Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Mexico has an image problem. And for years, its negatives—both real and perceived—led U.S. companies to shy away from the country. Its history of unpredictable regulatory changes, inconsistent customs policies, inefficient distribution, and rampant theft and drug smuggling left shippers, carriers, and third-party logistics companies (3PLs) feeling discouraged and frustrated.
In the end, cheap labor and the cost advantages of both the North American Free Trade Agreement and the maquiladora program often tipped the balance in Mexico's favor. Still, the country's drawbacks caused many to pull up stakes and move to China.
Now, some of that lost business is returning. A devalued Mexican peso coupled with Asia's rising labor costs and long transit times are making Mexico attractive again. Shippers also like the notable improvements in logistics services, technologies, and facilities. Furthermore, Mexico's government has made a public commitment to modernize infrastructure, improve security, and liberalize its customs regime.
Some of the old problems persist, but if you're making decisions about Mexico based on old assumptions, it's time to take a fresh look at this dynamic market. Here's an overview of some recent developments.
Transportation and infrastructure
Some of the biggest differences in freight transportation can be seen out on the roads, where well-maintained toll highways managed by private companies have cut transit times for over-the-road shipments. The trucks that travel Mexico's highways have changed, too. In years gone by, most trucks were old, worn-out, cab-overs—many of them taken out of service in the United States and resold in Mexico. Some of the mom-and-pops that shuttle trailers and containers across the border still operate aging equipment. But for truckload and less-than-truckload carriers, shiny new Class 8 tractors are now the norm. "The transportation equipment you see in Mexico today is pretty much state of the art," says Gene Sevilla-Sacasa, vice president and managing director of Ryder Latin America. "If you look at the average fleet today versus 10 years ago, it's much bigger and much younger."
Vehicle tracking systems are ubiquitous now. Indeed, they're a condition of doing business with large shippers, says Con-way Truckload's vice president of operations, Saul Gonzalez. All but two or three of Con-way's 80 Mexican partners use Qualcomm's satellite tracking system. The U.S. carrier's system interfaces with those of its partners, providing real-time notification of events and pinpointing the location of the 2,000-plus trailers it typically has in Mexico or along the border each day.
Trucking isn't the only mode that's modernizing. The government's policy of granting operating concessions to private operators, which typically pay most of the development costs, benefits rail, port, and intermodal services, says Carlos Bouffier, an independent consultant who works with the consulting firm TranSystems. The government often provides assistance to private infrastructure projects in order to create jobs and boost local economies, he says. Recently, for instance, national and local governments helped to build roadways, utilities, and industrial parks for vehicle-assembly plants and associated parts manufacturers, Bouffier notes.
There's more work to be done. Some intermodal yards, such as the one at Monterrey, are badly congested, and funding problems have delayed construction of container terminals at Punta Colonet, says Ben Fuqua, a vice president with TranSystems. There is some good news on the intermodal front, though. The Port of Lázaro Cárdenas on Mexico's West Coast boasts a new container terminal and expanded shipping services. The Kansas City Southern de Mexico's rail service from that port has opened up the market for importing raw materials and other products for final assembly inland, and provides rapid access for the finished goods to U.S. markets, Fuqua adds.
Facilities and technology
Not too long ago, you could safely assume that warehouses and distribution centers in Mexico would be inefficient, mistakeprone, manual operations. That's no longer the case for facilities that serve large Mexican and multinational companies.
"There's been tremendous improvement in warehousing," says Ryder's Sevilla-Sacasa. "If you go back 10 years, it was difficult to find a very good warehouse. Now, I would say we operate five million square feet of warehouse space in Mexico, and all of it is AAA, state-of-the-art facilities with very, very good security." It's still not easy to build those warehouses, though. According to the World Bank publication Doing Business in Mexico 2009, the biggest obstacle to building a warehouse is getting utility connections, such as water, telephone lines, sewers, and electricity.
Many operations rely on the same warehouse management systems and transportation management systems that are popular north of the border, and workers use similar types of equipment and software to store, pick, pack, and ship products. In fact, vendors of material handling and dock equipment say that Mexico is one of their fastest-growing markets.
Mexican companies are under the same cost and service pressures as their counterparts up north, and that's boosting investments in supply chain technology, says Francisco Giral, CEO of NetLogistik, a systems integrator that represents RedPrairie, Vocollect, and UPS Logistics Technologies in Mexico and Argentina. "We still have a five- to 10-year gap [in technology compared to the United States]," he says, "but that's diminishing."
In the past, companies typically relied on homegrown applications, but sales of best-of-breed solutions have climbed in the last five years. One reason is that most vendors now release their software in different international markets simultaneously, making new products available to Mexican buyers more quickly than before. Additionally, buyers can more easily share data and collaborate with suppliers and customers outside of Mexico if they use the same or compatible software.
Collaborating with trading partners via an Internet pOréal, especially in areas like transportation and supplier management, is catching on quickly. Giral says he also is seeing growing interest in service-oriented architecture (SOA) and supply chain performance measurement. Until a few years ago, the country lacked data centers that were capable of reliably hosting solutions. Now, there are several such centers in Mexico, most of them associated with big telecom companies.
