The advent of "dim weight" rules in the ground transportation business has changed the economics of parcel shipping. But high-speed cubing equipment can keep shippers from making costly mistakes.
Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
Like other shippers across North America, Andrew Moonilal of Deeley Harley-Davidson Canada was forced to take a greater interest in the weights and dimensions of packages shipped from the company's DC last January. That's when major ground parcel carriers—among them FedEx Ground, UPS, and DHL—changed the way they calculated shipping charges for large, low-density packages.
That change had major implications for Deeley Harley-Davidson Canada, which is the exclusive distributor of Harley-Davidson and Buell motorcycles, apparel, parts, and accessories in that country. The company ships close to 1,000 packages from its Concord, Ontario, DC each day, 85 percent of which are tendered to small-package carriers.
What made things complicated for the distributor is that its products vary widely in size and density. Goods shipped from the DC, which handles some 15,000 stock-keeping units, range from dense items like motorcycle batteries to bulky but lightweight items like Harley-Davidson jackets. "A box can contain a T-shirt, a battery, or spark plugs," says Moonilal, who is senior manager of operations at the DC.
And that's where things can get tricky—particularly if the package is light and bulky. Under the carriers' new dimensional weight, or "dim weight," rules, a shipper tendering a large, low-density package must determine both the package's weight and its dimensional weight. If the dimensional weight exceeds the physical weight, that becomes the basis for the freight charge. Dimensional weight is calculated by multiplying the pack age's length by its width by its height and dividing by 194 (or by 166 for Canadian shipments) to arrive at the dimensional weight in pounds. The dimensional weight rating also applies to any package in excess of three cubic feet or 5,184 cubic inches. That would be, for example, a box measuring three feet long by a foot high by a foot wide.
It's important to note that the net effect of the rules change has not been an across the-board rate increase. Although costs rose for light, bulky products, shippers have found that they declined for some denser, heavier shipments.
But the advent of dim weight rules has undeniably changed the economics of shipping. That's led many shippers to rethink their shipping patterns—changing packaging, consolidating orders, and so on to minimize transportation costs. Shippers have also been forced to take on the added responsibility of obtaining precise information on package weights and dimensions to ensure that their shipments are properly rated. If their ratings are incorrect, shippers risk being hit with charge-backs and penalties.
A whole new dimension
With the new rules looming, Moonilal says his immediate challenge was to find a way to get a better handle on shipping costs. "We needed to capture the density of our shipments and better understand our freight mix," he says. In particular, he wanted a way to obtain information on package weights and dimensions internally, with less reliance on data from the carriers. He also wanted to bring greater awareness of freight costs to distribution center employees.
Moonilal's solution was to buy a "cubing" or "dimensioning" system, a device that automatically determines the dimensions and weights of parcels and pallets. These days, his DC is using a cubing system developed by ExpressCube, a Mississauga, Ontario-based manufacturer of dimensioning and weighing equipment. "We run everything through it," he says. "It tells us what boxes we are putting less weight in and if the cube is greater than the weight."
This was not Moonilal's first experience with dimensioning equipment. He says that his previous employer made regular use of the equipment. "When I came to this company, I said there is a lot to be learned from understanding cubing," he says. That included exploring ways to reduce shipping costs, better understand the freight spend, and assuring that carrier charges are accurate.
His goals now are to ensure that shipping personnel use the best box for a shipment and take the time to determine if additional goods destined for the same dealer can be added to a particular box. "We look at how goods are packed and if there are voids where we could fit more product in," he says. "It helps us with package processing, and it helps us determine if we have enough weight or too much weight."
Moonilal adds that he considers the dimensioning system "a real good education piece. It helps us understand the freight we are putting out the door."
While he notes that his company has a ways to go before it's taking full advantage of the information provided by the dimensioning system, Moonilal reports that the distributor's freight spend has already dropped. In particular, he says, reweigh bills from couriers have fallen by 85 percent. "As our packaging management gets smarter, that will bring more savings," he says. "I can almost guarantee that by spring, we will have the machine paid for."
High interest rate
Moonilal is not alone. Since the new dim weight rules took effect in ground transportation at the beginning of the year, shippers have shown "significant interest" in dimensioning systems, says Randy Neilson, director of sales and marketing for Quantronix. Based in Farmington, Utah, Quantronix markets the Cubiscan line of cubing and weighing equipment.
Though dim weights aren't exactly new—dimensional weight charges have been used in the air transportation industry for years—Neilson says many shippers found the transition rough and, sometimes, expensive."What shippers are finding out as they ship packages is that UPS and FedEx Ground are beginning to dimension those and shippers are getting charge-backs," he says. "They have already billed their customers, so they have to absorb the difference. That can amount to a lot of money—thousands of dollars a day."
The ability to capture accurate dimensional information allows shippers to both understand their true shipping costs and bill their customers correctly, Neilson adds. "Shippers have to understand that [under the new system,] they could have significant increases in shipping costs,"he says."If you have those, you want to be able to pass them on to consignees. If you don't have a dimensioning system, you are going to be missing some extra shipping costs."
Ignorance and confusion aren't the only potential problems for shippers. If their parcels are close to hitting the point where dimensional weight may exceed the actual weight, shippers have little choice but to measure any parcels outside of standard-sized cartons. And that can be cumbersome: On its Web site, Mettler Toledo, a Columbus, Ohio-based manufacturer of weighing and cubing equipment, cites cases of customers who had employees devoted to measuring packages with tape measures before they converted to automated cubing equipment.
Along with bringing clarity to the process and streamlining operations, dimensioning equipment can also help shippers identify opportunities to save on shipping charges. "Take, for example, a shipper sending a package that exceeds the three-cubic-foot requirement," says Neilson. "That potentially can be dim'ed for additional freight charges. But if you can pick a smaller package, maybe you can save yourself or your customer some money on freight."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."