When changes in wafer fabrication added more links to Texas Instruments' supply chain, the semiconductor maker responded by streamlining its operations.
James Cooke is a principal analyst with Nucleus Research in Boston, covering supply chain planning software. He was previously the editor of CSCMP?s Supply Chain Quarterly and a staff writer for DC Velocity.
Over the years, its supply chain has expanded to include additional steps and players. Yet Texas Instruments hasn't allowed that to slow down the process. James Cooke tells the story in this article, which first appeared in the Quarter 1/2008 edition of CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
This story represents the type of analytical articles featured in the Quarterly. Readers can obtain a subscription by joining the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (whose annual membership includes a free subscription). Subscriptions are also available to non-members for $89 a year. For more information, visit www.SupplyChainQuarterly.com.
You might think that a product made from silicon would flow through a supply chain like sand through an hourglass. But that's hardly the case for Texas Instruments Inc. (TI), one of the world's largest makers of silicon chips. Though its products may not present handling challenges, the Dallas-based company still faces the same difficulties that confront any business trying to coordinate the movement of materials through a far-flung global supply chain. And for TI, those challenges have only been magnified as the company's manufacturing process has become increasingly complex.
Those changes in Texas Instruments' manufacturing process over the years are largely a reflection of marketplace developments. Since TI introduced the first integrated circuit to the world in the middle of the last century, the market has exploded into a multibillion dollar global business. The company, which once concentrated on making chips for use in computers, now produces 55,000 different semiconductor products that are incorporated into a wide variety of electronic devices, including mobile phones, modems, and DVD players. Today, the computer industry accounts for only about 30 percent of TI's semiconductor sales, while customers in the communications industry consume at least half of the 10 billion-plus chips TI makes each year.
Not surprisingly, these changes have also had repercussions for TI's supply chain. Compared to a few decades ago, there are now more steps in the manufacturing process and, because TI has contracted with third parties for some of its manufacturing and distribution needs, more players in the chain. The conventional wisdom holds that the more links in the chain, the greater the potential for delays and other disruptions to the flow of materials and information among the various parties. Yet that hasn't been the case at TI. In the face of added challenges, the semiconductor maker has actually responded by streamlining its operations.
Complicating factors
Semiconductors—also called integrated circuits or chips— are big business for TI, which makes both analog and digital versions. In 2006, the most recent year for which financial figures are available, $13.7 billion of the company's $14.2 billion in revenue (96.5 percent) came from its semiconductor business. Asia and Europe each accounted for 25 percent of the company's semiconductor sales; the United States accounted for another 20 percent.
The chips themselves are made from silicon wafers in highly specialized factories known as fabrication plants, or "fabs." From the fabs, they move to assembly and test (A/T) facilities, where the wafers are cut into individual chips, which are then assembled into packages and tested.
Not so long ago, back when most of TI's chips were sold for use in personal computers (PCs), chip manufacturing was a relatively straightforward business. "The world used to be fairly simple," says Jan De Meulder, TI's director of supply chain logistics. "You were building chips for one PC application in one fab, sending them to one assembly and test site for completion, and your end customer was IBM, who was doing everything else. That was back in the '70s."
These days, it's no longer so simple. "Today, we have some processes [that] start in a first fab and then go to a second fab to complete the wafer's fabrication," explains De Meulder. "Then, they could be packaged in an assembly plant, followed by burn-in (tests in which the devices are subjected to high temperatures to assure quality) and final test processes in yet another site. Quite often, we then have to send those to an electronic manufacturing corporation that builds subassembly boards." From there, the units might be shipped directly to the customer's factory, where end products such as cell phones are assembled.
At the same time, more players have been introduced into the process. Three decades ago, Texas Instruments owned most of its chip-making facilities. But over the years, the company has outsourced part of its production to thirdparty foundries. At present, Texas Instruments uses more than 30 fabs and foundries around the globe. (Fabs make product strictly for TI's customers; foundries take orders from multiple customers, including TI's competitors.)
Delivering the goods
TI's process for moving semiconductors out to its customers, which now number more than 3,000 worldwide, is no less complicated. About 75 percent of the company's semiconductor products move through its distribution network, which includes four big regional distribution centers and more than 70 smaller hubs (see Figure 1). The company uses a regional DC in Singapore to serve customers in Asia; one in Dallas to serve North America; one in Utrecht, the Netherlands, to serve Europe; and one in Tsukuba, Japan, to serve markets in that country. But Texas Instruments doesn't manage these facilities itself; it uses third-party logistics service providers (3PLs) to handle the day-to-day operations of those warehouses.
