Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Importers who have read the reports about quality problems with Chinese products have to be thinking "There but for the grace of God go I." They know that regardless of what they're buying and where they source from, there are times when suppliers just don't do what they're expected to do.
What many importers don't know is that mistakes are not always the suppliers' fault. In fact, suppliers' failure to comply with product specs, customs regulations, and cargo security requirements may have more to do with poor communication than with willful disregard.
To ensure that far-away vendors follow all the rules, say experienced importers, you must first make your expectations crystal clear. After all, nobody can meet expectations if they don't know what they are.
That's not to say that up-front communication is the only consideration; establishing standard procedures and regularly monitoring both product and process are equally important. The best way to get what you paid for is to do all of those things in a respectful and friendly manner. In other words, don't command—collaborate.
IBM listens to suppliers
When it comes to collaborating with overseas suppliers, IBM provides an example that all importers—large or small—might want to emulate. The technology giant does business in 170 countries, and shipments criss-cross the globe as they move between dozens of origin-destination country pairs.
No matter where a shipment originates or is headed, IBM requires its suppliers to meet uniformly high standards. "We expect all suppliers to abide by all of the applicable laws and regulations—import, export, or otherwise—and we state that in all of our contracts and agreements," says Alan Kohlscheen, executive program manager for import compliance strategy.
The word "uniformly" is key: Globally accepted standards and procedures are central to IBM's business philosophy, says Debbie Turnbull, executive program manager for supply chain security.
The company is eager to see common security and trade facilitation standards established across all of the countries where IBM does business, she says. That would greatly improve supply chain efficiency, effectiveness, costs, and speed, and it's a major reason why IBM is a leading advocate of the World Customs Organization's global standard for supply chain security, known as the SAFE Framework.
Among other initiatives, Big Blue has spearheaded the formation of a coalition of high-tech companies that is developing industry-specific standards that will be consistent with the SAFE Framework. One of the coalition's aims, says Turnbull, is to mitigate the compliance burden on suppliers by creating common requirements that would be adopted by many high-tech companies.
At the same time, IBM avoids painting all suppliers with the same broad brush. Even as it promotes consistency in quality and process, the company is sensitive to cultural differences and local business practices. "Our compliance organization has people in seven countries engaged in import compliance and supply chain security," Kohlscheen notes. "We're not in a control tower trying to understand everything. We're fortunate to have the diversity we do have around the globe; it adds to our effectiveness."
IBM also considers a supplier's size and available resources when imposing compliance and procedural requirements. "It really takes a two-way conversation to understand suppliers' capabilities and how you can work with them," says Kohlscheen. "If you take a heavy-handed approach, you may end up adding cost and inefficiencies in your supply chain."
That balance between centralized policy-making and flexibility is apparent in the way IBM communicates its expectations to suppliers. For example, the company has held conferences with its manufacturing and logistics suppliers to discuss supply chain security and regulatory issues. These events are true give-and-take dialogues: Not only does IBM explain its expectations, but government representatives also present their perspectives and suppliers show each other how they are meeting their big customer's requirements.
Despite such comprehensive efforts, and although it's rare, IBM's suppliers still experience quality issues from time to time. That's why testing and verification are built into its supplier management programs. The high-tech leader follows up educational outreach with transaction testing and process sampling to verify compliance with its policies. Compliance teams may check data quality and format as well as the accuracy of customs and transportation documents, even opening packages in some cases. These checks are risk-based. For instance, lanes where IBM has found anomalies in the past often are targeted for review, Kohlscheen says. And if an error should turn up? "We circle back to the suppliers and discuss it with them. In my experience, once you point that out, they are very willing to make changes."
Automation or the personal touch?
IBM achieves its compliance objectives through a combination of technology-supported process standardization and face-to-face communication. While both approaches have a role to play in ensuring that suppliers meet expectations, some companies and industries may favor one over the other.
Import-dependent retailers that impose a variety of requirements in areas like product fit, quality standards, and environmental and social responsibility are finding that automation can be an efficient and cost-effective way to work with overseas suppliers. Apparel makers, for instance, may have dozens of points of measure for a single style; if a supplier fails to measure each of them properly, the product will be defective and the importer will either have to reject it or deal with costly returns and dissatisfied customers. To be certain that suppliers understand exactly what each point of measure means and that they consistently measure it correctly, some retailers are using software to guide them through that process.
One such product is the Quality Management module of TradeStone's retail merchandising solution. With TradeStone, suppliers see a diagram that shows each measurement point for a specific product or style; when they click on each point of measure, they get a close-up view and an explanation of how to verify that measure. This method not only reduces the need for multiple, very costly fit evaluations and the incidence of returns, but it also ensures consistency in high-volume operations with large numbers of employees, says TradeStone CEO Sue Welch. The software's flexibility when it comes to language is another way to ensure suppliers understand what's expected of them: Users can easily configure screens and vocabulary to reflect their preferences.
