When it comes to handicapping the supply chain software race, WMS still looks like a shoo-in. But a couple of dark horse challengers are coming up from behind.
James Cooke is a principal analyst with Nucleus Research in Boston, covering supply chain planning software. He was previously the editor of CSCMP?s Supply Chain Quarterly and a staff writer for DC Velocity.
In the race for buyers' software dollars, there's never been any question about who's out in front. Year after year, warehouse management systems (WMS) have easily outdistanced the rest of the field, generating at least half the revenue in the supply chain execution (SCE) market. And that's unlikely to change anytime soon. Most analysts see no big changes in the software horse race in 2008.
Nonetheless, close observers report that they're seeing some subtle shifts in the mar- ket for supply chain execution applications, systems that manage storage, order fulfillment, and delivery functions. For one thing, it appears that transportation management syst (TMS) have put on a burst of speed and are gaining on WMS. For another, ther ple of contenders from the back of the pack are about to make their move.
Trade-up time
Supply chain execution (SCE) software has become big business. According to the Stamford, Conn. based research firm Gartner Inc., sales of these applications totaled $1.55 billion in 2006 and are expected to reach $1.7 billion in 2007—an increase of 9.7 percent. Gartner says growth will continue this year, though the pace will slacken a bit. Its forecast calls for revenues to grow another 8.5 percent to $1.845 billion.
Right now, warehouse management systems account for approximately 56 percent of that revenue. License sales and maintenance fees for WMS—software that keeps tabs on inventory and oversees DC tasks like receiving, putaway, and order picking—reached $950 million in 2007, according to Gartner. The analyst's forecast calls for sales to climb 6 or 7 percent this year, which would put revenues over the $1 billion mark.
Although other analysts may differ with Gartner's market-size estimates, they all agree that WMS sales will continue to expand. In most cases, however, it's not new users that are driving the growth; it's existing users that are trading up. "In large part, it's a replacement cycle for older WMS packages that were bought and implemented in the mid '90s," says John Fontanella, an analyst with Boston-based AMR Research. The newer packages, he says, offer enhanced reporting capabilities and realtime information processing. And many include features designed to help users comply with their own customers' mounting demands—enabling them to, say, load pallets or package shipments in specific ways.
Today's upgraded packages typically include a labor management component, which enables users to measure worker productivity and optimize the use of labor in picking, packing, and sorting. That's fast becoming a must, says Fontanella. "Companies are finding it harder to recruit warehouse workers," he explains. "Because the costs are going up for labor, they have to make sure they get the most out of their labor."
Adrian Gonzales, executive director of the logistics council at ARC Advisory Group in Dedham, Mass., says enhanced data-exchange capabilities are another factor in the newer versions' appeal. The older WMS applications lacked the ability to support data exchange with external trading partners, he says. The latest packages, however, contain features designed to give a company's supply chain partners visibility into a warehouse's inventory holdings.
The new WMS applications are also more flexible than their predecessors. Among other things, they're designed for easy reconfiguration if a company needs to make changes to its warehouse operations. "In the past, you would have to write custom code for a new business requirement," explains Gonzales. "The new software architecture [used in the latest WMS packages] allows you to make changes more easily and cost effectively. Because a lot of companies are looking to be nimble, they are looking to upgrade the WMS from the standpoint of information technology so they can more cost effectively respond to business changes."
still in the game
The WMS market may be maturing, but demand for the software hasn't flagged. Nearly a quarter of the respondents to a recent DC VELOCITY survey said they planned to buy a warehouse management system this year.
(2008 software purchase plans - % of respondents)
Warehouse management
24%
Transportation management
18%
Inventory planning
18%
Planning and forecasting
17%
Supply chain optimization
13%
Labor management
13%
Supply chain design
11%
Supply chain performance management
10%
Demand planning
10%
Enterprise resource planning
9%
Yard management
9%
Supply chain event management
7%
Trade/import/export management
7%
TMS put on the speed
When it comes to revenues, warehousing software may have left the rest of the field in the dust. But it's a different story when it comes to growth. While WMS sales are cantering along at a 6- to 7-percent clip, for example, sales of TMS are hurtling forward at double-digit rates. Gartner expects sales of TMS applications (systems that oversee freight planning and movements) to reach $493 million in 2007—an 11.9 percent increase over 2006 revenues of $441 million. This year, the research firm expects TMS revenue to surge another 12.4 percent to $554 million.
What's driving the growth? An obvious factor is skyrocketing fuel prices, says Gonzales of ARC. "Companies are realizing that unless they implement this technology, their costs are going to go up and their service will degrade."
But it's not just about fuel, he says. The newer versions are fast becoming more global in scope and, therefore, appeal to a broader base of users than their predecessors did. Unlike the earlier versions, which could only manage truck and rail movements, the newer versions can handle air and ocean shipments as well. Gonzales also thinks TMS vendors will soon start adding features normally associated with global trade management solutions, such as regulatory compliance. "In 2008, you'll see more activity in terms of TMS and global trade management becoming more integrated," he predicts.
