DC VELOCITY's annual salary survey reveals that logistics/supply chain professionals are logging marathon hours on the job. But are they treated right?
Karen Bachrach brings more than two decades' worth of magazine editing and production experience to DC VELOCITY. A veteran of the supply chain field, she has worked at such publications as Purchasing and Logistics Management. She was also part of the launch team behind Supply Chain Management Review, serving as the managing editor from 1997 through 2002.
If it feels like you and your colleagues are working longer and harder these days, it's probably not your imagination. In the logistics and supply chain world, the 40-hour workweek is clearly a thing of the past. Only one in five of the readers who took part in DC VELOCITY's third annual salary survey worked 45 hours or less during the average week. A whopping 72 percent said they routinely logged somewhere between 46 and 60 hours a week (including time spent working outside the office). Another 9 percent appear to be stuck on a frenetic work treadmill that rarely shuts down; they're spending more than 60 hours a week on the job.
It's not just harried executives who are tethered to their work. The same thing is happening down on the DC floor among supervisors, operations managers, and shipping/receiving coordinators. If you haven't seen it in your own operation yet, chances are you will. The marathon workweeks are being reported across all industries—from food and grocery to lumber and wood products. They're being logged in companies of all sizes. And they're taking hold in facilities from coast to coast.
What's behind the epidemic of long work hours? It's partly that people in this field simply have more to do. Seventy-one percent of the 1,230 survey respondents reported that the number of functions they manage has increased over the past three years. (Another 25 percent said their responsibilities had stayed the same, and 4 percent reported a decrease.) The typical reader is no longer responsible for just, say, transportation management or fleet operations. He or she is likely overseeing warehouse/ DC operations or import/export activities as well. On top of that, professionals in this field typically manage a lot of people; 63 percent of the survey respondents have five or more direct reports.
It seems clear enough that readers are working hard for the money, but are they treated right? Our survey didn't measure job satisfaction, so it's tough to say. But if compensation is any indication, logistics and supply chain professionals have little to complain about. Our survey showed that the average salary was comfortably in the six figures—$105,834, to be precise. The median salary was somewhat lower, at $89,000. But that's still more than two and a half times the median U.S. salary, which the Bureau of Labor Statistics put at $33,634 in 2006 (the most recent year for which data are available).
As for salary trends, 78 percent saw their salaries increase in the past year, 19 percent said their pay had stayed the same, and 3 percent reported that they had taken a hit in salary. The respondents whose pay had risen reported an average increase of 9.6 percent over the previous year, which easily outpaced the 4.4 percent rise in the Consumer Price Index during the same period. We should note here that the pay increases reflected more than just annual raises. Two-thirds of the respondents reported that at least some percentage of their total compensation was based on performance.
It's all about the title
Given the broad range of titles and responsibilities among our survey respondents (see sidebar), it's probably no surprise that the latest study found a significant range in salaries. The highestpaid respondent, the president of a company in the wholesale/retail sector, earned $955,000. The lowest earner, a supervisor working in the pharmaceuticals field, brought home $25,000.
That $930,000 differential is less a reflection of pay scales in the wholesale/retail and pharmaceutical sectors than a reflection of the respondents' titles and responsibilities. When it comes to salaries, it's not what you do—or where you live or even what you know—that matters. It's what you're called. As our salary surveys have consistently shown, job title is the biggest factor in determining what you earn.
So which titles bring the highest pay? This year, it was the senior vice presidents who topped the salary charts. The median salary for the senior VPs who participated in our survey was $200,000—11 percent higher than the median salary of those next in line, corporate officers. Those corporate officers, in turn, made $20,000 more than executive vice presidents, who made $22,000 more than "plain" vice presidents. Presidents and directors came next, with median salaries of $120,000 and $110,000, respectively.
At that point, the gap began to widen. Managers made $35,000 less than directors, and supervisors earned $20,000 less than managers. Exhibit 1 shows the median salary and average salary for each title (we've used the median numbers, rather than the averages, as the basis for comparison because they are less likely to be skewed by outliers, or statistical extremes).
By the numbers
Job title may reign supreme, but there are still many other factors that influence how much a given logistics or supply chain professional makes. Where you work (geographic region), how much schooling you've had, and time spent in the trenches typically have a significant effect on salaries.
Take geography, for instance. As Exhibit 2 shows, there was wide variation in the median salaries reported in the different regions of the country. This year, the highest median salary was found in the Mid-Atlantic states, where the median pay was $104,000. From there, the median salary dropped by $13,000 to $91,000, which was reported in the West. Managers working in the Lower 48 did better than their counterparts in Hawaii, Alaska, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, where the median salary was $62,000. The lowest median salary of all, $56,250, was reported by respondents working outside North America.
As you might expect, our survey also found a strong correlation between earnings and education. As Exhibit 3 shows, the median salary for respondents with only a highschool diploma was $71,500. The professionals at the other end of the scale, those who have earned a doctorate, take home 50 percent more, with a median salary of $110,000.
