The choice was much easier a quarter century ago. If you had a small package to ship, you went with either the U.S.Postal Service (USPS) or United Parcel Service (UPS).
Then along came Federal Express, with an overnight delivery service, and Roadway Package System (now called FedEx Ground), which was the first to offer ground parcel service with package-tracking capability. Lured by the prospect of money to mine, others—most notably Airborne Express and DHL Worldwide Express—quickly jumped into the domestic express service game.
But that doesn't mean small package carriers own the market. Today, they're getting some competition from an unexpected quarter—the less-than-truckload (LTL) carriers. LTL haulers, which have adjusted their networks and upgraded their systems so they can offer time-definite delivery and tracking, are gearing up to beat small package specialists at their own game, especially in business-to-business shipping.
As a result of all the competition, shippers looking to move small packages today can reach any address in the nation, choose how fast the goods get there and obtain notification of their exact time of arrival. Also as a result of all the competition, shippers now have a lot more options to investigate—not only among the traditional small parcel carriers, but among LTL competitors and consolidators as well.
So many choices, so little time
The pantheon of small-parcel carriers is pretty familiar to most shippers by now. The grand daddy, of course, is the USPS, often the choice of customers who are interested in saving money. What's noteworthy about the Postal Service's offerings is the absence of extra charges: There is no extra charge for delivering to residences or for making Saturday deliveries, and there's no fuel surcharge. And even though the USPS does impose a fee for its pickup service, that fee is charged for the visit, not the number of pieces as is the case with many of its competitors.
Then there's FedEx, which offers a wide variety of services. Domestic offerings range from same-day, overnight, and two-or three-day delivery (FedEx Express U.S.) to one-to five-day ground delivery (FedEx Ground U.S.). International offerings include FedEx Express International (one- to three-day or four-to five-day service to more than 210 countries) and FedEx Ground International (day-definite service to business addresses in Canada and Puerto Rico).
Meanwhile, megacarrier UPS, already a huge player in both the domestic ground and air-express business, is looking to strengthen its foothold in the international small package market. The carrier, through its UPS Supply Chain Solutions division, launched its "Trade Direct Ocean" service in Brazil and China late last year. Under that program, which is popular among shoe and apparel manufacturers, the company works with vendors and manufacturers to prelabel small packages, which are then moved via ocean container to the United States. Upon arrival, UPS unloads the packages and immediately places them directly into its small package network.
Another major player is Airborne, which offers overnight, next-afternoon, second-day, and ground service as well as a deferred one-to five-day service. The company's recent focus has been on expanding its Web site, Airborne.com, to include a number of transactional capabilities. Shippers now can print their own labels, track shipments, schedule pickups and pay bills-all online.
Along with the national players, there are a number of regional parcel carriers. Eastern Connection, for example, provides parcel delivery services in cities from Maine to Virginia. Small by comparison to UPS or FedEx (it handles about 8,000 packages a day), Eastern Connection provides next-day service to most of its destinations.
Grounded
But the regionals are not the only carriers nipping at the traditional parcel and express carriers' heels. The LTL haulers are making headway among shippers that move large volumes of small packages to business consignees. The major carriers in the marketplace have reduced transit times on thousands of lanes and have tracking capabilities comparable to the parcel carriers'. For example, Roadway Express, one of the nation's largest LTL carriers, now offers services that historically have been associated with parcel and express specialists, such as delivery within specific time windows and tracking by its own PRO number, by bill of lading and by purchase order or booking number.
Yellow Transportation, another national LTL carrier, offers what it calls Exact Express, which provides time-specific delivery the same day or the next day. Its Definite Delivery services offer guaranteed on-time delivery for non-expedited shipments. As an added bonus, shipment status information is available 24/7.
Con-Way Transportation Services, a group of regional LTL carriers, also offers time-definite and day-definite delivery services. It provides a number of tracking options, including tracking via its Web site and tracking by bill of lading, purchase order, PRO number or shipper-specific identification number. Last month, the company introduced a service offering tracking information via e-mail.
