When a new line of business caused backups at Koch Entertainment's packing stations, an automated packaging system cleared the logjam. Now the music and film distributor is shipping a lot more orders in much less time.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
New product line, new customers, new revenue ... what's not to like? Nothing—unless that nice new chunk of business doesn't fit well with your existing process for packaging and shipping orders.
That was the position Koch Entertainment found itself in two years ago. The company, which bills itself as the largest independent wholesale distributor of music and videos in North America, had just taken on fulfillment of direct-to-consumer orders for some of its customers, most of which are music retailers. Trouble was, the picking, packing, and shipping system in its distribution center was designed to handle cartons, not the individual CDs or DVDs needed to fill consumers' orders.
Picking was no problem, but the flood of small orders gummed up the works when they reached the packing stations. Fortunately, Koch quickly found a solution. An automated packaging system directed by a warehouse control system (WCS) not only broke up the logjam, it also allowed the distributor to ship out more orders in much less time. It's so efficient, in fact, that the company will be able to take on even more new business without skipping a beat.
Shipper sings the blues
Koch Entertainment Distribution handles distribution for dozens of music and video labels, large and small, from its distribution centers in the United States and Canada. The U.S. organization serves customers from a 90,000-square-foot DC staffed by some 80 employees in Port Washington, N.Y. Each day, the DC ships out between 2,500 and 3,000 mail orders to consumers by UPS, FedEx, and the U.S. Postal Service, and about 1,500 larger shipments by parcel carrier or less-than-truckload to its customers' warehouses and DCs.
show stoppers
Automated packaging systems are available in all sorts of variations, ranging from stand-alone, manual equipment all the way up to fully automated solutions that can be integrated with material handling and data-capture devices as well as with warehouse management, warehouse control, and automated shipping systems.
If you'd like to learn more and see some of this equipment in action, consider attending one of these trade shows:
PackExpo: Sponsored by the Packaging Machinery Manufacturers Institute (PMMI), this year's event was held Nov. 9-13 in Chicago. PackExpo 2009 is scheduled for October 5-7 in Las Vegas.
ProMat 2009: Sponsored by the Material
Handling Industry of America (MHIA), the big show will be held in
Chicago from Jan. 12 through 15, 2009.
Interpack: The world's largest trade fair for the packaging industry, Interpack is held in Düsseldorf, Germany, every three years. This year's event has come and gone; the next show will be held May 12-18, 2011.
Until late 2006, the DC had handled only wholesale orders for music and video retailers. But with online sales of CDs, DVDs, and other entertainment media growing fast, Koch saw an opportunity to swiftly expand its business. The distributor could cut time and cost for its retailer customers by fulfilling individual consumer orders directly from its own DC, rather than shipping orders in bulk to the retailers' facilities for repackaging and fulfillment.
Koch's distribution center had the capacity to take on the additional business. The facility already was highly automated, with a 125,000-location, 21-level storage and retrieval system; a futuristic robotic picking system developed by a sister company in Austria; and an automated storage and retrieval crane for large orders. Orders were picked to totes, which then traveled by conveyor to a series of bulk shipping stations. There, workers would perform the labor-intensive process of taking the items from the totes, scanning them, packing them in boxes, adding dunnage and packing slips to the cartons, sealing the cartons, and sending them on to shipping.
This worked well for the large commercial orders the system was designed for. But when Koch took on fulfillment of individual consumer orders—and the volume of those orders grew more quickly than expected—the packing stations couldn't keep up with the flood of small items, and backlogs soon developed.
There were two reasons for the holdups. First, the warehouse management system assigned each order to a separate tote or group of totes. "If we got 500 orders, we potentially could get 500 totes, with orders as small as one piece per tote taking up prime real estate on the conveyor," says Phil Wulff, senior vice president of logistics. And second, because it took much longer to manually pack, say, 100 individual consumer orders than it did to pack a bulk order of 100 items, throughput slowed dramatically.
Any sort of slowdown, though, was unacceptable. For one thing, the entertainment industry is extremely time-sensitive: New products must be in retail stores and mail orders must be available to ship on the announced release, or "street," date, Wulff explains. "You can't get them there too early because you don't want them on the shelf before the street date, and you don't want them to get there late or they won't sell," he notes. For another, it was taking two or more days to ship some direct-to-consumer orders, and Koch's customers required same-day shipping for those orders. Wulff and John Papazoros, Koch's senior director of distribution, had to find a way to move orders through the packing stations much faster. The solution would be to automate the cumbersome manual packaging process—and there was not a moment to lose.
