No one wants to think about the possibility of a product recall. But those in the know say the key to surviving the crisis is to put a recall management plan in place before the worst happens.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Product recall. The words alone are enough to strike terror in the hearts of logistics and distribution managers. And who wouldn't quail at the prospect of having to retrieve and dispose of thousands (perhaps millions) of individual items—usually with little or no advance notice?
Even companies with reverse-logistics systems already in place may find product recalls daunting. After all, there's so much at stake: In addition to the cost of retrieving and repairing or destroying recalled items, companies may rack up millions of dollars in transportation, inventory, and other costs to replace faulty merchandise.
Most costly of all, perhaps, is the loss of customers' confidence. Just ask Topps Meat Co., which went out of business less than a week after recalling more than 21 million pounds of frozen beef. Or ask Mattel, which now faces a shareholder lawsuit over allegations that it mishandled recalls of unsafe toys.
The infrastructure, processes, and technology needed to protect your company's interests during a recall are complex. They take time to develop, test, and implement. If you wait until a "red alert" occurs, it will be too late. The only way to successfully manage one of these nerve-wracking situations is to launch a pre-emptive strike—putting a plan in place before the worst can happen.
Make a federal case of it
Before you put together an action plan, there's research to be done. "One of the most important things to recognize is that there are very defined disciplines and procedures that need to be followed," says Tom Giovingo, executive vice president of Fidelitone Logistics, which handles recalls for automotive and other manufacturers. "You need to make sure you have fully explored all the requirements and procedures."
Recall dos and don'ts
Here's some practical advice from those in the know:
Jack Walsh, Videojet Technologies Inc.: Keep your product and customer database accurate and up to date. Pay attention to how the product code needs to be read downstream. Don't just put a code on the package; make sure it will serve a purpose and that it will be readable by the time it gets to the consumer level.
Despina Keegan, JPMorgan Chase Global Trade Services: Act quickly when a crisis does arise, and show the federal agency regulating your product that you didn't sit on the information. Your paramount goal should be consumer protection. That's what will help maintain your reputation with customers and protect your brand.
Tom Giovingo, Fidelitone Logistics: Recalls are not the time to be conservative and cautious. If you're unsure of your potential exposure, bring it all back. Step up to the plate and do what you need to do to make it right. You can't put a price on potential lost sales.
Kevin Brady, Satellite Logistics: Most state regulations make the manufacturer responsible for proper disposal of products. Make sure your recalled products don't end up being resold on the gray market and that you can accurately document disposal for regulators.
Krish Mantripragada and Sven Denecken, SAP: Not all suppliers are able to deploy an automated solution to manage the recall process effectively. By using existing automation to deploy standard, template best practices, they can achieve some level of quality-control compliance in manufacturing, logistics, and distribution.
Many of those requirements come straight from the U.S. government's playbook. The Food and Drug Administration, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Consumer Product Safety Commission, and several other agencies get involved in recalls. Each has its own rules—and if you don't follow them, you could be in violation of federal law.
If you're unfamiliar with those rules, help is available. Six federal agencies have launched www.recalls.gov, a Web site that consolidates news about recalls by product category and provides links to more detailed information.
Product recalls aren't a U.S.-only problem, of course. "Any company doing business in any market across the globe has to know the rules and regulations that apply in that market. You have to be proactive in knowing the rules for all recalls, whether domestic or international," says Despina Keegan, a senior trade adviser in JPMorgan Chase's Global Trade Services group.
Plug up the holes
Knowing the rules up front lets you design processes with regulatory compliance in mind, says Giovingo. For example, the sorting process has to be paired with careful documentation because manufacturers must report to government agencies how many pieces were received during a recall, and of those, how many were deemed to be suspect or bad.
Effective recall management also depends on making sure now that you have the information you'll need later on. It makes perfect sense: You won't be able to identify the source of a problem if you haven't been tracking the origin and disposition of raw materials all along. And you won't be able to retrieve individual items if you don't know exactly where each one went.
Many companies have a basic system for identifying lot or batch numbers and for tracking cases or pallets, but they may not know precisely who the end customer is for a specific item or what ingredients went into which batch, observes Jack Walsh, director of sales for brand-protection solutions at Videojet Technologies Inc., a provider of marking solutions. Without that level of visibility, they may have no choice but to recall an entire product line just to be safe. "Those are the 'black holes' of the chain of custody," he says. "There's a cost associated with plugging those holes; people have to balance that against the risk and cost of having to conduct a massive recall compared to a specific recall."