Another player is national LTL carrier ABF Freight System, which provides a premium delivery service it calls Assured Service. That service guarantees delivery on the advertised service date by the shipper's choice of noon or 5 p.m. ABF also offers a non-guaranteed express service providing next-day, second-day or third-day delivery.
Even the multi-regionals have gotten into the act. For example, Old Dominion Freight Lines, a multi-regional carrier with direct service in 38 states, offers three levels of guaranteed delivery service. Its Speed Service Guaranteed provides a guarantee of delivery within regular transit times; Speed Service On Demand provides expedited service; and Speed Service Next Day Air provides next-day service in the United States.
Getting PO'd
But the traditional parcel carriers and their LTL competitors do not have the field to themselves. Companies that ship the bulk of their small packages to residences also have the option of using consolidation and mailer services. These services arrange for packages to move most of the way by truck before being deposited into the U.S. Postal Service's system for final delivery.
This can mean big savings for shippers. R.R. Donnelley Logistics Services, which is probably the largest of the consolidators, handling more than 150 million packages a year, says the service can save shippers up to 25 percent over other ground delivery services. This service is a variation of an older concept called zone-skipping, in which consolidators placed packages into either the UPS or the Postal Service delivery network at the end of the linehaul and near the point of delivery.
One event that has spurred the growth of the consolidation and mailer segment has been the development of tracking capabilities up to the point of delivery. Historically that was the weak point in the zone-skipping model. But in October 2001, Donnelley Logistics and the Postal Service integrated their tracking systems, allowing shippers to follow packages for which they had requested delivery confirmation.
Though Donnelley may be the biggest player in the market, it doesn't lack for competitors. Parcel/Direct, another package consolidator serving companies that ship to residences, began operations in 1998 and now runs seven distribution centers around the United States. Other players include Parcel Corp. of America, which began as a zone-skipping consolidator and now offers fulfillment services on the West Coast to direct marketers. PFI, also on the West Coast, specializes in daily delivery of parcels directly to 1,500 post offices (called "destination delivery units" in Postal Service jargon). Established in 1999 as PaQast Inc., it has aimed from the out set to establish a joint venture with the Postal Service to provide expedited parcel delivery.
What shippers want
Given the wealth of options out there for moving small packages, the question on everybody's mind is what shippers really want. You might think that all small package shippers want pretty much the same thing. But you'd be wrong. According to a recent survey by J.D. Power and Associates, what shippers are looking for varies markedly with the type of shipment. For example, the survey found that where ground service was concerned, shippers ranked "shipping & delivery" (that is, consistency of delivery and damage-free delivery) highest (51 percent), with "invoicing" a distant second (11 percent). Where international service was concerned, "shipping & delivery" again ranked highest (42 percent), followed by "value" (24 percent). But those survey respondents using air service saw things differently. With this group, "value" ranked highest (23 percent), with "shipping & delivery" a close second (19 percent) and "driver relationships" a close third (16 percent).
Other factors included in the survey were reputation, account executives, tracking information, communication, special services and customer service reps.
Though both air and international shippers gave "value" a lot of weight, that wasn't the case among ground shippers, who relegated it to seventh place (3 percent). Surprising? Not necessarily, says Curt Carlson, director of custom research for J. D. Power and Associates, which is based in Westlake Village, Calif. "Costs for ground service," he points out, "tend to be lower than they are for air and international services, which typically lowers expectations as well."
Not only did the J.D. Power survey look at attribute rankings, but it also asked its shipper respondents which carriers they preferred-though the research included only the traditional small package carriers. The survey found that participants (almost 1,000 shipping managers in companies with more than 10 employees that spent $10,000 or more a year on small package shipments) preferred the following carriers in this order:
Ground service: FedEx, UPS and the USPS. (Airborne did not have a sufficient sample to be included.) "Ranking between FedEx and UPS was reasonably close in this area," reports Carlson.
International service: FedEx, then UPS. Airborne and the USPS did not have a sufficient sample to be included.)