Just what they needed
For help, Koch turned to systems integrator Glen Road Systems Inc. (GRSI), which had extensive experience with automated packaging solutions. GRSI's task was to figure out "how to achieve the best results with the least amount of labor and cost," says Steve Martyn, the integrator's CEO.
After examining Koch's existing operation and considering its future needs, GRSI and partner Sealed Air Corp., a manufacturer of automated packaging equipment and packing materials, developed a solution that filled the bill. Just three weeks after the backlog began to develop, they installed what Martyn calls an "in-motion order and packaging fulfillment system." This solution included Sealed Air's PriorityPak automated packaging equipment, along with automatic feeders, scanners, a bar-code printer, an in-motion scale, a print-and-apply labeler, and a sorter. All of these components are controlled by GRSI's proprietary FastTrak warehouse control system.
Now, 100 small orders at a time are batch picked into a tote, which operators scan and place on a conveyor. When the tote arrives at the packaging system, another operator removes the CDs and DVDs and stacks them in an automatic feeder. An induction scanner reads the bar code on each individual item. The WCS then asks the warehouse management system to identify the next order for those items and matches the items with that order. "There could be five different orders with the same product. PriorityPak grabs the first order its sees and starts the whole packaging process," Papazoros explains. "When it sees that SKU (stock-keeping unit) again, it reaches for the next order with that item."
As the items move down the line, PriorityPak scans their dimensions and dispenses two sheets of rigid cardboard, sized to fit the items on the conveyor. The underside of the board is coated with a special cohesive, which sticks only to itself and not to the items sandwiched between the sheets, says Jeff Zahansky, Sealed Air's business manager for automated packaging. As the machine gently compresses and seals the coated board to create a protective package, the cohesive closes around the product and prevents it from shifting. The package provides extra protection for the corners of the CDs and DVDs, where damage is most likely to occur in transportation. Essentially, says Martyn, the packing stations have been converted from assembly operations to manufacturing operations, where packaging is created on demand.
Meanwhile, the FastTrak WCS scans the item's bar code and assigns it to a random bar code that is preprinted on the rigid board. The latter bar code functions as a "license plate" for a particular customer order, and the system creates a "marriage" between the two bar codes for tracking purposes, Wulff says. The items then move on down the line to be scanned once again, and then weighed, labeled, and sorted for shipping. Martyn notes that the WCS is tied into Koch's automated parcel shipping system, so that information about the order seamlessly moves from packaging to shipping, with no need to rekey.
With PriorityPak handling about 1,200 orders an hour, orders can be weighed, packaged, and labeled in a little over two hours—a big improvement over the two days it often took with manual packaging processes. "Once we got the machine commissioned, the problems were quickly solved," Papazoros says.
Not every mail order passes through the PriorityPak system. Some items—bulky boxed sets, for instance—are too big for the fully automated line. Based on each SKU's characteristics, the WCS directs oversized items to the most appropriate of Koch's other packing stations, including some that are partially or fully manual. If they're part of an order that includes small items from the automated station, they are reunited with the rest of the order during pre-shipping sortation.
Savings signed, sealed, delivered ...
As for the cost of this type of equipment, Martyn and Zahansky estimate that prices for automatic packaging system range from around $60,000 to $115,000 for low-tech, largely manual equipment, to about $200,000 to $300,000 for a mid-range system, and $350,000 or so for a completely automated in-motion fulfillment system with extras like a shipping sorter. All of them, Zahansky says, typically achieve payback in less than one year.
For Koch Entertainment, the payback has come on several fronts. PriorityPak handles so many orders in so little time that the company was able to eliminate five of its packing and shipping stations. The cost of packaging materials and dunnage has declined, as has the incidence of in-transit damage. Orders now fly through the system so swiftly that some customers have actually complained that they ship out too quickly, Wulff laughs.
Getting orders out sooner opened the way for Koch to ship a lot more of its direct-to-consumer orders via the U.S. Postal Service. Using the Postal Service lets the distributor pay by the ounce instead of by the pound, at a "considerable" savings, says Papazoros. (Koch does use third-party expeditor services, including FedEx SmartPost and UPS Mail Innovations, for those mail shipments.) Wulff and Papazoros consider the automated system to be more than a money saver; it's a moneymaker as well, they say. Although PriorityPak is currently processing 1,200 small orders per hour, the integrated system can handle up to 3,000 per hour. "As our business grows, we have the ability to add more throughput," says Wulff. "And if we didn't have this automation, we could not have taken on the mail order business. Automating allowed us to go out and get more business."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."