James Cooke is a principal analyst with Nucleus Research in Boston, covering supply chain planning software. He was previously the editor of CSCMP?s Supply Chain Quarterly and a staff writer for DC Velocity.
The economy may be down and businesses may be cutting back, but supply chain execution (SCE) software packages are expected to sell briskly throughout 2009. That's the consensus view of leading analysts who follow the supply chain software market for a living.
As for why these applications would be bucking sales trends, it's all about managing costs. In an economic downturn, companies are looking to pare warehousing and transportation expenses wherever they can. And that's precisely what tools like warehouse management systems (WMS), transportation management systems (TMS), and global trade management systems (GTM) are designed to do.
Why TMS is hot
The top-selling application in the supply chain execution sector this year will likely be TMS, software that oversees freight planning and movements. TMS revenues totaled $650 million in 2008, according to the Stamford, Conn.-based information technology and research firm Gartner Inc. Despite the recession, Gartner expects TMS revenue to grow 12.3 percent to $730 million in 2009.
Gartner analyst Dwight Klappich says there are a couple of reasons for his firm's bullish forecast. For starters, he says, the number of TMS users is still fairly small, even in North America and Europe. "Market penetration remains relatively low," he explains, "so there is a lot of new business potential."
On top of that, Klappich says, transportation management software offers a quick payback on the initial investment. "It's not uncommon to see cost reductions of 10 percent or more on the annual freight spend," he says.
In fact, nowadays, even small shippers can benefit from using a TMS, the Gartner analyst reports. That wasn't the case a year or two ago when the software's primary selling point was its ability to consolidate shipments. "A small shipper could not justify the cost of a TMS on optimizing 20 LTL shipments," Klappich explains.
In the last year, however, software developers have been loading up their TMS packages with new functions: carrier rate comparison features, governance mechanisms that force users throughout the corporation to select the low-cost carrier, and freight bill auditing capabilities that ensure that shipping charges reflect contracted rates. "Small shippers can now justify a TMS on the freight payment and audit feature alone," Klappich says. "Anyone spending $25 million or more on freight can now justify the cost of a TMS."
Analyst Adrian Gonzales agrees that TMS sales will remain strong in 2009. "Companies will want to prioritize transportation initiatives to cut costs and improve profitability, considering business sales are going down or remaining flat," says Gonzales, who is executive director of the logistics council at ARC Advisory Group in Dedham, Mass.
Gonzales says some of that demand is coming from a previously untapped source: companies that once outsourced their transportation management to a third-party logistics company but have since decided to do it themselves. "Companies need a TMS in order to bring that function back in house," he explains.
WMS: Still the revenue leader
TMS may be the fastest-growing segment of the SCE software market. But in terms of dollars spent, the hands-down winner remains the WMS, software designed to oversee distribution center operations. Gartner pegged worldwide revenues for WMS in 2008 at $1.03 billion; it expects revenues to climb 11.7 percent to $1.15 billion in 2009.
In the past year, much of that revenue came from sales to companies in Western Europe and the United States that were replacing their old systems. Sales of replacement systems will likely slow this year, but Klappich believes that weakness will be offset by growing demand for WMS from companies in Eastern Europe, the Asia Pacific region, and Latin America. And while North American companies may put major systems upgrades on hold, he predicts that they'll still buy add-on modules like labor and performance management.
Customs regs spur GTM sales
Another growth area for supply chain software will be global trade management systems, which have a smaller user base than either TMS or WMS. Gartner expects that vendors will see worldwide revenues from global trade software jump 16.7 percent to $238 million in 2009 from $204 million in 2008.
Although many companies still rely on their customs brokers, freight forwarders, or third-party logistics service providers to handle trade compliance, enterprises running global supply chains are likely to find it necessary to obtain software to deal with fast-changing customs regulations. "Even if they don't want to, companies may have to invest in this software due to customs," says Klappich.
Five more good years?
Despite all the turmoil on the world economic front, at least one prominent analyst remained bullish on this category of software at the end of last year. In an e-mail sent a couple of weeks before his death on Nov. 30 (see related article on p. 16), John Fontanella of AMR Research in Boston predicted that sales for all types of SCE software would remain strong for the next five years. According to his company's projections, the overall market for supply chain-related software will grow 7 percent annually through 2012.
As for why companies would continue to buy supply chain software in a period of corporate belt-tightening, Fontanella said it was a matter of cost control. The bailout of the financial industry expanded the money supply of major nations, he explained, leading to devalued currency and an environment favorable to inflation. "Supply chain managers will be expected to play an important role to protect product and company margins through cost control and increased efficiencies in their operations," he said.
On top of that, he added, in times of financial turmoil, companies hoard cash. "For the first time, cash preservation will become a major imperative outside the corporate treasurer's office," Fontanella said. "Capital spending will come under great scrutiny in this environment, so technologies that increase the velocity of cash collection will become a critical component of initiatives going forward."
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."