Taken alone, transportation management systems can do a lot to make shipping more efficient. But combine them with other software in a supply chain execution system and the software becomes truly formidable.
Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
Searching for a transportation management system (TMS) is something like buying a new car. There are plenty of models out there—from the luxury styles to bare bones versions—and the models come with plenty of options. Some will manage your freight around the globe; others provide good, reliable execution tools at relatively low cost.
Want a TMS to help purchase transportation service? You got it. Book freight? Done. Execute against existing carrier contracts or customer requirements? Done. Analyze speed and cost tradeoffs? Done. Run sophisticated algorithms to help choose carriers? Done. Create bills of lading? Audit carrier billings? Track shipments and notify everybody of delays? Measure carrier performance against contracted standards? Ensure international shipment documentation is correct? Done, done, done and done.
Standing alone, a TMS can accomplish a lot: Transportation management systems have helped shippers reduce transportation costs, increase transportation reliability, improve asset utilization, and capture and manage critically important information before, during, and after shipment.
But combine it with other systems and suddenly, you've got something very powerful. All the information captured and managed by a TMS can be used as a key component of a supply chain execution (SCE) system, providing visibility of inventory out on the road, on the seas and in the air. In fact, transportation, warehousing, order management and inventory systems can all support one another, helping create a seamless flow of information that is the backbone of supply chain management success.
Long on execution
TMS packages, or at least shipping software in some form, have been around for some time now. But what exactly does a basic execution system do? Razat Gaurav, senior manager of product marketing and business development for i2, explains that the software is designed mainly to help users handle the following four functions:
Transportation procurement, including negotiating with core carriers.
Transportation planning, which includes designing the transportation network, running what-if analyses, structuring lanes and identifying opportunities for improvement. That might mean examining such things as how a new cross-docking location or a new customer would affect the network or studying better ways to deploy the private fleet.
Transportation execution-that is,managing the entire execution life cycle, from route planning to load tendering, the confirmation process, and freight audit and payment.
Visibility and reporting-providing near real-time access to shipment-status information and proactive exception-based alerting.
Given that this software has been around a while, it's no surprise that there are plenty of vendors vying for this space. One of the major players is i2, which offers a broadbased system that encompasses inbound, intra-facility and outbound transportation. The i2 Transportation and Distribution Management system includes strategic planning, tactical planning and operations execution components. Features include Web-based transportation procurement, load planning and optimization, transportation modeling and real-time visibility.
Another big player is Irista, an HK Systems company that markets its package to mid-sized and large shippers, those with $10 million to $100 million in annual distribution costs. Its software is designed to provide users with a topflight execution tool. Doug Metcalfe, Irista's director of business development and transportation solutions, says the company's software handles "nitty-gritty shipping and load building [tasks] using the wide variety of constraints associated with moving goods." The system is designed, he says, to juggle multiple carriers, modes, customers and sites and take into account a wide variety of constraints based on a customer's business rules. "We're able define all those things," he explains,"then use our rating and routing engine to consider all those factors in executing."
The Irista software, which provides highly detailed information before, during and after the shipping process, compiles data for freight audit and claims, for example. It is also able to handle dynamic load planning and look for consolidation opportunities, for possible pooling points and at direct shipping versus linehaul options. The company has also worked closely with carriers to ensure compliance with labeling, manifesting, bill of lading and other requirements through a single system.
Metcalfe adds that the software is designed for use by DCs that don't have vast IT resources to draw upon. "We want practical, usable systems," he says. "The basic reality is that true transportation optimization can be difficult to manage and typically cannot be performed by distribution personnel alone. We recognize and promote optimization as a valuable tool for the right companies-it just isn't for everyone. The overhead necessary to implement, manage and maintain optimization engines may, in fact, eclipse the savings, yet 'low-hanging fruit'—such as eliminating chargebacks, producing carrier-compliant documentation and performing an internal freight audit-is often overlooked. Irista takes a practical approach to solve real business needs today while providing a plan for the future."
One of the oldest providers of TMS software is Pitney Bowes, which has offered shipping software for more than a quarter century. Its TMS, Pitney Bowes Distribution Solutions, "has focused on execution," says Scott Koopmans, director of strategic marketing and business development for the product. "That's been our claim to fame for 25 years." But the TMS is really more than that, he adds. "We see shipping as only half of what's happening. It's really package management. What's outbound to me is inbound to you. Our solutions contribute to the full life cycle of a package. It's not just about lowering transportation costs. It's about balancing delivery requirements with cost."
