With sales surging, online retailer Zappos.com needed an order picking technology that could be up and running quickly. The answer? A system that uses robots to bring goods to order pickers.
Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
Ask its customers what type of company Zappos.com is, and they'll likely tell you it's an online retailer of shoes—and maybe accessories and apparel. But Zappos itself would tell you something different. As it explains on its Web site, Zappos considers itself to be "a service company that happens to sell shoes, handbags, and anything and everything."
What Zappos means by "service" is what supply chain professionals would call order fulfillment. In its online profile, the retailer attributes its spectacular success over the past nine years to a commitment to speedy order delivery and a guarantee of product availability (the company says it will not offer a product for sale unless it's physically present in its warehouse). It's hard to argue with the results. Since its founding in 1999, Zappos.com has recorded double-digit—sometimes even triple digit—sales increases every year, and it's looking forward to more of the same. The privately held company expects sales to surpass $1 billion this year, which would mean growth of about 20 percent over 2007 figures.
As gratifying as that sales growth may be to, say, management and accounting, it presents enormous challenges for the distribution centers that must fill all those orders. The company stocks more than 3 million items across 1,400 brands, and runs what could only be described as a high-volume shipping operation. Craig Adkins, vice president of fulfillment operations for Zappos.com, says the retailer moves about 35,000 units daily through its two distribution centers in Shepherdsville, Ky., which include its original 280,000-square-foot building and a new 832,000-square-foot facility. Peak season volumes can hit 60,000 units daily, all shipped directly to consumers. Nearly all items require split-case picks.
In order to keep up with demand, Zappos continues to expand its fulfillment capabilities. But when it comes to installing new equipment, it has to proceed with caution— its very public commitment to prompt order turnaround means there's little margin for error. So it's no surprise that, when it went to choose a fulfillment technology earlier this year, Zappos was attracted to a system that promised rapid deployment.
The company found what it wanted in a technology developed by Woburn, Mass.-based Kiva Systems that relies on robots to move products stored on portable shelves to order pickers. Because there are no racks or conveyors to install (all of its hardware components are mobile), the Kiva system offered the prospect of a quick installation. "One of the challenges of growing fast is that we need a kind of just-in-time installation, which Kiva offers," says Adkins.
In June, the company announced that it had completed installation of a Kiva Mobile Fulfillment System in one quadrant of its new 832,000-square-foot DC. True to its billing, the system proved simple to deploy. The complete installation took about four months from the time the two companies signed a contract until the system was up and running.
A good fit
When it came to purchasing the new technology, Zappos.com started small: Its initial order with Kiva was for 70 robots. Zappos could have used more, says Adkins, but the company wanted to test the system first to validate its assumptions about how it would perform and ensure that its economic analysis was correct.
The actual installation began shortly after the contract was signed—something Kiva was able to accomplish because it already had the groundwork in place. Early in the negotiation process, Kiva asks potential customers for detailed shipping information. "We create an exact simulation of the warehouse environment, including orders and volume," says J.D. Harris, vice president of professional services for Kiva and the on-site manager for Zappos.com's installation.
While Kiva assembled the robots at its Woburn plant, the company sent a team to the Zappos.com site to prepare the floor, installing two-dimensional barcode stickers that the robots use for navigation. Once the configuration work was completed, Kiva delivered the robots, which it terms the "drive units," and the shelving units, or "pods," and the software was configured and tested.
Adkins reports the installation progressed rapidly once the robots, which can handle loads of up to 3,000 pounds, were delivered. "When you take them off the truck and turn them on, they start to communicate," he says. "You can tell them to go out in the grid and start driving around.
"Soon after the bots arrived, we started testing those and bringing in the shelving and deploying that," he continues. "Then the stations were built and assembled; then we tested communications between the software [applications]."
The Kiva system currently handles about 15 percent of the overall volume shipped from the DC, and Adkins expects to buy additional units. "In subsequent years, as we grow," he says, "we will order more." Adding on will be easy, he says, because the Kiva system is highly scaleable."You don't have to buy entire systems," he explains. "You can buy one robot and one shelf. Then it scales with the business. That's a lot of capital cost avoidance."
Fast and flexible
Speedy installation and scaleability are just two of the Kiva system's advantages, says Adkins. Zappos has also found it to be extremely energy efficient. Because the system uses robots, not humans, to retrieve inventory and bring it to the picking stations, there's no need to keep the lights on in the areas where goods are stored. And unlike powered conveyors, it does not use motors that must operate constantly. "The energy savings are pretty huge," he says.
Adkins expects to see other savings opportunities as well. He reports that Zappos' analysis indicates that using the Kiva system should result in about a 40percent reduction in labor costs. He explains that the savings will come from the system's ability to receive and put away simultaneously on the inbound side and to handle picking, sorting, and packing simultaneously on the outbound side. Another labor benefit, according to Adkins: Training is simple. "The learning curve to use the picking stations is very short," he reports. "We can take anybody and train them in 15 to 30 minutes."
Adkins adds that another key advantage of the Kiva system is its ease of reconfiguration. Changing the robots' paths—and thus, the product flow— requires little more than moving the barcode stickers on the DC floor that the robots use for navigation.
Similarly, it will be a simple matter for Zappos to adjust its operation as its product mix changes. Right now, 90 percent of Zappos' business is shoes, Adkins says, but the company expects the balance to shift more to apparel in the coming years. As that happens, it can simply change the items stored on the shelving pods without affecting the way the system works.
And finally, there's the portability advantage. In Adkins' eyes, one of the biggest benefits of all is the ability to move the entire system if need be. "If we have to move," he says, "it is easy to pick up and go."
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."
Businesses are cautiously optimistic as peak holiday shipping season draws near, with many anticipating year-over-year sales increases as they continue to battle challenging supply chain conditions.
That’s according to the DHL 2024 Peak Season Shipping Survey, released today by express shipping service provider DHL Express U.S. The company surveyed small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to gauge their holiday business outlook compared to last year and found that a mix of optimism and “strategic caution” prevail ahead of this year’s peak.
Nearly half (48%) of the SMEs surveyed said they expect higher holiday sales compared to 2023, while 44% said they expect sales to remain on par with last year, and just 8% said they foresee a decline. Respondents said the main challenges to hitting those goals are supply chain problems (35%), inflation and fluctuating consumer demand (34%), staffing (16%), and inventory challenges (14%).
But respondents said they have strategies in place to tackle those issues. Many said they began preparing for holiday season earlier this year—with 45% saying they started planning in Q2 or earlier, up from 39% last year. Other strategies include expanding into international markets (35%) and leveraging holiday discounts (32%).
Sixty percent of respondents said they will prioritize personalized customer service as a way to enhance customer interactions and loyalty this year. Still others said they will invest in enhanced web and mobile experiences (23%) and eco-friendly practices (13%) to draw customers this holiday season.