Unfazed by its worst recession in 40 years and emerging threats from Malaysia and China, Singapore has launched a full-bore drive to become the distribution hub for all of Asia.
Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
Maybe you've never cruised across Singapore's harbor, watching the tropical sun set over waters swarming with homebuilt sampans and sleek containerships, but it's a sure bet that at least one item in your home or office has. Today, a high percentage of the goods entering or leaving Asia go through Singapore's seaport, one of the busiest in the world.
Why Singapore? Part of it's the nation's unique geographic location—an island near the southern tip of the Malay Peninsula, between the South China Sea and the Indian Ocean; but part of it's a well-orchestrated bid to become the distribution hub for all of Asia. Stung by the defection of several of its biggest ocean carrier customers to Malaysia's Tanjung containerport two years ago, Singapore is setting its sights on the broader logistics and supply chain management field—betting its future on efforts to become the region's premier transshipment hub, one that moves goods through with amazingly little friction.
And that pitch seems to be working, at least with North American businesses. Though some in Shanghai sneer that Singapore offers "logistics for beginners," that jab contains a veiled compliment. "North Americans are very comfortable in Singapore," says Harvey Donaldson, director of The Logistics Institute at the Georgia Institute of Technology. It's easy to see why: English is nearly universal (all education is conducted in English), the government bends over backward to accommodate private businesses and the nation boasts some of the most advanced telecommunications and banking systems in the Asia-Pacific region.
time to leave the island?
A 2001 survey of logistics companies in the island nation of Singapore conducted by the National University of Singapore and the Singapore Trade Development Board provided a look at logistics companies in that nation. Some of the findings:
Most of the companies are small: 45 percent of the respondents reported that they had 50 or fewer employees and nearly half reported annual revenues of under US$6 million.
About 12 percent of logistics company employees held university or technical degrees.
Supply chain software, such as warehouse or transportation management systems, was not in widespread use.
Only slightly more than a third of logistics companies in Singapore provided logistics services outside of Singapore for more than half their customers. By contrast, nearly two-thirds of foreign-owned companies performed international logistics services for more than half their customers.
Noting the flurry of merger and consolidation activity taking place among logistics companies in Singapore, the study's authors urged domestic logistics companies to look outward to develop their businesses. "Given the small and highly competitive domestic market," the report said, "logistics companies in Singapore should adopt a more outward focus in their expansion plans toward the region or even the world."
Chamber of e-commerce?
Behind this drive to expand Singapore's presence as a distribution hub is Singapore's aggressive Economic Development Board (EDB), an agency responsible for attracting business and investment to Singapore. The board has set itself the ambitious goal of building Singapore into a supply chain management "nerve center," and some are betting it wi ll succeed . "Their intention is to become the business center for the Asia-Pacific region," says Donaldson. "They have the resources and assets to do that."
As part of a broader national strategy to build a knowledge-based economy —one whose strength lies not in copra exports but in biomedical sciences, electronics, and IT and communications—the EDB has set a deadline of the year 2010 for developing Singapore into a major international integrated logistics hub. To jumpstart the process, the EDB, along with Singapore businesses and other agencies, is dangling incentives to lure both logistics service providers and customers to its shores.
Some of its initiatives have already taken root: Several major logistics players, including United Parcel Service, Exel and BAX Global, have established a major presence in Singapore, lured there in part by economic incentives. BAX Global Singapore, the international forwarder's Asia-Pacific subsidiary, for instance, has registered itself in a program called the Major Exporter Scheme, which allows companies to defer Singapore's goods and services tax on goods that are re-ex ported. (That tax wi ll jump to 5 percent from its current 4 percent next year.) "Singapore is the ultimate free trader, implementing practically no barriers to the free flow of goods across its borders" says Clayton Noble, the forwarder's vice president, logistics, Asia Pacific. He points out that Singapore has completed free trade agreements with many of the world's trade heavyweights including the United States, New Zealand, Japan, Mexico, Canada, Australia and the European Free Trade Association.
The country is also getting wired, making a big push to bring its IT infrastructure up to speed. Noble reports that the government is driving the development of an integrated and globally connected IT infrastructure designed to help companies conduct e-commerce and e-business. Already in place, he says, are efficient trade and IT facilitation systems such as TradeNet, TradeNet Plus and Singapore ONE.
High on the ALPS
Of course, in the logistics game, the infrastructure that really counts is the transportation network. And Singapore has kept up its end here, even in the face of its worst recession in 40 years. The country recently opened the Airport Logistics Park of Singapore, or ALPS, located at Singapore's Changi Airport. ALPS, a 64-acre free trade zone that can accommodate up to 20 third-party logistics providers, was built in hopes of attracting companies that handle high-value goods requiring fast flow through and value-added services. In addition to its proximity to the airport, ALPS boasts links to major seaport facilities.