Part and parcel
Though a TMS can be extremely effective in kicking operations up a notch,it is most valuable when incorporated into a larger system, Koopmans says."In the end," he explains,"a TMS is an essential element of a comprehensive supply chain solution. It both accelerates the order fulfillment process and provides the means to manage carrier spend. It allows for optimal carrier selection to achieve delivery objectives at the least cost and provide for order visibility."
Koopmans goes so far as to say a supply chain execution solution is incomplete without a TMS. "It is often the only operations-focused system that provides a link between a company and its customers and the carriers it uses,"he continues. "It allows order fulfillment to continue beyond the DC. DCs have to balance speed and cost. How do you achieve the requisite speed of orders delivered to customers without its being cost prohibitive? A WMS can't do it. An order management system can't do it. An ERP [enterprise resource planning system] can't do it. Even a carrier provided shipping system can't do it in a world where a well-designed supp ly chain uses a variety of carriers."
Koopmans isn't alone in his view. Doug Metcalfe of Irista says, "It is our belief that the systems have to work together. It's a more holistic view of the supply chain. Tying them together can be challenging, but the value you can derive is immense."
Gaurav from i2 likewise considers TMS to be a key component of supply chain execution, along with warehouse, order, inventory, and international trade management systems. He offers this hypothetical example of what can happen when those components are properly integrated: A shipment out of Southeast Asia that is stuck at the port of origin should generate an exception report from the TMS. That is communicated to the warehouse management system at the DC awaiting the shipment. The inventory management system is automatically notified: The missing shipment may bring inventory below safety stocks predefined in its business rules. That would generate an alert to the order management system to seek an alternative source. Once located, the TMS would execute against the new order—all without human intervention.
Yet another player who believes that a TMS offers the most value to customers when combined with supply chain execution systems is Greg Johnson, vice president, products for GT Nexus. Transportation management is crucial to managing supply chain costs, he says, adding that the biggest supply chain execution expenses are typically logistics related. "[Logistics costs] represent 12 to 14 percent of a company's revenues," he reports. Of those costs, generally about 30 percent are for transportation and another 25 to 30 percent are inventory-related.
Johnson sees yet another plus to bolting TMS software onto SCE systems: Integrating systems helps overcome traditional bar riers within enterprises. "The users of systems often don't talk to each other," he says. "An order is created, and you talk over the walls to the transportation guys. Collaboration is thin. The ability to link processes for both the transportation guys and the merchandisers and procurement specialists on the other side of the wall allows them to base decisions on common data and knowledge."
TMS software's importance to supply chain execution was unders cored by the announcement late last year that Manhattan Associates, one of the leading players in the supply chain execution field, was buying Logistics.com, a company that offers both carriers and shippers a broad suite of transportation planning and execution systems. Manhattan spent $20 million to purchase Logistics.com's major assets from Internet Capital Group. In announcing the purchase, Manhattan said the acquisition would bridge the gap between transportation planning and execution and strengthen its position in the global supply chain execution market.
Then last month, Kewill Systems, a provider of transportation management and supply chain control software, and Catalyst International, a provider of supply chain execution systems, announced that they would expand their existing partnership. Catalyst will market, integrate and license the Clippership and Kewill.Ship shipping automation solutions as well as Kewill's e-fulfillment application, Kewill.Trade.
No longer an option
Whether they stand alone or are combined into SCE systems, TMS packages are becoming an essential tool, not a nice-to-have option, especially in international transportation. Import regulations in particular are becoming more onerous all the time, which means shippers require both timely and dead-on accurate information on all their shipments. International shipping places other demands on a system as well —the ability to manage currencies, time zones and language among them. "The ability of the TMS to handle global idiosyncrasies is important, "says Johnson of GT Nexus.
GT Nexus, which has its roots in international ocean transportation (its GTN pOréal is the leading Internet pOréal for ocean transportation), specifically designed its Web based Enterprise Series 7 suite of software products to link supply chain performance management, supply chain execution and transportation management. Its decision to use the Web reflects another fast-growing trend. Many providers now offer systems that are Web-based and priced on a subscription basis, which allows for a quick startup and minimal integration costs. "It's a huge advantage for customers," says Johnson. "It minimizes their risk and transfers the risk to us. We can manage risk better than they can themselves. They pay as they go."
Johnson reports that in most cases, clients recoup their investment costs in four to five months. Beyond that, the benefits derived from linking the TMS to other execution software systems may be hard to quantify. Hard to quantify, maybe. But if software revenue reports are any indication, not a hard sell.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."