Air service: FedEx, UPS, Airborne and the USPS.
Suit yourself
Though the shippers surveyed by J. D. Power had definite ideas about which carriers deserved a place on their "preferred" lists, patterns of usage in the industry are much less clear cut. Some companies use different carriers for different DC locations, and some even use different carriers within the same site.
One such company is Acme Distribution Centers in Denver. "Our decisions in selecting small package carriers vary depending on the physical location of our distribution center and the physical attributes of the product, "says Doug Sampson, senior vice president. "In making the decisions, we look at service, price, technology and support. In other words, everything is customized. Certain carriers perform better in certain areas than others, and certain carriers handle certain pack a ges better than others."
The J. D. Power survey confirms that Sampson is not alone: "While there were a few surprises in the survey overall, the biggest one was that one size doesn't fit all," notes Carlson. "The industry works hard at creating a combination of services designed to meet everyone's needs. However, as seamless as carriers try to make those services, our survey has shown that shippers have many different expectations."
Raising returns
Parcel carriers, like most other businesses, suffered some setbacks under the double shocks of a stalled economy and the 20 01 terrorist attacks. FedEx Express's average daily volumes, for example, grew by a scant 0.3 percent in its 20 01 fiscal year (which closes at the end of May) and dropped by 5.8 percent in its 2002 fiscal year.
Though there are signs that some of the business is rebounding—FedEx Corp. reports that average daily package volume for FedEx Express and FedEx Ground was up 13 percent in the quarter ended Nov. 30—it's definitely not a universal. If you look at stats through the first nine months of last year, UPS's average daily volume of 12.9 million domestic packages lagged 1.8 percent behind the previous year's.
One way to offset falling volumes, of course, is to raise prices. And indeed, most of the small package carriers have announced rate increases recently. In November 2002, UPS raised its rates an average of 2.9 percent. FedEx raised its express rates by 3.5 percent and ground rates by 3.9 percent. Airborne followed suit, announcing rate hikes of between 3 and 4 percent for its various services. Those followed a 10-percent increase by the Postal Service for Priority Mail earlier in the year.
But that doesn't immediately or necessarily translate into a rate increase for all customers, says Donald Broughton, a transportation equity analyst with A.G. Edwards of St. Louis. " For example, customers who have contracts with small package carriers won't see increases for up to a year," he says, "and those who already have discounts will continue to get those discounts off the base rates."
Does a rate increase among parcel carriers give a pricing edge to the LTL carriers? No, says Broughton. "Small package carriers' decisions to raise rates won't hurt them in terms of going up against regional LTLs because the LTLs have been raising their rates, too."
Overall, LTLs have tended to use far less discipline in terms of not negotiating back all of their rate increases through discounts, he adds. "In other words, if you have a discount with a small package carrier that raises its rates, you will still continue to receive that discount. However, this isn't always the same with LTL carriers. For example, if an LTL carrier announces a 5-percent rate increase, a customer with a 50-percent discount may end up with a 52-percent discount."
Warehouse automation vendor Locus Robotics marked the grand opening of its global headquarters facility in Wilmington, Mass., this week.
The state-of-the-art, 157,000 square-foot Locus Park facility “serves as the nexus for hundreds of Locus employees driving the company's mission to revolutionize global supply chains through advanced robotics solutions,” the company said in a statement Thursday.
The new headquarters boasts an expansive research and development, testing, and engineering space, and is home base to the firm’s nearly 200 New England area employees. The facility also handles all robotics manufacturing, shipping, and administration functions.
“Locus Park represents our commitment to innovation and our confidence in the future,” company CEO Rick Faulk said in the statement. “It's a launchpad for the next generation of robotics and AI solutions that will redefine warehouse efficiency and empower workforces worldwide. As we stand at the forefront of industrial automation, we're not just leading the industry but transforming it.”
Alongside the grand opening, Locus also celebrated surpassing four billion units picked across its customer deployments around the world.
