Despite a sputtering economy, regional truckers know their stock could soar at any moment. In the meantime, they're pulling out all the stops to keep customers on the line.
Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
For a long time, regional less-than-truckload (LTL) carriage has been one area of the trucking industry where growth seemed unstoppable. Every time Corporate America rolled out a new money-saving logistics strategy, it seemed to play right into the carrier's hands. Cut costs by reducing inventories? All the more small shipments for regionals to deliver. Slash storage costs by reducing cycle times? More need for overnight or second-day service, a specialty of the regional carriers'. Cut transportation bills by consolidating shipments into truck loads? More need for regional haulers to carry out final deliveries.
None of that's changed, but in the last two years it became apparent that even the regional carriers weren't exempt from economic cycles. Shipments sagged and profits lagged. Though a few carriers report that earnings have shown signs of improvement lately, that's not saying a lot. Capacity remains plentiful and competition fierce, forcing some of the weaker players to consolidate or shut down altogether. (The latest casualty, Plymouth Rock Transportation, a regional carrier in the Northeast, was acquired by USF Red Star in April.)
In short , it's a buyer's market right now. And the competition is making it tough for regional LTLs to raise rates (and recoup rising operating costs) ,especially at a time when the nation's shippers are still entrenched in a cost-cutting mode. "The question we keep hearing in the marketplace right now is, 'How do I save money.' That's the mantra," says Edward Moritz, director of marketing for Con-Way Transportation Services.
Tight competition also means that what business is out there is getting spread among a lot of players, dashing carriers' hopes of a freight bonanza any time soon. "We've not built any economic growth into our forecasts for this year," admits Steve Ginter, vice president of marketing for New Penn Motor Express, a Roadway Corp. subsidiary with operations in the Northeast.
Shock therapy
But if the regionals have glumly accepted the lack luster short-term outlook, they're also gearing up for a brighter future. They have reason for optimism, says Ted Scherck, president of the research firm Colography Group. Speaking at the Council of Logistics Management's annual meeting last fall, Scherck suggested that regionals would be major beneficiaries of what he called "shocks to the system" that disrupted global supply chains over the last few years—terrorist attacks and the resulting increased regulation of international shipments, and labor disruptions at West Coast ports last fall, among others. Afraid of being burned again, he predicted, companies will overhaul their distribution networks with an eye toward increasing investments in regional distribution centers, regional inventories … and regional transportation.
As they wait for the economy to restructure, carriers are adjusting their own networks and services to accommodate shippers' changing demands."We're trying to make lemonade from the lemons," says Moritz of Con-Way, which operates three regional LTL carriers across North America. Con-Way has added capabilities to its Web site that make it easier for customers to download customized reports of various types. And mindful of its customers' desire to save money, it's also "looking at bundling and delivering services more effectively," Moritz reports.
Con-Way, he add s, has also enhanced its pool distribution services, which combine a truckload line-haul with regional distribution. "[Pool distribution's] been around for 50 years,"he says, but today's analytical tools do a much better job of identifying opportunities for assembly and distribution programs.
New Penn has also focused on pool distribution. Ginter says the carrier will introduce a new electronic service, called POOLT RAC, that provides door-to-door shipment tracking capability for pool distribution shipments. Like Moritz, Ginter says he's fielded many requests lately from customers looking for ways to reduce costs without necessarily focusing on rates. "They realize they cannot continue to reduce costs by get ting bigger discounts on the backs of the carriers,"he says. "They're making genuine inquiries about how to take cost out of the process as opposed to just reducing their prices."
He admits those opportunities are not always easy to find. "For a regional carrier like us, taking cost out is largely a function of streamlining the pickup and delivery process," he says. "That's where the opportunity is." Speeding up pickup or delivery, he adds, can be as simple as working with customers to stage freight effectively before the truck arrives to shorten the loading process.
New Penn will soon add a returns management capability to its Web site that allows customers to complete a bill of lading and submit it simultaneously to both the shipper and carrier. "Where we can help," he says, "is to provide a system to help facilitate communication between the buyer and seller."
On a roll
In a superheated competitive market, Con-Way and New Penn have plenty of company among carriers rolling out service improvements. Other regional carriers are unveiling services faster than Freddie Mac's top executives are resigning. Here's a brief look at some recent announcements:
FedEx Freight, which provides regional LTL services around North America, has joined up with FedEx Trade Networks and FedEx Ground to offer ocean and ground service fromAsia to nearly all continental U.S. ZIP codes via the new Fed Ex Trade Net works Ocean- Ground Distribution service. That launch was announced only months after the company introduced a less-than-container- load (LCL) service to and from Europe, via FedEx Trade Networks Ocean Transport Service.
USF Corp. (formerly USFreightways Corp.), which operates a network of regional LTL carriers, has launched the third generation of its Internet services for LTL customers at www.usfnet.com. Registered users can track shipments, get location-based rate quotes, request pick ups online and view images of shipping documents. Earlier this spring, the company announced that it had standardized the services offered by its five LTL carriers.
Old Dominion Freight Line late last year announced that it had restructured the company into four major components. OD-Domestic provides regional, multi-regional and interregional coverage in 38 states. OD-Expedited is a time-critical service program. OD-Technology includes management of the carrier's Web site, among other features. And OD-Global includes cross-border service to Canada, Mexico, Puerto Rico and the Caribbean as well as service to Alaska and container drayage service to and from a number of ports.
Pitt-Ohio Express, a regional carrier serving Pennsylvania, Ohio, Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, Delaware and portions of some adjoining states, recently extended its services to Chicago. It offers Chicago customers a next-day service to the East Coast along selected lanes.
Vitran Express, a regional carrier serving the Midwest and Canada, and Saia, a regional carrier serving the Southern and Western United States, have added to their ONETrak partnership agreement with a number of new information services for shippers, including a single PRO number from origin to destination, shipment tracing through both networks, access to image documents on both carriers' Web sites, and access to transit time information between all points in the United States and Canada.
AAA Cooper Transportation, which serves 11 states in the Southeast and portions of the Midwest, launched a new Web site earlier this year to provide better access to carrier information. Among the enhancements to the site are a rate quote feature and an online bill of lading. Like its counter parts in this market , AAA Cooper has clearly decided to get its affairs in order now. When the upturn comes, the regionals will be ready to start their engines.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."