Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
For most distribution/supply chain managers, the question doesn't really require much in the way of explanation. When asked how many distribution centers they oversee, they can give a simple, direct answer: two or 17 or 153. But Mark Pollard doesn't have this luxury. Though his company ships to sites all over the country, it operates without a single DC.
How does he accomplish that? He gets by with a little help (well, actually a lot of help) from his motor carriers. His company, the Finland based Raflatac, has U.S. manufacturing facilities in Fletcher, N.C.; Loveland, Ohio; and Ontario, Calif. From these sites, it reaches customers across the United States with a combination of truckload consolidation and less-than-truckload (LTL) distribution service. In essence, it has built a distribution network without ever building a DC.
That might have been a difficult feat to pull off a few years back. But not today. LTL haulers have made a big push in recent years to trim transit times on thousands of lanes and extend the geography they can reach in one or two or three days. As a result, some next-day lanes stretch out as far as 700 or 800 miles (and on-time performance among top carriers now routinely reaches close to 99 percent).
Stock in trade
A relatively new presence in the United States, Raflatac manufactures paper and film pressure-sensitive label stock that is used in a wide variety of industries. Raflatac label stock turns up on everything from the small labels on your apples to the fancy embossed labels on fine wines to the barcode labels used in your DC. Its primary customers are the printers and converters who produce the actual labels.
Pollard, who is supply chain manager for Raflatacs U.S. operations, says his company's strategy for competing in the U.S. market centers on speed. Not only will the North Carolina facility take orders as late as 4 pm. on Monday for delivery to a customer in the eastern United States on Wednesday, he says, but the whole manufacturing system is geared toward fast replenishment.
To keep expenses under control, Raflatac ships products out of its DCs in truckload quantities. On average, the company ships 30 to 40 truckloads a day from its Fletcher facility. (C.H. Robinson, a major non-asset-based third-party logistics company, manages the truckload shipping process for Raflatac.) Many of the truckload shipments move directly to customers, which is Pollard's preference because of the cost advantage over LTL. "We only do LTL if we have to," he says.
Even so, 14 or 15 of the daily truck loads shipped out of the North Carolina plant are consolidated LTL shipments. The average order consists of about 2.5 pallets, and as many as 15 customers' shipments may be in one consolidated truckload. Each of those consolidated truckloads moves to one of 11 FedEx Freight hubs. There, the shipments are shifted into the LTL carrier's network for next-day delivery to Raflatac's customers. (FedEx Freight is the multiregional LTL subsidiary of FedEx Corp. It has two units, the former Viking Freight System and the former American Freightways, which combined reach most addresses in the United States.) Despite the time required for handoffs, Pollard says, this is faster than pure truck load freight transportation.
Destination anywhere
With its "rolling DCs" in place, Raflatac was able to create a nearly instant—and extremely flexible—nationwide distribution network. "As a bulk manufacturer, we felt it was important for us to consolidate our sites to as few as possible," says Pollard. "This has allowed us to compete differently. We penetrate markets using our distribution network." That, he says, is far cheaper than building distribution facilities, especially since the destination hubs change continuously, based on Raflatac's current orders.
The system also allows Raflatac to split production among facilities but still consolidate individual customer shipments at the FedEx Freight hubs so that customers receive a single delivery. "It gives us more agility," Pollard says."It allows us to make the best use of our resources internally."
Making the system work requires close collaboration between the company and the carriers, he says. And that means finding the right partners. "It comes to one thing," Pollard says, "people."
That's people, not price. Pollard is quick to note that the company competes based on efficient network operations, not on the transportation rate."The key thing for me is that FedEx makes good money," he says. "We bring costs down by innovative solutions, not the rate. Many people don't realize that transportation costs are not determined so much by rates as by the way you manage it.We've brought down our costs by 20 percent by collaborating to increase efficiency. You'd never be able to reduce costs by 20 percent through rates alone."
One key to making the system work is finding collaborators that offer sufficient geographic reach, Pollard adds. "The companies we work with have to have nationwide coverage," he says, noting that this requirement limits the pool of available carriers. "You can't build links with many companies. First, they need physical presence, then consistent service capability. They have to be strong across the board."
Though FedEx Freight met all the stated requirements, Pollard still moved cautiously in selecting the company as its LTL carrier. Though his goal from the outset was to have a single LTL provider, he used several carriers in the early days to mitigate risk. Why the caution? Because in a system like this, the carrier must necessarily become part of the distribution strategy, he answers. "Once the systems are in place, it is very difficult to change."
Moving out
Raflatac is not the only manufacturer using trucks as rolling DC s these days. The accelerating velocity of inventory-or at least the desire to accelerate the movement of goods through the supply chain-is driving many companies to use carriers to extend distribution's geographic reach. Denny Carey, vice president of marketing for FedEx Freight, says, "It is not an exaggeration; we have customers manufacturing products today that are shipped tomorrow to be on the shelf tomorrow afternoon." He says that based on customer demands, FedEx Freight is continuing to cut transit times between hundreds of ZIP code pairings.
A number of other LTL carriers have followed suit, including regional, multiregional and national haulers. For example, Roadway Express, a major national LTL carrier, has tightened its service standards on 40,000 lanes, says Tom Collins, a group manager in the carrier's marketing department. "From a distribution standpoint, our customers are looking to use our network in place of their real estate," Collins says. He adds that Roadway has set up regional networks to help meet the growing demand for regional transportation. "Customers are using our distribution network as their distribution network."
Dave Miller, president and CEO of Con-Way Southern Express, has observed this trend as well. He says that his company's customers are using the regional carrier's network "to be closer to their customers without expending capital." Con-Way Southern is part of the Con-Way Transportation Services family of regional LTL carriers that also include Con-Way Western Express and Con-Way Central Express.
Con-Way, too, has made major efforts to tighten service standards in its carriers' networks. Its next-day service now reaches as far as 700 miles, Miller says. For example, John Guice, vice president of sales for Con-Way Southern, says the carrier has improved service on 6,000 lanes in the past year. "We've found some customers who have been able to close warehouses by allowing direct LTL shipments to customers," he says. He reports that one customer distributing petroleum products from central Texas uses the carrier to reach both coasts in two days.
And there's every indication that this trend will continue. A recent Freight Pulse survey by Morgan Stanley Dean Witter asked shippers what services they were using. Not only did the results show a continuing shift away from national LTL carriers and toward regional carriers, but the analysis indicates there's plenty of reason to believe that regional carriers will gain further market share as they extend their geographic reach.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."