When it comes to handicapping the supply chain software race, WMS still looks like a shoo-in. But a couple of dark horse challengers are coming up from behind.
James Cooke is a principal analyst with Nucleus Research in Boston, covering supply chain planning software. He was previously the editor of CSCMP?s Supply Chain Quarterly and a staff writer for DC Velocity.
In the race for buyers' software dollars, there's never been any question about who's out in front. Year after year, warehouse management systems (WMS) have easily outdistanced the rest of the field, generating at least half the revenue in the supply chain execution (SCE) market. And that's unlikely to change anytime soon. Most analysts see no big changes in the software horse race in 2008.
Nonetheless, close observers report that they're seeing some subtle shifts in the mar- ket for supply chain execution applications, systems that manage storage, order fulfillment, and delivery functions. For one thing, it appears that transportation management syst (TMS) have put on a burst of speed and are gaining on WMS. For another, ther ple of contenders from the back of the pack are about to make their move.
Trade-up time
Supply chain execution (SCE) software has become big business. According to the Stamford, Conn. based research firm Gartner Inc., sales of these applications totaled $1.55 billion in 2006 and are expected to reach $1.7 billion in 2007—an increase of 9.7 percent. Gartner says growth will continue this year, though the pace will slacken a bit. Its forecast calls for revenues to grow another 8.5 percent to $1.845 billion.
Right now, warehouse management systems account for approximately 56 percent of that revenue. License sales and maintenance fees for WMS—software that keeps tabs on inventory and oversees DC tasks like receiving, putaway, and order picking—reached $950 million in 2007, according to Gartner. The analyst's forecast calls for sales to climb 6 or 7 percent this year, which would put revenues over the $1 billion mark.
Although other analysts may differ with Gartner's market-size estimates, they all agree that WMS sales will continue to expand. In most cases, however, it's not new users that are driving the growth; it's existing users that are trading up. "In large part, it's a replacement cycle for older WMS packages that were bought and implemented in the mid '90s," says John Fontanella, an analyst with Boston-based AMR Research. The newer packages, he says, offer enhanced reporting capabilities and realtime information processing. And many include features designed to help users comply with their own customers' mounting demands—enabling them to, say, load pallets or package shipments in specific ways.
Today's upgraded packages typically include a labor management component, which enables users to measure worker productivity and optimize the use of labor in picking, packing, and sorting. That's fast becoming a must, says Fontanella. "Companies are finding it harder to recruit warehouse workers," he explains. "Because the costs are going up for labor, they have to make sure they get the most out of their labor."
Adrian Gonzales, executive director of the logistics council at ARC Advisory Group in Dedham, Mass., says enhanced data-exchange capabilities are another factor in the newer versions' appeal. The older WMS applications lacked the ability to support data exchange with external trading partners, he says. The latest packages, however, contain features designed to give a company's supply chain partners visibility into a warehouse's inventory holdings.
The new WMS applications are also more flexible than their predecessors. Among other things, they're designed for easy reconfiguration if a company needs to make changes to its warehouse operations. "In the past, you would have to write custom code for a new business requirement," explains Gonzales. "The new software architecture [used in the latest WMS packages] allows you to make changes more easily and cost effectively. Because a lot of companies are looking to be nimble, they are looking to upgrade the WMS from the standpoint of information technology so they can more cost effectively respond to business changes."
still in the game
The WMS market may be maturing, but demand for the software hasn't flagged. Nearly a quarter of the respondents to a recent DC VELOCITY survey said they planned to buy a warehouse management system this year.
(2008 software purchase plans - % of respondents)
Warehouse management
24%
Transportation management
18%
Inventory planning
18%
Planning and forecasting
17%
Supply chain optimization
13%
Labor management
13%
Supply chain design
11%
Supply chain performance management
10%
Demand planning
10%
Enterprise resource planning
9%
Yard management
9%
Supply chain event management
7%
Trade/import/export management
7%
TMS put on the speed
When it comes to revenues, warehousing software may have left the rest of the field in the dust. But it's a different story when it comes to growth. While WMS sales are cantering along at a 6- to 7-percent clip, for example, sales of TMS are hurtling forward at double-digit rates. Gartner expects sales of TMS applications (systems that oversee freight planning and movements) to reach $493 million in 2007—an 11.9 percent increase over 2006 revenues of $441 million. This year, the research firm expects TMS revenue to surge another 12.4 percent to $554 million.
