Looking for warehouse workers you can rely on? Older folks can be highly reliable and productive, provided you give them the support and benefits they need.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
If you have anything to do with staffing warehouses and distribution centers, then you've probably given some thought to the subject of demographics lately.
Demographics? That statistics-heavy stuff you read about in social studies? Yes, indeed—and let's hope you paid attention in class that day. That's because any long-term strategy for staffing warehouses and DCs has to consider the changing demographic profile of the American workforce—or else risk being caught shorthanded.
Most likely, what you've heard on the topic has focused on today's multilingual workforce. That's something virtually all warehouses and DCs are dealing with, whether they're located in urban or rural locales. (See "¿habla warehousing?" DC VELOCITY, September 2007.)
Important as that is, it's not the only demographic issue you need to be aware of: Age should also be on your radar screen. The U.S. population is getting older; people are living longer and working longer. According to "65+ in the United States: 2005," a National Institute on Aging report compiled by the U.S. Census Bureau, the number of senior citizens in this country is expected to double by 2030, when nearly one in five Americans will be 65 or older.
Right now, that trend may not be apparent in many warehouses (youthful immigrant workers still dominate the average DC's workforce). Yet it's a big enough worry that the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) annual conference in 2007 included two sessions on "disruptive demographics," including lengthy discussions of the impact of an aging population on supply chains. At last year's Material Handling Logistics Summit, moreover, a group of business executives, material handling equipment vendors, and academics identified the impact of demographics on distribution and logistics as their top concern.
The graying of America is a trend that will affect most, if not all, warehouses and DCs. The downside, of course, is the inevitable loss of knowledge and experience when large numbers of baby boomers retire. But there is an upside, especially if you're willing to think of an aging population as an opportunity instead of a problem: Employing "over 50" workers can actually boost warehouse productivity.
16 steps to a safer workplace
The American Society of Safety Engineers (www.asse.org) suggests the following steps to make industrial workplaces safer for older employees. Though the list was created with older workers in mind, the group says the changes will benefit workers of all ages.
Improve illumination and add color contrast.
Eliminate heavy lifts, elevated work from ladders and long reaches.
Design work floors and platforms with smooth and solid decking while still allowing some cushioning.
Reduce static standing time.
Remove clutter from control panels and computer screens, and use large video displays.
Reduce noise levels.
Install chain actuators for valve hand wheels, damper levers, or other similar control devices. This brings the control manipulation to ground level, which helps to reduce falls.
Install skid-resistant material for flooring and especially for stair treads.
Install shallow-angle stairways in place of ladders when space permits and where any daily, elevated access is needed to complete a task.
Increase task rotation, which will reduce the strain of repetitive motion.
Lower sound-system pitches, such as on alarm systems, as they tend to be easier to hear.
Lengthen time requirements between steps in a task.
Increase the time allowed for making decisions.
Consider necessary reaction time when assigning older workers to tasks.
Provide opportunities for practice and time to develop task familiarity.
Older achievers
That older workers should be more productive than the young 'uns may sound counterintuitive. After all, everyone knows that as people age, they think and move more slowly, and their eyesight, hearing, and muscle strength decline. That's true, but medical researchers, gerontologists, and safety engineers all agree that it's no reason to write off the over-50 crowd in a warehouse setting. In fact, research cited by the American Society of Safety Engineers and federal health agencies shows that workers 55 and older have fewer accidents on the job than do younger people. (When they are injured, though, they often take longer to recover.)
As for why older workers outperform their younger counterparts, there are a number of possible explanations, says Brian R. Sherman, director of ergonomic services for The Ergonomics Center of North Carolina at North Carolina State University. "They have more experience, and they may have moved up in their jobs so that now they're managers, or they may be leveraging support within their group," he suggests.
Another factor in their favor: Mature workers tend to subscribe to the "work smarter, not harder" philosophy. Forty-five percent of productivity increases in warehouses and DCs comes from more effective use of time, says Jeff Boudreau, a partner at workforce productivity specialists XCD Performance Consulting. In his experience, older employees excel in this area. "They are less easily distracted, and they know how to stay on task," he says. "The more senior warehouse associates usually are at the top of the list in terms of productivity, quality, and consistency. I've never found somebody who's not been able to achieve performance incentives due to age."
That's significant, because performance standards are not adjusted for specific groups of employees, says Evan Danner, president of TZA Consulting, which develops engineered performance standards and labor management systems. "You set specific standards for different functions … but in a world of engineered standards, you cannot set different standards based on age," he explains.
What about positions that require working with technology, such as highly automated material handling equipment? Boudreau says that seniors may not always be as tech-savvy as their younger co-workers, but he strongly disputes the notion that they can't be successful in technology-related jobs. "We've tracked all different types of [warehouse] workers on training curves. Even when we have set up moving goals, we have always found that older workers progress up the training curve the same as anyone else," he says.
Sherman agrees that older folks can make the grade when it comes to mastering tasks. "A number of studies on worker performance, including research papers that compare job performance and age, generally have found no correlation—either positive or negative—between the two relative to technical competence," he says.
Hiring mature workers can be an antidote to one of warehousing's most intractable problems: employee turnover. Danner has found that older workers tend to stay in their jobs longer, particularly in a unionized environment with good pay and benefits. They usually care more about benefits than 20- somethings and are more rooted in their communities. As a result, they're less likely to change jobs when something new comes along—like the oil companies that Boudreau says are "literally poaching people in the parking lot" of a West Texas warehouse operated by one of his clients.
