John Johnson joined the DC Velocity team in March 2004. A veteran business journalist, John has over a dozen years of experience covering the supply chain field, including time as chief editor of Warehousing Management. In addition, he has covered the venture capital community and previously was a sports reporter covering professional and collegiate sports in the Boston area. John served as senior editor and chief editor of DC Velocity until April 2008.
J. Polep Distribution Services may make its money in the convenience store distribution business, but until recently, you would have been hard pressed to find anyone who characterized its operations as convenient.
Certainly not the people working at the company's Chicopee, Mass., distribution center. On a typical day, products being staged got in the way of products being picked, which forced workers to spend hours of overtime wading through the clutter to load the delivery trucks.
And certainly not its customers. Plagued by order inaccuracies and chronically late deliveries, J. Polep's customers-convenience stores located in New York and New England-were,in fact, quite inconvenienced.
Though it's a $550 million business, J. Polep simply wasn't up to speed when it came to serving its customers. "We were a slow pallet load, labor-intense line pick facility," admits Bill Fitzsimmons, J. Polep's vice president and chief financial officer. "We'd pick product and offload it onto a pallet, and then it went to the loading dock, where we'd stage it. It got to the point where we were staging all the way down our main aisle. We were basically out-picking our ability to load."
Relocation specialist
But that was in 1999, before J. Polep invested heavily in material handling systems that would ultimately allow it to double its business without expanding the company's 92,000-square-foot distribution center. Forced to make some drastic operational changes to a DC that was already bursting at the seams, J. Polep executives put out a call for vendors to look at the existing system and recommend improvements.
The winning bidder, a team of design, engineering and product-handling specialists from Maybury Material Handling, first reviewed everything from receiving, order handling and order picking to auditing and shipping and then evaluated different approaches for improving product flow. And they found a lot of things they wanted to change.
First up was the existing shipping and receiving process. Initially, both receiving and shipping were handled through a single set of doors. But the Maybury team quickly convinced J. Polep to relocate the operations, putting the receiving process at one dock and shipping at another. This allowed for continuous product flow through the building and resulted in a more efficient operation. (Today, the company uses 10 receiving docks and six loading docks.)
"We didn't see huge increases in throughput," says Fitzsimmons, "but we did see improvements in accuracy and in our ability to get product from the pickers' hands to the truck much faster. There was no longer a bottleneck at the load area. We were loading 10 minutes after a full truck was picked. Before, it could have been picked in 20 minutes, but it was maybe three or four hours before it got loaded."
Maybury RFID
Next, the team turned its attention to J. Polep's material handling system. To use existing DC space more efficiently, Maybury designed a two-level pick module using Interlake Material Handling's racks, conveyors, and carton and pallet flow units, integrated with a Maybury mezzanine and Quantum Conveyor's automated induction and sortation systems. This module was designed with an eye toward providing state-of-the-art order picking , accumulation, sortation and delivery to the loading dock as well as automated verification of product shipped to J. Polep's customers. J. Polep eventually outgrew the Quantum sortation solution and now relies on a state-of-the-art shoe sorter.
Not only has this setup boosted efficiency, but it has also paved the way for technological enhancements down the line, including radio frequency identification (RFID). Maybury designed a system that has enabled the company to use RFID for product putaway, and Fitzsimmons expects to use the same technology for picking most products within six months.
Among the challenges the design team overcame was creating a system that could accommodate the storage and handling of a huge variety of diverse product lines. The new system accommodates more than 10,000 different items and is capable of handling a nightly cycle of more than 100,000 picks. Units picked range from individual healthcare items to full cases of beverages and paper cups.
Conveyors play a big role in the new system. Candy items are picked from carton and pallet flow racks into totes that are transported on gravity and power roller conveyors; bulk goods are picked directly to a belt conveyor; and cigarettes are conveyed from pick locations to tax stamping machines and then to overhead accumulation lines.
All conveyable products arrive at a common induction point, where a computer-controlled sortation system picks them from the accumulation conveyors. The bar codes on the individual items are then scanned for order verification and billing confirmation, and the items are sorted to gravity conveyors, to allow loading of up to four trucks at a time.
As the 30 trucks that arrive nightly show up at the loading doors, the proper orders are released and conveyed directly into the truck. At this point, as they are stacked in the truck,the orders receive their first human handling since they were picked and placed on a nearly half-mile-long conveyor.
"The system has already made a positive contribution to our productivity, and it provides an audit trail for each container we ship out of the building," says Fitzsimmons, adding that the company has also seen a significant reduction in labor hours. He credits the new design and equipment with providing the capacity J. Polep needs to remain in its current location as business continues to grow.
Margin calls
And grow it will.The state-of-the-art material handling system has allowed J. Polep to greatly increase the number of SKUs it carries. Instead of serving as just a candy and cigarette distributor, the company now offers clients a wide array of grocery items, including frozen foods.
But that expanded array of products brings with it an expanded array of challenges. Convenience store distribution is much like the grocery distribution business, which operates on notoriously thin margins, only the c-store business, as it's known, is even more demanding. "In the supermarket business, it's pallet on, pallet off," says Fitzsimmons. "In this industry, you are building your pallets one SKU at a time, and it's even more of a challenge because we are in the tobacco industry. We run about 6.5 percent gross profit, so there's not a lot of room for error."
Then there was the accuracy issue. "It's a high-volume, turn-it-fast environment, and it's not a high-margin business so the focus has to be on order quality," says Brad Albert, sales manager for Maybury Material Handling. "They need to get the right thing to the customer the first time, or the cost of making it right is phenomenal."
At this point, J. Polep seems to be getting it right. Mike McCarthy, owner of 13 convenience stores in western Massachusetts that operate under the name of B&D Petroleum Sales, has praise for both the timeliness and accuracy of J. Polep's deliveries. At B&D Petroleum, he explains, managers typically finish their shifts in the early afternoon. In the past, late deliveries from J. Polep often forced his managers to work overtime, which meant McCarthy faced additional labor costs. But that's all changed. "Their new conveyor system is amazing and it has made things much better. In general, if J. Polep says they'll be here at 11, they are here within half an hour of that time,"McCarthy says."Their picks are much more accurate as well, and that's of huge importance for us."
Morale support
While the new material handling system certainly has made for plenty of happy customers, it has also boosted morale significantly at J. Polep.
"In the old days,the more clustered we got,the slower the warehouse workers would go because they knew the daunting task ahead of them," says Fitzsimmons. "Now they are banging out a truck in 10 to 20 minutes, and life is much easier. They are happier because instead of working 75- hour weeks, they max out at about 50 hours. Our employees are much happier with the new system in place."
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."