Collaborating with a third-party logistics management firm and an international material handling specialist, BMW runs a production parts warehouse in South Carolina that operates with the precision of a Z4 roadster.
Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
Any effort to describe the operations of the production parts warehouse at BMW's assembly plant in Spartanburg, S.C., leads inevitably to comparisons with the finely engineered vehicles that emerge from the other end of the process.
BMW has earned a reputation for producing automobiles and sports utility vehicles that are fast, responsive and reliable. In the same way—from the coordination of inbound materials through the material handling process and sequencing of parts and out to delivery of parts to the production line—the warehouse facility is the result of both careful design and a well-oiled operation that ensures that the right parts arrive at the right place with little wasted motion.
What's more,the process is delivering parts not for mass production but for vehicles that are made to order. Each Z4 roadster or X5 SUV that's built at the Spartanburg facility is the result of an individual order configured with options and color schemes for a particular customer. Literally millions of variations are possible, including left- or right-hand drive and manual or automatic transmissions.
It is the challenge of the entire supply chain,and particularly the warehouse operation, to ensure that the right parts arrive for the right car at the right place at the right time. The plant produces 650 cars every day and the odds are that no two of any model are exactly alike.
The warehouse operation is essentially a DC with a single customer but with several delivery points within the assembly plant. Parts come in from suppliers from around the world and are picked for timely delivery to specific locations in the factory.
Many options, one standard
"Our focus is to deliver cars right on time while allowing customers and dealers as much flexibility to change orders as possible," says Manfred Stöger, vice president of logistics and information technology for BMW Manufacturing Corp. The materials and manufacturing systems allow dealers to adjust orders up to six days prior to the start of production. "That has a lot of advantages for customers and dealers," Stöger says, "but it's a huge challenge for the supply chain."
To deliver the enormous variety of vehicles on time and in the right configurations demands a highly automated system and a cadre of sophisticated suppliers and well-integrated systems. "The warehouse could not handle this manually," Stöger says.
The operation is interesting for a number of reasons. First, while BMW owns the warehouse, management of inbound materials and the internal operations is in the hands of a contract logistics company, TNT Logistics, which has more than 500 employees dedicated to BMW operations on site. Second,the highly automated system for storing and retrieving a large portion of the thousands of parts that go into any vehicle, through tight integration with BMW systems and automatic identification technology, enables much of the precision in the operations. The system was designed and installed by the German material handling company Witron, a specialist in building automated distribution centers.
The company selected Witron in part, says Stöger, because it develops and customizes its mechanical parts and software itself, including the warehouse management system used by the warehouse.
Witron CEO Reinhard Boesl says that the planning involved six months of "intensive discussions" with BMW managers in Spartanburg and in Munich. The actual installation took about 18 months. "We had tough timelines," Boesl says . "The roof was not done when we began installing systems." Another few months were required to ramp up and test the system.
Boesl continues, "As soon as we achieved a degree of integration, we invited BMW to do testing. The testing process is a good opportunity to double-check if the detailed specifications match the practical requirements. It's a critical phase. It allows the client to see what he is getting."
The complex system can adapt as BMW makes changes to its operations, though the flexibility is not unlimited.
Responsive handling
On the other hand, the system adapted quickly to increases in production and model changes. Since the automated systems have been up and running, BMW and its partners have made a number of adjustments to the operation. For instance, the company added a third induction point in the warehouse—conveyor locations that move material to storage locations. When BMW ended production of the Z3 roadster and started building the Z4, the system adapted without a single change to software code. In late September, the plant began producing 2004 X5s that included 2,100 new parts—with only a 10-car gap between the old and new models. The warehouse is flowing parts for 600 to 650 cars a day with a system initially designed to support production of 450. Stöger says, "We'll be able to increase production to 700 units without additional storage space."
About half the content of the vehicles flows through the warehouse, which handles about 13,000 active parts for the Z4 and X5. A second warehouse within a few miles of the main facility handles hazardous materials and the largest and bulkiest parts. Those include any materials larger than a pallet and any that are mo re than 2.5 meters high.
Ronald Feld, section manager for physical logistics for BMW, probably has the most day-to-day familiarity with the warehouse operations. Because each car is somewhat different from every other car, getting the right parts to the line is perhaps the central mission of the warehouse. "I'm sequencing single parts," Feld says. But the system is efficient enough that it requires notice only three to four hours before parts are needed on the assembly line. "When a car enters the assembly area from the stacker, its [identification number] generates a broadcast signal to us in the warehouse and to direct sequence suppliers." The system also calculates the expected time to deliver the materials.