What's driving the growth? An obvious factor is skyrocketing fuel prices, says Gonzales of ARC. "Companies are realizing that unless they implement this technology, their costs are going to go up and their service will degrade."
But it's not just about fuel, he says. The newer versions are fast becoming more global in scope and, therefore, appeal to a broader base of users than their predecessors did. Unlike the earlier versions, which could only manage truck and rail movements, the newer versions can handle air and ocean shipments as well. Gonzales also thinks TMS vendors will soon start adding features normally associated with global trade management solutions, such as regulatory compliance. "In 2008, you'll see more activity in terms of TMS and global trade management becoming more integrated," he predicts.
The growing pressure to go green could also boost demand for transportation software, according to Gonzales. "Although I haven't seen any company justify a TMS purchase solely for green purposes, I'm beginning to see and hear companies talk about it," he says. "The driving force for a TMS is still to reduce costs and improve service levels, but when you consolidate loads and optimize routes, you have fewer trucks on the road, using less fuel."
Falling TMS prices may provide another incentive for buyers to finally take the plunge. The availability of TMS on demand—that is, delivered over the Internet for a relatively low monthly or per-transaction fee—has placed "downward pressure" on the price of software sold under the traditional licensing model, says Gonzales. "Prices are staying the same or decreasing slightly for TMS," he says.
As things now stand, the only thing that could spoil the TMS vendors' party is an emerging competitive threat from a couple of outside sources. In recent years, freight carriers have begun offering shippers access to their own in-house TMS solutions on an on-demand basis. At the same time, third-party logistics service providers (3PLs) have started offering load consolidation and routing optimization as part of their service. Indeed, Gartner analyst Chad Eschinger notes that the primary question facing shippers these days is which provider offers a better value proposition for freight spend optimization—a 3PL or a software vendor.
Dark horse candidates
Although WMS and TMS tend to get all the attention, Fontanella of AMR notes that there are a couple of other SCE applications that bear watching. These applications— network design and inventory optimization systems—are relatively new to the market, but they're already attracting a lot of interest. "Network design and optimization and inventory optimization are the fastest-growing categories, though they are working off a small base," he says.
Network design software lets users evaluate different options for reconfiguring their supply chain operations— giving them an idea of how, say, closing a DC in Miami and opening one in Atlanta would affect transportation costs and customer service levels. Though sales of network design applications only amounted to $54 million in 2006, Fontanella expects strong growth in 2008 as users scramble to cope with a turbulent market. "Network design was something you used to do periodically," he says. "But that's changed now. Companies are constantly re-evaluating their supply chain. That's because they are changing who they are buying from, and they are regularly looking at where they locate plants and warehouses or where a 3PL might set up a postponement center."
Like network design systems, inventory optimization applications help users figure out how best to respond to changing market conditions. As its name suggests, inventory optimization software helps users decide where to locate stock and analyze the cost/service implications of various scenarios. "It helps companies with postponement and where to locate inventory to keep it close to the customer," says Fontanella. Inventory optimization software racked up $91 million in sales in 2006.
A smaller field in the future?
With all these applications jockeying for market position, the obvious question is which ones will be in the lead 10 years from now. But at least one analyst thinks the question will be moot. Dwight Klappich of Gartner foresees a day in the not-too-distant future when individual SCE packages are replaced by integrated solutions built on a single platform for easy information exchange. "Increasingly, as core functionality approaches commoditization," he says, "that [WMS and TMS] functionality will move to the platform vendors—the SAPs, Oracles, and Microsofts."
If Klappich's predictions are on target, companies will someday be buying not a WMS or a TMS, but a broad supply chain application with those capabilities built in. The big ERP vendors would undoubtedly welcome such a turn of events, but what about the smaller vendors that specialize in "best-ofbreed" warehousing and transportation management systems? That type of market shift would throw their whole future into question. As Klappich puts it, they will be "forced to reinvent themselves" if they want to stay in the race.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."