When it comes to handicapping the supply chain software race, WMS still looks like a shoo-in. But a couple of dark horse challengers are coming up from behind.
James Cooke is a principal analyst with Nucleus Research in Boston, covering supply chain planning software. He was previously the editor of CSCMP?s Supply Chain Quarterly and a staff writer for DC Velocity.
In the race for buyers' software dollars, there's never been any question about who's out in front. Year after year, warehouse management systems (WMS) have easily outdistanced the rest of the field, generating at least half the revenue in the supply chain execution (SCE) market. And that's unlikely to change anytime soon. Most analysts see no big changes in the software horse race in 2008.
Nonetheless, close observers report that they're seeing some subtle shifts in the mar- ket for supply chain execution applications, systems that manage storage, order fulfillment, and delivery functions. For one thing, it appears that transportation management syst (TMS) have put on a burst of speed and are gaining on WMS. For another, ther ple of contenders from the back of the pack are about to make their move.
Trade-up time
Supply chain execution (SCE) software has become big business. According to the Stamford, Conn. based research firm Gartner Inc., sales of these applications totaled $1.55 billion in 2006 and are expected to reach $1.7 billion in 2007—an increase of 9.7 percent. Gartner says growth will continue this year, though the pace will slacken a bit. Its forecast calls for revenues to grow another 8.5 percent to $1.845 billion.
Right now, warehouse management systems account for approximately 56 percent of that revenue. License sales and maintenance fees for WMS—software that keeps tabs on inventory and oversees DC tasks like receiving, putaway, and order picking—reached $950 million in 2007, according to Gartner. The analyst's forecast calls for sales to climb 6 or 7 percent this year, which would put revenues over the $1 billion mark.
Although other analysts may differ with Gartner's market-size estimates, they all agree that WMS sales will continue to expand. In most cases, however, it's not new users that are driving the growth; it's existing users that are trading up. "In large part, it's a replacement cycle for older WMS packages that were bought and implemented in the mid '90s," says John Fontanella, an analyst with Boston-based AMR Research. The newer packages, he says, offer enhanced reporting capabilities and realtime information processing. And many include features designed to help users comply with their own customers' mounting demands—enabling them to, say, load pallets or package shipments in specific ways.
Today's upgraded packages typically include a labor management component, which enables users to measure worker productivity and optimize the use of labor in picking, packing, and sorting. That's fast becoming a must, says Fontanella. "Companies are finding it harder to recruit warehouse workers," he explains. "Because the costs are going up for labor, they have to make sure they get the most out of their labor."
Adrian Gonzales, executive director of the logistics council at ARC Advisory Group in Dedham, Mass., says enhanced data-exchange capabilities are another factor in the newer versions' appeal. The older WMS applications lacked the ability to support data exchange with external trading partners, he says. The latest packages, however, contain features designed to give a company's supply chain partners visibility into a warehouse's inventory holdings.
The new WMS applications are also more flexible than their predecessors. Among other things, they're designed for easy reconfiguration if a company needs to make changes to its warehouse operations. "In the past, you would have to write custom code for a new business requirement," explains Gonzales. "The new software architecture [used in the latest WMS packages] allows you to make changes more easily and cost effectively. Because a lot of companies are looking to be nimble, they are looking to upgrade the WMS from the standpoint of information technology so they can more cost effectively respond to business changes."
still in the game
The WMS market may be maturing, but demand for the software hasn't flagged. Nearly a quarter of the respondents to a recent DC VELOCITY survey said they planned to buy a warehouse management system this year.
(2008 software purchase plans - % of respondents)
Warehouse management
24%
Transportation management
18%
Inventory planning
18%
Planning and forecasting
17%
Supply chain optimization
13%
Labor management
13%
Supply chain design
11%
Supply chain performance management
10%
Demand planning
10%
Enterprise resource planning
9%
Yard management
9%
Supply chain event management
7%
Trade/import/export management
7%
TMS put on the speed
When it comes to revenues, warehousing software may have left the rest of the field in the dust. But it's a different story when it comes to growth. While WMS sales are cantering along at a 6- to 7-percent clip, for example, sales of TMS are hurtling forward at double-digit rates. Gartner expects sales of TMS applications (systems that oversee freight planning and movements) to reach $493 million in 2007—an 11.9 percent increase over 2006 revenues of $441 million. This year, the research firm expects TMS revenue to surge another 12.4 percent to $554 million.