Business leaders in the manufacturing and transportation sectors will increasingly turn to technology in 2025 to adapt to developments in a tricky economic environment, according to a report from Forrester.
That approach is needed because companies in asset-intensive industries like manufacturing and transportation quickly feel the pain when energy prices rise, raw materials are harder to access, or borrowing money for capital projects becomes more expensive, according to researcher Paul Miller, vice president and principal analyst at Forrester.
And all of those conditions arose in 2024, forcing leaders to focus even more than usual on managing costs and improving efficiency. Forrester’s latest forecast doesn’t anticipate any dramatic improvement in the global macroeconomic situation in 2025, but it does anticipate several ways that companies will adapt.
For 2025, Forrester predicts that:
over 25% of big last-mile service and delivery fleets in Europe will be electric. Across the continent, parcel delivery firms, utility companies, and local governments operating large fleets of small vans over relatively short distances see electrification as an opportunity to manage costs while lowering carbon emissions.
less than 5% of the robots entering factories and warehouses will walk. While industry coverage often focuses on two-legged robots, Forrester says the compelling use cases for those legs are less common — or obvious — than supporters suggest. The report says that those robots have a wow factor, but they may not have the best form factor for addressing industry’s dull, dirty, and dangerous tasks.
carmakers will make significant cuts to their digital divisions, admitting defeat after the industry invested billions of dollars in recent years to build the capability to design the connected and digital features installed in modern vehicles. Instead, the future of mobility will be underpinned by ecosystems of various technology providers, not necessarily reliant on the same large automaker that made the car itself.
This story first appeared in the September/October issue of Supply Chain Xchange, a journal of thought leadership for the supply chain management profession and a sister publication to AGiLE Business Media & Events’' DC Velocity.
For the trucking industry, operational costs have become the most urgent issue of 2024, even more so than issues around driver shortages and driver retention. That’s because while demand has dropped and rates have plummeted, costs have risen significantly since 2022.
As reported by the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), every cost element has increased over the past two years, including diesel prices, insurance premiums, driver rates, and trailer and truck payments. Operating costs increased beyond $2.00 per mile for the first time ever in 2022. This trend continued in 2023, with the total marginal cost of operating a truck rising to $2.27 per mile, marking a new record-high cost. At the same time, the average spot rate for a dry van was $2.02 per mile, meaning that trucking companies would lose $0.25 per mile to haul a dry van load at spot rates.
These high costs have placed a significant burden on the operations of trucking companies, challenging their financial sustainability over the last two years. As a result, 2023 saw approximately 8,000 brokers and 88,000 trucking companies cease operations, including some marquee names, such as Yellow Corp. and Convoy, and decades-long businesses, such as Matheson Trucking and Arnold Transportation Services.
More so than ever before, trucking companies need to get better at efficiently using their assets and reducing operational costs. So, what is a trucking company to do? Technology is the answer! Given the nature of the problem, technology-led innovation will be critical to ensure companies can balance rising costs through efficient operations.
One technology that could be the answer to many of the trucking industry’s issues is the concept of digital twins. A digital twin is a virtual model of a real system and simulates the physical state and behavior of the real system. As the physical system changes state, the digital twin keeps up with the real-world changes and provides predictive and decision-making capabilities built on top of the digital model.
DHL, in a 2023 white paper, suggests that—due to the maturation of technologies such as the internet of things (IoT), cloud computing, artificial intelligence (AI), advanced software engineering paradigms, and virtual reality—digital twins have “come of age” and are now viable across multiple sectors, including transportation. We agree with this assessment and believe that digital twins are essential to radically improving the processes of fleet planning and dispatch.
THE NEED TO AUTOMATE
Outside of attaining procurement efficiencies, trucking companies can achieve lower costs by focusing on critical operational levers such as minimizing deadheads, reducing driver dwell time, and maximizing driver and asset utilization.
