For DCs that handle electronic products, it's not enough just to deliver the goods at warp speed. They also have to add value and oversee a mysterious process called distributed order fulfillment.
As any manager working in the electronics industry knows, the supply chain loop offers all too many opportunities for short circuits. Whether they deal with tiny electronic components like computer chips that go into other products or finished products for consumers,like PCs and peripherals,manufacturers and distributors in this field face daily reminders that even a minor slipup can translate into a major hit to their company's profitability.
There are several reasons for their edginess. To begin with, they have to keep the inventory moving. Nowhere is profitability so closely tied to the rapid movement of inventory than it is in electronics manufacturing and distribution.
Next, they're expected to add value, lots of value. Conditioned by the likes of Dell, consumers have come to expect highly customized products for delivery within days of the order. That means assembly at the 11th hour—most likely somewhere in the distribution process.
Then there's the challenge of coordinating the deliveries of components from multiple suppliers. The greater the number of players involved, of course, the greater the chances for disaster. And with complex electronic equipment, there are bound to be a lot of players.
Distribution at warp speed
With their notoriously short shelf life, electronic products are almost as perishable as food products. The latest models can command a premium price, but usually not for long.As soon as competitors catch up, prices plummet. Clearly, the pressure's on to get products out the door as quickly as possible.
Rapid technological advance also means rapid obsolescence. DCs that don't move electronic products right out may find themselves sitting on a pile of nearly worthless inventory. Many an electronics manufacturer has been stuck with millions of dollars in inventory that can only be written off. Some never recover.
"Inventory has become the hot potato of the electronics industry," says Rob Cushman, a senior manager with Accenture, a consulting firm whose clients include semiconductor manufacturers, PC manufacturers and wireless communications providers. To keep from being caught with that hot potato, managers like Bill Apel, director of distribution for computer manufacturer Systemax Inc., are substituting information for inventory. "With real-time information, we can cut our safety stock levels," he says. "This reduces our investment in inventory and improves our delivery service to customers at the same time."
The ability to "see" inventory in the supply chain lets companies shift products or components to where they're most needed. It's not at all unusual in the electronics industry for routing changes to be made while inventory is intransit. The greater the visibility, the easier it is for DCs and other supply chain players to adjust inventory flow for maximum profitability.
The push to add value
Distribution of electronic products is much more than storing and moving boxes. In this industry, DCs routinely handle some assembly and manufacturing. "In electronics distribution, the ability to perform value-added services is very important," confirms John Davies, co-founder and vice president of marketing for Optum, a provider of supply chain execution (SCE) software."
"People look to us [for] customization," reports Jim Smith, senior vice president of operations at Avnet, an electronic component distributor."They are looking for us to perform very specific services." These run the gamut from straightforward inventory management and parts "kitting" for assembly operations to more complex steps such as build-to-order manufacturing and programming. At Avnet's DC in Chandler, Ari z., for example, electronic chips are often diverted to special areas where they will be custom programmed to meet individual customers' specifications.
Accenture's Cushman does not expect the trend to slow anytime soon. In fact, he expects the opposite. "We see the need for value-added services increasing in coming years," he says.
A matter of coordination
Then there's the coordination challenge: Pressed by demands to cut costs without sacrificing service, more electronics companies today are outsourcing various tasks to supply chain partners that can do it for less. That has the effect of spreading responsibility for order fulfillment through the supply chain—a trend known as distributed order fulfillment.
But somebody still needs to manage the process, says Cushman. "As more functions get outsourced in an effort to reduce costs, the ability to execute involves multiple partners and multiple systems." Most companies look to software as the answer. "The ability to make this model work depends on having a distributed order management and transactions management system that can sit on top of this model and provide visibility and execution coordination for all parties involved."
Keys to success
Though the challenges may vary somewhat from company to company, most electronics industry players agree that success depends largely on the following:
Advanced technologies that can enhance supply chain management. Leading-edge supply chain execution systems, warehouse management systems (WMS), software that provides full supply chain visibility and other technology tools can be very valuable for DCs in electronics distribution.
Flexibility in inventory handling. This often requires special material handling equipment and product identification and tracking technologies that are used to identify individual components or products automatically, and divert them to locations as needed.
Highly trained employees. At least part of the work force should have a high degree of technical competence, which is often required to perform value-added services of increasing technical complexity.
The ability to cope with continuous change. The electronics industry is so fast-paced that leading companies undergo nearly constant change to keep up with new technologies and new business processes.
modify processes, not software
Jim Smith knows now that it was a big mistake. When his company, electronic component distributor Avnet, installed data-transfer technology in its Chandler, Ariz., DC several years ago, it opted to take standard software (in this case a package from Optum) and modify it to fit the facility's existing processes.
He would do things differently today. "After we implemented the new system, changes in our business forced us to go back and change the software," says Smith, the company's senior vice president of operations. "Modifying custom software is very time-consuming and often costs more than you'd expect. If we were doing it all over again, we would modify our existing business processes to fit the software, instead of the other way around."
Another disadvantage of customizing software is that you then have to customize the training manuals and support documentation, making it tougher to train multiple users, Smith continues. Then there's the dependency issue: Using custom solutions can make a user company too reliant on one individual who knows the solution well. "The more you depend on that individual," he says, "the more problems you will have if he or she leaves the company or is reassigned to another internal position."
To others about to embark on a digital adventure, Smith recommends working closely with the software vendor. Many times, vendors will upgrade their standard software offerings to meet the customer's needs, he reports. "Software that requires customization today may be the vendor's standard offering tomorrow," he says. "Software vendors are very receptive to hearing about a customer's future needs. In a sense, users are the vendor's research and development center."
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.