What's driving the growth? An obvious factor is skyrocketing fuel prices, says Gonzales of ARC. "Companies are realizing that unless they implement this technology, their costs are going to go up and their service will degrade."
But it's not just about fuel, he says. The newer versions are fast becoming more global in scope and, therefore, appeal to a broader base of users than their predecessors did. Unlike the earlier versions, which could only manage truck and rail movements, the newer versions can handle air and ocean shipments as well. Gonzales also thinks TMS vendors will soon start adding features normally associated with global trade management solutions, such as regulatory compliance. "In 2008, you'll see more activity in terms of TMS and global trade management becoming more integrated," he predicts.
The growing pressure to go green could also boost demand for transportation software, according to Gonzales. "Although I haven't seen any company justify a TMS purchase solely for green purposes, I'm beginning to see and hear companies talk about it," he says. "The driving force for a TMS is still to reduce costs and improve service levels, but when you consolidate loads and optimize routes, you have fewer trucks on the road, using less fuel."
Falling TMS prices may provide another incentive for buyers to finally take the plunge. The availability of TMS on demand—that is, delivered over the Internet for a relatively low monthly or per-transaction fee—has placed "downward pressure" on the price of software sold under the traditional licensing model, says Gonzales. "Prices are staying the same or decreasing slightly for TMS," he says.
As things now stand, the only thing that could spoil the TMS vendors' party is an emerging competitive threat from a couple of outside sources. In recent years, freight carriers have begun offering shippers access to their own in-house TMS solutions on an on-demand basis. At the same time, third-party logistics service providers (3PLs) have started offering load consolidation and routing optimization as part of their service. Indeed, Gartner analyst Chad Eschinger notes that the primary question facing shippers these days is which provider offers a better value proposition for freight spend optimization—a 3PL or a software vendor.
Dark horse candidates
Although WMS and TMS tend to get all the attention, Fontanella of AMR notes that there are a couple of other SCE applications that bear watching. These applications— network design and inventory optimization systems—are relatively new to the market, but they're already attracting a lot of interest. "Network design and optimization and inventory optimization are the fastest-growing categories, though they are working off a small base," he says.
Network design software lets users evaluate different options for reconfiguring their supply chain operations— giving them an idea of how, say, closing a DC in Miami and opening one in Atlanta would affect transportation costs and customer service levels. Though sales of network design applications only amounted to $54 million in 2006, Fontanella expects strong growth in 2008 as users scramble to cope with a turbulent market. "Network design was something you used to do periodically," he says. "But that's changed now. Companies are constantly re-evaluating their supply chain. That's because they are changing who they are buying from, and they are regularly looking at where they locate plants and warehouses or where a 3PL might set up a postponement center."
Like network design systems, inventory optimization applications help users figure out how best to respond to changing market conditions. As its name suggests, inventory optimization software helps users decide where to locate stock and analyze the cost/service implications of various scenarios. "It helps companies with postponement and where to locate inventory to keep it close to the customer," says Fontanella. Inventory optimization software racked up $91 million in sales in 2006.
A smaller field in the future?
With all these applications jockeying for market position, the obvious question is which ones will be in the lead 10 years from now. But at least one analyst thinks the question will be moot. Dwight Klappich of Gartner foresees a day in the not-too-distant future when individual SCE packages are replaced by integrated solutions built on a single platform for easy information exchange. "Increasingly, as core functionality approaches commoditization," he says, "that [WMS and TMS] functionality will move to the platform vendors—the SAPs, Oracles, and Microsofts."
If Klappich's predictions are on target, companies will someday be buying not a WMS or a TMS, but a broad supply chain application with those capabilities built in. The big ERP vendors would undoubtedly welcome such a turn of events, but what about the smaller vendors that specialize in "best-ofbreed" warehousing and transportation management systems? That type of market shift would throw their whole future into question. As Klappich puts it, they will be "forced to reinvent themselves" if they want to stay in the race.
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.