Steve Geary is adjunct faculty at the University of Tennessee's Haaslam College of Business and is a lecturer at The Gordon Institute at Tufts University. He is the President of the Supply Chain Visions family of companies, consultancies that work across the government sector. Steve is a contributing editor at DC Velocity, and editor-at-large for CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
Imagine a business where supply chain excellence really matters.
Imagine a business where your direct competitors sell the same products you do. You're small box retail, but some of what you sell can also be bought at Wal-Mart, so in certain items you face the most formidable competitor on the planet. You don't control the designs of the products that you sell, so engineering and technology matter little.
You turn your inventories over a couple of times a year, so if you make a mistake, you sit on it for a long time. You manage 25,000 or so SKUs at the retail level, and hundreds of thousands in your wholesale network. You have hundreds of suppliers to manage, located around the world. And with every passing day, more and more of the production is going offshore. Plus, your suppliers are merging and consolidating, so your power over them is eroding.
If you're the best in the business, you may make 10 percent of sales in net profits. If you're not, you may be just above break even, or worse. And if you struggle, one of your competitors will swallow you right up.
And now—the 2008 economy. Your products are chock full of oil, metals, and plastics. Most of them are heavy, and you need to move them a long way to get them to market in the United States, often from Mexico, or India, or China. Your transportation costs are exploding; your cost of goods, and by implication your prices, are being driven up by the commodity markets.
Welcome to the world of the automotive aftermarket retail supply chain. You can try to build intimacy and customer loyalty, but a spark plug is a spark plug. You can try to innovate with product design for private-label initiatives, but the OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) control specifications. So success comes down to a focus on supply chain fundamentals.
Ten major retailers account for about 40 percent of the do-it-yourself auto parts aftermarket. The strategic, fact-driven approaches of the top three can offer lessons that apply to all supply chains, no matter the industry.
Their most important lesson: Don't let your imagination run wild. Stay focused, stay anchored, and stay with the basics.
"Yes, no, or a number"
AutoZone is the largest of the aftermarket parts retailers in the United States, with about 85 percent of its sales coming from U.S. retail outlets. Sales in 2007 were over $6 billion, with after-tax earnings of almost 10 percent of sales. Quarterly releases this year indicate a modest sales growth of around 3 to 4 percent. Same-store sales, however, are flat. But in the face of the competitive squeeze, AutoZone is thriving. Earnings per share are up around 15 percent this year.
How is it improving its margins in such a challenging environment? Central to AutoZone's strategy is a renewed emphasis on category management and financial engineering.
One senior manager for AutoZone provided insight into how management runs the business: "There are only three answers to a question: yes, no, or a number."
AutoZone's category management initiative might be described as inventory optimization on steroids. Basically, retailers using category management break down the entire range of products they sell into discrete groups, or categories, of related products, focusing on how customers purchase and use the products. Each category is then run like a profit center, with its own set of targets and strategies. The core principle of category management is having the right set of complementary items that customers want in stock at the right location, instead of just driving shelf availability at the item level. It is customer-driven portfolio management of inventory, organized around the application, rather than item management organized around commodities.
For example, a category manager will think about the customer planning an oil change and manage the store inventory to ensure that a complementary set of products is available to support that activity. So, in addition to motor oil, there have to be filters, drain pans, funnels, strap wrenches, drain plugs, shop rags, and oil absorbents to take care of spills. And the category manager will tune the pricing and profitability of the portfolio, from the low-cost to the premium offerings. It's not about managing the motor oil; it's about responding to the oil change event.
In fiscal 2007, AutoZone added over $70 million of parts to its product assortment. At the same time, it rebalanced inventory levels within categories and conducted a top-to-bottom merchandise line review on every single category. Refinements have continued in 2008.
To support its category management initiative, the company rolled out a new planning software package that helps select the right part for the right retail location. AutoZone also uses databases populated with information from vehicle registrations in each store's trade area to tailor inventory to the makes and models of the cars driven by all potential customers in that area.
AutoZone's focus on inventory management is not restricted to the operating side of the business: Some healthy financial engineering is under way. Although AutoZone has over $2 billion worth of inventory on the shelf, the company hasn't paid for most of it. At the end of 2007, AutoZone's on-hand inventory less inventory payables amounted to about $135 million. Technically the company owns the inventory on the shelf and owes the supplier for it, but AutoZone doesn't have to pay for it until it sells—an approach the company calls "pay on scan." The net effect is that little of AutoZone's cash is tied up in inventory because the suppliers are financing it.