TradeStone also monitors other types of compliance checkpoints from the design and bid stages all the way through to final delivery. At appropriate points in the product's lifecycle, the software asks suppliers to confirm and verify that they have received required certifications, performed testing (such as Underwriters Laboratories' tests for electrical items), complied with security and customs regulations, fulfilled social responsibility mandates regarding labor and the environment, and met similar buyer-imposed requirements. The process is configured in such a way that the product cannot move on to the next step until complete information has been submitted, Welch says. Furthermore, if there is any deviation from expectations, the system alerts the buyer and identifies any changes in cost, specs, and other requirements that may result."At each point, the system looks for the responsible party to confirm which actions have been done, and if a new date, cost, or classification is needed, it notifies everybody involved," she explains.
Automation is an integral part of the picture for users of the Supplier Management service offered by UPS Supply Chain Solutions, but face-to-face communication and follow-up is the program's hallmark. Supplier Management monitors vendors' compliance with purchase orders,manufacturing, distribution, documentation, and customs clearance requirements. "We act as our clients' eyes and ears all over the world," says Director of Supplier Management Tom Boike. "We take an order's 'temperature,' making personal contact and verifying that it's on time, that quantity and quality are correct, and so forth."
UPS begins the process by sitting down with the importer and small groups of its suppliers to discuss the client's expectations and what UPS's role will be. UPS receives a purchase order at the same time the supplier does; local staff assigned to that account follow the order's adherence to the client's rules using a combination of automated monitoring and personal communication with the factory and logistics service providers. The supplier and the importer also can arrange "events" such as shipment bookings and quality inspections through UPS's proprietary visibility system. If there is a problem, UPS notifies the appropriate parties and works with the supplier to come up with a solution.
Although personal contact and careful application of technology are the main drivers of a compliance program's success, many importers wisely do not rely on friendly persuasion or technology alone. IBM, Hewlett-Packard, Intel, and others write specific compliance mandates into suppliers' contracts to give them the power of law. But UPS may have built the ultimate compliance incentive into its system: "We act as the trigger for payment," Boike explains. "We don't control the money, but we control the documents that enable the supplier to get the money—and they don't get paid if they don't comply."
prevention is still the best medicine
Perhaps the best advice for importers who want to ensure that their suppliers toe the line is to do everything possible to prevent problems from happening, says Ken Koenemann, practice leader for TBM Consulting Group's Lean Value Chain Practice and an expert in offshoring. And that's essentially what the following suggestions are all about. They may seem fairly basic or even obvious in some cases, he says, but these preventive measures are often overlooked by companies that are more focused on cheap labor than on the potential consequences of their actions.
Use key metrics and a scorecard system to monitor compliance. Setting up a system for tracking metrics much as you would do in your home-based operation will allow you to assess your offshore suppliers' processes at a glance and will provide early warning when something is about to go wrong.
Communicate regularly and clearly with your offshore suppliers, and be prepared to follow up. Making periodic visits to suppliers' sites will help you find and solve problems before they affect your ability to profitably meet your own customers' requirements.
Lay out terms for agreements and partnerships in contractual form. Don't assume that your offshore manufacturer understands what you want—put your expectations and agreements in writing. Specify exactly what you want with respect to quality, cost, delivery, and services, and make sure you do it in clear, unambiguous language.
Perform due diligence on your offshore suppliers. Find out the facts about their capabilities in such areas as product design, engineering, transportation management, and supply chain technology. It's up to you to do the necessary research to ensure you're getting what you expect—and that you're doing business with a company that can fulfill those expectations.
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
Manufacturing and logistics workers are raising a red flag over workplace quality issues according to industry research released this week.
A comparative study of more than 4,000 workers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia found that manufacturing and logistics workers say they have seen colleagues reduce the quality of their work and not follow processes in the workplace over the past year, with rates exceeding the overall average by 11% and 8%, respectively.
The study—the Resilience Nation report—was commissioned by UK-based regulatory and compliance software company Ideagen, and it polled workers in industries such as energy, aviation, healthcare, and financial services. The results “explore the major threats and macroeconomic factors affecting people today, providing perspectives on resilience across global landscapes,” according to the authors.
According to the study, 41% of manufacturing and logistics workers said they’d witnessed their peers hiding mistakes, and 45% said they’ve observed coworkers cutting corners due to apathy—9% above the average. The results also showed that workers are seeing colleagues take safety risks: More than a third of respondents said they’ve seen people putting themselves in physical danger at work.
The authors said growing pressure inside and outside of the workplace are to blame for the lack of diligence and resiliency on the job. Internally, workers say they are under pressure to deliver more despite reduced capacity. Among the external pressures, respondents cited the rising cost of living as the biggest problem (39%), closely followed by inflation rates, supply chain challenges, and energy prices.
“People are being asked to deliver more at work when their resilience is being challenged by economic and political headwinds,” Ideagen’s CEO Ben Dorks said in a statement announcing the findings. “Ultimately, this is having a determinantal impact on business productivity, workplace health and safety, and the quality of work produced, as well as further reducing the resilience of the nation at large.”
Respondents said they believe technology will eventually alleviate some of the stress occurring in manufacturing and logistics, however.
“People are optimistic that emerging tech and AI will ultimately lighten the load, but they’re not yet feeling the benefits,” Dorks added. “It’s a gap that now, more than ever, business leaders must look to close and support their workforce to ensure their staff remain safe and compliance needs are met across the business.”
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.