Customs and security
Customs policies and cargo security, which are intimately connected, are high on the list of concerns for anyone doing business with Mexico. They're also priorities for President Felipe Calderón Hinojosa, who has ordered some changes in customs practices and reinstated a federal security program to reduce thefts from trucks traveling Mexico's highways.
The Mexican Customs Administration (popularly known as Aduana) is working hard to change its image. That campaign has succeeded, in Gonzalez's opinion. "They are very professional now and very easy to work with," he says. "I personally have not heard about any negative things with Mexican customs in years."
Two years ago, customs officials issued a five-year plan that called for redesigned and simplified procedures; greater use of automation, including an integrated IT system that encompasses all stakeholders; and better management of change and of human resources, among other measures. The agency is well on its way toward achieving those goals. Several years ago, it did away with the infamous "red light, green light" procedure for selecting shipments for inspection and has since implemented an electronic submission system for documents and payments.
Aduana is collaborating with international bankers JP Morgan on a pilot program that will give tax-friendly treatment to imports of raw materials for some manufacturers, reports Alvaro Quintana, formerly a high-level official in Mexican Customs and now head of logistics business for JP Morgan's global trade services group in Mexico. Under the pilot, three manufacturing companies and their customs brokers are clearing shipments through customs using a simplified document that contains minimal information. They do not need to classify the goods, and there are no physical inspections by either the customs authorities or the brokers. After they're cleared, the shipments go to special bonded warehouses called Recinto Fiscalizado Estratégicas (RFEs), where they can remain for up to two years tax- and duty-free.
The program is similar but more liberal than one that's already available to the auto industry. Quintana expects that if Aduana approves RFEs for wider use, the cost of importing into Mexico—estimated by the World Bank at $2,700 per container—will drop sharply, because it will speed customs clearance, eliminate two rounds of inspections, and reduce brokers' fees by hundreds of dollars per shipment.
Cargo security remains the biggest worry for shippers, carriers, and 3PLs, despite their best efforts. Truckers stick to major highways and travel in convoys; warehouses are installing high-tech surveillance and identity technology; and carriers in all modes are spending millions of dollars on guards and inspections.
But those measures have had limited success. A cargo security manager working on the border (who requested anonymity for safety reasons) reports that drug smugglers are targeting companies that participate in the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) because U.S. Customs is unlikely to open their trailers for inspection—and are threatening employees with death if they refuse to cooperate. In late January, the newspaper Reforma created a stir in Mexico when it reported that drug cartels control the major rail lines serving the United States. The newspaper said it had proof that railroad personnel at all levels and at nearly every station are colluding with the traffickers. The Mexican Railroad Association denied those charges, asserting that rail is the safest method of freight transportation in Mexico.
To combat cargo theft, many companies are turning to technology. Vehicle-tracking and container-monitoring systems are widespread, and some high-tech warehouses have sophisticated access controls, including fingerprint matching.
There are a number of cargo security and tracking systems on the market and in development. Aduana is planning to test one from Powers International, a company headed by Dr. Jim Giermanski, a professor of international business at Belmont Abbey College in North Carolina and an expert on trade with Mexico. Like other tracking systems, Powers' technology transmits alerts when a trailer or container door has been opened. It also "notices" if an intruder cuts a hole elsewhere in the equipment, and it can detect changes in light, temperature, and vibration.
Here's what makes this system interesting to Mexican Customs: It also tracks the chain of custody, controlling access and recording the container's contents at both origin and destination. At the point of origin, an authorized person enters data about the trailer's contents into a computer and uses an electronic "key" (similar to a swipe card) to arm and secure the lock. "The person who locks it has to be a vetted person who has a unique code number, so we know his identity," Giermanski explains. The system sends the handler's ID and detailed shipment data via satellite to a data center, which communicates the information to the shipper's logistics software and to customs authorities. En route, the container "reports" variations from its planned route and any other changes to a network of data centers. At the destination, an authorized person with a unique identifier opens the container with an electronic key and verifies that the contents match the original shipment.
Upbeat but realistic
The outlook for transportation, logistics, and trade in Mexico is positive and encouraging. Certainly problems persist, but Mexico will likely continue to make progress in its drive to reach logistics parity with the United States and Canada.
The growing cadre of Mexican logistics and supply chain professionals will see to that. The number of courses in the discipline at Mexican universities is growing, as is membership in professional organizations. The Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals, for example, now has two roundtables in Mexico, and APICS—The Association for Operations Management has nine chapters in the country. The rapid expansion of events like the annual Expologística trade show, which typically draws more than 300 exhibitors of material handling equipment and supply chain technology and services, testifies to the demand for logistics tools and information.
Like many people who do business in the country, Sevilla-Sacasa offers an upbeat view of Mexico's future that is at the same time, tempered with a dose of realism. "I think that Mexico has a lot of challenges, yet a lot of very positive things are happening," he says. "We all have to deal with difficult issues like drugs and crime— we can't be blind to them. But the fact of the matter is that goods continue to move and to reach the Mexican marketplace. Mexico is becoming a very competitive place ... and we are pretty confident the changes we are making will mean continuing improvement."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."