The growing pressure to go green could also boost demand for transportation software, according to Gonzales. "Although I haven't seen any company justify a TMS purchase solely for green purposes, I'm beginning to see and hear companies talk about it," he says. "The driving force for a TMS is still to reduce costs and improve service levels, but when you consolidate loads and optimize routes, you have fewer trucks on the road, using less fuel."
Falling TMS prices may provide another incentive for buyers to finally take the plunge. The availability of TMS on demand—that is, delivered over the Internet for a relatively low monthly or per-transaction fee—has placed "downward pressure" on the price of software sold under the traditional licensing model, says Gonzales. "Prices are staying the same or decreasing slightly for TMS," he says.
As things now stand, the only thing that could spoil the TMS vendors' party is an emerging competitive threat from a couple of outside sources. In recent years, freight carriers have begun offering shippers access to their own in-house TMS solutions on an on-demand basis. At the same time, third-party logistics service providers (3PLs) have started offering load consolidation and routing optimization as part of their service. Indeed, Gartner analyst Chad Eschinger notes that the primary question facing shippers these days is which provider offers a better value proposition for freight spend optimization—a 3PL or a software vendor.
Dark horse candidates
Although WMS and TMS tend to get all the attention, Fontanella of AMR notes that there are a couple of other SCE applications that bear watching. These applications— network design and inventory optimization systems—are relatively new to the market, but they're already attracting a lot of interest. "Network design and optimization and inventory optimization are the fastest-growing categories, though they are working off a small base," he says.
Network design software lets users evaluate different options for reconfiguring their supply chain operations— giving them an idea of how, say, closing a DC in Miami and opening one in Atlanta would affect transportation costs and customer service levels. Though sales of network design applications only amounted to $54 million in 2006, Fontanella expects strong growth in 2008 as users scramble to cope with a turbulent market. "Network design was something you used to do periodically," he says. "But that's changed now. Companies are constantly re-evaluating their supply chain. That's because they are changing who they are buying from, and they are regularly looking at where they locate plants and warehouses or where a 3PL might set up a postponement center."
Like network design systems, inventory optimization applications help users figure out how best to respond to changing market conditions. As its name suggests, inventory optimization software helps users decide where to locate stock and analyze the cost/service implications of various scenarios. "It helps companies with postponement and where to locate inventory to keep it close to the customer," says Fontanella. Inventory optimization software racked up $91 million in sales in 2006.
A smaller field in the future?
With all these applications jockeying for market position, the obvious question is which ones will be in the lead 10 years from now. But at least one analyst thinks the question will be moot. Dwight Klappich of Gartner foresees a day in the not-too-distant future when individual SCE packages are replaced by integrated solutions built on a single platform for easy information exchange. "Increasingly, as core functionality approaches commoditization," he says, "that [WMS and TMS] functionality will move to the platform vendors—the SAPs, Oracles, and Microsofts."
If Klappich's predictions are on target, companies will someday be buying not a WMS or a TMS, but a broad supply chain application with those capabilities built in. The big ERP vendors would undoubtedly welcome such a turn of events, but what about the smaller vendors that specialize in "best-ofbreed" warehousing and transportation management systems? That type of market shift would throw their whole future into question. As Klappich puts it, they will be "forced to reinvent themselves" if they want to stay in the race.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."
Businesses are cautiously optimistic as peak holiday shipping season draws near, with many anticipating year-over-year sales increases as they continue to battle challenging supply chain conditions.
That’s according to the DHL 2024 Peak Season Shipping Survey, released today by express shipping service provider DHL Express U.S. The company surveyed small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to gauge their holiday business outlook compared to last year and found that a mix of optimism and “strategic caution” prevail ahead of this year’s peak.
Nearly half (48%) of the SMEs surveyed said they expect higher holiday sales compared to 2023, while 44% said they expect sales to remain on par with last year, and just 8% said they foresee a decline. Respondents said the main challenges to hitting those goals are supply chain problems (35%), inflation and fluctuating consumer demand (34%), staffing (16%), and inventory challenges (14%).
But respondents said they have strategies in place to tackle those issues. Many said they began preparing for holiday season earlier this year—with 45% saying they started planning in Q2 or earlier, up from 39% last year. Other strategies include expanding into international markets (35%) and leveraging holiday discounts (32%).
Sixty percent of respondents said they will prioritize personalized customer service as a way to enhance customer interactions and loyalty this year. Still others said they will invest in enhanced web and mobile experiences (23%) and eco-friendly practices (13%) to draw customers this holiday season.
That challenge is one of the reasons that fewer shoppers overall are satisfied with their shopping experiences lately, Lincolnshire, Illinois-based Zebra said in its “17th Annual Global Shopper Study.”th Annual Global Shopper Study.” While 85% of shoppers last year were satisfied with both the in-store and online experiences, only 81% in 2024 are satisfied with the in-store experience and just 79% with online shopping.
In response, most retailers (78%) say they are investing in technology tools that can help both frontline workers and those watching operations from behind the scenes to minimize theft and loss, Zebra said.
