Mitch Mac Donald has more than 30 years of experience in both the newspaper and magazine businesses. He has covered the logistics and supply chain fields since 1988. Twice named one of the Top 10 Business Journalists in the U.S., he has served in a multitude of editorial and publishing roles. The leading force behind the launch of Supply Chain Management Review, he was that brand's founding publisher and editorial director from 1997 to 2000. Additionally, he has served as news editor, chief editor, publisher and editorial director of Logistics Management, as well as publisher of Modern Materials Handling. Mitch is also the president and CEO of Agile Business Media, LLC, the parent company of DC VELOCITY and CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
With one successful warehouse management system installation behind him, Robby Dhesi had no reason to doubt that he could do it again. Before joining Fox Racing in 2003, he had spent five years in operations management at Fisher Scientific, where he served as project manager for a WMS installation. So he had no reason to doubt that he could duplicate that success at his new employer. This time, however, the WMS installation didn't go quite as smoothly as planned. Frustrated, Dhesi left the company in 2004.
That was not to be the end of Dhesi's association with Fox Racing, however. Although he himself was dissatisfied with the WMS project's results, Fox was impressed enough with Dhesi's previous work that it tried to lure him back. Dhesi came back to the fold in late 2006. Today, he serves as the company's director of distribution. In 2008, his team wrapped up another warehouse management system installation, and this time, Dhesi is satisfied with the results.
He spoke recently with DC VELOCITY Group Editorial Director Mitch Mac Donald about his career, the lessons learned from the ill-starred WMS installation, and why his high-throughput facility uses virtually no automated equipment.
Q: For those unfamiliar with the company, what is Fox Racing?
A: Fox Racing is a leading manufacturer of motocross and fashion apparel that's sold online as well as through our company stores and through retail stores worldwide. We fill all of those orders out of our distribution center in Morgan Hill, California.
Q: What are you working on as we speak?
A: We're just coming off our peak season, so right now, activity is dying down. This past peak shipping season was the first real test of our new warehouse management system, which went live last April. As it turned out, we were able to process over 5,800 orders a day—in less than 10 hours, in fact. That would have taken us two and a half days with our old system.
Q: Was it the chance to oversee the installation of that new system that drew you back to Fox Racing?
A: Yes. I came back to Fox to handle that specific task. I wanted to lead the selection process, find the consultants, see the implementation process through, and deliver a successful project.
Q: What did you do differently this time around?
A: The issue with the 2004 installation was that we failed to clearly define what we were trying to achieve, and we looked for an ERP (enterprise resource planning system) that would meet our distribution requirements. It became clear to me that the system we installed wasn't going to meet those requirements, and that was my major reason for leaving Fox. Basically, we failed because Fox didn't define everything clearly.
Q: That's a critical part, isn't it?
A: It really is. This time around, my team did its due diligence during the selection process. For example, we put together an extensive RFP that ran over 1,000 lines. Eventually, we chose a WMS from HighJump Software. I also hired an integrator, Vitech out of Bellingham, Washington, to do my configuration. They did a lot of the heavy lifting.
Q: You're now almost a year out from the project's completion. Is it meeting expectations?
A: We have exceeded all of them, basically. We used to be able to receive about three containers max on a given day. Now, we are receiving five to six. In our outbound operations, we've decreased our staff across the whole company from 132 to 107. Our goal is to get that down to 83 by the middle of the year.
Q: I understand that you also brought in voice recognition technology. Was that something you planned from the start or was that something that the folks at Vitech suggested?
A: That was something that Vitech brought to the table at the design stage. I was concerned about going directly from paper to voice and skipping the whole RF generation in between. What Vitech did was set up a voice pilot for the founder of the company. First, we had one of our pickers pick eight orders using the normal process, selecting items from a paper pick list. It took him 45 minutes. Then, we trained our founder on the voice system. After just an hour and a half of training, the founder was able to pick the same number of orders in 21 minutes.
Q: In your view, what's the key to harnessing the capabilities of whatever technologies you're using to make your system run as efficiently as possible?
A: My philosophy is that you can take any system—whether it's a Manhattan system, a RedPrairie system, a HighJump system, or any tier-one system—and it's going to work. They have already proven they are tier one. Really, the critical piece that it comes down to is the processes. You know, laying out the processes so that they're simple enough that your employees can follow them without having to think too deeply about what exactly they need to do at this particular screen. During the design stage, we worked really hard to make it as simple as possible. Currently, we continue to do that. We continue to look at every single process with a microscope and say, you know, with this system, how many times are we touching "X"? Do we need to touch this that many times? Could we get the system to do some of our thinking?
Q: Although you're using a WMS that's supported by voice and other types of technology, your operation isn't what we'd normally think of as highly automated, right?
A: No, we really have no automation at all. In fact, we spent less than $16,000 on hardware. That was a deliberate decision on my part. Fox has been experiencing double-digit growth in recent years, and as I see it, investing in a lot of conveyors and automated systems could limit our options for expansion. Everybody says you can take this kind of equipment with you, but really, it is pretty difficult to do that. How are you going to take it with you when you're building a new facility and you've still got to operate this one?
Q: So, the installation is done. 2008 is a wrap. What are your operational goals for 2009?
A: Our operational goal for 2009 first and foremost is flawless execution—both from a process and from an employee/management standpoint. We face the same economic challenges that every other company faces right now, and we have to cut expenses by 10 percent.
The other goal that we set for ourselves is to have a contingency plan for every single process in the warehouse. Today, we're using voice technology—a system from Vocollect—but we're using RF as well. We are going to roll out voice to other areas so that if one of the applications isn't acting properly or we have some other type of system breakdown, we will still be able to get orders out the door.
Q: Let's shift gears a bit. In your opinion, what are the key skills a logistics executive will need to succeed in the 21st century?
A: In the case of an executive person like myself, you have to have the 10,000-foot view. You can't be in the forest. You've got to be thinking about all the minute details—everything from the number of boxes the operation is handling down to whether you're hiring the right people. The right people are not necessarily those with advanced degrees; they're people you can trust, who are going to be committed and passionate. It is very difficult to interview for that type of person.
Q: What advice would you give to a young person interested in a career in logistics?
A: I'd tell them that the best thing they can do is improve their people skills. Beyond moving the boxes, beyond handling a trucking fleet, this is a business of people. There are systems involved, but you've got to be a good people person.
You've got to be able to interact with people at all levels. You have to be able to understand what that material handler is doing every day to make an impact. Then you've got to be able to manage the managers as well. If you have the right people skills, you're going to succeed.
Q: Any closing thoughts?
A: The only thing I'd like to add is that if you work in distribution, you can expect to face all kinds of challenges in the course of your career, and you'll need outside partners to help you. Make sure you choose your partners with a critical eye. You've got to find people who have the experience and the passion that you have. They've got to have a vested interest in making you successful, not just selling you something.
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.