Not ready to hang it up
The advantages of hiring mature workers seem clear enough. But do they actually want to work? Apparently, they do. A 2004 survey of 2,300 baby boomers conducted by Merrill Lynch, pollsters Harris Interactive, and the consulting firm Age Wave found that 76 percent of the respondents planned to continue working after retirement. In an earlier study of 1,000 people aged 55 and older, conducted by Age Wave on behalf of insurance giant AIG SunAmerica, about 95 percent of respondents said they expected to work at least part time after they retire, either by choice or by necessity.
Add those findings to current worries about the future of Social Security and the state of the U.S. economy, and you can't help but expect more mature workers to be knocking on your door looking for work. That could well happen, but they won't all be looking for a 40-hour week: Only 6 percent of the respondents to the Merrill Lynch study said they would want full-time work.
Flexible scheduling and good benefits are the biggest lures for mature workers. Adjusting work flows and scheduling to accommodate part-time workers takes some effort, of course, but the benefits often make up for it. Boudreau tells of one retailer who went to high school PTA meetings to recruit middle-aged and older mothers to work in a DC during school hours; the company also gave the part-timers a discount on merchandise and made the work environment as pleasant as possible. That strategy netted the retailer a number of reliable long-term employees, he says.
Another example is that of a company that moved its DC from northern New Jersey to a rural community in the southern part of the state because of the availability of large tracts of land. It soon found that the labor pool in its new location was too small to fully staff the DC with fulltime workers. Instead, Boudreau says, the company found the reliable—mostly part-time—workers it needed among the retirees in the "55-plus" communities that were springing up in the area.
Safe and sound
Although mature workers easily match (or outpace) their younger counterparts when it comes to productivity, there's no denying that their reactions may be a little slower, their eyesight may be a little fuzzier, and they may tire a little sooner than their younger colleagues. There are some basic steps you can take to help older workers consistently perform at high levels in the safest possible environment. For a quick rundown, see the sidebar titled "16 steps to a safer workplace." Here are a few additional recommendations:
Consider each person individually, and screen carefully (in accordance with labor laws, of course). Be alert for potential problems, such as a decline in memory or eyesight, but don't assume that everyone over a certain age is unfit. "It's kind of like an upside-down funnel," explains Sherman of The Ergonomics Center. "Young children's strength capabilities don't vary much, but as we get older, capability can differ greatly among people in their 50s and 60s." Boudreau, too, cautions against stereotyping: At one client's DC, a woman in her 70s is among the most productive trailer loaders.
Pay special attention to ergonomics. Workers of different ages may be prone to certain types of injuries; read up on the research and take steps to prevent those injuries from occurring. Of particular concern: hazards that could cause a loss of balance, trips, and falls.
Take the "vision test." Look around your operation. Does it present any obstacles for someone whose vision is no longer 20/20? Better lighting and clearly readable signage improve visibility, as do uncluttered screens and larger characters on terminals and scanners.
Match employees with the right jobs. Since engineered performance standards can't be adjusted for individuals, the smart route is to place people where they're most likely to be successful, says Danner. "If a worker is over 60, I would question whether you want to put him in a pick module where he has to handle 400 cases an hour," he says. "But he could probably be very successful in a piece-pick area where weight is not a big factor and there is more emphasis on dexterity and skill."
Offer health and wellness programs for mature workers. Making those programs available is an effective way to help them stay in the workforce longer, agree all of the experts consulted for this article. Health is a major concern for even the halest and heartiest of this generation; by supporting older employees' health needs, you'll not only keep them working longer but will earn their loyalty, too.
Respect for all
Health and safety considerations aside, there are a few other factors that come into play in managing an older workforce. For instance, it's important to keep in mind that boomers and their elders have a very different way of looking at work, authority, and personal development than do the current crop of young professionals. In some DCs, there now are four generations working together— and that creates some managerial challenges.
Danner notes, for example, that friction sometimes occurs between young people with degrees in logistics or supply chain management and the older, more experienced workers they may supervise.
Yet for all their differences, workers from the various generations have this in common: they want respect. Regardless of their age or experience, they want to be treated as individuals with valuable ideas and knowledge that can be tapped for the benefit of all.
That's not something older workers can always take for granted. In some companies, there's still a tacit assumption that older folks are inflexible, uncreative, and generally less capable than younger co-workers. Therein lies an opportunity to make your DC stand out from the crowd. Give older workers what they want and need—including respect—and you could gain some of the most reliable, self-directed, and productive employees you've ever had.
CVS puts demographics to work
To see what the DC workforce of the future might look like, just go to one of the DCs run by CVS Caremark, the Woonsocket, R.I.-based drugstore chain. In 2007, 10 percent of new hires in the company's distribution centers were over 50 years old. Currently, 25 percent of the DC workforce is over 50, and in 10 years that figure is expected to top 33 percent, says Kevin F. Smith, the company's senior vice president-supply chain and logistics.
Though that wasn't planned, Smith says he's not alarmed by the trend. He believes that having older workers on the job is an asset. "Older workers are more experienced and knowledgeable, and this helps in creating a safe and productive workplace," he says.
Over the past eight or 10 years, CVS has been automating more of its operations and making ergonomic enhancements to its DCs. Smith says the retailer made that decision to improve processes, boost productivity, and lessen the likelihood of repetitive stress-related injuries in the workforce in general, but those measures have proved to be especially helpful to older workers.
The combination of efficiency and more mature workers has produced a steady increase in productivity and improvements in customer service. Smith believes that CVS's distribution centers are safer and more productive than ever. That's a tribute to all of the company's associates, both young and old, he says. But older employees have played a big role in that success. "We believe that our current mature workers add to that productivity, rather than detract from it, because of their experience, knowledge, and expertise," Smith observes. "These are associates who know our business and continually help us to fine-tune processes that help us to serve our customers better. These individuals understand the processes they work with better than anybody else and therefore are more apt to recognize ways to improve those processes."
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.