When you think of your best defenses against disaster, the weather guy is probably not the first thing that comes to mind. But maybe he should. Threats to your operations can come from all venues—terrorists, fires, chemical spills—but an awful lot of them seem to involve weather: tornadoes, blizzards and ice storms, hurricanes and floods.
Though any one of these weather events could completely disrupt the supply chain, they're rare enough that they may only rate mention in, say, Section 19-G of the corporate disaster plan. That's a risky way to do business. "You wouldn't think of operating a distribution center without a fire alarm," says Michael R. Smith, CEO and founder of WeatherData of Wichita, Kan., "but it's amazing how many companies try to operate their weathersensitive businesses without some kind of weather alarm system."
In fact, it seems that many companies are trying to run their businesses without much in the way of a disaster preparedness plan at all. According to a recent survey, the 2003 Protecting Value Study conducted by commercial and industrial property insurer FM Global, the Financial Executives Research Foundation and the National Association of Corporate Treasurers, 88 percent of financial executives and 83 percent of risk managers admitted that their companies were not entirely prepared to recover from a major disruption to a top revenue source. That same study singled out property-related hazards, such as fire and natural disasters, as the greatest threat to revenue sources.
There's not a thing you can do to prevent a natural disaster, of course. But there are many matters you can think through in advance when it comes to recovery: Who's responsible when a tornado rips through your loading dock and damages a carrier's trucks? What happens to the urgent shipment that requires pickup in Alabama when your fleet is snowed in somewhere on Michigan's Upper Peninsula? How can you protect your delicate robotic loading equipment from lightning strikes?
You may never have to answer these questions. But then again, you might. For those who aren't taking any chances, we offer five tips on preparing your supply chain for stormy weather:
Back up all your systems – not just your computer systems. Too many people figure that because their IT specialists have devised a recovery strategy for their data center, they've made a good start to their disaster planning, says Mike Morganti, customer training manager for FM Global of Johnston, R.I. The problem is, there's more to the distribution of goods than just the data.
Take the private fleet, for example. "Having your own fleet and drivers gives you a lot of control, but it doesn't preclude something's interrupting the flow," Morganti says. His advice: "Identify strategies to make sure there will be an uninterrupted flow of products from the distribution center to the customer. This could be as simple as making flexible arrangements with outside carriers."
Another option is to pre-position product in certain locations if the weather looks threatening, says Michael J. Fagel, Ph.D. , emergency management director for meat packer Aurora Packing Co. of North Aurora, Ill., and emergency manager for the village of Sugar Grove, Ill. Arrange for some alternative warehousing around the country and get your product closer to the "end game." Then rotate your stock. "For example, a lot of companies placed food and other perishables on trailers and had them pre-positioned throughout the country just prior to Y2K in case there were problems," he recalls. "If you're anticipating, say, a winter storm or other disaster, this is something to consider."
Review your insurance coverage. A seemingly minor point, but one that may save you a lot of money: "If you have other companies' inventory in your center, you must be sure you are properly insured for it, "warns John Kauffman, director of loss control training for the Connecticut-based Hartford Financial Services Group.
Of course, somewhere down the road, most—if not all—inventory becomes cargo. That cargo should be insured as well. "Make sure third-party carriers are adequately insured, "advises Kauffman, "and get copies of proofs of insurance. "Then meet with your insurance agent to discuss what your exposures and responsibilities are with third-party carriers in disaster situations. For example, if the carrier's trucks are on your premises during a disaster and are damaged ,who's responsible for the damage to those trucks? "Create up-front agreements with the carriers so everyone knows who's responsible for what du ring a disaster, such as alternate means of transportation," he urges. Then make sure the carriers have disaster plans in place and be prepared to coordinate your plans with their plans.
Forget the NWS. Many companies rely on reports from the National Weather Service (NWS) for advance notice of weather-related problems. But those NWS reports often fall short, argues Smith of WeatherData, a service that helps clients identify their weather-related risks and create plans to mitigate those risks.
For example, the NWS does not issue any kind of lightning warnings. "However, if you have a highly automated distribution center that relies on robotic loading equipment or computers that run the operations, a power surge can be disastrous," he says. If that's the case, you need a lightning warning system so you have time to shift to your generators and isolate your power sources from commercial power before lightning arrives.
The NWS doesn't do much better with tornadoes. The Weather Service only issues tornado warnings by county, which gives you no real indication whether your facility is directly in the tornado's path. "It is possible, using the improved technology that has been developed over the last decade, to be very specific about whether a given site is within the path of a tornado or not," Smith reports. That's important to know: "If you're in the path, you want to do an orderly shutdown and shelter your people," he says."If you're not in the path, though, there is no reason to take what could be a very expensive hit in terms of productivity by shutting down operations."
Hurricanes present a different kind of problem: Ever since Hurricane Andrew devastated parts of Florida, the NWS has been prone to overwarning, stressing the worstcase scenarios. The problem is that the overwarnings are becoming very costly to businesses. You can't do much about an approaching hurricane, of course, but by working with a business-focused weather consultant,it is possible to anticipate and be proactive in these circumstances, and figure out the potential risk to your sp ecific site.
Take off the blinders. Many times DC managers underestimate how vulnerable they are to significant weather events at distant points in the supply chain."I can't tell you how many times over the years I've heard of people running out of parts or experiencing other supply disruptions when the weather was clear at the distribution center and clear at the customer's or supplier's location, but there was an ice storm, snowstorm or flood in between," says Smith.
If your business depends on your ability to receive raw materials or ship finished products, you'll want to keep an eye on the weather along the entire supply chain. As soon as you hear of a potential disruption along your supply route, you can begin to coordinate with your customers."You can't wait until there are 15 inches of snow on the ground to decide what you're going to do," Smith says. You need to ask customers how they want to plan for the event before it happens. For example: Do they want additional parts or inventory sent early? Do they want a contingency plan put into effect to use air freight?
Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst. One mistake many managers make—particularly when building a new facility—is gauging hazards from statistics drawn from an inadequate time period, according to Smith. In some cases, companies look at averages over as few as three to 10 years, he says, which can be very misleading.
"For example, if you had used data taken from the last three to 10 years on the potential threat for roof loading due to heavy snow in Denver, you wouldn't get much useful information because the last 10 years have been relatively snow-free," says Smith. Yet after a decade of winters that featured a relatively light accumulation,on Wednesday, March 19, almost seven feet of snow fell in the Denver area, making it the worst blizzard in almost a century and the second worst in Denver's history. Fire officials reported that roofs caved in on approximately 100 homes, businesses and other buildings.
Smith recommends that businesses review at least 30 years' worth of records, and preferably 50 to 100 years' worth (which are also available), to get a true idea of just how bad things could get. And, no surprise here, he also points out that using a weather risk management service can provide crucial advance warning ("Though no one expected the Denver roof collapses," he reports, "the information we put out to our clients did mention this possibility").
Could early warning have helped avert a disaster? It's hard to know. But one thing seems clear enough: With advance information, you could at least break out the snow melters and roof rakes. And maybe call up and thank the weather guy.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."