Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

newsworthy

rebellion brewing against Customs' proposed "10+2" rule

Importers, customs brokers, and other international traders have expressed concerns about the rule, which was mandated by the SAFE Port Act of 2006.

When U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) finally issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the so-called "10+2" rule on Jan. 2, U.S. importers were disappointed—but not surprised—by the contents of that proposal. As they had feared, the proposed rule failed to include most of the recommendations they had presented over the past year.

Formally known as the "Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier Requirements," the proposed rule places new legal burdens on importers and ocean carriers to submit data they currently do not provide to the agency. Ocean carriers will have to provide two new pieces of information: container-status messages and stowage plans showing the location of cargo on board vessels bound for the United States. Shipping lines already submit two dozen other data elements to CBP.


Importers or their agents, who already provide detailed shipment information on their entry summaries, will be required to submit 10 additional data elements:

  • Manufacturer (or supplier) name and address
  • Seller (or owner) name and address
  • Buyer (or owner) name and address
  • Ship-to name and address
  • Container stuffing location
  • Consolidator (stuffer) name and address
  • Importer of Record number/foreign trade zone (FTZ) applicant identification number
  • Consignee number(s)
  • Country of origin
  • Commodity Harmonized Tariff Schedule number

The data must be electronically submitted at least 24 hours prior to vessel load- ing at the foreign port of origin.

Importers, customs brokers, and other international traders have expressed concerns about the rule, which was mandated by the SAFE Port Act of 2006. Among other things, they've questioned whether the security filing falls under the definition of "customs business" and therefore must be transacted by a licensed customs broker (it does not, but many people think it should); whether filings could be amended for goods that are sold in transit (they can); and whether CBP might use information obtained in security filings for commercial enforcement purposes (the agency says it will not). That's just a tiny sampling of the issues that have been raised; CBP's Commercial Operations Advisory Committee alone recommended more than three dozen changes. Only about one-third of them made it into the proposed rule.

Now a rebellion against 10+2 appears to be brewing. According to a trade compliance expert who's active in several industry groups, a movement to ask Congress or President Bush to intervene is picking up momentum.

Among the complaints: Some importers believe the rule goes beyond the legislation's intent by placing legal liability on the importer to obtain complete, accurate information from overseas sources, even though it may be impossible to obtain or verify that information by the pre-sailing deadline. Furthermore, compliance will be costly: The federal Office of Management and Budget has estimated that the 10+2 rule could cost industry between $350 million and $600 million annually. Critics say that estimate is too low, in part because it doesn't take into account the cost of the inevitable delays and longer cycle times.

The proposal is open for public comment until March 3, 2008, but CBP is under no obligation to adopt the recommendations it receives. Based on their experiences so far, the compliance expert notes, few people expect the results of the next round of rulemaking to be much different from the first.

The Latest

More Stories

legal scales and gavel

FMCSA rule would require greater broker transparency

A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.

According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

pickle robot unloading truck

Pickle Robot lands $50 million in VC for truck-unloading robots

The truck unloading automation provider Pickle Robot Co. today said it has raised $50 million in venture capital and will use the money to accelerate the development of new feature sets and build out the company’s commercial teams to unlock new markets and geographies.

The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.

Keep ReadingShow less
chart of trucking conditions

FTR: Trucking sector outlook is bright for a two-year horizon

The trucking freight market is still on course to rebound from a two-year recession despite stumbling in September, according to the latest assessment by transportation industry analysis group FTR.

Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.

Keep ReadingShow less
chart of robot use in factories by country

Global robot density in factories has doubled in 7 years

Global robot density in factories has doubled in seven years, according to the “World Robotics 2024 report,” presented by the International Federation of Robotics (IFR).

Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.

Keep ReadingShow less
person using AI at a laptop

Gartner: GenAI set to impact procurement processes

Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.

Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.

Keep ReadingShow less