When Grayling Industries needed a real-time view of inventory on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border, it turned to rented software for help. Now, the mid-sized company knows exactly what's what?and where it's at.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
There's something interesting about inventory visibility: Everybody wants it, many software vendors promise it, yet plenty of companies still don't have it. It isn't easy for any company to achieve, of course. But it's especially challenging for companies that have multiple suppliers, do business across borders, and cannot afford costly, time-consuming software implementations involving supply chain partners.
Grayling Industries fits all three of those categories, yet the manufacturer of asbestos-abatement supplies knows exactly what inventory is on hand at any given moment—not just in its own facilities but also in those of its top suppliers and its third-party logistics (3PL) partner. The mid-sized shipper was able to achieve this feat by getting its business partners to join it in using an on-demand inventory and warehouse management system (WMS) that makes it easy to share information across companies.
Cross-border confusion
Grayling Industries, headquartered in Alpharetta, Ga., sells protective liners for intermediate bulk containers (IBCs), bulk bags, and totes; disposal bags for asbestos; decontamination showers; and chemicals for asbestos and lead paint removal. About half of its $20 million in annual business involves custom orders, according to Carlos Rubio, Grayling's director of finance and operations.
The company serves customers from warehouses in Atlanta, Toronto, and Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Most of its products are assembled in a 60,000-square-foot, ISO-certified maquiladora in Juarez, Mexico, where more than 40 unique, custom-designed machines form polyethylene into liners, bags, and other items. About 5 percent of the polyethylene sheeting and other materials used in manufacturing comes from Asia and Europe, 15 percent is supplied from Mexico, and the balance comes from the United States, says Rubio. Materials for assembly are shipped in full trailers and ocean containers or by less-than-truckload transportation to Juarez. About 80 percent of the finished product is sold to customers in the United States, and on average, some 600 full trailer loads of finished goods cross the Rio Grande each year.
All of that back-and-forth across the border created some information gaps. One of those was a lack of real-time information on inbound shipments from suppliers. In the past, Grayling stored those shipments in its customs broker's warehouse, where shipment information was keyed in and updated only once a day. "If a truck came in later that night, we weren't aware of it until the end of the next day," Rubio says. "We were basing decisions on the inventory status at 5 p.m."
As a result, the plant sometimes did not know that material it urgently needed on the production lines was sitting in the broker's facility. Worse still, it sometimes ran out of inventory, forcing it to shut down a production line. That was bad news for a company that routinely has order backlogs and needs to keep its production lines humming. Making matters worse, purchase order and delivery information was slow to arrive, and more time was lost in rekeying and reconciling that information before Grayling's accounting system could pay suppliers.
The big switch
With responsibility for both operations and finance, Rubio understood the importance of keeping up with the pace of orders while optimizing the timing of supplier payments. To achieve both objectives, the company would need an up-to-the-minute view of inbound orders from suppliers and outbound shipments to Juarez. He decided to make two big changes in the way Grayling handled its cross-border business.
The first was to implement software that could handle several tasks, including informing suppliers of replenishment requirements; tracking inbound and outbound inventory; providing Grayling and its supply chain partners with real-time updates; and integrating with the shipper's enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. There were several software products that could fulfill Grayling's needs, but Rubio faced some constraints that narrowed the field of contenders. For one thing, the shipper could not afford a long, costly implementation. For another, the system would have to be affordable and easy for Grayling's supply chain partners—some of which were small, family-owned companies—to install and use.
The Inventory and Warehouse Management System from SmartTurn met all of Grayling's criteria. At a cost of just $500 per month and no limit on the number of users, the on-demand system was very affordable. As with other applications delivered over the Internet under the "software as a service" (SaaS) model, there would be no need for a long and costly installation, customization, or modifications to existing systems. Upgrades and maintenance would be handled at the source and become automatically available to all users at no extra cost. And because the license holder would be able to control what data external partners could access and modify, security would not be a concern.
