Data bits swirl through the air in DCs across the country, moving vital information without a cable or cord in sight. So why have companies been so slow to take wireless on the road?
If the wireless future is here, swept in on a wave of technology that allows information to be zapped from point A to point B without the copper wires, why aren't more logistics operations using it? Right now, the majority of wireless devices are largely housebound—or more precisely, warehouse-bound—rarely venturing outside the distribution center or terminal yard. But that could change soon. If industry can get this show on the road, companies could someday be able to tap into those bit streams up and down the supply chain.
In many ways, wireless transmission of data, whether it involves the laser reading of bar codes,tags that employ radio waves or cellphone microwaves, is a technology looking for a home in the logistics world. "We're still trying to figure out where it fits to make the most value," says Dave Adams, vice president of global services at GT Nexus, a logistics and transportation management software firm based in Alameda, Calif.
Even the vendors concede that wireless has been a bit slow out of the gate. Matt Armanino, vice president of business development at Santa Clara , Calif.-based WhereNet, which uses wireless radio technology to pinpoint the location of truck chassis and forklifts, says his company 's products are sti ll mostly used in concentrated areas of cargo activity, such as warehouses, port terminals and truck yards.
"Our typical user is a person who's operating the yard," Armanino says."People who manage distribution centers tend to have a black hole [somewhere in their operations] where they lose their assets," he explains. "They've tended to manage assets with warehouse management, yard management, transportation management and plant floor production software systems, but the Achilles' heel is that they're physically disconnected to the assets they're supposed to be managing. Often the data about those physical assets is still gathered manually … and often, that information is out of date or incorrect."Wireless could change all that.
Making a connection
Though wireless providers and logistics users have yet to establish what might be termed a high-speed connection, some of the industry's heavyweights have taken steps in that direction. For example, Portland, Ore.-based Con-Way has embraced wireless technology based on both bar-code and satellite communication,says Jackie Barretta, vice president of information services. Con-Way, which is both a carrier and a third-party logistics service provider, sees wireless as an economically viable way of tracking cargo as it moves through the warehouse as well as on the road.
Bits swirl through the airwaves today at Con-Way's warehouses with nary a cable in sight. Con-Way uses forkliftmounted automatic bar-code readers from Intermec to register when goods are received and handheld units to manage picking and packing at its six warehouses across the United States. Deploying the readers has made these operations paperless, Barretta says. It's also made them reliable. "[Scanning] gives us an order fill accuracy rate of 99-plus percent," she reports. "It also gives us a rather rapid order fill that allows those six warehouses to offer next-day services to around 90 percent of the U.S. population. That benefits the customer," she adds.
Yet in all too many companies, that intricate data-transmission infrastructure crumbles once the cargo leaves the warehouse—just when it could be most useful. People need data to make real-time decisions about freight on the spot, when there's no time to go to a PC, says Adams, who believes wireless technology's real potential lies in the dynamic management of freight while it's in transit. "Today that's often done via cellphone —you communicate with somebody running the numbers in the office and if they decide to change and drop off load B instead of load A first, you call and ask the driver to change the route. In a wireless world, the route plan would be popping up and would be updated, telling the driver to go somewhere else."
In fact , truckers have begun joining the wireless world, albeit slowly. Barretta reports that Con-Way's express delivery service, Con-Way NOW, has fitted global positioning satellite (GPS) technology to all trucks in the fleet, which means a driver doesn't even have to enter information about location—it's done automatically. Many trucks that belong to oth er companies but are used by Con-Way as part of its third-party service also feature this technology. "We're integrating with a lot of carriers and getting information from them when they're moving the freight,"Barretta says."We're finding that more and more carriers have a wireless connection."
Barretta herself has a handheld Siemens T-Mobile device that functions as a cellphone and more—it receives e-mails and Blackberry messages and even allows her to open e-mail attachments while she's out on the road. Though she uses it to keep track of IT projects, the same sort of device could help managers in logistics and other departments who have to be away from their desks regularly.
Cutting the cord
Meanwhile, adoption of wireless technology in the logistics space remains relatively slow, limited mainly to the lessthan-truckload and expedited parts of the business, says Kevin Moore, Intermec's logistics business development manager. "Transportation and logistics companies tend to be technology skeptics," he says."But I think the early adoption [phase] is over, and the missionary work's been done. Now those skeptics who've been on the sidelines are saying: 'It's real, it's here. So how do we make the best use of the technology and tools?'"
Wireless equipment providers like Intermec, PsionTeklogix and Symbol Technologies are working hard to develop products that will help a wider range of customers do a wider range of things. Moore says Intermec is "on the cusp" of releasing multi-functional wireless devices that a logistics manager can use either in a warehouse or off the premises, able to connect either with a local-area computer network or a wide-area network, depending on where he is. Vendors are also developing equipment that uses Bluetooth technology, which allows a device to hook into the network without being near a transmitter. Bluetooth devices form a sort of tag-team signal through any other Bluetooth devices nearby, carrying on until the signal hits the nearest bit of communications infrastructure. This removes the need to be close to a transmitter / receiver—a problem familiar to everyone who's had trouble getting a cellphone signal.
Andrew Zolli, founder of Z Plus Partners, a consulting group in Brooklyn, N.Y., sees this communications bucket brigade—where one wireless device uses another to send and receive signals—as the future of wireless technology. In 10 years,he predicts,individual products will have "dynamic packaging," which will be capable, via RFID and other technologies, of transmitting signals via other, nearby wired products. A quart of milk will be able to actively transmit information about what it is, where it is and how fresh the contents are.
WhereNet's Armanino predicts at the very least a huge adoption of proactive wireless tracking technology across the supply chain. "Ten years from now it will be hard to imagine assets that don't identify themselves and give information about their status," he says."People will look at barcode scanning and the way they had to throw labor at that and wonder how they did it."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."