James Cooke is a principal analyst with Nucleus Research in Boston, covering supply chain planning software. He was previously the editor of CSCMP?s Supply Chain Quarterly and a staff writer for DC Velocity.
At a time of ever-increasing fuel surcharges, Jel Sert Co. has managed to do the seemingly impossible: hold the line on its transportation expenses. When it tallied up its freight expenditures for 2007, Jel Sert, a snack food and dessert maker perhaps best known for its freezer pops, found that it had managed to keep its spending to the same level it did in 2006— $15 million.
But the company did more than simply hold the line on transportation expenses last year, says Michael Martinez, Jel Sert's director of distribution. It actually reduced its per-shipment cost. In 2006, the company paid $15 million to move 20,000 shipments, he says. "But [in 2007,] we shipped 1,000 more truckloads [while keeping] the dollar spend the same. It's like having 1,000 free truckloads."
How did it manage this feat? Jel Sert says the key to its success was a transportation management system, or TMS. In December 2006, the company began using its first TMS—a Web-hosted version from Lean Logistics. Almost immediately, the software identified ways to streamline operations and consolidate loads. (For more on Jel Sert's story, see the sidebar.)
Jel Sert's case is hardly unusual, say the makers of TMS solutions. They claim that companies that use the software, which is designed to help users manage their transportation operations by overseeing the planning and movement of shipments, routinely see reductions in their freight bills. Yet experts in the field warn that not every shipper may be in a position to reap huge savings from a TMS. Shippers have to meet certain criteria if they hope to score big.
It pays to automate
TMS applications are nothing new. In fact, they've been around for almost two decades now. But these days, shippers have a couple of choices when it comes to how they use the software: They can buy a software license from the vendor and install the application on their corporate servers. Or they can do as Jel Sert did and arrange to have the software delivered "on demand." Under this model, which tends to be the less costly approach, the user essentially rents the application from a vendor that hosts the program on its own servers and delivers it over the Internet for a fee.
With rates rising and fuel surcharges soaring, analysts say interest in transportation management systems has grown over the past couple of years. And that interest shows no sign of receding. The Stamford, Conn.-based research firm Gartner Group forecasts that TMS software vendors will see revenues march steadily upward this year. Gartner expects sales to climb from $493 million in 2007 to $554 million this year—a gain of 12.4 percent.
Though TMS vendors tout their wares as a way for shippers to stem the tide of rising transportation costs, the potential benefits vary according to the state of a shipper's current operations. "The savings depend on how messed up you are to begin with," says Adrian Gonzalez, director of ARC Advisory Group's Logistics Executive Council in Dedham, Mass. He notes that in general, companies that rely on manual processes—where, say, employees call up carriers to tender loads and fax out routing instructions— have the most to gain from implementing a TMS. "The range of savings will depend on how manual your processes are to begin with," he says. "It could be significant, with the range of savings from 5 to 20 percent."
Analyst John Fontanella of Boston's AMR Research Inc. agrees with Gonzalez that manual operations have the most to gain from installing a TMS, but his estimate of the potential savings runs somewhat lower. Fontanella puts the savings at somewhere between 5 and 10 percent of transportation expenditures. To warrant the expense of purchasing or renting a system, he adds, a company must spend at least $8 million a year on transportation. "Below that it's tough to justify the cost of a TMS," says Fontanella.
What a TMS can do
Assuming a company has a large enough annual freight bill to justify the expenditure, how can a TMS improve its operations? For starters, the software can automate the day-to-day freight management activities. Transportation management systems are designed to handle standard communications with carriers, sending emails or faxes to book a shipment or schedule a pickup, for example. They're also set up to compile rate databases, collecting information on various carriers' rates and terms by contacting them via email and asking them to submit their rates online. Not only does that eliminate the need for employees to contact carriers individually and record rate information on an Excel spreadsheet, but it also makes rate comparison a snap.
In addition to compiling rate databases, many TMS systems boast procurement features that allow shippers to solicit electronic bids from carriers, Gonzalez notes. This, in turn, enables shippers to identify opportunities to negotiate volume discounts with those carriers. "For companies that don't put out their freight to bid and have a fragmented carrier base, they can use the TMS to take a centralized approach to aggregate their spend across their divisions and negotiate better rates with carriers," explains the ARC analyst. "The TMS also has optimization technology that can analyze all the carrier bids and take into account business rule requirements or any constraints."
Along with rate comparisons, transportation management systems typically can analyze shipment patterns and look for ways to consolidate orders—for example, combining several shipments into a single truckload for delivery to multiple customers, rather than sending several less-than-truckload shipments. "Savings often come from optimization, minimizing the number of less-thantruckload shipments," says Gonzalez.
