When the results of the State of Logistics Report were released earlier this summer, the report's author, Rosalyn Wilson, announced that logistics costs as a percentage of GDP had risen in 2007, climbing above the 10-percent mark for the first time since 2000.
Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
For 19 years now, The State of Logistics Report has provided an annual snapshot of logistics costs across the U.S. economy. While some critics have disputed the methodology behind it, the report has become the mostly widely cited barometer of those costs. For most of those years, it has shown a relatively steady trend—the decline of logistics costs as a percentage of the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP).
Not so this year. When she unveiled the latest study's results earlier this summer, the report's author, Rosalyn Wilson, announced that logistics costs as a percentage of GDP had risen in 2007, climbing above the 10-percent mark for the first time since 2000. During a press conference in Washington, D.C., Wilson also noted that total U.S. logistics costs for 2007 totaled $1.4 trillion, an increase of $91 billion over 2006, the fourth year in a row the number has hit a record level.
In her report, which is sponsored by the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP), Wilson cited a number of reasons for the rise in logistics costs. Not surprisingly, skyrocketing transportation expenses made the list. She also cited higher inventory carrying costs—a result of excess inventory in the system as consumer spending slowed. In fact, she said, inventory carrying costs grew 9.0 percent last year, faster than transportation costs, which were up 5.9 percent. "Costs were up for virtually every component of business logistics," she added.
Wilson, who subtitled her report "Surviving the Slump," does not expect an immediate turnaround. The Federal Reserve insists that the country has not yet entered a recession, she said, "but, in my opinion, neither have we entered a recovery." Wilson added that she believes the remainder of 2008 will bring more of the same, with a slow recovery to begin next year.
A glass half full?
Despite the generally gloomy news in the report, a panel of shippers and carriers who discussed the findings after the presentation sounded relatively upbeat.
John Gray, senior vice president for policy and economics for the Association of American Railroads, said, "I reject the idea that this is a frightening time. There have been few times that it has been more exciting to be in the transportation business." While he acknowledged that the railroads, like other modes, have had to contend with rising fuel costs, he nevertheless insisted that he foresees a strong future. "This is a time of unprecedented opportunity," he said.
Kevin Smith, senior vice president of supply chain and logistics for drugstore chain CVS, likewise took issue with the gloomy prognostications. "In talking to my colleagues, we have a much brighter outlook," he said. Smith wasn't the only shipper to express those sentiments. Despite the collapse of the housing market, Brian Hancock, vice president of supply chain for Whirlpool Corp., whose appliance sales are tied to that market, also said he was confident about the future.
But fuel costs, and what they mean to supply chains, were clearly on the minds of the panelists. Rick Jackson, chief operating officer for Victoria's Secret Direct, said, "Our supply chain is built around a cost-service proposition, and speed is a very important part of that proposition." If fuel prices continue to climb, he said, his company may be forced to reassess the cost/service trade-offs, and perhaps "make some paradigm-changing decisions about what the service model ought to be and what the speed model ought to be."
Cliff Otto, president of Saddle Creek Corp., a third-party logistics service company, added that he was already seeing evidence of some supply chain realignments. Soaring fuel and inventory costs, he said, are causing shippers to reexamine their distribution networks and number of distribution points to determine the most cost-effective way to serve customers.
Jackson said he is concerned in particular about the future of the truckload market, which has lost a significant amount of capacity in the past two years. Historically, capacity in that market ramps up quickly during economic recoveries. That may have changed. "As capacity is leaving the market, so have the assets," he said. "That hasn't happened in the past."
Wilson noted in her report that foreign buyers are purchasing many of the trucks sidelined by the downturn, permanently removing them from the United States.
The panel's trucking representative, Jim O'Neal, president of O&S Trucking, agreed that shippers may be in for a tough time when business picks up, which he thinks will happen sooner rather than later. He said he believes the economy is "on the precipice of a significant recovery." When the turnaround comes, he warned, shippers could face a severe shortage of trucking capacity.
For the present, though, Wilson noted, shippers have the upper hand in price negotiations with carriers.
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.