Though Latin America is still playing catch-up when it comes to supply chain technology, it will progress quickly over the next few years if vendors can avoid some potential roadblocks.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Ask someone in Latin America about the state of supply chain technology, and he or she will probably tell you that the region is a decade behind the United States.
Why the 10-year lag? It's not because of Latin America's vine-filled jungles, mile-wide rivers, or forbidding mountain ranges—although these topographical features have made it tough to build reliable infrastructure. Rather, it's a result of decades of instability in this diverse region, which stretches more than 7,000 miles from the United States-Mexico border to the islands of Tierra del Fuego at South America's southern tip. Given the region's long history of economic volatility, governments and the private sector have had little incentive to invest in costly new technologies.
But that situation is quickly changing. As Latin America's economies stabilize, the region is becoming a competitive exporter. Consumer demand is rising, and that has drawn retailers and manufacturers from North America, Europe, and Asia to its fast-growing cities and industrial centers. Multinationals like Wal-Mart, Coca-Cola, and Sony have forced competition on these markets. They've also brought along some high expectations: They want the same data quality and supply chain visibility they enjoy in more developed parts of the world. All of these factors make for an upbeat forecast for supply chain technology south of the border, though vendors will still find there are hurdles to clear.
Different priorities
In at least one respect, the supply chain technology market in Latin America is similar to that in North America: Warehouse management systems (WMS) and transportation management systems (TMS) are the most frequently used types of software, says Francisco Giral, CEO of NetLogistik, a Mexico City-based consulting firm and systems integrator that represents several U.S. technology providers, including RedPrairie and Vocollect. Other types of software, automated material handling systems, and voice-directed solutions are less common, but sales are nonetheless growing, Giral says.
Despite that similarity, the factors driving demand for supply chain technologies in Latin America are quite different than in the United States, says John Price, president of InfoAmericas, a Miami-based business intelligence firm with offices in Mexico and Brazil. In the U.S. market, he says, the most important drivers are the costs of labor, space, real estate, and financing inventory, in that order. In Latin America, labor, space, and real estate costs generally are not major considerations. Instead, the top priorities are minimizing both security risks and financing costs.
InfoAmericas classifies Latin American countries in four tiers relative to their usage of supply chain technologies:
Tier 1: Mexico's export economy, dominated by large exporters, multinationals, and their suppliers. Assembly operations that moved to northern Mexico in search of cheaper labor adopted sophisticated logistics practices and technologies to compensate for higher transportation costs and greater distances from suppliers and customers.
Tier 2: Mexico's domestic economy, Brazil, Puerto Rico, and Panama. Multinational retailers and third-party logistics service companies (3PLs) are leaders in implementing supply chain technologies here.
Tier 3: Chile, Argentina, Colombia, Uruguay, Costa Rica, and Venezuela, which Price calls "the next frontier" for logistics. These countries need world-class logistics capabilities to help them compete internationally.
Tier 4: The rest of Latin America, where multinationals have a minimal presence and technology investments focus on cargo security.
Top priority: security
Who are the technology leaders in the region? Price says companies that handle high-value, high-volume products like pharmaceuticals and electronics—where security and integrity of product handling are top priorities—"spend pretty lavishly on logistics technology."
In Mexico, adds Giral, retailers and grocery chains are leading the way—in part because of competitive pressures from multinationals like Wal-Mart. When it comes to material handling systems, however, the pharmaceutical industry, with its specialized handling requirements, is in the vanguard. Still, it's a small universe: Probably fewer than twodozen companies in Mexico have such sophisticated systems as pick-to-light and automated storage and retrieval, he says.
Large exporters also have incentives to invest in technology. For instance, Chile's produce and seafood exporters, which compete in North America, Europe, and Asia, want software that will help them understand their lead times, optimize inventories, and reduce costs, says Michael Schetman, director of international business development for the Americas for technology provider Savi Networks.
When you look at businesses in general, however, the number-one reason for investing in technology remains security—and in Latin America, "security" means preventing cargo theft and drug smuggling, not terrorism. "Cargo insurance costs are astronomical, as are the claims for theft and other losses, so [companies] have to make every effort to mitigate those costs," says Price. "If a technology can do that, customers will buy it."
The traditional approach has been to hire guards to ride shotgun with trucks and containers, notes Neil Smith, acting CEO of Savi Networks. But companies in fast-growing economies like Colombia and Brazil have been receptive to the use of RFID, global positioning system (GPS) devices, and cell-phone-based systems to track and monitor assets.
In Colombia, Savi has teamed up with the technology firm Emprevi Ltda. This locally owned company has more than 20 years of experience managing logistics risks for clients like Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, and Gillette. The two partners operate an RFID-based system that tracks the location and security status of shipments between Colombian factories and seaports. A network of readers captures data that has been transmitted from electronic container seals and routes the information to transportation security software, Schetman explains. In addition to reporting location and security status, the software also sends alerts about security breaches and other exceptions to users' e-mail accounts, cell phones, or personal digital assistants (PDAs).
But wait a minute—RFID and cell phones in the jungle? It's true. Although many rural areas have no access to telecom networks, basic services are now available in most population centers. In regions where utilities and telecom infrastructure are unreliable, satellite-based solutions are popular. Savi and Emprevi are a little more creative: They're successfully using solar-powered RFID readers in some parts of Colombia.