Just 38% of retailers currently use AI-based prescriptive analytics for loss prevention, but a much larger 50% say they plan to use it in the next 1-3 years. That was followed by self-checkout cameras and sensors (45%), computer vision (46%), and RFID tags and readers (42%) that are planned for use within the next three years, specifically for loss prevention.
Those strategies could help improve the brick and mortar shopping experience, since 78% of shoppers say it’s annoying when products are locked up or secured within cases. Adding to that frustration is that it’s hard to find an associate while shopping in stores these days, according to 70% of consumers. In response, some just walk out; one in five shoppers has left a store without getting what they needed because a retail associate wasn’t available to help, an increase over the past two years.
The survey also identified additional frustrations faced by retailers and associates:
challenges with offering easy options for click-and-collect or returns, despite high shopper demand for them
the struggle to confirm current inventory and pricing
lingering labor shortages and increasing loss incidents, even as shoppers return to stores
“Many retailers are laying the groundwork to build a modern store experience,” Matt Guiste, Global Retail Technology Strategist, Zebra Technologies, said in a release. “They are investing in mobile and intelligent automation technologies to help inform operational decisions and enable associates to do the things that keep shoppers happy.”
The survey was administered online by Azure Knowledge Corporation and included 4,200 adult shoppers (age 18+), decision-makers, and associates, who replied to questions about the topics of shopper experience, device and technology usage, and delivery and fulfillment in store and online.
An eight-year veteran of the Georgia company, Hakala will begin his new role on January 1, when the current CEO, Tero Peltomäki, will retire after a long and noteworthy career, continuing as a member of the board of directors, Cimcorp said.
According to Hakala, automation is an inevitable course in Cimcorp’s core sectors, and the company’s end-to-end capabilities will be crucial for clients’ success. In the past, both the tire and grocery retail industries have automated individual machines and parts of their operations. In recent years, automation has spread throughout the facilities, as companies want to be able to see their entire operation with one look, utilize analytics, optimize processes, and lead with data.
“Cimcorp has always grown by starting small in the new business segments. We’ve created one solution first, and as we’ve gained more knowledge of our clients’ challenges, we have been able to expand,” Hakala said in a release. “In every phase, we aim to bring our experience to the table and even challenge the client’s initial perspective. We are interested in what our client does and how it could be done better and more efficiently.”
Although many shoppers will
return to physical stores this holiday season, online shopping remains a driving force behind peak-season shipping challenges, especially when it comes to the last mile. Consumers still want fast, free shipping if they can get it—without any delays or disruptions to their holiday deliveries.
One disruptor that gets a lot of headlines this time of year is package theft—committed by so-called “porch pirates.” These are thieves who snatch parcels from front stairs, side porches, and driveways in neighborhoods across the country. The problem adds up to billions of dollars in stolen merchandise each year—not to mention headaches for shippers, parcel delivery companies, and, of course, consumers.
Given the scope of the problem, it’s no wonder online shoppers are worried about it—especially during holiday season. In its annual report on package theft trends, released in October, the
security-focused research and product review firm Security.org found that:
17% of Americans had a package stolen in the past three months, with the typical stolen parcel worth about $50. Some 44% said they’d had a package taken at some point in their life.
Package thieves poached more than $8 billion in merchandise over the past year.
18% of adults said they’d had a package stolen that contained a gift for someone else.
Ahead of the holiday season, 88% of adults said they were worried about theft of online purchases, with more than a quarter saying they were “extremely” or “very” concerned.
But it doesn’t have to be that way. There are some low-tech steps consumers can take to help guard against porch piracy along with some high-tech logistics-focused innovations in the pipeline that can protect deliveries in the last mile. First, some common-sense advice on avoiding package theft from the Security.org research:
Install a doorbell camera, which is a relatively low-cost deterrent.
Bring packages inside promptly or arrange to have them delivered to a secure location if no one will be at home.
Consider using click-and-collect options when possible.
If the retailer allows you to specify delivery-time windows, consider doing so to avoid having packages sit outside for extended periods.
These steps may sound basic, but they are by no means a given: Fewer than half of Americans consider the timing of deliveries, less than a third have a doorbell camera, and nearly one-fifth take no precautions to prevent package theft, according to the research.
Tech vendors are stepping up to help. One example is
Arrive AI, which develops smart mailboxes for last-mile delivery and pickup. The company says its Mailbox-as-a-Service (MaaS) platform will revolutionize the last mile by building a network of parcel-storage boxes that can be accessed by people, drones, or robots. In a nutshell: Packages are placed into a weatherproof box via drone, robot, driverless carrier, or traditional delivery method—and no one other than the rightful owner can access it.
Although the platform is still in development, the company already offers solutions for business clients looking to secure high-value deliveries and sensitive shipments. The health-care industry is one example: Arrive AI offers secure drone delivery of medical supplies, prescriptions, lab samples, and the like to hospitals and other health-care facilities. The platform provides real-time tracking, chain-of-custody controls, and theft-prevention features. Arrive is conducting short-term deployments between logistics companies and health-care partners now, according to a company spokesperson.
The MaaS solution has a pretty high cool factor. And the common-sense best practices just seem like solid advice. Maybe combining both is the key to a more secure last mile—during peak shipping season and throughout the year as well.