Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
Every year, students in John Bartholdi's warehousing and distribution class at Georgia Tech choose a handful of remote locations around the globe and send packages off to each of them via UPS, FedEx, and DHL. The exercise has become known as The Great Package Race. Its objective is to see which carrier reaches the remote and sometimes dangerous locations first.
Last year, the students selected Apia, the only city on the island of Upulu (a part of Samoa); Florianopolis, an island off the southern coast of Brazil; Harare, the capital of Zimbabwe; Tikrit, the birthplace of Saddam Hussein in Iraq; and Yangon (formerly Rangoon), until recently the capital of Burma (or Myanmar, as its military rulers would have it).
Bartholdi, who is the research director for Georgia Tech's Supply Chain and Logistics Institute, is careful to note that The Great Package Race is just a way to get students interested in the challenges of global shipping and should not be viewed as a valid comparison of the carriers' performance. But the exercise does serve to illustrate the reach of the three major express carriers.
As the Georgia Tech students learn, FedEx, UPS, and DHL can indeed deliver to addresses almost anywhere in the world. But that's not all they do: As they have extended their physical reach, they have also expanded into the types of services traditionally offered by freight forwarders and customs brokers.
By adding brokerage, forwarding, and other information-related services to their lineups, the Big Three express carriers can offer something approaching a one-stop shopping experience for international parcel shipments. And because they have expanded the scope of their services while simplifying import and export procedures for their customers, they've opened the door to global trade for a growing number of companies—particularly small and mid-sized players that may previously have found international trade daunting.
Navigating the global marketplace
Trimble Navigation Ltd. is one of the small and medium-sized enterprises that have benefited from the parcel carriers' comprehensive international services. The California-based company provides positioning technologies for the agriculture, engineering and construction, transportation, and wireless communications industries. It has offices in 18 countries, manufacturing facilities in Asia, and customers around the globe.
Trimble uses all of the major express service providers to import and export parcels, many of which are destined for—or departing from—the shipper's Dayton, Ohio, distribution center, says Brigitte Smith, Trimble's manager of transportation and logistics. Smith demands speed and a high degree of reliability—critical factors for a company that promises turnaround times of 24 to 48 hours and must provide warranty replacements and service for thousands of products.
The high-tech company relies on its parcel carriers not just to provide transportation but also to help it manage the complexities of international shipping. While it's important for any importer or exporter to be familiar with the regulations of the countries it operates in, Smith says, carriers can and should be able to provide additional expertise in areas like commodity classifications. She also expects them to provide a comprehensive customs service, including automated clearance, reporting, and management of drawback claims.
Along with using their transportation services, Smith also benefits from using the shipping software that the express carriers provide. She cites DHL's EasyShip program as an example of the type of software tool she has come to rely on. EasyShip offers automated document preparation and processing, shipment management tools, shipment tracking, and database management and maintenance for international traders.
Smith especially likes the fact that express carriers are so versatile nowadays. In the past, Trimble sometimes had to use four or five different service providers to handle various parcel shipping activities, but that's no longer the case. "It is nice to have a carrier that has the flexibility to provide services without branching out to a forwarder," she says.
Window on the world
Trimble is just one of thousands of small and medium-sized companies that are now taking advantage of express carriers' international services. In fact, says Carl Asmus, vice president of international marketing for FedEx Services, small and mid-sized companies represent the fastest-growing segment of the international parcel shipping market. "In the past, they have not had the resources to participate in international sourcing or selling," he explains. "[But now] they have to do it in order to survive. They have to compete with companies that can source around the world or have markets around the world."
For many of them, parcel carriers can provide the necessary resources. Henk Vlietstra, vice president of international services for DHL Express, says that by having offices around the world staffed with employees who understand import and export rules, parcel carriers can extend the reach of shippers that don't have their own international facilities. "They effectively have the capability to do international sourcing," he says.
In some cases, carriers are not only enabling smaller companies to build an international supply chain but are also actively encouraging it through education. FedEx, for instance, began a program in Latin America and the Caribbean in 2004 that offers seminars on exporting to small and mid-sized companies in Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, and Puerto Rico.
The international trade software that parcel carriers provide to their customers allows even small shippers to track their goods and ensure that those shipments comply with diverse and perpetually changing regulatory and security regimes. By providing a window on the world, these software tools encourage companies with limited international trade experience to venture across borders.
UPS, for example, developed its TradeAbility software package to help those shippers overcome many of the obstacles to international trade, says Ross McCullough, vice president of global marketing. The software, which helps international shippers generate cost estimates for duties, taxes, and transportation and locate compliance information for 34 countries, can take some of the worry out of exporting and importing for shippers that may not even know where to start. McCullough notes that UPS's WorldShip software, which provides direct Internet connections between shippers' own databases and UPS's air and ground information systems, is installed in some 550,000 locations around the world.
FedEx has focused on developing technology that improves the speed and reliability of its international express services, says Asmus. Among the tools it makes available to customers is FedEx InSight, a Web-based program that provides visibility into inbound, outbound, and third-party shipments, allowing shippers to find out about customs-clearance delays while it's still early enough to take corrective action. At the same time, the carrier has been promoting its Internet-based FedEx Global Trade Manager service as a tool to guide customers who are new to international trade through the international shipping process. The program includes import and export documents from more than 200 countries, assists in landed-cost calculations, and conducts denied-party screening for exports.
DHL, too, offers international shipping tools for customers of all sizes. "We can do automated shipment preparation for everyone from the mom-and-pop shipper to operations that ship up to 7,000 parcels per day," says Vlietstra. In addition to the EasyShip software that Trimble uses, the carrier offers DHL Import Express Online. The program helps importers prepare import shipments and manage the details from pickup to delivery.
Keep walking the walk
Demand for international services almost certainly will continue to grow as more shippers take the plunge into international trade. The express carriers are responding by expanding their physical and technical infrastructure to give their customers what they need, wherever they need it.
These days, where they need it is likely to be China or India. Even the smallest of international traders are now venturing into those markets. But bureaucracy is deeply entrenched in China and India, and it can be challenging to stay abreast of their constantly changing (and sometimes inconsistent) regulatory requirements. In those cases, smaller importers and exporters may end up relying more heavily than ever on their parcel carriers to help them navigate the trade landscape.
UPS, FedEx, and DHL will be ready. UPS, for instance, has allied with AFL, an express carrier in India that will pick up international shipments on its behalf. Big Brown also expects to open a new international air hub at Pudong International Airport in Shanghai later this year.
FedEx Express will offer FedEx International Economy, a new day-definite, customs-cleared, door-to-door service in 10 Asia-Pacific markets. Last year, FedEx acquired express businesses in China and India, and by the end of 2008, it expects to complete a new air hub at Guangzhou's Baiyun International Airport in South China.
DHL, meanwhile, has expanded its lift capacity between the United States and Asia through a 20-year agreement with Polar Air Cargo Worldwide. And in May 2007, it consolidated its various investments in Indian logistics, freight forwarding, and customs brokerage into a single joint venture.
Regardless of where in the world they do business, international shippers of all sizes are likely to demand much from their carriers. Smith of Trimble Navigation certainly does. "It is a very competitive world, and we have to do what we can to ensure that our customers will come back to us," she says. "Our carriers have to talk the talk and walk the walk."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.