Buy globally, implement locally
Sales channels for software and automated systems in Latin America differ considerably from those in the U.S. market. In a culture where personal relationships still matter, few technology firms sell directly to end users, says Price. Instead, they may partner with logistics service providers, which offer software to clients as a value-add. That system has made third-party logistics companies and freight forwarders "incredibly important" in introducing technology to the mostly family-owned companies in this region, he says.
The Latin American market is not yet lucrative enough for companies to develop technology specifically for that region, so products designed for the United States and Europe dominate the marketplace, says Schetman. In some countries, foreign software has a virtual lock on the market because users can get more mature, proven products for roughly the same price they'd pay for homegrown solutions. One exception is Colombia, where political unrest and security worries have kept most foreign logistics companies and technology vendors away. According to Price, Colombian companies have developed about half a dozen competitive logistics applications.
Foreign products may dominate sales, but when it comes time for implementation, Latin American buyers prefer to work with local firms. Many of the locals started out as developers, Price says, but their inability to invest in second- and third-generation technology, together with the lack of legal protections for intellectual property, pushed most of them to become service companies allied with foreign vendors.
Buyers' preference for local partners is based as much on cost as it is on shared language and culture, says Giral. Similarly, demand for product customization has more to do with corporate customs than with cultural differences. But language can still influence buying decisions. Brazilian companies, for instance, prefer to buy from and work with Portuguese-speakers, and communication problems can arise even in Spanish. For instance, when Mexico-based NetLogistik develops a "dictionary" of templates in a service-oriented architecture application for RedPrairie in Argentina, it must change about 30 percent of the terms to reflect differences in vocabulary.
Filling the knowledge gap
Despite a bright outlook for supply chain technologies in Latin America, one problem threatens to strangle future growth: a severe shortage of technical experts.
"Latin Americans are extremely well educated, but they are untrained," says Price. That is, higher education is very traditional and classical; the university system does not turn out enough scientists, engineers, and technicians, and there is nothing like the technical colleges that fill that role in Europe.What's missing from the labor pool, he says, is the competent, mid-level technician. As a result, companies find that they have to spend a lot more on technical training than they expected.
For Giral's company, the solution to that problem has been to hire young engineers from Mexico's top universities and teach them what they need to know. Similarly, Savi takes a "train the trainer" approach, with the goal of creating a pool of experts who can manage operations and customization in Colombia, says Schetman.
Interestingly, technology itself may help to mitigate the effects of Latin America's knowledge gap, Schetman notes. Hosted on-demand solutions that are now beginning to take hold in the region require comparatively little in the way of implementation time and expense; more important, perhaps, is that they can be upgraded and supported over the Internet by the application service provider.
For now, depending on outsiders to develop and support supply chain technologies may indeed be the most sensible course for a region that is still finding its economic way. Latin America's "watch and wait" approach to technology adoption has served it well in the past, says Giral, who points to Mexico's communication infrastructure as an example. Because conservative Mexican buyers waited for U.S. companies to work out all the bugs, he says, the country was able to leapfrog over intermediate telecom systems and go directly to fiber-optic communications—and do so at a speed unmatched in most of the United States.
success south of the border
Latin American companies may be conservative when it comes to buying technology, but an expanding array of logistics and transportation trade shows offers testament to the region's appetite for supply chain solutions. U.S., European, and Asian vendors of supply chain software and automated material handling systems represent a hefty percentage of exhibitors at events like Expo Logisti-K Argentina, Salon de la Logística Latinoamericana in Chile, Intermodal Brasil, Colombia's Sala Logística de las Américas, Congreso de Logística in Costa Rica, and Mexico's Expologística (the granddaddy of logistics events in the region), to name a few.
They wouldn't exhibit if they didn't see sales opportunities—and a number of these vendors have already struck gold in this market. Here are just a few success stories from the last few months:
INTTRA, a provider of e-commerce solutions to ocean carriers and their customers, experienced more than 200-percent sales growth in Mexico, Peru, and Venezuela in the 12-month period ending in June 2007.
Infor expects to rack up 20-percent sales growth in Argentina for 2007. The company now has some 800 active clients in that country.
FKI Logistex has added several sales executives in Mexico to handle increased demand for automated material handling systems.
JDA Software announced that Colombian grocery chain Almacenes Éxito increased inventory turnover by 10 percent, reduced overstocks by 60 percent, and cut out-of-stocks by 12 percent with JDA's E3 allocation and replenishment solutions.
Epicor Software formed strategic alliances with Technology Coast Partners (TCP) in Chile and Ability Data in Colombia, to offer integrated enterprise resource planning (ERP), customer relationship management (CRM), supply chain management (SCM), and professional services automation (PSA) software.
Editor's note: A useful source of information about the technology capabilities of third-party logistics service companies is Who's Who in Latin American Logistics and Supply Chain Management, published by Armstrong & Associates Inc. in partnership with InfoAmericas. Profiles of 88 global and local companies include details of their services, facilities, information technology capabilities, major customers, and more. For information, go to www.3PLogistics.com.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."