When you think of your best defenses against disaster, the weather guy is probably not the first thing that comes to mind. But maybe he should. Threats to your operations can come from all venues—terrorists, fires, chemical spills—but an awful lot of them seem to involve weather: tornadoes, blizzards and ice storms, hurricanes and floods.
Though any one of these weather events could completely disrupt the supply chain, they're rare enough that they may only rate mention in, say, Section 19-G of the corporate disaster plan. That's a risky way to do business. "You wouldn't think of operating a distribution center without a fire alarm," says Michael R. Smith, CEO and founder of WeatherData of Wichita, Kan., "but it's amazing how many companies try to operate their weathersensitive businesses without some kind of weather alarm system."
In fact, it seems that many companies are trying to run their businesses without much in the way of a disaster preparedness plan at all. According to a recent survey, the 2003 Protecting Value Study conducted by commercial and industrial property insurer FM Global, the Financial Executives Research Foundation and the National Association of Corporate Treasurers, 88 percent of financial executives and 83 percent of risk managers admitted that their companies were not entirely prepared to recover from a major disruption to a top revenue source. That same study singled out property-related hazards, such as fire and natural disasters, as the greatest threat to revenue sources.
There's not a thing you can do to prevent a natural disaster, of course. But there are many matters you can think through in advance when it comes to recovery: Who's responsible when a tornado rips through your loading dock and damages a carrier's trucks? What happens to the urgent shipment that requires pickup in Alabama when your fleet is snowed in somewhere on Michigan's Upper Peninsula? How can you protect your delicate robotic loading equipment from lightning strikes?
You may never have to answer these questions. But then again, you might. For those who aren't taking any chances, we offer five tips on preparing your supply chain for stormy weather:
Back up all your systems – not just your computer systems. Too many people figure that because their IT specialists have devised a recovery strategy for their data center, they've made a good start to their disaster planning, says Mike Morganti, customer training manager for FM Global of Johnston, R.I. The problem is, there's more to the distribution of goods than just the data.
Take the private fleet, for example. "Having your own fleet and drivers gives you a lot of control, but it doesn't preclude something's interrupting the flow," Morganti says. His advice: "Identify strategies to make sure there will be an uninterrupted flow of products from the distribution center to the customer. This could be as simple as making flexible arrangements with outside carriers."
Another option is to pre-position product in certain locations if the weather looks threatening, says Michael J. Fagel, Ph.D. , emergency management director for meat packer Aurora Packing Co. of North Aurora, Ill., and emergency manager for the village of Sugar Grove, Ill. Arrange for some alternative warehousing around the country and get your product closer to the "end game." Then rotate your stock. "For example, a lot of companies placed food and other perishables on trailers and had them pre-positioned throughout the country just prior to Y2K in case there were problems," he recalls. "If you're anticipating, say, a winter storm or other disaster, this is something to consider."
Review your insurance coverage. A seemingly minor point, but one that may save you a lot of money: "If you have other companies' inventory in your center, you must be sure you are properly insured for it, "warns John Kauffman, director of loss control training for the Connecticut-based Hartford Financial Services Group.
Of course, somewhere down the road, most—if not all—inventory becomes cargo. That cargo should be insured as well. "Make sure third-party carriers are adequately insured, "advises Kauffman, "and get copies of proofs of insurance. "Then meet with your insurance agent to discuss what your exposures and responsibilities are with third-party carriers in disaster situations. For example, if the carrier's trucks are on your premises during a disaster and are damaged ,who's responsible for the damage to those trucks? "Create up-front agreements with the carriers so everyone knows who's responsible for what du ring a disaster, such as alternate means of transportation," he urges. Then make sure the carriers have disaster plans in place and be prepared to coordinate your plans with their plans.
Forget the NWS. Many companies rely on reports from the National Weather Service (NWS) for advance notice of weather-related problems. But those NWS reports often fall short, argues Smith of WeatherData, a service that helps clients identify their weather-related risks and create plans to mitigate those risks.
For example, the NWS does not issue any kind of lightning warnings. "However, if you have a highly automated distribution center that relies on robotic loading equipment or computers that run the operations, a power surge can be disastrous," he says. If that's the case, you need a lightning warning system so you have time to shift to your generators and isolate your power sources from commercial power before lightning arrives.
The NWS doesn't do much better with tornadoes. The Weather Service only issues tornado warnings by county, which gives you no real indication whether your facility is directly in the tornado's path. "It is possible, using the improved technology that has been developed over the last decade, to be very specific about whether a given site is within the path of a tornado or not," Smith reports. That's important to know: "If you're in the path, you want to do an orderly shutdown and shelter your people," he says."If you're not in the path, though, there is no reason to take what could be a very expensive hit in terms of productivity by shutting down operations."
Hurricanes present a different kind of problem: Ever since Hurricane Andrew devastated parts of Florida, the NWS has been prone to overwarning, stressing the worstcase scenarios. The problem is that the overwarnings are becoming very costly to businesses. You can't do much about an approaching hurricane, of course, but by working with a business-focused weather consultant,it is possible to anticipate and be proactive in these circumstances, and figure out the potential risk to your sp ecific site.
Take off the blinders. Many times DC managers underestimate how vulnerable they are to significant weather events at distant points in the supply chain."I can't tell you how many times over the years I've heard of people running out of parts or experiencing other supply disruptions when the weather was clear at the distribution center and clear at the customer's or supplier's location, but there was an ice storm, snowstorm or flood in between," says Smith.
If your business depends on your ability to receive raw materials or ship finished products, you'll want to keep an eye on the weather along the entire supply chain. As soon as you hear of a potential disruption along your supply route, you can begin to coordinate with your customers."You can't wait until there are 15 inches of snow on the ground to decide what you're going to do," Smith says. You need to ask customers how they want to plan for the event before it happens. For example: Do they want additional parts or inventory sent early? Do they want a contingency plan put into effect to use air freight?
Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst. One mistake many managers make—particularly when building a new facility—is gauging hazards from statistics drawn from an inadequate time period, according to Smith. In some cases, companies look at averages over as few as three to 10 years, he says, which can be very misleading.
"For example, if you had used data taken from the last three to 10 years on the potential threat for roof loading due to heavy snow in Denver, you wouldn't get much useful information because the last 10 years have been relatively snow-free," says Smith. Yet after a decade of winters that featured a relatively light accumulation,on Wednesday, March 19, almost seven feet of snow fell in the Denver area, making it the worst blizzard in almost a century and the second worst in Denver's history. Fire officials reported that roofs caved in on approximately 100 homes, businesses and other buildings.
Smith recommends that businesses review at least 30 years' worth of records, and preferably 50 to 100 years' worth (which are also available), to get a true idea of just how bad things could get. And, no surprise here, he also points out that using a weather risk management service can provide crucial advance warning ("Though no one expected the Denver roof collapses," he reports, "the information we put out to our clients did mention this possibility").
Could early warning have helped avert a disaster? It's hard to know. But one thing seems clear enough: With advance information, you could at least break out the snow melters and roof rakes. And maybe call up and thank the weather guy.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."