In addition, a TMS can make short work of tasks like building loads and assigning orders to a particular shipment—tasks that tend to tax the human brain's capacity. "When you're trying to build loads manually, it gets overwhelming too quickly," says transportation consultant Foster Finley, a managing director at AlixPartners in Detroit. Say, for example, a manager is looking for the best way to move a $300 LTL shipment heading west, he says. Sorting through hundreds of shipments manually to find the best solution would be an all but impossible task. But turn the problem over to a TMS, and in minutes, it's likely to come up with an opportunity to add it to an existing truckload move for an additional $50 stop-off charge.
A stick for discipline
A TMS can offer other benefits as well. What many companies overlook is the potential for a TMS to help them impose discipline on transportation operations throughout the company's various sites. Fontanella notes that a TMS can be a particularly useful tool for ensuring that individual sites comply with corporate policies and adhere to the terms of any contracts the company has signed with carriers.
The software can also help steer users to the lowest-cost carriers. If all company DCs use the same TMS for load tendering, Finley says, the system can be set up to ensure that shipments are booked on preferred carriers. "When you're tendering a load and you have multiple tariffs," he says, "you can use the TMS to make sure you have the carrier with the lowest rate accepting the load if possible."
In the past, TMS applications were generally geared to domestic highway and rail movements. Today, however, most TMS applications are designed to identify savings opportunities not just in domestic movements but in international ones as well. "The bigger TMS vendors are expanding their footprint to cover more areas," says Gonzalez. "They are becoming more multimodal."
Companies that operate private fleets can also realize savings by using a TMS to streamline their operations. Gonzalez says that a TMS can be used to analyze routes or even find a backhaul load. A TMS can also eliminate the need for manual appointment scheduling. "Many companies still pick up the phone to schedule a delivery or appointment," says Gonzalez. "[With a TMS,] you can direct someone to a Web site where they can book themselves a slot online."
Future flexibility
Although most companies justify the cost of a TMS on the basis of transportation savings, that might not be the case in the future. Someday, companies may turn to this type of software more for the flexibility it offers them to react to changing conditions in the marketplace. Consultant Stephen Craig of CP Consulting says a TMS makes it easier for a shipper to change its transportation strategy each year or even respond to transportation market changes. In fact, a TMS can be used to model a company's current shipping approach and then come up with different scenarios for saving money.
The customers that get the most from their transportation management systems, he says, will be those that use the software for more than simply solving short-term problems. "A TMS is not going to help you beat fuel surcharges," says Craig. "But a well-implemented TMS is a good way for folks to deal with the changes that are just not stopping."
a taste for savings
Interested in using a transportation management system (TMS) but worried that it might be too costly for your operation? If food producer Jel Sert's experience is any indication, those fears might be unfounded. According to Michael Martinez, the company's director of distribution, Jel Sert saw a prompt payback on its TMS investment. In fact, he reports, the on-demand TMS that the company implemented in December 2006 paid for itself in less than three months.
A privately held, family-owned company based in West Chicago, Ill., Jel Sert makes "My-T-Fine" puddings, "Fla-Vor- Ice" freezer bars, "Otter" freeze pops, and Wyler's soft drink mixes. The company, whose business is largely seasonal (it moves 75 percent of its products in the spring and early summer), uses a combination of truckload, intermodal, less-than-truckload (LTL), and parcel carriers to ship its merchandise to locations nationwide.
Up until 2006, when the company deployed its first TMS, its transportation operation was strictly a paper-based manual process. "We were very transactional, processing one piece of paper at a time, and we were missing the opportunity to see multiple pieces of data at one time," says Martinez.
But the company's shift to a TMS—a Web-hosted solution from Lean Logistics that Jel Sert "rents" for a monthly subscription fee—changed all that. "By automating with a TMS, we are able to see 'lots' of orders on our terminals at one time, giving us the ability to save on freight by aggregating our data and putting things together like a puzzle," Martinez reports.
Seeing the big picture enabled Jel Sert to take advantage of opportunities to consolidate LTL shipments into lesscostly truckloads. "In the past, we did LTL," says Martinez, "Or we would use a 53-foot trailer with only 10 pallets on it, and we paid the full price for the truck." Now, he says, that no longer happens.
In the year prior to installing the TMS, the company spent $15 million on freight transportation. This past year, it spent the same amount, even though fuel charges rose and the company made 1,000 more truckload shipments. "We shipped more volume but we didn't spend a dollar more," says Martinez. "The savings were in the seven digits."
Jel Sert has gained one other advantage from its TMS— it's now finding itself quite popular with carriers. In the past, the food producer had used a third-party freight payment service to reimburse its carriers. Because the TMS has a payment module, Jel Sert has switched over to that, eliminating the middleman. "It's improved the receipt-to-payment cycle time," Martinez says. "And that means more carriers want to do business with us."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."