David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
What do ice cream, french fries, and fax machines have in common? Not much, unless you happen to be in Tilloy-les-Mofflaines, France. There, you'll find all those products and more housed in the same distribution center.
That DC itself is fast becoming a sort of United Nations of distribution: The ice cream is owned by Haagen-Dazs (a company based in the United States), the french fries are a product of McCain Foods (Canada), and the fax machines are from Brother International (Japan). While it might seem odd for all these products to be occupying the same facility, there's a simple enough explanation: Their makers have all contracted with the same third-party logistics service provider (3PL)—France's FM Logistic—to handle their distribution in Europe.
These three companies are hardly alone in their decision to take the 3PL route. Plenty of foreign manufacturers have done the same, for reasons ranging from costs to the opportunity to avail themselves of the provider's local expertise. As a result, business for 3PLs in Europe has boomed in the last few years. And it shows no signs of slowing. Executives of European 3PL operations who responded to a recent survey by Boston's Northeastern University projected growth of about 15 percent for this year.
Despite what you might expect, this growth is not just being driven by large companies with an established customer base on the continent. "The majority of companies that use 3PL services are not multinationals, but rather, companies looking to get their feet wet in Europe. It is a good way for small companies to get there without having to invest in an asset base," says Jeffrey Rodriguez, senior logistics manager for Craters & Freighters, a nonasset-based logistics service provider.
The 3PL advantage
As for why they turn to 3PLs for distribution on foreign soil, manufacturers cite a number of reasons. But one that appears on nearly every list is knowledge of local markets. Language and cultural differences among European nations often make it tricky for newcomers to navigate the marketplace. The creation of the European Union (EU) has made things easier, but moving products from Germany into France is still not the same as delivering goods from Kansas to Nebraska.
That's where the seasoned 3PL comes in. "It's a matter of core competency," explains John Langley, professor of supply chain management at Georgia Tech. "A 3PL's core competency is that they help companies mitigate their risk with someone who has on-the-ground knowledge of each country and region."
Not only do 3PLs know local markets, but most already have the necessary infrastructure in place, with facilities in prime distribution locations. That's a major consideration in Europe, where land is at a premium. In Europe, prime distribution locations include the Netherlands, Belgium, northern France, and northern Germany—all points from which shipments can easily reach the continent's largest cities within one to two days. These locations also offer the advantage of proximity to ocean ports, such as Rotterdam, Amsterdam, Antwerp, and Dunkirk, and to the superb network of canals, rails, and roads in this part of Europe.
FM Logistic's Tilloy-les-Mofflaines facility is one such example. Located in northern France, the site is within easy reach of the ports of Dunkirk and Antwerp.
Another is Menlo Worldwide Logistics' facility in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Menlo Worldwide, a global third-party service provider, operates the dedicated facility for one of its clients, NCR, which manufactures items like cash registers, ATMs, self-service checkout stations, and point-of-sale workstations. At the Rotterdam site, Menlo aggregates products manufactured worldwide for shipment to NCR's clients. "The NCR customer is typically a retail chain," explains Michael Chandler, vice president of fulfillment operations for NCR. "The customer does not care where it comes from as long as it shows up as a complete order and not just separate components coming from all over the world." From Rotterdam, he adds, the company can reach most of Western Europe within 24 hours.
At present, 3PLs are pushing their frontiers eastward, expanding their presence in Eastern Europe, where the greatest market opportunities are believed to lie. "There has been a big push eastward by 3PLs," says Robert Lieb, professor of supply chain management at Northeastern University and the author of the university's 3PL study. "Eastern Europe and Russia are targeted as growth areas.
Many 3PLs are establishing operations in Hungary, Poland, Estonia, and other countries such as new European Union members." FM Logistic, for example, is establishing new facilities in Russia.
Getting a toehold
For many companies, another major attraction of using a 3PL is that it allows them to enter new markets with only a minimal capital investment. Essentially, the 3PL can serve as a stepping stone until such time as the company decides to construct its own DC. "It gives them the ability to scale up and minimize the risk until they have the volumes needed to justify building a facility of their own," says Lieb.
But it's not only the newcomers that are using 3PLs to limit the amount of capital they must invest. Companies that have an established presence in Europe are doing it as well. Campbell Soup is a case in point. Up until about a decade ago, it used its own warehouses and fleets to handle distribution on that continent. But as the company's business grew, it opted for a change in strategy. "We started to outsource about 10 years ago," recalls Hans Ernest, the company's vice president of supply chain for Europe. "If you look at our scale of operations, it is significantly smaller in Europe than it is in the United States. We have so much diversity of products, so we try to reduce our costs and invested capital by pushing our logistics activities outside."
Third parties also offer flexibility—an important consideration for a growing company. "Most companies that expand into Europe may not know what their volumes will look like two to three years out," notes Langley. "A 3PL can help companies match capacity to customer needs."
That holds true in the short term as well. For many shippers, a major advantage of using a third party is the 3PL's ability to accommodate peaks in demand. For example, in addition to the dedicated facility in Rotterdam, NCR can take advantage of shared flex space in other Menlo facilities when the need arises.
Beyond that flexibility, using a 3PL may allow the shipper to benefit from economies of scale. Third-party logistics service providers often can find complementary products among their clients' wares that can be stored, processed, and shipped together for maximum efficiency. McCain Foods and Haagen-Dazs, for example, share many of the same customers in Europe. As a result, FM Logistic can pick McCain's frozen food items and Haagen-Dazs's ice cream products and ship them together, allowing the companies to share costs.