BMW's automated warehouse
Pallet warehouse
Eight AS/RS pallet cranes
Picking left or right five pallets deep
38,800 cubic meters storage volume
17,500 pallet storage locations
928 sequence picking locations
Tray warehouse
Five AS/RS tray cranes
Picking left or right one deep
23,500 tray locations
3,900 cubic meters storage volume
Daily activity
2,200 pallet receipts
2,500 tray receipts
2,200 outbound pallets via conveyor
3,300 tray movements, in and out
8,000 sequence picks
Source: Witron
Dual systems
To keep operations running smoothly, Witron installed both pallet and tray automated storage and retrieval systems. The pallet warehouse is a high-bay facility with 17,400 storage locations on six storage levels. The Witron system has a number of fail-safe parts to its design, Feld explains. For example, pallets are stacked six wide at each level. Should a crane fail, the system allows other cranes to retrieve pallets five deep, allowing complete redundancy if required. In addition, the system is designed such that if the system wants a pallet that is three deep, for example, the cranes can store the first two in different areas to retrieve the third, all the while keeping track of the first t wo. "The warehouse reorganizes itself I don't know how many times a day," Feld says . To enable that, the system reserves 15 percent of the storage locations to allow it to relocate pallets.
The warehouse is not fully automated, however. A substantial amount of picking occurs by hand. Employees pick and scan each part. "It's all picks of one," Feld explains. So while a tote containing visors contains enough for 80 vehicles, each one is destined for a specific car. When a worker completes a pick in one location, he or she receives automated notification of his or her next stop. "This optimizes the operation," Feld says. "[A worker follows] the shortest path with the fewest steps."
The automated tray warehouse has 26,000 storage locations, and each storage location can hold up to 10 part numbers. The t ray handling system can handle individual loads of up to 220 pounds, compared to 2,200 pounds for the pallet handling system. Further, the tray system is simpler than the pallet system: Trays are stored one deep on each side of the large racks, and the automated picking equipment need only select to the left and right.
The system provides protection against breakdowns by storing each part number in more than one tray and in separate aisles, so if one machine breaks down, parts are still accessible for other parts of the warehouse. About 70 percent of the storage locations are in use.
Trays selected by the automated system move to one of five identical workstations. Four of the locations are used for picking and putaway, while the fifth is reserved for unusual requirements. Even that is part of the efficiency plan: Keeping the fifth position in reserve helps compress the travel time for the automatic guided vehicle that transports material to and from the work stations. Typically, one worker can man two of the stations.
Inbound controls
On the inbound side, materials are scanned on arrival and data uploaded via an RF system. Data capture then occurs several other times as goods move to putaway locations and eventually to staging for the shop floor. After shipments are received, palletized loads move to one of two major induction points, or i-points as they are called by BMW. "A scan marries the container to a bar-coded pallet," Feld explains. The pallets then move via an automated system to the pallet warehouse. As the pallets move down the conveyor, automated devices automatically check for contours,height and weight and divert any pallets that might need any correction, a process handled manually.
A large portion of the inbound shipments are in returnable containers that will be sent back to suppliers for reuse. "We promote returnables," says Feld. "We're making giant steps with our European suppliers. They were shipping 100- percent corrugated. Now we're getting 30- to 40-percent returnables. Our NAFTA suppliers are shipping 95-percent returnables." Those suppliers, he reports, only ship in disposable corrugated containers when they are short of returnables.
The actual material handling in the warehouse is overseen by BMW, but operations are in the hands of TNT Logistics North America, the lead logistics provider for the company. TNT manages both inbound transportation and material processing and sequencing in the warehouse. It processes more than 10,000 inbound and outbound shipments each day: the outbound sequencing, which involves 28 parts families, is managed through Witron's warehouse management system.
TNT, BMW suppliers and BMW operations are closely integrated from origin until delivery to the production line. Deb Hall, vice president of l ogistics solutions for TNT North America , summarizes the process: "BMW provides the demand file, which provides all information on material from each supply point. We schedule by optimizing loads and provide that to suppliers."
Road masters
Carriers are responsible for signing off on shipments picked up at the supplier locations. Both the carrier and the supplier have to agree on the contents of a shipment: Drivers report any discrepancies to TNT's Jacksonville call center.While physical receiving takes place at the warehouse, BMW has immediate visibility into any exceptions.
Currently, five truckload carriers and one LTL carrier bring in the bulk of the shipments.TNT also operates a small dedicated fleet performing a few milk runs, shuttles between warehouses and truckload shipping. Some 425 trucks a day move through the warehouse bays over two shifts. Those loads are destined either for the plant or the warehouse. Once the materials have arrived, TNT continues to manage the process for BMW, managing the yard and staging of trailers. Shipments are scanned and received at the dock and validated against what's expected. Goods then move either directly to the production line or to the warehouse. (BMW manages ocean and air freight transportation. It consolidates shipments out of Europe in Germany to maximize weight and cube utilization, sending about 9,000 40-foot containers a year to the South Carolina facility.)
Hall says, "A lot of 3PLs manage transportation. The difference here is that we are actually managing materials. BMW does not view the route or the driver—it doesn't need to see that. BMW personnel see things that are of interest to them. They can see exceptions. There's a proactive notification, so there's no monitoring needed by BMW."
She adds, "BMW is a very demanding customer, but it doesn't expect more than it should." She meets with Stöger every month to gain an executive level view of operations. In addition, the TNT operations managers on site meet with BMW's materials and logistics managers daily. "Our staff and their staff are integrated," Hall says. "They are very forthcoming.
They want us involved in the planning process. … We were fortunate to find a customer that would allow us to be integrated, not only in transportation but in material planning. They allowed us to step over a line we're not allowed to step over very often."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."