The second big change was to shift responsibility for the storage and handling of inbound and outbound shipments to a 3PL that could be more flexible and responsive than the customs broker. The manufacturer chose Prologistics, a small 3PL in El Paso, Texas, that specializes in U.S.-Mexico trade. Prologistics had been handling some of Grayling's shipments, and Rubio was pleased with the 3PL's service quality and fees. The one drawback was that the small business had no WMS and relied on paper documents and physical inspections. But once Prologistics agreed to use SmartTurn's system (a condition of getting Grayling's business), the relationship took off.
On time, every time
Within a couple of weeks, SmartTurn had completed planning, configuration, and deployment of the inventory and WMS system for both Prologistics and Grayling. The partners then brought Grayling's two largest suppliers into the loop at no cost to them, other than the time required for training.
Now, those suppliers are responsible for managing inventory; they can log into the system and see purchase order requirements as well as inventory in Prologistics' warehouse. Based on that information, they plan their production to ensure that the warehouse always has 90 days' worth of inventory on hand (the facility holds the material on a consignment basis). When the suppliers ship the consignment orders, they enter complete details directly into the system. Once the shipments arrive at the warehouse, Prologistics updates SmartTurn and holds the material until the assembly plant just across the border needs it. "When they request it, we pull out the orders for them," explains Luis Gijón, an operations agent for Prologistics. The 3PL updates the inventory status as soon as a trailer leaves the warehouse, so that the maquiladora and Grayling's headquarters both know exactly which items are en route.
That real-time information on exactly what is in the pipeline—and exactly where it is—has improved the cost and service picture for shipper, supplier, and 3PL alike. For example, Prologistics now can immediately respond to unanticipated situations. "If something is hot and [Grayling] needs it urgently ... as soon as it arrives, we put it in the system and they know immediately how many pallets and boxes, so they can do the customs paperwork right away," Gijón says. And there's no more searching through piles of papers when the customer has questions: "We can give them an answer in a couple of seconds," he reports. Prologistics also has been able to attract several new customers because it can use the software to manage their inventory at no additional cost to them.
From Rubio's perspective, one of the most important benefits of the new system is that materials needed in Juarez now arrive on a just-intime basis, yet the assembly line is never caught short. "The information is so accurate, we've been able to completely eliminate line stoppages. We have not had one this year," he says.
Rubio also reports that Grayling has been able to improve its cash flow. With the new software, he now has an accurate, up-to-the-minute view of exactly what was pulled and when—information that lets accounting determine the optimum time to pay suppliers.
Before the inventory and warehouse system was in place,Grayling paid its suppliers after weekly or monthly reports wended their way to accounts payable and were verified. Under the consignment arrangement with its top suppliers, the company pays only for what it pulls from the warehouse. "Now I have 90 days' inventory that's not on my books, plus an additional 45 days after it's pulled to pay, so I get 135 days before I have to pay," Rubio explains. What's in it for the suppliers? They can run 90 days' worth of products they custom manufacture for Grayling, rather than changing over production lines on short notice. That cut production costs so much that Grayling asked for—and got—price discounts, he notes.
For other suppliers, Grayling can now reconcile purchase orders and shipment bills of lading promptly, which allows it to take full advantage of early-payment discounts. This is no small matter: Before the system was in place, Grayling was missing out on about $40,000 a month in trade discounts, Rubio says. The manufacturer has also used the SmartTurn system to improve the timeliness and accuracy of its customs documentation for imports from Asia and Europe. These temporary imports are stored in bond in El Paso, and Grayling pays duties on them only when they reenter the United States as part of finished products. U.S. regulations set a limit of 180 days for the round trip; importers that miss the cutoff pay double duties. That's no longer a worry for Grayling, and the manufacturer can quickly produce audit-ready data if questions should arise.
Rubio is more than happy with the improvements the real-time system has produced for Grayling Industries, but he's equally pleased that his company's smallbusiness partners are sharing in the benefits. "Times are so tough," he says. "We wanted to know that we could reduce costs and make it a win-win for everyone."
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."