Those economies of scale aren't limited to picking and handling. They also come into play with transportation. FM Logistic, for example, is currently developing plans to bring products from several of its food clients together so that they can be pooled and shipped as full truckloads.
On top of that, 3PLs often can leverage their volumes to get better transportation rates. That's been the experience of NCR, which uses Menlo to manage its transportation. Although Menlo often uses its own fleet to provide transportation, the 3PL also contracts out some of its business to other trucking lines. "They have a deep reach into the transportation network, as they represent multiple clients," says Chandler. "That allows them to bring in greater volumes and negotiate better rates with transportation providers."
Not just for distribution anymore
As the Menlo example indicates, 3PLs do more than merely store goods and fulfill orders these days. Many also handle transportation and related services like customs clearance for their clients.
More and more 3PLs are also offering "value-added" services at their DCs. For example, FM Logistic configures the Brother copiers, computer printers, and other office machines stored at its facility in Tilloy-les-Mofflaines to meet the needs of local markets. As anyone who has traveled in Europe knows, there's little standardization among the various countries' electrical systems—for instance, electrical plugs in France have a different prong arrangement from those used in England. To address these variations, FM Logistic workers wire the proper plugs onto the machines and add instruction booklets in the appropriate language before they ship the cartons to the end users.
In fact, Menlo's ability to perform value-added services is what led NCR Corp. to use the 3PL for its European distribution. Menlo's Rotterdam facility provides NCR with light manufacturing capabilities, which range from changing switch settings within a component to the kitting of all of the components—cash registers, scanners, and so forth— needed for a retail store. In these cases, all of the IT-related products needed for a retail operation are brought together, assembled as needed, and then shipped as a unit. "It involves bolting all of the pieces together, mounting the drawer in the cash register, and mounting the scanners— everything from the 700-pound self checkout to a handheld scanner that weighs just a few ounces," says Chandler.
Information please
For all the advantages of using a 3PL for distribution overseas, the decision isn't always a slam dunk. The advantages must be weighed against the main disadvantage of outsourcing: loss of control over your distribution.
"On one end [when you use a 3PL], you share the risk; on the other, you increase the risk," reflects Campbell's Ernest. That is, companies that contract with a 3PL reduce their risks by minimizing the amount of capital they have to invest, but they also increase their risks by ceding control of their distribution to an outside party.
Third parties are well aware of shippers' fears about loss of control. To reassure clients on that count, many 3PLs make it a point to provide comprehensive information about the transactions they perform on behalf of their customers.
New visibility technologies have made that a snap. "Third-party service providers are very IT-oriented," notes Rodriguez of Craters & Freighters. "Inventory status and booking reports can often be accessed online 24/7. There really is no discernable difference now working with someone in Germany or Chicago."
Kuehne + Nagel, a worldwide 3PL based in Germany, provides its customers with continuous updates on its transactions. The 3PL uses a tracking and tracing system to keep clients in the loop, says Ernst Cuppens, the company's director of contract logistics in Belgium. "With our main customers, we have direct EDI [electronic data interchange], which informs the customer every 15 minutes about the status of their orders."
Similarly, Menlo determines what information customers want to see and then generates regular reports providing the desired information. "The client can define what KPIs [key performance indicators] are to be used to measure under the contract, such as shipping on time, order accuracy, etc.," says Gert Askes, Menlo's managing director for European operations. "Real-time information can be provided, but it is costly. Usually clients can simply go to a Web site where information is updated throughout the day. Many clients only need a daily snapshot. If you get a daily report, you have control."
making the right choice
When it comes to choosing a 3PL to handle their distribution in Europe, many shippers go with what they know. Oftentimes, shippers that are already working with a third party in North America simply opt to use the same one in Europe, says Robert Lieb, professor of supply chain management at Boston's Northeastern University.
Take office machine specialist NCR, for example. NCR uses Menlo Worldwide Logistics for its distribution needs both in the United States and in Europe. That has a couple of advantages from NCR's standpoint. First, it's able to build upon an established relationship rather than start over with an unknown entity. Second, by expanding its relationship with Menlo, it gains economies of scale and added leverage when it comes to renegotiating contracts.
But that option isn't always available to companies expanding their operations overseas. Some, for example, cannot find a single provider in Europe that can fulfill all of their needs.
Campbell Soup is one such company. Campbell Soup has built up its business in Europe mostly through acquisitions, and it continues to maintain the local brands in each country. Because its products vary widely from market to market, Campbell Soup typically uses a separate 3PL for warehousing in each country it serves. It also uses a number of transportation service providers across the continent.
Hans Ernest, Campbell Soup's vice president of supply chain for Europe, would like to find one carrier that can meet all of his company's transportation needs continentwide. But at the moment, most carriers do not offer the coverage required. Yet that could change someday soon, he says. There's a shift under way in the European third-party marketplace, with traditional warehousing companies getting into the transportation business and transportation companies providing distribution services. Companies like Campbell Soup may have to be patient, he says, but it's probably just a matter of time before they'll likely get what they're seeking.
For companies that find themselves in need of a new third party, Ernest has some advice on what to look for in a service provider:
"First, look for experience," he says. "Ask yourself: 'How strategic are they and what are their capabilities? What other services are they developing, and how do they plan to expand their operations in Europe?'"
John Langley, professor of supply chain management at Georgia Tech, agrees that service is—and should be—a priority for shippers when choosing a 3PL. But he adds that there's one other consideration that invariably emerges when shippers go to make their choice: price. "Price and service will always be at the top of the list," he says. "That's no different in Europe than elsewhere."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."