The technology to plug those holes does exist. There are systems and software that can identify the sources of raw materials and track them before and during manufacture. Others label or mark goods in a way that will be useful during a recall, enabling tracking of individual orders, lots or batches, and stock-keeping units (SKUs) all the way from manufacturing to the end consumer and back again.
Some systems used for managing recalls are so sophisticated that they can pinpoint an item's exact location hour by hour. Tim Konrad, president of GENCO Supply Chain Solutions' reverse logistics unit, tells this illustrative tale: A consumer who returned a suitcase for repair later realized that she had left a jewelry case with a wedding ring inside. Using bar codes assigned to the suitcase and to the pallet on which it was strapped, GENCO was able to track the pallet and find out where the suitcase went, when it arrived at the processing center, and where it was located inside the facility. Voilà: One wedding ring returned to a grateful owner.
The ring episode shows the value of creating software-enabled associations between each link in the chain of custody. Another example: By associating the lot numbers on medicine bottles with the bar codes or RFID tags on cases and pallets, a manufacturer could trace individual bottles to a specific customer order and a particular delivery location.
An effective recall system should use such associations to collect, process, and share relevant information among multiple sources, says Sven Denecken, vice president of ERP market strategy for SAP. Connecting material tracking with regulatory restrictions helps to ensure compliance. It also helps to create the audit trails required by regulatory agencies as proof that potentially dangerous products have been properly destroyed or neutralized, he says.
One of the most important of those connections is the one between operations and finance; without it, you can't accurately determine the financial implications of a recall, says Krish Mantripragada, SAP's head of solutions management for RFID and supply chain management. That's especially clear when taxes and import duties are involved, notes Kevin Brady, president of beverage industry specialist Satellite Logistics. When alcoholic beverages have been recalled and destroyed, for instance, companies can file for a rebate of the excise tax—but only if the relationship between the product that was destroyed and the taxes already paid on that specific product lot can be accurately documented.
Protect yourself
The final area to consider in your plan is the recall equivalent of the "last mile": Once you have the faulty items back in hand, what will you do with them? The choices regarding product disposition, also known as material recovery, range from repair and resale to recycling of salvageable parts and materials to the total destruction required for regulated materials.
Protecting your company's brand undoubtedly will factor into that decision. "If you're a name brand with a billiondollar marquee, you want discretion when it comes to material recovery," Brady says.
Whatever course you choose, it should be part of a comprehensive, detailed plan that lays the groundwork for handling a recall long before such an event occurs. "You want to be all dressed up and ready to go instead of scrambling," Giovingo says. "Anybody who's been in that kind of negative situation is definitely thankful they took the time to prepare beforehand."
an ounce of prevention
Most of the recalls in the news recently have involved imports from China. Is it possible to prevent quality problems if you're located here and the factory is over there? "Maybe not 100 percent, but you can get pretty close," says Despina Keegan, a legal expert and senior trade adviser for JPMorgan Chase's Global Trade Services group. She advises her clients to be specific about product quality and testing requirements in contracts with suppliers. She also recommends making both scheduled and unannounced visits to check on production: "You can't rely on the product samples you got when you started doing business with a supplier," she says.
Verifying product quality requires a significant commitment. "You have to have systems in place just like we've seen for supply chain security and for checking that working conditions are safe and no child labor is being used," Keegan says.
Knowing exactly who the supplier is can be challenging in China, where layers of subcontractors are common and manufacturing "towns" are swiftly springing up throughout the country. Investigate carefully, remain vigilant, and regularly re-evaluate—and that goes not only for new suppliers and venues but also for long-standing relationships, she adds. The bottom line: "If you can't verify who you're doing business with, you don't have the resources to do it, or you're not allowed to do it, then you have no business doing business there."
The fault may not always be with the supplier, however. Research by professors Hari Bapuji of the University of Manitoba and Paul Beamish of the University of West London (Ontario) found that product design was the most common cause of recalls. Of the 550 toy recalls since 1988, 420 (76.4 percent) could be attributed to design flaws. Only 54 (9.8 percent) of the recalls were attributable to defects such as poor craftsmanship, overheating batteries, lead paint, and inappropriate raw materials.
Importers of Chinese goods may be setting themselves up for failure by focusing on making a product to certain specifications as cheaply as possible, says Sven Denecken, SAP's vice president for ERP market strategy. "They tend to look at it from a money perspective and from the perspective of ensuring that they always get the product on time," he observes. "They are not taking into account the possibility that one kind of supply is cheaper but it could cause product problems later on."
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."