Steve Geary is adjunct faculty at the University of Tennessee's Haaslam College of Business and is a lecturer at The Gordon Institute at Tufts University. He is the President of the Supply Chain Visions family of companies, consultancies that work across the government sector. Steve is a contributing editor at DC Velocity, and editor-at-large for CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
Imagine a business where supply chain excellence really matters.
Imagine a business where your direct competitors sell the same products you do. You're small box retail, but some of what you sell can also be bought at Wal-Mart, so in certain items you face the most formidable competitor on the planet. You don't control the designs of the products that you sell, so engineering and technology matter little.
You turn your inventories over a couple of times a year, so if you make a mistake, you sit on it for a long time. You manage 25,000 or so SKUs at the retail level, and hundreds of thousands in your wholesale network. You have hundreds of suppliers to manage, located around the world. And with every passing day, more and more of the production is going offshore. Plus, your suppliers are merging and consolidating, so your power over them is eroding.
If you're the best in the business, you may make 10 percent of sales in net profits. If you're not, you may be just above break even, or worse. And if you struggle, one of your competitors will swallow you right up.
And now—the 2008 economy. Your products are chock full of oil, metals, and plastics. Most of them are heavy, and you need to move them a long way to get them to market in the United States, often from Mexico, or India, or China. Your transportation costs are exploding; your cost of goods, and by implication your prices, are being driven up by the commodity markets.
Welcome to the world of the automotive aftermarket retail supply chain. You can try to build intimacy and customer loyalty, but a spark plug is a spark plug. You can try to innovate with product design for private-label initiatives, but the OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) control specifications. So success comes down to a focus on supply chain fundamentals.
Ten major retailers account for about 40 percent of the do-it-yourself auto parts aftermarket. The strategic, fact-driven approaches of the top three can offer lessons that apply to all supply chains, no matter the industry.
Their most important lesson: Don't let your imagination run wild. Stay focused, stay anchored, and stay with the basics.
"Yes, no, or a number"
AutoZone is the largest of the aftermarket parts retailers in the United States, with about 85 percent of its sales coming from U.S. retail outlets. Sales in 2007 were over $6 billion, with after-tax earnings of almost 10 percent of sales. Quarterly releases this year indicate a modest sales growth of around 3 to 4 percent. Same-store sales, however, are flat. But in the face of the competitive squeeze, AutoZone is thriving. Earnings per share are up around 15 percent this year.
How is it improving its margins in such a challenging environment? Central to AutoZone's strategy is a renewed emphasis on category management and financial engineering.
One senior manager for AutoZone provided insight into how management runs the business: "There are only three answers to a question: yes, no, or a number."
AutoZone's category management initiative might be described as inventory optimization on steroids. Basically, retailers using category management break down the entire range of products they sell into discrete groups, or categories, of related products, focusing on how customers purchase and use the products. Each category is then run like a profit center, with its own set of targets and strategies. The core principle of category management is having the right set of complementary items that customers want in stock at the right location, instead of just driving shelf availability at the item level. It is customer-driven portfolio management of inventory, organized around the application, rather than item management organized around commodities.
For example, a category manager will think about the customer planning an oil change and manage the store inventory to ensure that a complementary set of products is available to support that activity. So, in addition to motor oil, there have to be filters, drain pans, funnels, strap wrenches, drain plugs, shop rags, and oil absorbents to take care of spills. And the category manager will tune the pricing and profitability of the portfolio, from the low-cost to the premium offerings. It's not about managing the motor oil; it's about responding to the oil change event.
In fiscal 2007, AutoZone added over $70 million of parts to its product assortment. At the same time, it rebalanced inventory levels within categories and conducted a top-to-bottom merchandise line review on every single category. Refinements have continued in 2008.
To support its category management initiative, the company rolled out a new planning software package that helps select the right part for the right retail location. AutoZone also uses databases populated with information from vehicle registrations in each store's trade area to tailor inventory to the makes and models of the cars driven by all potential customers in that area.
AutoZone's focus on inventory management is not restricted to the operating side of the business: Some healthy financial engineering is under way. Although AutoZone has over $2 billion worth of inventory on the shelf, the company hasn't paid for most of it. At the end of 2007, AutoZone's on-hand inventory less inventory payables amounted to about $135 million. Technically the company owns the inventory on the shelf and owes the supplier for it, but AutoZone doesn't have to pay for it until it sells—an approach the company calls "pay on scan." The net effect is that little of AutoZone's cash is tied up in inventory because the suppliers are financing it.