However, manual methods of planning and dispatch cannot optimally balance these levers to achieve efficiency and cost control. Even when planners work very hard and owners strive to improve processes, optimizing fleet planning is not a problem humans can solve routinely. Planning is a computationally intensive activity. To achieve fleet-level efficiencies, the planner has to consider all possible truck-to-load combinations in real time and solve for many operational constraints such as drivers’ hours of service, customer windows, and driver home time, to name just a few. These computations become even more complex when you add in the dynamic nature of real-world conditions such as trucks getting stuck in traffic or breaking down or orders getting delayed. This is not a task humans do best! For these sorts of tasks, technology has the upper hand.
When a company creates a digital twin of its trucking network, it has a real-time model that factors in truck locations, drivers’ hours of service, and loads being executed and planned. Planners can then use this digital model to assess possible decisions and select ones that increase asset utilization, improve customer and driver satisfaction, and lower costs.
For example, a digital twin of the network can offer significant insights and analysis on the state of the network, including exceptions such as delayed pickups and deliveries, unassigned loads, and trucks needing assignments. Backed by AI that takes business rules into account, digital twins can allow companies to optimize their fleet performance by finding the most efficient load assignments and dynamically adjusting in real time to changes in traffic patterns and weather, customer delays, truck issues, and so on.
With a digital twin, carriers can optimize the matching of assets, drivers, and freight. Typically, an investment in this innovative technology results in a 20%+ increase in productive miles per truck, while also improving driver pay and significantly decreasing driver churn. Drivers get paid by the miles they run, so when they run more, they are able to make more money, resulting in less need to chase the next job in search of better pay.
ADDITIONAL BENEFITS
Digital twins also combat deadheading, another source of driver dissatisfaction and cost inefficiencies. On average, over-the-road drivers spend 17%–20% of road miles driving empty. Using a digital twin, a company can search across several freight sources to find a load that perfectly matches the deadhead leg without impacting downstream commitments. These additional revenue miles will help drivers to maximize their earnings on the road and carriers to maximize their asset utilization and profitability.
The traditional manual dispatch planning model is becoming increasingly outdated—each planner and fleet manager tasked with overseeing 30 to 40 vehicles. Carriers try to manage this problem by dividing the fleet into manageable chunks, which results in cross-fleet inefficiencies. Such a system isn’t scalable. A digital twin acts as an equalizer for small and mid-sized fleets. It enables carriers to expand by venturing beyond the fixed routes and network they were forced to run out of fear of additional logistical complexity.
A digital twin can also give an organization the transparency and visibility it needs to find and fix inefficiencies. A successful carrier will leverage the technology to learn from the hitches in its operations. While this visibility is beneficial in its own right, it also provides the first step toward a seamless, digitized operation. “Digital revolution” is a buzzword frequently heard at transportation conferences. Yet not too many organizations are dedicated to digitizing their operations past the visibility stage. The end goal should be using decision-support systems to automate key elements of the system, thus freeing up planners from their daily rote tasks to focus on problems that only humans can solve.
Finally incorporating a digital twin can also help trucking companies work toward the broader trend of creating greener supply chains. Because they have lower deadhead and dwell times, trucking companies that have adopted a digital twin can be more attractive to shippers that are looking for more efficient operations that meet their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) goals.
THE FUTURE IS HERE
It is important to note that the benefits described here are not dreams for the future; digital twin technology is already here. In fact, choosing a digital twin can seem daunting because there are already a spectrum of options out there. First and foremost, an organization must ensure that the digital twin it selects aligns with both the goals and the scope of its operation.
Additionally, the ideal digital twin should:
Operate in near real time. A digital twin should be able to refresh as often as the network changes.
Be able to factor in specific customer delivery requirements as well as asset- and operator-specific constraints.
Be computationally efficient and comprehensive as it considers thousands of permutations in milliseconds. The digital twin should be able to reoptimize an entire fleet’s schedule of multi-day routes on the fly.
Before implementing a digital twin, carriers need to make sure that they have robust data management processes in place. Electronic logging devices (ELDs), customers’ tenders, billing, shipments, and so on are already inundating carriers with a glut of data. However, the manual nature of operations in many carriers leads to poor data quality. Carriers will need to invest in data management approaches to improve data quality to support the generation and use of high-fidelity digital twins. Otherwise, the digital twin will not be representative of reality and companies will run into an issue of “garbage in, garbage out.”
