Keith R. Schmitz is a Midwest-based writer who has written about and taught courses in the areas of supply chain operations, material handling and management.
It's not easy being lean. In today's sputtering economy, supply chain leaders face the enormous challenge of satisfying customers with the most limited of resources. To do this, they must understand the complex and interdependent touch points within the supply chain. They must understand the obvious—and not so obvious—impacts of their decisions on total costs as well as service. They also need to balance all of these requirements under conditions of continual change.
As companies struggle to compete in a volatile economic environment,creating a manageable supply chain becomes all the more critical. Manageable supply chain operations dynamically integrate demand and supply management, target customers to boost revenue and help to maximize profit and shareholder value.
If that sounds like a lot of work, it is. But it's worth the trouble. By building a manageable supply chain operation, companies are better positioned to tackle changes in the supply chain environment. Beyond that, a manageable supply chain enables a company to become an adaptive enterprise, using technology tools to gauge changes in the market and respond quickly to them, consider the best options to use capital and grow its business faster than its competitors can.
The challenge is to get more out of what has already been invested—to achieve maximum return on assets (ROA). Every company must ensure that its most important assets—its existing IT infrastructure and its database of information on customers, suppliers and employees—are optimized for maximum return.
Elements of a successful supply chain
Strategically, it is easy to talk about minimizing costs while maintaining or increasing customer service levels. It is at the operational level where this strategy will either succeed or fail. This is the area where logistics is critical to meeting customers' needs in a cost-effective manner.
The cynic in all of us will question whether it's truly possible to balance customer service and total supply chain costs without sacrificing one for the other. With a lot of hard work, it is possible. The result is higher profits, higher earnings per share and higher stock values.
In order to meet the customer's needs and still obtain good financial results, supply chain leaders must focus on technology, infrastructure and human capital. That's more than mere theory. The following are some actual examples of cases in which supply chain leaders have come up with solutions that reduce overall operating costs and increase service levels:
A project team designed standard business processes that consolidated more than 20 different order fulfillment process flows into two standard business processes, improving expected turn time by 15 percent while increasing order accuracy and decreasing back orders.
A decision support team's analysis of a client's shipping costs resulted in a change in packaging material and grouping, leading to cost reductions of more than 18 percent.
A shipping team came up with a plan for grouping customers' shipments based on destination, reducing the number of order status inquiries by more than 15 percent.
Operations specialists proactively modified a customer's packaging types, resulting in a 20-percent savings in material costs.
But successful supply chain leaders have to do much more than satisfy customers; they must balance those customers' needs against profits. The only way to know what is possible—and determine its impact on your balance sheet—is to adopt an in-depth supply chain approach. This requires leaders to use the following three tools to manage every facet of the production and movement of products:
Technology. A central element of being a supply chain leader and creating a manageable supply chain is the ability to integrate with legacy systems,ERP systems and workflow systems. Once connectivity and visibility are established across the supply chain, it becomes essential to harness the available data to help managers make informed decisions affecting the supply chain.
Two important technological changes will affect how business is conducted with customers: integration of software applications, such as enterprise resource planning (ERP), customer relationship management (CRM) and advanced planning and scheduling (APS),and the advent of Internet-based communication.
Companies have begun to realize that every customer interaction is an opportunity to ensure that a customer is satisfied and that satisfied customers buy more products. The need for companies,especially those in the mid-market sector, to achieve greater return on relationships, enhance customer loyalty, expand and protect market share, and adapt to constant change can only be met by integrating ERP, CRM and material requirements planning (MRP) functionality into their supply chain.
Infrastructure. To remain competitive, supply chain leaders must be able to sell their products worldwide, at any time and in any quantity required. The prerequisite for this is a system of connected/networked global distribution points (and the associated information) that can respond individually and quickly to customer demand. What is needed is an integrated supply model that can coordinate sourcing of multiple products/components from multiple suppliers on demand.
There is a great deal of planning involved when considering how much of an on-demand model a client can effectively incorporate into its supply chain. The most compelling reasons for considering this cultural change in a company's operations include the following:
On-demand solutions greatly enhance a client's ability to communicate with its entire customer base while sending messages that are individual, personal, unique and targeted.
On-demand solutions distinguish a company from its competition, resulting in improved customer retention and loyalty.
On-demand solutions add flexibility to order design and program management.
An organization's ability to manage a supply chain infrastructure that integrates on-demand solutions will give it the flexibility to adapt to the market's ever-changing requirements.
The cornerstone of on-demand manufacturing is material management, an area where true supply chain leaders will have to focus their attention and energy. This is the grouping of all management functions that support the complete cycle of material flow from procurement, warehousing and production to fulfillment and distribution.
Human capital. It is people who come first.Without a good team, business success is impossible to achieve. The quality of products and services depends on the competence and professionalism of the people who provide them. A true supply chain leader is one who not only understands the importance of enthusiastic employees, but also consistently and effectively motivates them toward continual improvement.
Building trust with your employees comes from being able to rely on the other links in your supply chain. A successful supply chain requires an understanding of the new interdependencies being constructed and of the roles and responsibilities that must be adopted for the enterprise and its supply partners to become more collaborative.
Beyond the requisite technical skills, employees must become comfortable with the new workflow and underlying concepts int roduced by supply chain initiatives before the company will benefit from increased productivity.
To help shorten the ramp-up period, businesses implementing supply chain solutions should plan a comprehensive training program that offers employees hands-on access to a system that simulates real-world supply chain environments and provides insight into strategic supply chain operations.
Great expectations Supply chain ROA can be greatly enhanced—or impeded— by the way a company addresses the difficult challenge of adapting to a supply chain workflow model. Ultimately, it will be the human factor that makes or breaks this new work process within an organization.
The future development of supply chains will determine the success of companies and their profitability. Working with other supply chain leaders can translate into cost savi ngs and enhanced supply chain solutions. Your organization will begin to adopt the practices, attitudes and expectations of the customers and suppliers with which it interacts. By selecting the best, working with the best and expecting the best, you increase your chances of achieving the best.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."