel cells early next year. In the meantime, the batteries are being managed with Sackett Systems' HydraHandler battery handling system, which will be removed when the conversion is completed.
Central Grocers has outsourced fleet maintenance to Yale Equipment & Services, which has been a vendor to the grocer for more than 40 years. That includes maintaining the fuel cell units under a full maintenance contract.
No more lines
Despite the higher startup costs, Coari is confident that using fuel cells will yield longterm savings for Central Grocers. "Plug Power made it very attractive to go with them," he said. "The initial cost is higher, but we will make up the difference in labor savings."
In particular, labor productivity will improve, he explained, by eliminating the time workers take to exchange batteries in a traditional battery room operation. Typically, he said, a battery exchange takes between five and 15 minutes, and it's not unusual to have several operators waiting in line to switch out batteries. Refueling at hydrogen stations will take no more than five minutes, and sometimes as little as two minutes. The new DC currently has three hydrogen fueling stations located at strategic locations throughout the facility. Two more will be added when the other trucks are converted early next year.
In addition, Coari said, trucks operating on hydrogen fuel cells are more like internal combustion vehicles than battery trucks in that they operate at close to full power throughout the shift. With batteryoperated trucks (particularly those powered by directcurrent batteries), voltage drops as the day wears on, making the vehicles sluggish.
Finally, eliminating the need for a battery room has meant a more productive use of DC floor space.
Delayed gratification
All told, Central Grocers expects the savings to add up to $1.5 million over 10 years, most of that in the last five years.
Despite those impressive savings, the technology is not for everyone. For one thing, the initial acquisition cost is substantially higher for fuel cells than for batteryoperated trucks, Anglewicz says, which means the technology probably won't benefit smallscale operations. "From our perspective, you probably need a minimum of 50 to 75 trucks and a twoshift operation," he says. But for large fleets in operations that are willing to wait for a payback, fuel cells offer benefits in fast fueling times, operating efficiency, and perhaps reduced maintenance costs.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."