Another 10 percent of TI's chips move directly from its factories to customers. The other 15 percent are sent to warehouses near key customers' factories. TI maintains inventories for those customers at the sites on a consignment basis.
To move its products, Texas Instruments relies heavily on air carriers, although the company has begun experimenting with ocean shipments for products with long lead times. Given its global reach, TI must keep track of rates on more than 1,000 different shipping routes.
All in all, the process is a lengthy one. On average, it takes eight months to source material, build the various semiconductor components, and deliver them into the end customers' hands. Texas Instruments keeps about 90 days' worth of inventory on hand to meet demand.
All together now!
As for how TI has managed to streamline its supply chain despite the additional steps, the explanation lies partly in its effective use of electronic communications. For starters, TI has standardized its information technology platform, deploying a common global IT system to handle all orders and shipments. The company now uses a single version of SAP's enterprise resource planning (ERP) system across all business units around the globe. The SAP system allows Texas Instruments to take an order from any customer anywhere on the planet and check whether it can meet the order. "People can look at orders and inventory anywhere around the world," says De Meulder. "It allows us to track changes in real time."
At the same time, the company has set up a global connectivity platform to exchange information with its external partners. It uses a variety of methods, ranging from electronic data interchange (EDI) to XML-messaging on the Internet, to connect with those external players. "When you have so many touch points with suppliers, you have to be connected by IT to your partners," De Meulder says.
TI's efforts to standardize its information base have extended to other areas of the operation as well. For example, the company uses a single version of i2's production planning software and has adopted a sales and operations planning (S&OP) process that has pushed everyone in the organization to use a standard set of data. "Everybody is aligned on what the company will aim for, what revenues we're looking for, and what the factories will build to," De Meulder says. "And everybody will execute the same plan."
As part of that process, Texas Instruments conducts a monthly review to spot potential gaps between supply and demand, so that it can act swiftly to resolve disparities. That monthly plan drives the weekly production plan for the factories, which must be kept running in order to be cost effective. "We can't afford to have the factory idle," De Meulder explains.
Fast-moving parts
Along with its IT and planning initiatives, Texas Instruments has also introduced several innovative transportation programs. To coordinate inbound parts shipments from offshore suppliers to its North American production plants, for example, the company has set up an Inbound Routing Center in Dallas. As it did with its regional distribution centers, TI has contracted with a 3PL to run the Inbound Routing Center. Among other functions, the 3PL is responsible for determining the most cost-efficient manner of shipping.
To help ensure a steady flow of parts and components needed for production, the Dallas chipmaker has also contracted with suppliers to set up vendor-managed inventory hubs near its fabs and A/T factories in Asia and Mexico. "We are asking suppliers to put key components right in front of our factories," says De Meulder, who notes that these programs are similar to the ones TI operates for its own customers.
Initiatives aimed at streamlining the company's outbound transportation include what TI calls the "shippacked-to-sales-order" program. Under this program, which is designed to expedite order shipping, a factory in, say, Malaysia will consolidate individual orders for Japanese customers into one container for shipment to TI's Tsukuba distribution center. Before it leaves the factory, each package is labeled with the final customer's name and other delivery details. When the shipment arrives at Tsukuba, workers at the DC break down the load into individual orders for final delivery.
Texas Instruments has also begun deploying transportation management software (TMS) to help it move shipments to customers swiftly at the lowest possible cost as well as to obtain better visibility of shipments in transit. Although it now uses the software only at its distribution centers, the company has plans to deploy the same TMS applications at all of its assembly and test facilities, which will allow those sites to take over tasks like filling out customs and shipping documents. "We want the factory to be able to do the same thing the DC can do," says De Meulder. The company has also developed contingency plans to keep the network running in case of supply chain disruptions. It has re-examined its shipping patterns and routes to ensure that it has an alternative carrier to move products and supplies on every key inbound and outbound lane. "If something happens, we have a backup plan with another strong provider," De Meulder reports.
A perfect delivery network
For all of its successful improvement initiatives, Texas Instruments still considers its supply chain to be a work in progress. It recently engaged an outside research firm to model its distribution network to determine the optimum locations for its distribution centers. "We will use that model to project the future," De Meulder says. He adds that he expects TI to relocate more DC operations to Asia in an effort to get closer to Asian customers, increase its presence in that part of world, and reduce its operating costs.
"We are busy working on developing a truly optimized network that can handle any shipment to any customer anywhere," says De Meulder. "Customers are not ... forgivng today; they want a perfect delivery network."
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.