Back to basics
Advance Auto Parts, another large player in the market, faces the same pressures as AutoZone. Sales in 2007 were just a shade under $5 billion, yielding a net after-tax income of 4.9 percent of sales. Like AutoZone, it is finding a way to become more profitable in a difficult economy by recalibrating around the basics.
To stay competitive in today's tough market, Advance Auto Parts is focusing on strategies to improve inventory effectiveness. Those strategies include providing better late-model and import parts coverage in key markets, making incremental inventory investments to speed up responses to store requests for parts, customizing parts assortments for specific stores, limiting order capability at the store level, and rationalizing sales-floor SKUs to remove less productive inventory.
The result: improved inventory turnover rates chain-wide and a merchandise mix that more accurately meets customers' needs on a store-by-store basis. This, in turn, drives sales. Inventory effectiveness drives top-line revenue growth.
It sounds a lot like category management.
At the same time, Advance has targeted expenses to improve the bottom line. The company has pruned initiatives that do not demonstrably support profitable growth, cutting information technology, logistics, and other investment projects that did not deliver an acceptable rate of return. According to financial information posted on its Web site, Advance has identified more than $70 million in expense reduction initiatives for 2007 and 2008.
The combined initiatives have led to improved results this year, yielding net after-tax income of 6.1 percent of sales in the quarter ending in July 2008, a quarter of a percentage point improvement over the same period in 2007. Overall sales are up almost 6 percent.
Be the consolidator
O'Reilly Automotive, another top tier supplier in the automotive aftermarket, has taken a different approach. Sales in 2007 were $2.5 billion, with a net after-tax profit of 7.7 percent of sales. In the quarter ending June 30, 2008, net income is up 7.5 percent compared to the same period in 2007. However, rather than continuing an internal focus to drive performance improvement, it has decided to look for opportunity in somebody else's sandbox. O'Reilly is growing through acquisition, hoping to achieve economies of scale in inventory and distribution, and improve overall profitability of the combined operations.
In April of this year, O'Reilly agreed to merge with CSK Auto Corp. CSK operates Checker Auto Parts, Schuck's Auto Supply, Kragen Auto Parts, and Murray's Auto Stores. Year-over-year sales for CSK have been declining, and net after-tax income for the latest period is less than 1 percent of sales. But CSK's annual sales of $1.9 billion will raise the combined O'Reilly/CSK organization to nearly the size and scale of Advance Auto Parts.
There is always risk in mergers, but CSK's markets, which are west of the Mississippi, nicely complement O'Reilly's base, predominantly east of the Mississippi. And scale matters in the auto parts business. Clearly, there is opportunity to improve the profitability of CSK's operations, and O'Reilly has demonstrated its skill as an operator.
Like AutoZone, O'Reilly has sophisticated inventory management systems that customize the assortment of products stocked at each store based upon market demand and vehicle registration data. O'Reilly intends to apply its sophistication in operations and inventory management to CSK's operations, while at the same time taking advantage of its increased size across what will effectively be a national distribution network. Instead of two independent distribution networks, one for the east and one for the west, the combined operation will have the opportunity to manage coast to coast.
Beyond automotive
Each of these companies demonstrates that, in order to be effective, a supply chain strategist has to evaluate performance in the overall economy and the specific industry the supply chain serves. In today's economy, businesses of all types and sizes are confronting cost issues outside their control. But what the corner office cares about is profits, not costs, and each of these three companies provides valuable lessons in making supply chain excellence relevant to driving growth and profits.
What makes the automotive aftermarket sector particularly challenging is the large number of parts stores must stock in order to service the customer. Cars are being driven longer, which compounds the problem, while new technologies continue to broaden the product line because new technologies require new parts.
Automotive aftermarket retail supply chain strategists have found a way to use supply chain competencies to differentiate themselves from the competition and drive profits: making sure the right part is on the right shelf at the right time.
Wes Randall of Auburn University elaborates. "In a retail supply chain, when you're the intermediary between the manufacturer and the customer, you really have to be very deliberate in your response when commodity prices are creating profit pressure. Before you just pass along the price increases to the customer, you really need to see if you can find a way to be more productive with your internal financial structure and performance. It might be economies of scale. It might be category management. It might be rethinking how often you ship, or how much inventory you push to retail.
"Fighting against the macro-economic environment is like shoveling against the tide. It is what it is. Adapt, adjust to the current market, but be ready to respond when the market begins to turn back around."
That's a lesson the successful players in the automotive aftermarket have taken to heart: They are looking inside their four walls, focusing on their own supply chain strengths. And they're letting the facts and customer-focused opportunities—not their imaginations—drive them.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."