ALPS's first tenant was Menlo Worldwide Logistics, a major California-based third-party logistics provider, which opened a regional logist ics hub there in October. In November, Exel added its name to the list, breaking ground on a $13.1 million supply chain hub scheduled for completion in August.
Though Singapore is a relatively high-cost place to do business, ALPS represents a good location for a company like Menlo, says Frank Lange, the company's director of international development. ALPS's proximity to the airport gives Menlo quick access to inbound and outbound transportation. Its free trade zone status means goods moving through are exempt from many customs requirements and taxes. As a result, Menlo reports that turnaround time is 43 percent shorter and costs are 55 percent lower than at non-ALPS facilities.
In another infrastructure upgrade, Singapore has established a chemical logistics hub, the Banyan Logistics Hub, on Jurong Island. A nearly 200-acre marine facility for chemical plants located on the island, it's part of an EDB focus on specific niche areas of logistics, including automotive, chemicals, biomedical sciences and aerospace.
Georgia's on their mind
But efforts to build a knowledge-based economy—and provide advanced logistics and supply chain management services—hinge on the availability of an educated workforce. And that could be a problem: A 2001 survey of Singapore's logistics companies conducted by the National University of Singapore (NUS) and the Singapore Trade Development Board projected a future shortage of university-trained logistics professionals.
To help plug the hole, Singapore's Economic Development Board went in search of a foreign university with which it could develop a collaborative program. It found that partner in Georgia Institute of Technology. Georgia Tech's Logistics Institute (TLI), in turn, established The Logistics Institute-Asia Pacific in conjunction with the National University of Singapore. TLI-Asia Pacific conduct s research into critical areas of logistics and offers advanced education for logistics students, including a joint master's degree program in logistics that is now completing its second year.
Under the program's terms, about 25 students from Singapore and elsewhere in Asia are offered full scholarships for an 18- month program, including a semester in Atlanta. In return, the students agree to work for at least three years in Singapore after they complete their degree program.
John J. Bartholdi, research director at The Logistics Institute at Georgia Tech as well as a staff member at The Logistics Institute Asia-Pacific, says research is underway on air cargo, ocean cargo, chemical logistics, and logistics security and efficiency. Recently, a team from the institute completed research into the logistics industry in China. (See sidebar.)
"We like to think that the research programs raise the level of logistics performance," says Bartholdi, explaining that the goal is to help bring the sort of advanced logistics practices and decision support to bear on the significant assets already available in Singapore. "We're trying to make sure we're a source of trained professionals. Plus, we attend to the higher level things—the kinds of things Georgia Tech has specialized in—the rocket science things. You succeed [in logistics] based on how intelligently you use assets. It is really a battle of IT systems and mathematical models, those that can trim expenses by 2 percent here and 6 percent there. You get better and you get faster. Singapore can no longer compete with cheap labor."
China syndrome: logistics is hot, performance is not
An executive for a major U.S. building products retailer that sources in China was mystified: Why were all the goods in ocean containers arriving depalletized? he wondered. The goods, after all, had left the factories in China on pallets.
A visit to the port revealed the cause: Lift trucks are expensive, and labor is cheap. It was more cost effective at the ports to hand load containers than to buy and make use of a lift truck.
In China today, almost everyone with a truck claims to be in the logistics business. But in many parts of the country, logistics is still in its infancy.
China, the most populous nation on earth, has the world's largest manufacturing base and may soon be the largest single market in the world. Over the last two decades, the Chinese economy has transformed itself into a market economy. The nation has invested heavily in roads, ports, airports and warehouses. Logistics operations, however, have a long way to go.
How far? Last year, a team of researchers decided to find out. Composed of members from The Logistics Institute-Asia Pacific, a collaborative venture between Georgia Tech's Logistics Institute and the National University of Singapore, and the Institute of Logistics and Transportation, which is part of the China Communications & Transportation Association, the team wanted to find out just where things stood. "There's obvious interest to Singapore and to everyone else with China's growth," says John Bartholdi, director of research for Georgia Tech's Logistics Institute. "The bottleneck there is the logistics system. It is very chaotic there now."
The survey responses came from 33 logistics companies in China —25 domestic and eight foreign. Most of the companies have already established extensive domestic networks and plan to expand further. Most of them outsource transportation services, generally using overthe-road transportation.
Though the survey results yielded a few surprises—for example, foreign logistics joint ventures had a slight edge over Chinese domestic companies in domestic transportation—the results only confirmed perceptions regarding China's general backwardness in logistics. Take warehousing, for instance: The report says that most warehousing facilities are fairly rudimentary and make little use of information technology.
The survey also identified potential impediments to further logistics development in China. Both foreign and domestic logistics providers say that the shortage of logistics professionals is one of their prime concerns. Domestic companies also worry about whether sufficient resources are available for future development. Foreign companies cite policy restrictions and regulations in China as their biggest challenge.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."