Back to basics
Advance Auto Parts, another large player in the market, faces the same pressures as AutoZone. Sales in 2007 were just a shade under $5 billion, yielding a net after-tax income of 4.9 percent of sales. Like AutoZone, it is finding a way to become more profitable in a difficult economy by recalibrating around the basics.
To stay competitive in today's tough market, Advance Auto Parts is focusing on strategies to improve inventory effectiveness. Those strategies include providing better late-model and import parts coverage in key markets, making incremental inventory investments to speed up responses to store requests for parts, customizing parts assortments for specific stores, limiting order capability at the store level, and rationalizing sales-floor SKUs to remove less productive inventory.
The result: improved inventory turnover rates chain-wide and a merchandise mix that more accurately meets customers' needs on a store-by-store basis. This, in turn, drives sales. Inventory effectiveness drives top-line revenue growth.
It sounds a lot like category management.
At the same time, Advance has targeted expenses to improve the bottom line. The company has pruned initiatives that do not demonstrably support profitable growth, cutting information technology, logistics, and other investment projects that did not deliver an acceptable rate of return. According to financial information posted on its Web site, Advance has identified more than $70 million in expense reduction initiatives for 2007 and 2008.
The combined initiatives have led to improved results this year, yielding net after-tax income of 6.1 percent of sales in the quarter ending in July 2008, a quarter of a percentage point improvement over the same period in 2007. Overall sales are up almost 6 percent.
Be the consolidator
O'Reilly Automotive, another top tier supplier in the automotive aftermarket, has taken a different approach. Sales in 2007 were $2.5 billion, with a net after-tax profit of 7.7 percent of sales. In the quarter ending June 30, 2008, net income is up 7.5 percent compared to the same period in 2007. However, rather than continuing an internal focus to drive performance improvement, it has decided to look for opportunity in somebody else's sandbox. O'Reilly is growing through acquisition, hoping to achieve economies of scale in inventory and distribution, and improve overall profitability of the combined operations.
In April of this year, O'Reilly agreed to merge with CSK Auto Corp. CSK operates Checker Auto Parts, Schuck's Auto Supply, Kragen Auto Parts, and Murray's Auto Stores. Year-over-year sales for CSK have been declining, and net after-tax income for the latest period is less than 1 percent of sales. But CSK's annual sales of $1.9 billion will raise the combined O'Reilly/CSK organization to nearly the size and scale of Advance Auto Parts.
There is always risk in mergers, but CSK's markets, which are west of the Mississippi, nicely complement O'Reilly's base, predominantly east of the Mississippi. And scale matters in the auto parts business. Clearly, there is opportunity to improve the profitability of CSK's operations, and O'Reilly has demonstrated its skill as an operator.
Like AutoZone, O'Reilly has sophisticated inventory management systems that customize the assortment of products stocked at each store based upon market demand and vehicle registration data. O'Reilly intends to apply its sophistication in operations and inventory management to CSK's operations, while at the same time taking advantage of its increased size across what will effectively be a national distribution network. Instead of two independent distribution networks, one for the east and one for the west, the combined operation will have the opportunity to manage coast to coast.
Beyond automotive
Each of these companies demonstrates that, in order to be effective, a supply chain strategist has to evaluate performance in the overall economy and the specific industry the supply chain serves. In today's economy, businesses of all types and sizes are confronting cost issues outside their control. But what the corner office cares about is profits, not costs, and each of these three companies provides valuable lessons in making supply chain excellence relevant to driving growth and profits.
What makes the automotive aftermarket sector particularly challenging is the large number of parts stores must stock in order to service the customer. Cars are being driven longer, which compounds the problem, while new technologies continue to broaden the product line because new technologies require new parts.
Automotive aftermarket retail supply chain strategists have found a way to use supply chain competencies to differentiate themselves from the competition and drive profits: making sure the right part is on the right shelf at the right time.
Wes Randall of Auburn University elaborates. "In a retail supply chain, when you're the intermediary between the manufacturer and the customer, you really have to be very deliberate in your response when commodity prices are creating profit pressure. Before you just pass along the price increases to the customer, you really need to see if you can find a way to be more productive with your internal financial structure and performance. It might be economies of scale. It might be category management. It might be rethinking how often you ship, or how much inventory you push to retail.
"Fighting against the macro-economic environment is like shoveling against the tide. It is what it is. Adapt, adjust to the current market, but be ready to respond when the market begins to turn back around."
That's a lesson the successful players in the automotive aftermarket have taken to heart: They are looking inside their four walls, focusing on their own supply chain strengths. And they're letting the facts and customer-focused opportunities—not their imaginations—drive them.
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.