REINVENTION AND TRANSFORMATION
While data management is critical, change management through the ranks of dispatch operations is often a harder task. In fact, the largest roadblock carriers face when undergoing a digital transformation is the lack of willingness to change, not the technology itself. Many carriers cling to outmoded planning methods. Planners, used to operating based on well-worn business rules and tribal knowledge, could be wary of the technology and resistant to change. They may need to be assured that, while it is true that every trucking network is uniquely complex, digital twins can be set up to model the intricacies of their specific dispatch operations and drive value to the network. A significant amount of time and resources will need to be expended on change management. Otherwise even though trucking companies may invest in cutting-edge technology, they won't be able to fully capitalize on the added value it can provide.
As the truckload industry works through the current freight cycle, it is important to realize that change is inevitable. Carriers will need to reinvent their operations and invest in technologies to ride through the busts and booms of future freight cycles. Recent global events point to the many ways that wrenches can be thrown into global transportation networks, and the fact that such volatility is here to stay. Digital twins can provide companies with the visibility to navigate such changes. But above all, an operation that uses the digital twin to drive decisions can make customers and drivers happy, and help the carriers keep their heads above water during times such as now.
Regular online readers of DC Velocity and Supply Chain Xchange have probably noticed something new during the past few weeks. Our team has been working for months to produce shiny new websites that allow you to find the supply chain news and stories you need more easily.
It is always good for a media brand to undergo a refresh every once in a while. We certainly are not alone in retooling our websites; most of you likely go through that rather complex process every few years. But this was more than just your average refresh. We did it to take advantage of the most recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI).
Most of the AI work will take place behind the scenes. We will not, for instance, use AI to generate our stories. Those will still be written by our award-winning editorial team (I realize I’m biased, but I believe them to be the best in the business). Instead, we will be applying AI to things like graphics, search functions, and prioritizing relevant stories to make it easier for you to find the information you need along with related content.
We have also redesigned the websites’ layouts to make it quick and easy to find articles on specific topics. For example, content on DC Velocity’s new site is divided into five categories: material handling, robotics, transportation, technology, and supply chain services. We also offer a robust video section, including case histories, webcasts, and executive interviews, plus our weekly podcasts.
Over on the Supply Chain Xchange site, we have organized articles into categories that align with the traditional five phases of supply chain management: plan, procure, produce, move, and store. Plus, we added a “tech” category just to round it off. You can also find links to our videos, newsletters, podcasts, webcasts, blogs, and much more on the site.
Our mobile-app users will also notice some enhancements. An increasing number of you are receiving your daily supply chain news on your phones and tablets, so we have revamped our sites for optimal performance on those devices. For instance, you’ll find that related stories will appear right after the article you’re reading in case you want to delve further into the topic.
However you view us, you will find snappier headlines, more graphics and illustrations, and sites that are easier to navigate.
I would personally like to thank our management, IT department, and editors for their work in making this transition a reality. In our more than 20 years as a media company, this is our largest expansion into digital yet.
We hope you enjoy the experience.
Keep ReadingShow less
In this chart, the red and green bars represent Trucking Conditions Index for 2024. The blue line represents the Trucking Conditions Index for 2023. The index shows that while business conditions for trucking companies improved in August of 2024 versus July of 2024, they are still overall negative.
FTR’s Trucking Conditions Index improved in August to -1.39 from the reading of -5.59 in July. The Bloomington, Indiana-based firm forecasts that its TCI readings will remain mostly negative-to-neutral through the beginning of 2025.
“Trucking is en route to more favorable conditions next year, but the road remains bumpy as both freight volume and capacity utilization are still soft, keeping rates weak. Our forecasts continue to show the truck freight market starting to favor carriers modestly before the second quarter of next year,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions, and a negative score shows the opposite.