Experience in the field also counts when it comes to earnings (see Exhibit 4). The median salary of newcomers to the field (those with five or fewer years of experience in logistics) was $66,500. Those at the other end of the range (respondents with more than 25 years' experience) command a significant premium for their expertise. With a median salary of $102,000, the veterans out-earned the newcomers by a little over 50 percent.
Mind the gap
What other factors have the potential to affect salary? Our survey showed that a respondent's age and gender, the size of the company he or she works for, and his or her tenure with the current employer can play a role.
Take age, for example. It will probably come as no surprise that median salaries increased with age—but only up to a point. As Exhibit 5 shows, that point occurs somewhere around age 60. The median salary for respondents aged 55 to 60 was the same ($100,000) as it was for those over 60. Our survey also revealed a yawning salary gap between respondents who are under 35 and their elders. The median salary for the younger workers was $69,635; the median salaries for the other groups ranged from $90,000 to $100,000.
Just as younger workers lag behind their older counterparts when it comes to paychecks, females working in the field lag behind males. As Exhibit 6 shows, the gap in median salaries this year was 25 percent. (That may indicate that women are gaining on men; last year's survey showed a gap of 31 percent.) The salary gap seems to be at least partly a matter of experience. The female survey respondents have less experience than the males on average: 51 percent of the women have 15 years' experience or less, compared to 46 percent of the men. Similarly, 21 percent of the men who responded have more than 25 years' experience in logistics, compared to 8 percent of the women.
As Exhibit 7 shows, our survey also found a correlation between salaries and company size. As you might expect, the bigger the company, the higher the salary—with one exception. The median salary for companies with 1,001 to 5,000 employees was slightly lower than the median salary at companies one step down in size, those with 501 to 1,000 employees.
As for salaries by the respondents' tenure with their current companies, our survey found only a very weak correlation. As Exhibit 8 shows, the median salaries for employees with six to 20 years' tenure with a company clustered in the low $90,000s. From there, the median salary jumped to $100,000 for those with 21 to 25 years' tenure, but dipped slightly for employees who had been with the company for more than 25 years.
Charting a course
In the end, of course, there are countless other variables that might enter into any given person's salary—job performance, departmental budget, and perks and benefits, to name a few. But generally speaking, the primary factors in determining salary are title, geographic region, education, experience, age, company size, and gender.
What does that mean for those eager to boost their earnings? Well, there's not much you can do about your age or gender. But if you suspect your location or a lack of schooling might be holding you back, you can think about moving to a different part of the country or going back to school.
But be careful what you wish for. A bigger paycheck will almost certainly be accompanied by more responsibilities and longer hours. In the logistics and supply chain world, there's no getting around it: You'll work hard for the money.
about our survey
DC VELOCITY's third annual salary study was based on the responses of 1,230 readers who completed a 20-question survey during the first half of February. Of those respondents, 5 percent identified themselves as corporate officers (CEOs, COOs, CFOs); 4 percent as presidents; 12 percent as vice presidents, senior vice presidents, or executive vice presidents; 22 percent as directors; 46 percent as managers; and 11 percent as supervisors.
The survey respondents came from a broad swath of industries—including wholesale/retail (21 percent), third-party logistics services (13 percent), and food and grocery (8 percent). They represented companies of all sizes as well. Twenty percent were employed by companies with fewer than 100 employees, 25 percent by companies with 100 to 500 people, 9 percent by companies with 501 to 1,000 employees, 17 percent by companies with 1,001 to 5,000 people, and 29 percent by companies with more than 5,000 employees. Those companies were scattered throughout the United States, as well as Canada and Mexico. Only 1 percent of the survey respondents worked outside North America.
Our survey asked respondents to identify the functions they managed. As it turned out, only 22 percent of the respondents named just one function. The rest of the survey-takers indicated that they had multiple areas of responsibility (including 79 who said they were responsible for all of the functions listed). Warehouse and/or distribution center management was the most frequent response, cited by 74 percent of the respondents. That was followed by logistics management (63 percent), supply chain management (55 percent), transportation management (53 percent), import/export operations (28 percent), and fleet operations (22 percent).
As for the respondents themselves, 90 percent were male, 10 percent female. Some were newcomers to the workforce (14 percent were under 35 in age); others were veterans. The largest share of the respondents (71 percent) fell into the 36-to-55 age range. Thirteen percent were 56 to 65, and 2 percent said they were over 65. When asked about the highest level of education they had completed, 27 percent said high school, 54 percent had a bachelor's degree, 18 percent had a master's degree, and 1 percent had earned a Ph.D.
The majority of the respondents were seasoned professionals. When asked how many years they've worked in logistics-related jobs, only 15 percent said that they'd been in the field for five years or less. Another 16 percent have worked in logistics for six to 10 years, 18 percent for 11 to 15 years, 19 percent for 16 to 20 years, 12 percent for 21 to 25 years, and 20 percent for more than 25 years. And they're not job-hoppers: A full 62 percent said they had been working at the same company for six years or more.
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.